Sipp Industries, Inc.
Sipp Industries, Inc. (SIPC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SIPC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIPC | $0.00 | -11.11% | 275.5K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BUDFF | $63.84 | +1.24% | 127.4B | 18.24 | $3.50 | +1.77% |
| HINKF | $84.06 | +2.51% | 47B | 22.30 | $3.77 | +2.60% |
| HEINY | $40.78 | -1.43% | 45.7B | 21.61 | $1.89 | +2.56% |
| ASBRF | $13.78 | +7.07% | 20.7B | 17.67 | $0.78 | +3.79% |
| HKHHY | $35.92 | -1.23% | 20.3B | 18.83 | $1.91 | +3.05% |
| HKHHF | $71.91 | +0.36% | 19.5B | 18.87 | $3.81 | +3.04% |
| FMXUF | $8.50 | +0.00% | 17.5B | 23.61 | $0.36 | +6.68% |
| CABGY | $24.06 | -1.80% | 16.6B | 15.38 | $1.57 | +3.25% |
| CABHF | $121.00 | +0.00% | 16B | 16.83 | $7.19 | +3.27% |
Stock Comparison
SIPC vs BUDFF Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, BUDFF has a market cap of 127.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while BUDFF trades at $63.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BUDFF's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BUDFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC and BUDFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BUDFF's competition here
SIPC vs HINKF Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, HINKF has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while HINKF trades at $84.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HINKF's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HINKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to HINKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check HINKF's competition here
SIPC vs HEINY Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, HEINY has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while HEINY trades at $40.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HEINY's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HEINY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to HEINY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check HEINY's competition here
SIPC vs ASBRF Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, ASBRF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while ASBRF trades at $13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASBRF's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ASBRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to ASBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check ASBRF's competition here
SIPC vs HKHHY Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, HKHHY has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while HKHHY trades at $35.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKHHY's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HKHHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to HKHHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check HKHHY's competition here
SIPC vs HKHHF Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, HKHHF has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while HKHHF trades at $71.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKHHF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HKHHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to HKHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check HKHHF's competition here
SIPC vs FMXUF Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, FMXUF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while FMXUF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMXUF's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to FMXUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC and FMXUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FMXUF's competition here
SIPC vs CABGY Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, CABGY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while CABGY trades at $24.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CABGY's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CABGY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to CABGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check CABGY's competition here
SIPC vs CABHF Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, CABHF has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while CABHF trades at $121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CABHF's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CABHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to CABHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check CABHF's competition here
SIPC vs CABJF Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, CABJF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while CABJF trades at $117.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CABJF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CABJF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to CABJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check CABJF's competition here
SIPC vs BDWBF Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, BDWBF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while BDWBF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDWBF's P/E ratio is 29.25. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BDWBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to BDWBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check BDWBF's competition here
SIPC vs KNBWF Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, KNBWF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while KNBWF trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNBWF's P/E ratio is 35.11. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KNBWF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC and KNBWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KNBWF's competition here
SIPC vs KNBWY Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, KNBWY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while KNBWY trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNBWY's P/E ratio is 32.69. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to KNBWY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to KNBWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check KNBWY's competition here
SIPC vs CRHKY Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, CRHKY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while CRHKY trades at $7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRHKY's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CRHKY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to CRHKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check CRHKY's competition here
SIPC vs CRHKF Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, CRHKF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while CRHKF trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRHKF's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CRHKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to CRHKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check CRHKF's competition here
SIPC vs TSGTF Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, TSGTF has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while TSGTF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSGTF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TSGTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC and TSGTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TSGTF's competition here
SIPC vs TSGTY Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, TSGTY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while TSGTY trades at $31.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSGTY's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to TSGTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to TSGTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check TSGTY's competition here
SIPC vs MXGBF Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, MXGBF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while MXGBF trades at $51.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MXGBF's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MXGBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to MXGBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check MXGBF's competition here
SIPC vs STBFY Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, STBFY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while STBFY trades at $15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STBFY's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STBFY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to STBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check STBFY's competition here
SIPC vs STBFF Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, STBFF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while STBFF trades at $30.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STBFF's P/E ratio is 15.91. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to STBFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to STBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check STBFF's competition here
SIPC vs BDWBY Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, BDWBY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while BDWBY trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDWBY's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BDWBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to BDWBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check BDWBY's competition here
SIPC vs ROYUF Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, ROYUF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while ROYUF trades at $73.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROYUF's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to ROYUF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to ROYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check ROYUF's competition here
SIPC vs SOOBF Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, SOOBF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while SOOBF trades at $42.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOOBF's P/E ratio is 49.53. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SOOBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC and SOOBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOOBF's competition here
SIPC vs AEBZY Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, AEBZY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while AEBZY trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEBZY's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to AEBZY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to AEBZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check AEBZY's competition here
SIPC vs CGPZF Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, CGPZF has a market cap of 885.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while CGPZF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGPZF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CGPZF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to CGPZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check CGPZF's competition here
SIPC vs CCGPY Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, CCGPY has a market cap of 836.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while CCGPY trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCGPY's P/E ratio is 54.58. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to CCGPY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC and CCGPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCGPY's competition here
SIPC vs UMLGF Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, UMLGF has a market cap of 809.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while UMLGF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UMLGF's P/E ratio is 90.00. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to UMLGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to UMLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check UMLGF's competition here
SIPC vs BIBLF Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, BIBLF has a market cap of 104.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while BIBLF trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIBLF's P/E ratio is 146.00. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BIBLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC and BIBLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BIBLF's competition here
SIPC vs SMGLF Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, SMGLF has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while SMGLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMGLF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to SMGLF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to SMGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check SMGLF's competition here
SIPC vs BRBMF Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, BRBMF has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while BRBMF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRBMF's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to BRBMF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC and BRBMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRBMF's competition here
SIPC vs HVCW Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, HVCW has a market cap of 770.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while HVCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to HVCW's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC and HVCW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HVCW's competition here
SIPC vs EARI Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, EARI has a market cap of 169.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while EARI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EARI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to EARI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC and EARI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EARI's competition here
SIPC vs MRIB Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, MRIB has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while MRIB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRIB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MRIB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to MRIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check MRIB's competition here
SIPC vs MENB Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, MENB has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while MENB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MENB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to MENB's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC and MENB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MENB's competition here
SIPC vs GBEN Comparison August 2025
SIPC plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIPC stands at 275.5K. In comparison, GBEN has a market cap of 7. Regarding current trading prices, SIPC is priced at $0.00, while GBEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIPC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIPC's ROE is -0.12%, compared to GBEN's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SIPC is less volatile compared to GBEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIPC.Check GBEN's competition here