Serco Group plc
Serco Group plc SECCF Peers
See (SECCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SECCF | $2.63 | +19.00% | 2.66B | 52.60 | $0.05 | +1.54% |
| WOLTF | $184.30 | +4.15% | 43.19B | 36.50 | $5.05 | +1.21% |
| WTKWY | $181.25 | -0.90% | 42.48B | 35.89 | $5.05 | +1.23% |
| BMBLF | $14.24 | N/A | 19.51B | 23.73 | $0.60 | +2.89% |
| BXBLY | $28.23 | +0.05% | 19.33B | 23.72 | $1.19 | +2.66% |
| DNPCF | $30.50 | N/A | 13.78B | 18.26 | $1.67 | +0.85% |
| RKLIF | $4.58 | +12.96% | 11.50B | 28.59 | $0.16 | +2.91% |
| IKTSF | $66.84 | N/A | 10.66B | 23.70 | $2.82 | +2.46% |
| IKTSY | $66.79 | +0.72% | 10.65B | 23.68 | $2.82 | +2.46% |
| SDXAY | $13.33 | +2.62% | 9.75B | 13.07 | $1.02 | +14.88% |
Stock Comparison
SECCF vs WOLTF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, WOLTF has a market cap of 43.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while WOLTF trades at $184.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas WOLTF's P/E ratio is 36.50. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WOLTF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to WOLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs WTKWY Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, WTKWY has a market cap of 42.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while WTKWY trades at $181.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas WTKWY's P/E ratio is 35.89. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WTKWY's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to WTKWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs BMBLF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, BMBLF has a market cap of 19.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while BMBLF trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas BMBLF's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BMBLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to BMBLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs BXBLY Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, BXBLY has a market cap of 19.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while BXBLY trades at $28.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas BXBLY's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BXBLY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to BXBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs DNPCF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, DNPCF has a market cap of 13.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while DNPCF trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas DNPCF's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DNPCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to DNPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs RKLIF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, RKLIF has a market cap of 11.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while RKLIF trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas RKLIF's P/E ratio is 28.59. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RKLIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and RKLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs IKTSF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, IKTSF has a market cap of 10.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while IKTSF trades at $66.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas IKTSF's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IKTSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to IKTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs IKTSY Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, IKTSY has a market cap of 10.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while IKTSY trades at $66.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas IKTSY's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IKTSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to IKTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs SDXAY Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, SDXAY has a market cap of 9.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while SDXAY trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas SDXAY's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SDXAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to SDXAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs SDXOF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, SDXOF has a market cap of 9.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while SDXOF trades at $66.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas SDXOF's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SDXOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to SDXOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs TONPF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, TONPF has a market cap of 8.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while TONPF trades at $30.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas TONPF's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TONPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to TONPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs INPOY Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, INPOY has a market cap of 8.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while INPOY trades at $8.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas INPOY's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INPOY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to INPOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs TOPPY Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, TOPPY has a market cap of 8.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while TOPPY trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas TOPPY's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TOPPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to TOPPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs DNPLY Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, DNPLY has a market cap of 6.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while DNPLY trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas DNPLY's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DNPLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to DNPLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs TLPFY Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, TLPFY has a market cap of 6.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while TLPFY trades at $53.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas TLPFY's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TLPFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to TLPFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs TLPFF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, TLPFF has a market cap of 6.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while TLPFF trades at $105.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas TLPFF's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TLPFF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to TLPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs ELSSF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, ELSSF has a market cap of 5.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while ELSSF trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas ELSSF's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELSSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to ELSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs INPOF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, INPOF has a market cap of 4.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while INPOF trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas INPOF's P/E ratio is 38.42. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INPOF's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and INPOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs ISFFF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, ISFFF has a market cap of 4.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while ISFFF trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas ISFFF's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ISFFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to ISFFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs MITFY Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, MITFY has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while MITFY trades at $8.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas MITFY's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MITFY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to MITFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs SCGPY Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, SCGPY has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while SCGPY trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas SCGPY's P/E ratio is 43.60. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCGPY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and SCGPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs MITFF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, MITFF has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while MITFF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas MITFF's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MITFF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to MITFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs ACENY Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, ACENY has a market cap of 2.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while ACENY trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas ACENY's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACENY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to ACENY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs RELOF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, RELOF has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while RELOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas RELOF's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RELOF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to RELOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs APLUF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, APLUF has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while APLUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas APLUF's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APLUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to APLUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs ISSDY Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, ISSDY has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while ISSDY trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas ISSDY's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ISSDY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to ISSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs TCLAF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, TCLAF has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while TCLAF trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas TCLAF's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TCLAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and TCLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs IPHLF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, IPHLF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while IPHLF trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas IPHLF's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IPHLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to IPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs TCLCF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, TCLCF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while TCLCF trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas TCLCF's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TCLCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and TCLCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs JSVGF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, JSVGF has a market cap of 850.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while JSVGF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas JSVGF's P/E ratio is 117.73. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JSVGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and JSVGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs STGXF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, STGXF has a market cap of 837.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while STGXF trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas STGXF's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STGXF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and STGXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs RKSLF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, RKSLF has a market cap of 590.66M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while RKSLF trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas RKSLF's P/E ratio is 67.87. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RKSLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to RKSLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs GLCDF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, GLCDF has a market cap of 539.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while GLCDF trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas GLCDF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GLCDF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to GLCDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs GDIFF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, GDIFF has a market cap of 509.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while GDIFF trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas GDIFF's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GDIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and GDIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs ITEPF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, ITEPF has a market cap of 448.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while ITEPF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas ITEPF's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITEPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and ITEPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs IRMTF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, IRMTF has a market cap of 385.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while IRMTF trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas IRMTF's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IRMTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to IRMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs HZNOF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, HZNOF has a market cap of 385.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while HZNOF trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas HZNOF's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HZNOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to HZNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs VSSPY Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, VSSPY has a market cap of 361.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while VSSPY trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas VSSPY's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VSSPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to VSSPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs KPGHF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, KPGHF has a market cap of 338.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while KPGHF trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas KPGHF's P/E ratio is 188.61. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPGHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to KPGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs CLNFF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, CLNFF has a market cap of 335.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while CLNFF trades at $28.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas CLNFF's P/E ratio is 102.36. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLNFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to CLNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs DELRF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, DELRF has a market cap of 327.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while DELRF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas DELRF's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DELRF's ROE of -5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and DELRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs DLUEY Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, DLUEY has a market cap of 327.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while DLUEY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas DLUEY's P/E ratio is -15.62. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DLUEY's ROE of -5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and DLUEY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs CTAGF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, CTAGF has a market cap of 288.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while CTAGF trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas CTAGF's P/E ratio is 2.67. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CTAGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to CTAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs KBRLF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, KBRLF has a market cap of 270.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while KBRLF trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas KBRLF's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KBRLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to KBRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs ITEGY Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, ITEGY has a market cap of 244.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while ITEGY trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas ITEGY's P/E ratio is -7.46. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITEGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and ITEGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs PCRRF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, PCRRF has a market cap of 164.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while PCRRF trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas PCRRF's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PCRRF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to PCRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs AJISF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, AJISF has a market cap of 130.72M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while AJISF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas AJISF's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AJISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to AJISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs PCOA Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, PCOA has a market cap of 113.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while PCOA trades at $150,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas PCOA's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PCOA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SECCF has daily volatility of 0.00 and PCOA has daily volatility of N/A.
SECCF vs CTAGY Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, CTAGY has a market cap of 97.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while CTAGY trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas CTAGY's P/E ratio is 0.24. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CTAGY's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to CTAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs WTLLF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, WTLLF has a market cap of 91.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while WTLLF trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas WTLLF's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WTLLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to WTLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs ASFH Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, ASFH has a market cap of 81.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while ASFH trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas ASFH's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASFH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to ASFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs PGWFF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, PGWFF has a market cap of 78.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while PGWFF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas PGWFF's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PGWFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to PGWFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs DCMDF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, DCMDF has a market cap of 73.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while DCMDF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas DCMDF's P/E ratio is 33.25. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DCMDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and DCMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs FLNCF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, FLNCF has a market cap of 65.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while FLNCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas FLNCF's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FLNCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to FLNCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs RDCPF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, RDCPF has a market cap of 63.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while RDCPF trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas RDCPF's P/E ratio is 173.50. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RDCPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to RDCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs CERGF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, CERGF has a market cap of 62.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while CERGF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas CERGF's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CERGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and CERGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs ESTTF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, ESTTF has a market cap of 42.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while ESTTF trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas ESTTF's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ESTTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to ESTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs CRKT Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, CRKT has a market cap of 38.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while CRKT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas CRKT's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRKT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to CRKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs SFRX Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, SFRX has a market cap of 37.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while SFRX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas SFRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SFRX's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to SFRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs UWHGF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, UWHGF has a market cap of 32.41M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while UWHGF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas UWHGF's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UWHGF's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and UWHGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs FTBGF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, FTBGF has a market cap of 29.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while FTBGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas FTBGF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FTBGF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and FTBGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs SRRPF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, SRRPF has a market cap of 24.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while SRRPF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas SRRPF's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SRRPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and SRRPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs NSYC Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, NSYC has a market cap of 19.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while NSYC trades at $440.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas NSYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NSYC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and NSYC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs GNOLF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, GNOLF has a market cap of 17.72M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while GNOLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas GNOLF's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GNOLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and GNOLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs ELVG Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, ELVG has a market cap of 8.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while ELVG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas ELVG's P/E ratio is 0.66. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELVG's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to ELVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs GPOX Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, GPOX has a market cap of 7.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while GPOX trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas GPOX's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPOX's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to GPOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs ADMQ Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, ADMQ has a market cap of 6.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while ADMQ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas ADMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADMQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and ADMQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs REPO Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, REPO has a market cap of 4.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while REPO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas REPO's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to REPO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to REPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs BLIS Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, BLIS has a market cap of 2.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while BLIS trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas BLIS's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLIS's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to BLIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs LMTI Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, LMTI has a market cap of 2.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while LMTI trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas LMTI's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LMTI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to LMTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs CGRW Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, CGRW has a market cap of 2.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while CGRW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas CGRW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CGRW's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to CGRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs ANMP Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, ANMP has a market cap of 1.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while ANMP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas ANMP's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and ANMP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs SAYFF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, SAYFF has a market cap of 1.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while SAYFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas SAYFF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SAYFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and SAYFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs OODH Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, OODH has a market cap of 1.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while OODH trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas OODH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OODH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and OODH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs HHGI Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, HHGI has a market cap of 675406.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while HHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas HHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HHGI's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and HHGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs JFIL Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, JFIL has a market cap of 599571.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while JFIL trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas JFIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JFIL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and JFIL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs CLRYF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, CLRYF has a market cap of 579915.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while CLRYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas CLRYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLRYF's ROE of +1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to CLRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs UNDR Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, UNDR has a market cap of 479404.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while UNDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas UNDR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UNDR's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and UNDR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs AWAW Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, AWAW has a market cap of 435082.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while AWAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas AWAW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AWAW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to AWAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs MTPR Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, MTPR has a market cap of 407967.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while MTPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas MTPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to MTPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs DTSL Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, DTSL has a market cap of 391291.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while DTSL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas DTSL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to DTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs WLDPF Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, WLDPF has a market cap of 305956.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while WLDPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas WLDPF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WLDPF's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to WLDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs OPMG Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, OPMG has a market cap of 219237.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while OPMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas OPMG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OPMG's ROE of +15.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to OPMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs IJJP Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, IJJP has a market cap of 192545.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while IJJP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas IJJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IJJP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and IJJP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs XCPL Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, XCPL has a market cap of 168521.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while XCPL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas XCPL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XCPL's ROE of +7.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and XCPL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs IMJX Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, IMJX has a market cap of 112725.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while IMJX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas IMJX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IMJX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to IMJX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs ECOX Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, ECOX has a market cap of 109628.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while ECOX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas ECOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ECOX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and ECOX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs BRYN Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, BRYN has a market cap of 107900.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while BRYN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas BRYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRYN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to BRYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs CTGL Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, CTGL has a market cap of 104407.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while CTGL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas CTGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CTGL's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and CTGL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs NNFC Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, NNFC has a market cap of 97837.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while NNFC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas NNFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NNFC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to NNFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs DPUI Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, DPUI has a market cap of 83296.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while DPUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas DPUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DPUI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and DPUI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs INCC Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, INCC has a market cap of 69722.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while INCC trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas INCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INCC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to INCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs UCPC Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, UCPC has a market cap of 56164.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while UCPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas UCPC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UCPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to UCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs EVSV Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, EVSV has a market cap of 52006.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while EVSV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas EVSV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EVSV's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and EVSV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs GFGU Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, GFGU has a market cap of 48460.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while GFGU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas GFGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GFGU's ROE of +15.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF and GFGU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SECCF vs BFLD Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, BFLD has a market cap of 43750.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while BFLD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas BFLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BFLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to BFLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs SGLS Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, SGLS has a market cap of 39548.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while SGLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas SGLS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGLS's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to SGLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs CBMJ Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, CBMJ has a market cap of 36205.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while CBMJ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas CBMJ's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CBMJ's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to CBMJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.
SECCF vs PIFR Comparison
SECCF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SECCF stands at 2.66B. In comparison, PIFR has a market cap of 35132.00. Regarding current trading prices, SECCF is priced at $2.63, while PIFR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SECCF currently has a P/E ratio of 52.60, whereas PIFR's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, SECCF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PIFR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SECCF is less volatile compared to PIFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SECCF.