Schaeffler AG
Schaeffler AG SCFLF Peers
See (SCFLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto-Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCFLF | $4.80 | -1.84% | 3.44B | 9.60 | $0.50 | N/A |
| FYGGY | $1.50 | N/A | 48.07B | 13.64 | $0.11 | +1.00% |
| DNZOF | $14.19 | -1.05% | 39.98B | 14.48 | $0.98 | +3.06% |
| DNZOY | $13.24 | -0.90% | 37.34B | 13.51 | $0.98 | +0.94% |
| BRDCY | $21.09 | +1.64% | 28.89B | 14.85 | $1.42 | +2.09% |
| BRDCF | $42.50 | +18.38% | 28.81B | 15.68 | $2.71 | +3.10% |
| MGDDY | $19.40 | +0.88% | 27.38B | 8.69 | $2.23 | +3.76% |
| MGDDF | $38.66 | +3.04% | 27.28B | 3.46 | $11.17 | +3.79% |
| CTTAF | $84.80 | +3.18% | 16.96B | 12.99 | $6.53 | +2.96% |
| CTTAY | $8.30 | -0.60% | 16.60B | 12.77 | $0.65 | +2.67% |
Stock Comparison
SCFLF vs FYGGY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, FYGGY has a market cap of 48.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while FYGGY trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas FYGGY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FYGGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to FYGGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs DNZOF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, DNZOF has a market cap of 39.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while DNZOF trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas DNZOF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DNZOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to DNZOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs DNZOY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, DNZOY has a market cap of 37.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while DNZOY trades at $13.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas DNZOY's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DNZOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF and DNZOY have similar daily volatility (4.08).
SCFLF vs BRDCY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, BRDCY has a market cap of 28.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while BRDCY trades at $21.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas BRDCY's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRDCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to BRDCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs BRDCF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, BRDCF has a market cap of 28.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while BRDCF trades at $42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas BRDCF's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRDCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to BRDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs MGDDY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, MGDDY has a market cap of 27.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while MGDDY trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas MGDDY's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to MGDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs MGDDF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, MGDDF has a market cap of 27.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while MGDDF trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas MGDDF's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGDDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to MGDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs CTTAF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, CTTAF has a market cap of 16.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while CTTAF trades at $84.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas CTTAF's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTTAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to CTTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs CTTAY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, CTTAY has a market cap of 16.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while CTTAY trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas CTTAY's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTTAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to CTTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs KNRRY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, KNRRY has a market cap of 15.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while KNRRY trades at $23.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas KNRRY's P/E ratio is 32.35. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KNRRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to KNRRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs KNBHF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, KNBHF has a market cap of 15.41B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while KNBHF trades at $95.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas KNBHF's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KNBHF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to KNBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs SMTOY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, SMTOY has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while SMTOY trades at $17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas SMTOY's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMTOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to SMTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs PTAIY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, PTAIY has a market cap of 12.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while PTAIY trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas PTAIY's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PTAIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to PTAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs PTAIF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, PTAIF has a market cap of 11.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while PTAIF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas PTAIF's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PTAIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to PTAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs HLLGY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, HLLGY has a market cap of 10.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while HLLGY trades at $49.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas HLLGY's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLLGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to HLLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs HLKHF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, HLKHF has a market cap of 10.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while HLKHF trades at $92.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas HLKHF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLKHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to HLKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs ASEKY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, ASEKY has a market cap of 9.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while ASEKY trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas ASEKY's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASEKY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to ASEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs ASEKF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, ASEKF has a market cap of 7.64B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while ASEKF trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas ASEKF's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASEKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to ASEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs NGKSY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, NGKSY has a market cap of 6.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while NGKSY trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas NGKSY's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NGKSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to NGKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs PLLIF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, PLLIF has a market cap of 6.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while PLLIF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas PLLIF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PLLIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to PLLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs NGKSF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, NGKSF has a market cap of 6.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while NGKSF trades at $30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas NGKSF's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NGKSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to NGKSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs SFFLY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, SFFLY has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while SFFLY trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas SFFLY's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SFFLY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to SFFLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs KOTMF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, KOTMF has a market cap of 4.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while KOTMF trades at $14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas KOTMF's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KOTMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to KOTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs YORUF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, YORUF has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while YORUF trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas YORUF's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YORUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to YORUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs FESTF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, FESTF has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while FESTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas FESTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FESTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to FESTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs YORUY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, YORUY has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while YORUY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas YORUY's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YORUY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to YORUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs BRBOY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, BRBOY has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while BRBOY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas BRBOY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRBOY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to BRBOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs KOTMY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, KOTMY has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while KOTMY trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas KOTMY's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KOTMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to KOTMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs BRBOF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, BRBOF has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while BRBOF trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas BRBOF's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRBOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to BRBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs MNTHY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, MNTHY has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while MNTHY trades at $50.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas MNTHY's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MNTHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to MNTHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs STAEY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, STAEY has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while STAEY trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas STAEY's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STAEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to STAEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs SMTUF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, SMTUF has a market cap of 2.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while SMTUF trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas SMTUF's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMTUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to SMTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs LIMAF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, LIMAF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while LIMAF trades at $45.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas LIMAF's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LIMAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to LIMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs VLEEY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, VLEEY has a market cap of 2.54B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while VLEEY trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas VLEEY's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VLEEY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to VLEEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs STAEF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, STAEF has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while STAEF trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas STAEF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STAEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to STAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs TDBOF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, TDBOF has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while TDBOF trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas TDBOF's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDBOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to TDBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs VLEEF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, VLEEF has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while VLEEF trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas VLEEF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VLEEF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to VLEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs NHKGF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, NHKGF has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while NHKGF trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas NHKGF's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NHKGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to NHKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs VTSCF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, VTSCF has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while VTSCF trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas VTSCF's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VTSCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to VTSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs MNTHF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, MNTHF has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while MNTHF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas MNTHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MNTHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to MNTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs NPSKF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, NPSKF has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while NPSKF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas NPSKF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NPSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to NPSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs NPSKY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, NPSKY has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while NPSKY trades at $8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas NPSKY's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NPSKY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to NPSKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs TGOSY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, TGOSY has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while TGOSY trades at $33.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas TGOSY's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TGOSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to TGOSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs ARBFF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, ARBFF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while ARBFF trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas ARBFF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARBFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to ARBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs JELCF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, JELCF has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while JELCF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas JELCF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JELCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to JELCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs NKRKY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, NKRKY has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while NKRKY trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas NKRKY's P/E ratio is -25.21. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NKRKY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to NKRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs JEHLY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, JEHLY has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while JEHLY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas JEHLY's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JEHLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to JEHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs MBUMY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, MBUMY has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while MBUMY trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas MBUMY's P/E ratio is 29.52. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MBUMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to MBUMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs MBUMF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, MBUMF has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while MBUMF trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas MBUMF's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MBUMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to MBUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs GMPUF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, GMPUF has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while GMPUF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas GMPUF's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GMPUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to GMPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs UNIEF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, UNIEF has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while UNIEF trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas UNIEF's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UNIEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to UNIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs NTXVF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, NTXVF has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while NTXVF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas NTXVF's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NTXVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to NTXVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs GUDDY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, GUDDY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while GUDDY trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas GUDDY's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GUDDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to GUDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs FURCF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, FURCF has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while FURCF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas FURCF's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FURCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to FURCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs PASTF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, PASTF has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while PASTF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas PASTF's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PASTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to PASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs NIFCY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, NIFCY has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while NIFCY trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas NIFCY's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NIFCY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to NIFCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs NKRKF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, NKRKF has a market cap of 958.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while NKRKF trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas NKRKF's P/E ratio is -23.98. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NKRKF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to NKRKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs TIANF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, TIANF has a market cap of 939.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while TIANF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas TIANF's P/E ratio is 3.79. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TIANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to TIANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs GUDHF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, GUDHF has a market cap of 868.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while GUDHF trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas GUDHF's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GUDHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to GUDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs SFHLF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, SFHLF has a market cap of 847.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while SFHLF trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas SFHLF's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SFHLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to SFHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs ATNNF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, ATNNF has a market cap of 775.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while ATNNF trades at $133.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas ATNNF's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to ATNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs ABDDF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, ABDDF has a market cap of 757.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while ABDDF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas ABDDF's P/E ratio is 143.48. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ABDDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to ABDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs FAURY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, FAURY has a market cap of 623.92M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while FAURY trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas FAURY's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FAURY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to FAURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs FCVFF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, FCVFF has a market cap of 509.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while FCVFF trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas FCVFF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FCVFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to FCVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs NMAKF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, NMAKF has a market cap of 493.41M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while NMAKF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas NMAKF's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NMAKF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to NMAKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs MRETF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, MRETF has a market cap of 430.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while MRETF trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas MRETF's P/E ratio is -10.57. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MRETF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to MRETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs TCISF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, TCISF has a market cap of 419.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while TCISF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas TCISF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TCISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to TCISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs SAEOF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, SAEOF has a market cap of 401.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while SAEOF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas SAEOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SAEOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to SAEOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs VTSCY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, VTSCY has a market cap of 400.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while VTSCY trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas VTSCY's P/E ratio is 76.92. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VTSCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to VTSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs PWRHF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, PWRHF has a market cap of 371.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while PWRHF trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas PWRHF's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PWRHF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to PWRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs ELLRY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, ELLRY has a market cap of 361.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while ELLRY trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas ELLRY's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELLRY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to ELLRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs EGKLF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, EGKLF has a market cap of 302.70M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while EGKLF trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas EGKLF's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EGKLF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to EGKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs NPSGF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, NPSGF has a market cap of 294.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while NPSGF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas NPSGF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NPSGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to NPSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs NPSGY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, NPSGY has a market cap of 265.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while NPSGY trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas NPSGY's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NPSGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to NPSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs XNGIF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, XNGIF has a market cap of 244.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while XNGIF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas XNGIF's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to XNGIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to XNGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs IOCJY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, IOCJY has a market cap of 224.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while IOCJY trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas IOCJY's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IOCJY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to IOCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs WLMTF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, WLMTF has a market cap of 197.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while WLMTF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas WLMTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WLMTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to WLMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs EXCOF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, EXCOF has a market cap of 182.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while EXCOF trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas EXCOF's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EXCOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to EXCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs AKBIF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, AKBIF has a market cap of 181.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while AKBIF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas AKBIF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AKBIF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to AKBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs AMGRF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, AMGRF has a market cap of 162.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while AMGRF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas AMGRF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to AMGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs HWAFF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, HWAFF has a market cap of 158.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while HWAFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas HWAFF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HWAFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to HWAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs KGAUF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, KGAUF has a market cap of 148.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while KGAUF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas KGAUF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KGAUF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to KGAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs SCTH Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, SCTH has a market cap of 139.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while SCTH trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas SCTH's P/E ratio is -395.00. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCTH's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to SCTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs CAOHF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, CAOHF has a market cap of 61.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while CAOHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas CAOHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CAOHF's ROE of -14.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to CAOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs LEAT Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, LEAT has a market cap of 49.55M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while LEAT trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas LEAT's P/E ratio is -22.77. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to LEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs STSGF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, STSGF has a market cap of 38.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while STSGF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas STSGF's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STSGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to STSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs NWFAF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, NWFAF has a market cap of 37.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while NWFAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas NWFAF's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NWFAF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to NWFAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs VOAXF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, VOAXF has a market cap of 27.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while VOAXF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas VOAXF's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VOAXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to VOAXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs CREVF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, CREVF has a market cap of 23.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while CREVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas CREVF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CREVF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to CREVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs CCEGF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, CCEGF has a market cap of 20.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while CCEGF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas CCEGF's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCEGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to CCEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs CMMCF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, CMMCF has a market cap of 13.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while CMMCF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas CMMCF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMMCF's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to CMMCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs ATHHF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, ATHHF has a market cap of 4.74M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while ATHHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas ATHHF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATHHF's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to ATHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs UFMG Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, UFMG has a market cap of 4.49M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while UFMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas UFMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UFMG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to UFMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs AFFL Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, AFFL has a market cap of 4.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while AFFL trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas AFFL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AFFL's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to AFFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs OPTI Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, OPTI has a market cap of 3.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while OPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas OPTI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OPTI's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to OPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs AMTY Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, AMTY has a market cap of 3.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while AMTY trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas AMTY's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is less volatile compared to AMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs NFGRF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, NFGRF has a market cap of 3.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while NFGRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas NFGRF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NFGRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to NFGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs SPKTF Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, SPKTF has a market cap of 1.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while SPKTF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas SPKTF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPKTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to SPKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.
SCFLF vs CDTI Comparison
SCFLF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCFLF stands at 3.44B. In comparison, CDTI has a market cap of 1.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SCFLF is priced at $4.80, while CDTI trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCFLF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.60, whereas CDTI's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, SCFLF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CDTI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SCFLF is more volatile compared to CDTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCFLF.