Silver Elephant Mining Corp.
Silver Elephant Mining Corp. SILEF Peers
See (SILEF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SILEF | $0.16 | -6.16% | 7.5M | -1.00 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $25.70 | +1.40% | 130.4B | 11.47 | $2.24 | +4.83% |
| RTNTF | $73.22 | +3.40% | 104.7B | 10.36 | $7.07 | +3.21% |
| RTPPF | $59.30 | +1.66% | 100.3B | 8.39 | $7.07 | +6.78% |
| GLCNF | $4.23 | +0.95% | 50.3B | -32.54 | -$0.13 | +2.72% |
| GLNCY | $8.32 | -0.12% | 49.5B | -32.00 | -$0.26 | +2.58% |
| GMBXF | $6.07 | +1.51% | 47.3B | 12.65 | $0.48 | +3.06% |
| FSUMF | $10.75 | +1.90% | 33.1B | 8.53 | $1.26 | +8.23% |
| NGLOY | $15.21 | +2.44% | 32.8B | -10.56 | -$1.44 | +2.20% |
| FSUGY | $21.32 | +1.03% | 32.8B | 8.43 | $2.53 | +8.51% |
Stock Comparison
SILEF vs BHPLF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 130.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while BHPLF trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs RTNTF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 104.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while RTNTF trades at $73.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs RTPPF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 100.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while RTPPF trades at $59.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs GLCNF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while GLCNF trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -32.54. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs GLNCY Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while GLNCY trades at $8.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs GMBXF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while GMBXF trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs FSUMF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while FSUMF trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs NGLOY Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while NGLOY trades at $15.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs FSUGY Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while FSUGY trades at $21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs AAUKF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while AAUKF trades at $29.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs CMCLF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while CMCLF trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs TCKRF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while TCKRF trades at $42.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 844.20. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs IPOAF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while IPOAF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs IVPAF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while IVPAF trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs BOLIF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs BDNNY Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while BDNNY trades at $64.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs JXMNF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs SHTLF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while SHTLF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs SMMYY Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while SMMYY trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs ABML Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs STMNF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while STMNF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 57.32. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs LYSCF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while LYSCF trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 183.00. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs LYSDY Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while LYSDY trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 137.25. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs PUTKF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs PUTKY Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while PUTKY trades at $27.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.61. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs NILSY Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs PAEKY Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs PILBF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while PILBF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -100.70. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs MALRY Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while MALRY trades at $16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs FLMMF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs CHZQ Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs MALRF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while MALRF trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs NGXXF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while NGXXF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -42.12. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs PTNDY Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs MIMTF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while MIMTF trades at $16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs IIDDY Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while IIDDY trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs IPGDF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while IPGDF trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs DWMNF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs NICMF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while NICMF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs AZZVF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs SOUHY Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while SOUHY trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -40.31. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs AFBOF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs ERMAY Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while ERMAY trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 99.17. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs PTNDF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs ERMAF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while ERMAF trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 91.53. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs DETRF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while DETRF trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs ADTLF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while ADTLF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -14.26. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs ADMLF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while ADMLF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -14.23. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs BQSSF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while BQSSF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -71.00. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs AZRMF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs LINRF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while LINRF trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -45.38. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs ILKAY Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while ILKAY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs ILKAF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while ILKAF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs MFRVF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while MFRVF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs TAOFF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 973.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while TAOFF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -20.33. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs FMCXF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 940.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while FMCXF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -55.75. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs ALMTF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 935.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while ALMTF trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs ATUSF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 923.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while ATUSF trades at $19.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs STTSY Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to STTSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs AUSDF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 839.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while AUSDF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs AMVMF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 820.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while AMVMF trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -66.92. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs AFMJF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 820.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while AFMJF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs CTJHF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs NCKAF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 552M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs MJDLF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 546.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while MJDLF trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 29.04. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs VULNF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 533.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while VULNF trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -9.04. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs TTNNF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs OSTTF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs PXMFF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 484.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while PXMFF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.19. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs FGOVF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 475.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while FGOVF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -89.85. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs MCRZF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs MNXMF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 450.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while MNXMF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -70.00. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs CGMLF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 447.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while CGMLF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -28.75. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs MCHHF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 443.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while MCHHF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs BIRNF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs VTMXF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, VTMXF has a market cap of 412.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while VTMXF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VTMXF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to VTMXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to VTMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs FWEDF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 409.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while FWEDF trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs KMRPF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 395.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while KMRPF trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs REEMF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 381.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while REEMF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -24.66. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs NQMIY Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs MLYF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs CREQF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 362.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while CREQF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs CTJHY Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs MLXEF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 323.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while MLXEF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs LTSRF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 323.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while LTSRF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -13.65. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs ERLFF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 321.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while ERLFF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs PMETF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 316.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while PMETF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -65.00. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs ARAFF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 313.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while ARAFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -12.72. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs SVMLF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 299.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while SVMLF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -15.42. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs BSSMF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 293M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to BSSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs SLGGF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs JMXXF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 274.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while JMXXF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs EMOTF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, EMOTF has a market cap of 274.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while EMOTF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas EMOTF's P/E ratio is -25.95. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to EMOTF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to EMOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs MGMNF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 270.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while MGMNF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs ERDCF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 262M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while ERDCF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -71.64. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs LRSRF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs STQNF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to STQNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs MMILF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while MMILF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is less volatile compared to MMILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.
SILEF vs PRMNF Comparison
SILEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILEF stands at 7.5M. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 240.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SILEF is priced at $0.16, while PRMNF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILEF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -17.56. In terms of profitability, SILEF's ROE is -0.21%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SILEF is more volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILEF.