The Shipping Corporation of India Limited
The Shipping Corporation of India Limited (SCI.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SCI.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCI.NS | ₹256.15 | -2.78% | 119.3B | 10.53 | ₹24.32 | +5.11% |
| ADANIPORTS.NS | ₹1,470.30 | -3.33% | 3.4T | 25.45 | ₹57.78 | +0.48% |
| ADANIPORTS.BO | ₹1,470.20 | -3.33% | 3.4T | 25.44 | ₹57.78 | +0.48% |
| GESHIP.NS | ₹1,326.40 | -0.93% | 189.4B | 8.39 | ₹158.11 | +2.17% |
| GESHIP.BO | ₹1,326.40 | -0.86% | 189.4B | 8.39 | ₹158.11 | +2.17% |
| SCI.BO | ₹256.20 | -2.81% | 119.3B | 10.53 | ₹24.33 | +5.11% |
| GPPL.NS | ₹172.19 | -2.65% | 83.2B | 17.17 | ₹10.03 | +5.58% |
| GPPL.BO | ₹172.15 | -2.57% | 83.2B | 17.15 | ₹10.04 | +5.58% |
| SHREEJISPG.NS | ₹390.30 | -2.09% | 63.6B | 39.79 | ₹9.81 | +0.26% |
| SEAMECLTD.BO | ₹1,351.40 | +2.97% | 34.4B | 17.99 | ₹75.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SCI.NS vs ADANIPORTS.NS Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, ADANIPORTS.NS has a market cap of 3.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while ADANIPORTS.NS trades at ₹1,470.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas ADANIPORTS.NS's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADANIPORTS.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is more volatile compared to ADANIPORTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check ADANIPORTS.NS's competition here
SCI.NS vs ADANIPORTS.BO Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, ADANIPORTS.BO has a market cap of 3.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while ADANIPORTS.BO trades at ₹1,470.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas ADANIPORTS.BO's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADANIPORTS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is more volatile compared to ADANIPORTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check ADANIPORTS.BO's competition here
SCI.NS vs GESHIP.NS Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, GESHIP.NS has a market cap of 189.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while GESHIP.NS trades at ₹1,326.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas GESHIP.NS's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GESHIP.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is more volatile compared to GESHIP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check GESHIP.NS's competition here
SCI.NS vs GESHIP.BO Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, GESHIP.BO has a market cap of 189.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while GESHIP.BO trades at ₹1,326.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas GESHIP.BO's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GESHIP.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is more volatile compared to GESHIP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check GESHIP.BO's competition here
SCI.NS vs SCI.BO Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, SCI.BO has a market cap of 119.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while SCI.BO trades at ₹256.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas SCI.BO's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCI.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is less volatile compared to SCI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check SCI.BO's competition here
SCI.NS vs GPPL.NS Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, GPPL.NS has a market cap of 83.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while GPPL.NS trades at ₹172.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas GPPL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPPL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is more volatile compared to GPPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check GPPL.NS's competition here
SCI.NS vs GPPL.BO Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, GPPL.BO has a market cap of 83.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while GPPL.BO trades at ₹172.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas GPPL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPPL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is more volatile compared to GPPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check GPPL.BO's competition here
SCI.NS vs SHREEJISPG.NS Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, SHREEJISPG.NS has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while SHREEJISPG.NS trades at ₹390.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas SHREEJISPG.NS's P/E ratio is 39.79. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHREEJISPG.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is less volatile compared to SHREEJISPG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check SHREEJISPG.NS's competition here
SCI.NS vs SEAMECLTD.BO Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, SEAMECLTD.BO has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while SEAMECLTD.BO trades at ₹1,351.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas SEAMECLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SEAMECLTD.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is less volatile compared to SEAMECLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check SEAMECLTD.BO's competition here
SCI.NS vs SEAMECLTD.NS Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, SEAMECLTD.NS has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while SEAMECLTD.NS trades at ₹1,347.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas SEAMECLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SEAMECLTD.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is less volatile compared to SEAMECLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check SEAMECLTD.NS's competition here
SCI.NS vs MARINE.NS Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, MARINE.NS has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while MARINE.NS trades at ₹187.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas MARINE.NS's P/E ratio is 56.04. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MARINE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is less volatile compared to MARINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check MARINE.NS's competition here
SCI.NS vs KMEW.NS Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, KMEW.NS has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while KMEW.NS trades at ₹1,647.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas KMEW.NS's P/E ratio is 58.58. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KMEW.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is less volatile compared to KMEW.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check KMEW.NS's competition here
SCI.NS vs ORICON.BO Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, ORICON.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while ORICON.BO trades at ₹40.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas ORICON.BO's P/E ratio is -52.92. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ORICON.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is more volatile compared to ORICON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check ORICON.BO's competition here
SCI.NS vs SHREYAS.NS Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, SHREYAS.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while SHREYAS.NS trades at ₹284.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas SHREYAS.NS's P/E ratio is -12.41. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHREYAS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is less volatile compared to SHREYAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check SHREYAS.NS's competition here
SCI.NS vs SHREYAS.BO Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, SHREYAS.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while SHREYAS.BO trades at ₹282.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas SHREYAS.BO's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHREYAS.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is less volatile compared to SHREYAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check SHREYAS.BO's competition here
SCI.NS vs ESSARSHPNG.NS Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, ESSARSHPNG.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while ESSARSHPNG.NS trades at ₹24.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas ESSARSHPNG.NS's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ESSARSHPNG.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is less volatile compared to ESSARSHPNG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check ESSARSHPNG.NS's competition here
SCI.NS vs ESSARSHPNG.BO Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, ESSARSHPNG.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while ESSARSHPNG.BO trades at ₹24.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas ESSARSHPNG.BO's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ESSARSHPNG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is more volatile compared to ESSARSHPNG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check ESSARSHPNG.BO's competition here
SCI.NS vs LANCER.NS Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, LANCER.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while LANCER.NS trades at ₹149.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas LANCER.NS's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LANCER.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is more volatile compared to LANCER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check LANCER.NS's competition here
SCI.NS vs TRANSWORLD.BO Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, TRANSWORLD.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while TRANSWORLD.BO trades at ₹130.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas TRANSWORLD.BO's P/E ratio is -45.36. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRANSWORLD.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is less volatile compared to TRANSWORLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check TRANSWORLD.BO's competition here
SCI.NS vs TRANSWORLD.NS Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, TRANSWORLD.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while TRANSWORLD.NS trades at ₹130.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas TRANSWORLD.NS's P/E ratio is -45.24. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRANSWORLD.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is less volatile compared to TRANSWORLD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check TRANSWORLD.NS's competition here
SCI.NS vs LANCER.BO Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, LANCER.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while LANCER.BO trades at ₹9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas LANCER.BO's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LANCER.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is more volatile compared to LANCER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check LANCER.BO's competition here
SCI.NS vs CHOWGULSTM.BO Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, CHOWGULSTM.BO has a market cap of 679M. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while CHOWGULSTM.BO trades at ₹18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas CHOWGULSTM.BO's P/E ratio is 71.92. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHOWGULSTM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is less volatile compared to CHOWGULSTM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check CHOWGULSTM.BO's competition here
SCI.NS vs GLOBOFFS.NS Comparison March 2026
SCI.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCI.NS stands at 119.3B. In comparison, GLOBOFFS.NS has a market cap of 159.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SCI.NS is priced at ₹256.15, while GLOBOFFS.NS trades at ₹7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.53, whereas GLOBOFFS.NS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SCI.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GLOBOFFS.NS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SCI.NS is less volatile compared to GLOBOFFS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCI.NS.Check GLOBOFFS.NS's competition here