Signal Advance, Inc.
Signal Advance, Inc. SIGL Peers
See (SIGL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIGL | $0.14 | -32.15% | 5.50M | -14.16 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| KYCCF | $418.40 | -2.52% | 101.47B | 36.80 | $11.37 | +0.53% |
| HNHPF | $10.15 | -0.73% | 70.49B | 12.53 | $0.81 | +0.11% |
| HNHAF | $3.26 | -0.12% | 45.23B | 9.58 | $0.34 | +0.17% |
| MRAAF | $15.32 | -0.16% | 28.52B | 17.81 | $0.86 | +2.92% |
| HXGBY | $10.02 | +0.65% | 27.09B | 25.04 | $0.40 | +1.23% |
| MRAAY | $7.11 | -0.84% | 26.70B | 16.53 | $0.43 | +0.74% |
| HXGBF | $10.04 | -4.20% | 25.84B | 25.10 | $0.40 | +1.58% |
| TTDKF | $10.71 | +9.00% | 20.32B | 17.55 | $0.61 | +2.01% |
| TTDKY | $10.71 | -0.88% | 20.31B | 17.55 | $0.61 | +0.88% |
Stock Comparison
SIGL vs KYCCF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, KYCCF has a market cap of 101.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while KYCCF trades at $418.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas KYCCF's P/E ratio is 36.80. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KYCCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to KYCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs HNHPF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, HNHPF has a market cap of 70.49B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while HNHPF trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas HNHPF's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HNHPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to HNHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs HNHAF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, HNHAF has a market cap of 45.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while HNHAF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas HNHAF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HNHAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to HNHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs MRAAF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, MRAAF has a market cap of 28.52B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while MRAAF trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas MRAAF's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MRAAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to MRAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs HXGBY Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, HXGBY has a market cap of 27.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while HXGBY trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas HXGBY's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HXGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to HXGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs MRAAY Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, MRAAY has a market cap of 26.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while MRAAY trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas MRAAY's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MRAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to MRAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs HXGBF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, HXGBF has a market cap of 25.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while HXGBF trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas HXGBF's P/E ratio is 25.10. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HXGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to HXGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs TTDKF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, TTDKF has a market cap of 20.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while TTDKF trades at $10.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas TTDKF's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TTDKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to TTDKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs TTDKY Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, TTDKY has a market cap of 20.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while TTDKY trades at $10.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas TTDKY's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TTDKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to TTDKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs VEMLY Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, VEMLY has a market cap of 13.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while VEMLY trades at $45.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas VEMLY's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VEMLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to VEMLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs BYDIY Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, BYDIY has a market cap of 10.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while BYDIY trades at $224.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas BYDIY's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BYDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to BYDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs BYDIF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, BYDIF has a market cap of 9.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while BYDIF trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas BYDIF's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BYDIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to BYDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs SNPTF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, SNPTF has a market cap of 8.95B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while SNPTF trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas SNPTF's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SNPTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to SNPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs SOTGY Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, SOTGY has a market cap of 8.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while SOTGY trades at $78.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas SOTGY's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SOTGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to SOTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs SHMZF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, SHMZF has a market cap of 7.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while SHMZF trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas SHMZF's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SHMZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to SHMZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs MNBEY Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, MNBEY has a market cap of 7.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while MNBEY trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas MNBEY's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MNBEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to MNBEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs MNBEF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, MNBEF has a market cap of 5.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while MNBEF trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas MNBEF's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MNBEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to MNBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs OMRNY Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, OMRNY has a market cap of 5.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while OMRNY trades at $26.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas OMRNY's P/E ratio is 46.18. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to OMRNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to OMRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs IBIDF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, IBIDF has a market cap of 4.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while IBIDF trades at $35.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas IBIDF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IBIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to IBIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs AUOTY Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, AUOTY has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while AUOTY trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas AUOTY's P/E ratio is 37.81. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AUOTY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to AUOTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs HRSEF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, HRSEF has a market cap of 3.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while HRSEF trades at $105.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas HRSEF's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HRSEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to HRSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs HPHTF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, HPHTF has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while HPHTF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas HPHTF's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HPHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to HPHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs VEMLF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, VEMLF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while VEMLF trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas VEMLF's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VEMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to VEMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs SEPJF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, SEPJF has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while SEPJF trades at $26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas SEPJF's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SEPJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to SEPJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs HRIBF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, HRIBF has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while HRIBF trades at $61.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas HRIBF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HRIBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to HRIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs SEPJY Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, SEPJY has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while SEPJY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas SEPJY's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SEPJY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to SEPJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs TOPCF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, TOPCF has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while TOPCF trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas TOPCF's P/E ratio is 746.13. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TOPCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to TOPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs HPHTY Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, HPHTY has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while HPHTY trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas HPHTY's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HPHTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to HPHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs RNSHF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, RNSHF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while RNSHF trades at $29.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas RNSHF's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RNSHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to RNSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs APELF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, APELF has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while APELF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas APELF's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to APELF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to APELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs APELY Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, APELY has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while APELY trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas APELY's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to APELY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to APELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs TYOYY Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, TYOYY has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while TYOYY trades at $63.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas TYOYY's P/E ratio is 143.74. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TYOYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to TYOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs CODAF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, CODAF has a market cap of 1.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while CODAF trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas CODAF's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CODAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to CODAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs KGBLY Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, KGBLY has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while KGBLY trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas KGBLY's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KGBLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is less volatile compared to KGBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs FITGF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, FITGF has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while FITGF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas FITGF's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FITGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to FITGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs AMANF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, AMANF has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while AMANF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas AMANF's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AMANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to AMANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs NPEGF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, NPEGF has a market cap of 1.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while NPEGF trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas NPEGF's P/E ratio is -156.79. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NPEGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to NPEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs VAIAF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, VAIAF has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while VAIAF trades at $47.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas VAIAF's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VAIAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to VAIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs JELLF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, JELLF has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while JELLF trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas JELLF's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JELLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to JELLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs NILRF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, NILRF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while NILRF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas NILRF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NILRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to NILRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs JNPKF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, JNPKF has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while JNPKF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas JNPKF's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JNPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to JNPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs JPAVF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, JPAVF has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while JPAVF trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas JPAVF's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JPAVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to JPAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs BCNAF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, BCNAF has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while BCNAF trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas BCNAF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BCNAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to BCNAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs AITUF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, AITUF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while AITUF trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas AITUF's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AITUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to AITUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs AUDGF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, AUDGF has a market cap of 833.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while AUDGF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas AUDGF's P/E ratio is 333.33. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AUDGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to AUDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs CAZGF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, CAZGF has a market cap of 784.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while CAZGF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas CAZGF's P/E ratio is -99.00. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CAZGF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to CAZGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs ASAAF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, ASAAF has a market cap of 719.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while ASAAF trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas ASAAF's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ASAAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is less volatile compared to ASAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs BCNAY Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, BCNAY has a market cap of 600.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while BCNAY trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas BCNAY's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BCNAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to BCNAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs VARXF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, VARXF has a market cap of 531.70M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while VARXF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas VARXF's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VARXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to VARXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs JNNDF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, JNNDF has a market cap of 488.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while JNNDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas JNNDF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JNNDF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to JNNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs HNMUF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, HNMUF has a market cap of 468.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while HNMUF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas HNMUF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HNMUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to HNMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs KRKNF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, KRKNF has a market cap of 467.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while KRKNF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas KRKNF's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KRKNF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to KRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs JPDYY Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, JPDYY has a market cap of 457.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while JPDYY trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas JPDYY's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to JPDYY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to JPDYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs KACPF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, KACPF has a market cap of 437.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while KACPF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas KACPF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KACPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is less volatile compared to KACPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs HROEY Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, HROEY has a market cap of 371.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while HROEY trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas HROEY's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HROEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to HROEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs TRUHF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, TRUHF has a market cap of 364.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while TRUHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas TRUHF's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TRUHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to TRUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs NNFTF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, NNFTF has a market cap of 330.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while NNFTF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas NNFTF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NNFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to NNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs BMNR Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 285.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while BMNR trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is less volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs TTGPF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, TTGPF has a market cap of 204.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while TTGPF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas TTGPF's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TTGPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to TTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs SMOPF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, SMOPF has a market cap of 172.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while SMOPF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas SMOPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SMOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to SMOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs NPTSF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, NPTSF has a market cap of 166.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while NPTSF trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas NPTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NPTSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to NPTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs CHAEF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, CHAEF has a market cap of 154.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while CHAEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas CHAEF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CHAEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to CHAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs FUBAF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, FUBAF has a market cap of 126.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while FUBAF trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas FUBAF's P/E ratio is -59.54. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FUBAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to FUBAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs HUDLF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, HUDLF has a market cap of 122.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while HUDLF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas HUDLF's P/E ratio is -18.39. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HUDLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to HUDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs ENMPF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, ENMPF has a market cap of 119.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while ENMPF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas ENMPF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ENMPF's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to ENMPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs IACYF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, IACYF has a market cap of 108.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while IACYF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas IACYF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IACYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to IACYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs ENMPY Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, ENMPY has a market cap of 99.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while ENMPY trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas ENMPY's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ENMPY's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to ENMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs IKGPF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, IKGPF has a market cap of 88.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while IKGPF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas IKGPF's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IKGPF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to IKGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs ODYS Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 84.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while ODYS trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs SDIIF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, SDIIF has a market cap of 69.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while SDIIF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas SDIIF's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SDIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to SDIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs MPAD Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, MPAD has a market cap of 51.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while MPAD trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas MPAD's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MPAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to MPAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs SILLF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, SILLF has a market cap of 49.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while SILLF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas SILLF's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SILLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to SILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs ACFN Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 43.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while ACFN trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs AATC Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, AATC has a market cap of 40.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while AATC trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas AATC's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AATC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to AATC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs ERMG Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, ERMG has a market cap of 22.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while ERMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas ERMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ERMG's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to ERMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs IEHC Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, IEHC has a market cap of 21.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while IEHC trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas IEHC's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IEHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to IEHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs NSCIF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, NSCIF has a market cap of 21.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while NSCIF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas NSCIF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NSCIF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to NSCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs YNVYF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, YNVYF has a market cap of 20.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while YNVYF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas YNVYF's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to YNVYF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to YNVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs INRD Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, INRD has a market cap of 18.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while INRD trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas INRD's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to INRD's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to INRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs WELX Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, WELX has a market cap of 16.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while WELX trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas WELX's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WELX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to WELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs KESPF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, KESPF has a market cap of 15.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while KESPF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas KESPF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to KESPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to KESPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs FGRRF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, FGRRF has a market cap of 15.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while FGRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas FGRRF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FGRRF's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to FGRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs ROBOF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, ROBOF has a market cap of 14.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while ROBOF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas ROBOF's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ROBOF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to ROBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs AAIRF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, AAIRF has a market cap of 12.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while AAIRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas AAIRF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AAIRF's ROE of -4.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to AAIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs BNSOF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, BNSOF has a market cap of 10.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while BNSOF trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas BNSOF's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BNSOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is less volatile compared to BNSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs SCND Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, SCND has a market cap of 9.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while SCND trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas SCND's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SCND's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to SCND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs LCTC Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, LCTC has a market cap of 8.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while LCTC trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas LCTC's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LCTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to LCTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs GNCLF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, GNCLF has a market cap of 6.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while GNCLF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas GNCLF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GNCLF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is less volatile compared to GNCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs ESHSF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, ESHSF has a market cap of 6.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while ESHSF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas ESHSF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ESHSF's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is less volatile compared to ESHSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs ZTSTF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, ZTSTF has a market cap of 5.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while ZTSTF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas ZTSTF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ZTSTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to ZTSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs TNLX Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, TNLX has a market cap of 4.72M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while TNLX trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas TNLX's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TNLX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to TNLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs DPLS Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, DPLS has a market cap of 3.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while DPLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas DPLS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DPLS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to DPLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs RMTD Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, RMTD has a market cap of 2.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while RMTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas RMTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RMTD's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is less volatile compared to RMTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs MRRYF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, MRRYF has a market cap of 2.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while MRRYF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas MRRYF's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MRRYF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is less volatile compared to MRRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs TRCK Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, TRCK has a market cap of 2.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while TRCK trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas TRCK's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TRCK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to TRCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs VPER Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, VPER has a market cap of 1.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while VPER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas VPER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VPER's ROE of -3.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to VPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs VPIM Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, VPIM has a market cap of 1.92M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while VPIM trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas VPIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VPIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is less volatile compared to VPIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs NXOPF Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, NXOPF has a market cap of 1.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while NXOPF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas NXOPF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NXOPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is more volatile compared to NXOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.
SIGL vs TKOI Comparison
SIGL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SIGL stands at 5.50M. In comparison, TKOI has a market cap of 1.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SIGL is priced at $0.14, while TKOI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SIGL currently has a P/E ratio of -14.16, whereas TKOI's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, SIGL's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TKOI's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SIGL is less volatile compared to TKOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SIGL.