Stora Enso Oyj

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, KLBAY has a market cap of 20.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while KLBAY trades at $6.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas KLBAY's P/E ratio is 60.82. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KLBAY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to KLBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, UPMMY has a market cap of 14.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while UPMMY trades at $26.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas UPMMY's P/E ratio is 29.69. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UPMMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to UPMMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, UPMKF has a market cap of 13.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while UPMKF trades at $25.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas UPMKF's P/E ratio is 39.69. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UPMKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to UPMKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, SUZ has a market cap of 10.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while SUZ trades at $8.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas SUZ's P/E ratio is -9.42. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SUZ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to SUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, SCABY has a market cap of 9.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while SCABY trades at $14.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas SCABY's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SCABY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to SCABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, SVCBF has a market cap of 8.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while SVCBF trades at $12.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas SVCBF's P/E ratio is 23.24. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SVCBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to SVCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, MONDF has a market cap of 8.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while MONDF trades at $18.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas MONDF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MONDF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to MONDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, SEOJF has a market cap of 6.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while SEOJF trades at $8.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas SEOJF's P/E ratio is -57.07. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SEOJF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to SEOJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, MONDY has a market cap of 6.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while MONDY trades at $30.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas MONDY's P/E ratio is 27.61. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MONDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to MONDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 6.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while LPX trades at $87.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to LPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 6.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while UFPI trades at $99.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 5.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while WFG trades at $74.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -1060.00. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WFG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to WFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, OJIPF has a market cap of 4.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while OJIPF trades at $4.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas OJIPF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OJIPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to OJIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, OJIPY has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while OJIPY trades at $45.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas OJIPY's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OJIPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to OJIPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, RTTNY has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while RTTNY trades at $22.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas RTTNY's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RTTNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to RTTNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, POELF has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while POELF trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas POELF's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to POELF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to POELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, STLJF has a market cap of 2.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while STLJF trades at $48.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas STLJF's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STLJF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to STLJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, HLMNY has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while HLMNY trades at $17.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas HLMNY's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HLMNY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to HLMNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while SLVM trades at $59.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, BLRDF has a market cap of 2.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while BLRDF trades at $9.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas BLRDF's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BLRDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to BLRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, PIKQF has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while PIKQF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas PIKQF's P/E ratio is 4.36. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PIKQF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to PIKQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, NDGPY has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while NDGPY trades at $7.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas NDGPY's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NDGPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to NDGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, RFP has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while RFP trades at $21.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas RFP's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RFP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to RFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, NDGPF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while NDGPF trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas NDGPF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NDGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to NDGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while SWM trades at $23.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SWM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to SWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, SPPJY has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while SPPJY trades at $2.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas SPPJY's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SPPJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to SPPJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, LMPMF has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while LMPMF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas LMPMF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LMPMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to LMPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, CFPZF has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while CFPZF trades at $9.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas CFPZF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CFPZF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to CFPZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, LMPMY has a market cap of 1.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while LMPMY trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas LMPMY's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LMPMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to LMPMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, NIJPF has a market cap of 782.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while NIJPF trades at $6.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas NIJPF's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NIJPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to NIJPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, TKFTF has a market cap of 703.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while TKFTF trades at $10.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas TKFTF's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TKFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to TKFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, IFSPF has a market cap of 501.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while IFSPF trades at $9.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas IFSPF's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IFSPF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to IFSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, CLW has a market cap of 423.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while CLW trades at $26.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas CLW's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CLW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to CLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, PKNOF has a market cap of 319.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while PKNOF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas PKNOF's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PKNOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to PKNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 285.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while MATV trades at $5.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MATV's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to MATV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 234.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while MERC trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MERC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to MERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, ACAZF has a market cap of 223.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while ACAZF trades at $12.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas ACAZF's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ACAZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to ACAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, RTERF has a market cap of 144.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while RTERF trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas RTERF's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RTERF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to RTERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, ACSYF has a market cap of 124.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while ACSYF trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas ACSYF's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ACSYF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to ACSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, WFSTF has a market cap of 89.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while WFSTF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas WFSTF's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WFSTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to WFSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while GLT trades at $21.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to GLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, GFELF has a market cap of 71.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while GFELF trades at $8.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas GFELF's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GFELF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to GFELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, ICLTF has a market cap of 64.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while ICLTF trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas ICLTF's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ICLTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to ICLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, KEWL has a market cap of 41.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while KEWL trades at $31.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas KEWL's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KEWL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to KEWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, CFPUF has a market cap of 35.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while CFPUF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas CFPUF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CFPUF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to CFPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while EVA trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to EVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 22.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while NWGL trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, RUBNF has a market cap of 20.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while RUBNF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas RUBNF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RUBNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to RUBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, BRGSF has a market cap of 19.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while BRGSF trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas BRGSF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BRGSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to BRGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, TCOR has a market cap of 17.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while TCOR trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas TCOR's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TCOR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to TCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to JCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 13.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while JCTC trades at $3.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, SUPBF has a market cap of 10.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while SUPBF trades at $7.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas SUPBF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SUPBF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to SUPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, CFXTF has a market cap of 8.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while CFXTF trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas CFXTF's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CFXTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to CFXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, SGTM has a market cap of 8.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while SGTM trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas SGTM's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SGTM's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to SGTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, WBNEF has a market cap of 5.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while WBNEF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas WBNEF's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WBNEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to WBNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, BMSPF has a market cap of 2.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while BMSPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas BMSPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BMSPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to BMSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, ITP has a market cap of 2.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while ITP trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas ITP's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ITP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to ITP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, HMTC has a market cap of 2.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while HMTC trades at $5.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas HMTC's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HMTC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to HMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, BSTO has a market cap of 1.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while BSTO trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas BSTO's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BSTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to BSTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, SGMD has a market cap of 18714.00. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while SGMD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas SGMD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SGMD's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to SGMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, EXRG has a market cap of 5710.00. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while EXRG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas EXRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EXRG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to EXRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, ZMGD has a market cap of 5228.00. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while ZMGD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas ZMGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ZMGD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to ZMGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, BPMI has a market cap of 617.00. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while BPMI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas BPMI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BPMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to BPMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, NP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while NP trades at $31.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas NP's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is less volatile compared to NP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, VRDSF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while VRDSF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas VRDSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VRDSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to VRDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, KPCM comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while KPCM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas KPCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KPCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to KPCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, VRS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while VRS trades at $26.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas VRS's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to VRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, UFS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while UFS trades at $55.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas UFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UFS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to UFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.

SEOAY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SEOAY stands at 7.50B. In comparison, HAIPF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SEOAY is priced at $9.23, while HAIPF trades at $101.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SEOAY currently has a P/E ratio of -61.53, whereas HAIPF's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, SEOAY's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HAIPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SEOAY is more volatile compared to HAIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SEOAY.