Sincerity Applied Materials Holdings Corp.
Sincerity Applied Materials Holdings Corp. (SINC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SINC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SINC | $0.00 | +0.00% | 180.5K | N/A | -$0.06 | N/A |
| DSSMY | $30.00 | +14.90% | 41.5B | 37.04 | $0.81 | +3.38% |
| NPKLY | $21.00 | +84.21% | 34.7B | -2100.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| SMFTF | $49.11 | N/A | 25.5B | 15.54 | $3.16 | N/A |
| SMFKY | $45.96 | -0.13% | 24.8B | 14.54 | $3.16 | N/A |
| INPAP | $77.00 | +13.12% | 23.7B | N/A | N/A | +5.19% |
| AMCCF | $9.60 | +0.00% | 22.1B | 17.14 | $0.56 | +5.46% |
| DITHF | $7.22 | -3.86% | 10B | 36.10 | $0.20 | +3.27% |
| CCDBF | $55.23 | -1.54% | 9.6B | 15.78 | $3.50 | +1.58% |
| CCLLF | $52.88 | +0.00% | 9B | 15.11 | $3.50 | +1.63% |
Stock Comparison
SINC vs DSSMY Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, DSSMY has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while DSSMY trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSSMY's P/E ratio is 37.04. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to DSSMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to DSSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check DSSMY's competition here
SINC vs NPKLY Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, NPKLY has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while NPKLY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPKLY's P/E ratio is -2100.00. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to NPKLY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to NPKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check NPKLY's competition here
SINC vs SMFTF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, SMFTF has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while SMFTF trades at $49.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMFTF's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to SMFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC and SMFTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMFTF's competition here
SINC vs SMFKY Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, SMFKY has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while SMFKY trades at $45.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMFKY's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to SMFKY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to SMFKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check SMFKY's competition here
SINC vs INPAP Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, INPAP has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while INPAP trades at $77.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INPAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to INPAP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to INPAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check INPAP's competition here
SINC vs AMCCF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, AMCCF has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while AMCCF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMCCF's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to AMCCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to AMCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check AMCCF's competition here
SINC vs DITHF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, DITHF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while DITHF trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DITHF's P/E ratio is 36.10. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to DITHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to DITHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check DITHF's competition here
SINC vs CCDBF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, CCDBF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while CCDBF trades at $55.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCDBF's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to CCDBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to CCDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check CCDBF's competition here
SINC vs CCLLF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, CCLLF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while CCLLF trades at $52.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCLLF's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to CCLLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to CCLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check CCLLF's competition here
SINC vs SCBGF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, SCBGF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while SCBGF trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCBGF's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to SCBGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to SCBGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check SCBGF's competition here
SINC vs SIGCY Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, SIGCY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while SIGCY trades at $16.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIGCY's P/E ratio is 26.34. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to SIGCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to SIGCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check SIGCY's competition here
SINC vs VDRFF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, VDRFF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while VDRFF trades at $115.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDRFF's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to VDRFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC and VDRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VDRFF's competition here
SINC vs HOYFF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, HOYFF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while HOYFF trades at $35.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOYFF's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to HOYFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to HOYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check HOYFF's competition here
SINC vs WIPKF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, WIPKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while WIPKF trades at $29.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIPKF's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to WIPKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to WIPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check WIPKF's competition here
SINC vs ORRYY Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, ORRYY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while ORRYY trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORRYY's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to ORRYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to ORRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check ORRYY's competition here
SINC vs ORRAF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, ORRAF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while ORRAF trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORRAF's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to ORRAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to ORRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check ORRAF's competition here
SINC vs MNHFF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, MNHFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while MNHFF trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNHFF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to MNHFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to MNHFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check MNHFF's competition here
SINC vs FUJSF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, FUJSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while FUJSF trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUJSF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to FUJSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to FUJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check FUJSF's competition here
SINC vs FRFTF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, FRFTF has a market cap of 926.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while FRFTF trades at $42.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRFTF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to FRFTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to FRFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check FRFTF's competition here
SINC vs ELPKF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, ELPKF has a market cap of 755.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while ELPKF trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELPKF's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to ELPKF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to ELPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check ELPKF's competition here
SINC vs PCTGY Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, PCTGY has a market cap of 731M. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while PCTGY trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCTGY's P/E ratio is 57.91. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to PCTGY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC and PCTGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCTGY's competition here
SINC vs CADNF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, CADNF has a market cap of 665.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while CADNF trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CADNF's P/E ratio is -219.07. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to CADNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC and CADNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CADNF's competition here
SINC vs GRVWF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, GRVWF has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while GRVWF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRVWF's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to GRVWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC and GRVWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRVWF's competition here
SINC vs JSPCF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, JSPCF has a market cap of 385.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while JSPCF trades at $14.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSPCF's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to JSPCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC and JSPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JSPCF's competition here
SINC vs HXGCF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, HXGCF has a market cap of 358.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while HXGCF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HXGCF's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to HXGCF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to HXGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check HXGCF's competition here
SINC vs SNGSF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, SNGSF has a market cap of 173.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while SNGSF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNGSF's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to SNGSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC and SNGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNGSF's competition here
SINC vs VKSC Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, VKSC has a market cap of 171.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while VKSC trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VKSC's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to VKSC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC and VKSC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VKSC's competition here
SINC vs SUMXF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, SUMXF has a market cap of 73.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while SUMXF trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUMXF's P/E ratio is -7.85. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to SUMXF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC and SUMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUMXF's competition here
SINC vs IFLXF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, IFLXF has a market cap of 52.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while IFLXF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IFLXF's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to IFLXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC and IFLXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IFLXF's competition here
SINC vs YIKWF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, YIKWF has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while YIKWF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YIKWF's P/E ratio is 2.30. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to YIKWF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC and YIKWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YIKWF's competition here
SINC vs SPQDF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, SPQDF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while SPQDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPQDF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to SPQDF's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to SPQDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check SPQDF's competition here
SINC vs NEXNF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, NEXNF has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while NEXNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXNF's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to NEXNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to NEXNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check NEXNF's competition here
SINC vs IDND Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, IDND has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while IDND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDND's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to IDND's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to IDND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check IDND's competition here
SINC vs MAYX Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, MAYX has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while MAYX trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to MAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to MAYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check MAYX's competition here
SINC vs RDVA Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, RDVA has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while RDVA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDVA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to RDVA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to RDVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check RDVA's competition here
SINC vs GDNPF Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, GDNPF has a market cap of 976K. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while GDNPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDNPF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to GDNPF's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC and GDNPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GDNPF's competition here
SINC vs EPTI Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, EPTI has a market cap of 134.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while EPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to EPTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to EPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check EPTI's competition here
SINC vs TZPC Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, TZPC has a market cap of 41.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while TZPC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TZPC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to TZPC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to TZPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check TZPC's competition here
SINC vs ACGX Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, ACGX has a market cap of 34.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while ACGX trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACGX's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to ACGX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC and ACGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACGX's competition here
SINC vs PGOG Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, PGOG has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while PGOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to PGOG's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC is less volatile compared to PGOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINC.Check PGOG's competition here
SINC vs ACTX Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, ACTX has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while ACTX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to ACTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SINC and ACTX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACTX's competition here
SINC vs GPRC Comparison August 2025
SINC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINC stands at 180.5K. In comparison, GPRC has a market cap of 10. Regarding current trading prices, SINC is priced at $0.00, while GPRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SINC's ROE is +6.14%, compared to GPRC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SINC and GPRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GPRC's competition here