SIG Group AG
SIG Group AG (SCBGF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SCBGF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCBGF | $17.10 | -9.44% | 6.5B | 28.50 | $0.60 | +3.51% |
| DSSMY | $30.00 | +14.90% | 41.5B | 37.04 | $0.81 | +3.38% |
| NPKLY | $21.00 | +84.21% | 34.7B | -2100.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| INPAP | $80.00 | +0.00% | 28.7B | N/A | N/A | +5.00% |
| SMFTF | $49.11 | N/A | 25.5B | 15.54 | $3.16 | N/A |
| SMFKY | $45.96 | -0.13% | 24.8B | 14.54 | $3.16 | N/A |
| AMCCF | $9.60 | +1.48% | 22.1B | 17.14 | $0.56 | +5.32% |
| DITHF | $7.22 | -3.86% | 10B | 36.10 | $0.20 | +3.27% |
| CCDBF | $56.10 | -1.36% | 9.9B | 16.06 | $3.53 | +1.54% |
| CCLLF | $52.88 | +0.00% | 9B | 15.07 | $3.51 | +1.63% |
Stock Comparison
SCBGF vs DSSMY Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, DSSMY has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while DSSMY trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas DSSMY's P/E ratio is 37.04. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DSSMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF is less volatile compared to DSSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBGF.Check DSSMY's competition here
SCBGF vs NPKLY Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, NPKLY has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while NPKLY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas NPKLY's P/E ratio is -2100.00. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NPKLY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF is less volatile compared to NPKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBGF.Check NPKLY's competition here
SCBGF vs INPAP Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, INPAP has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while INPAP trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas INPAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INPAP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF is less volatile compared to INPAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBGF.Check INPAP's competition here
SCBGF vs SMFTF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SMFTF has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while SMFTF trades at $49.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas SMFTF's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and SMFTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMFTF's competition here
SCBGF vs SMFKY Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SMFKY has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while SMFKY trades at $45.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas SMFKY's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SMFKY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF is less volatile compared to SMFKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBGF.Check SMFKY's competition here
SCBGF vs AMCCF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, AMCCF has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while AMCCF trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas AMCCF's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AMCCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and AMCCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMCCF's competition here
SCBGF vs DITHF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, DITHF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while DITHF trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas DITHF's P/E ratio is 36.10. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DITHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF is less volatile compared to DITHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBGF.Check DITHF's competition here
SCBGF vs CCDBF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CCDBF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while CCDBF trades at $56.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas CCDBF's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCDBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF is less volatile compared to CCDBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBGF.Check CCDBF's competition here
SCBGF vs CCLLF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CCLLF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while CCLLF trades at $52.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas CCLLF's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCLLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF is less volatile compared to CCLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBGF.Check CCLLF's competition here
SCBGF vs SIGCY Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SIGCY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while SIGCY trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas SIGCY's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SIGCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF is less volatile compared to SIGCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBGF.Check SIGCY's competition here
SCBGF vs VDRFF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, VDRFF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while VDRFF trades at $115.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas VDRFF's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VDRFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and VDRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VDRFF's competition here
SCBGF vs HOYFF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, HOYFF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while HOYFF trades at $35.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas HOYFF's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HOYFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and HOYFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HOYFF's competition here
SCBGF vs WIPKF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, WIPKF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while WIPKF trades at $29.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas WIPKF's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WIPKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF is less volatile compared to WIPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBGF.Check WIPKF's competition here
SCBGF vs ORRYY Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ORRYY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while ORRYY trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas ORRYY's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ORRYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF is less volatile compared to ORRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBGF.Check ORRYY's competition here
SCBGF vs ORRAF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ORRAF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while ORRAF trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas ORRAF's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ORRAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and ORRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ORRAF's competition here
SCBGF vs MNHFF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, MNHFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while MNHFF trades at $72.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas MNHFF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MNHFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF is less volatile compared to MNHFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBGF.Check MNHFF's competition here
SCBGF vs FUJSF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, FUJSF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while FUJSF trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas FUJSF's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUJSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF is less volatile compared to FUJSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBGF.Check FUJSF's competition here
SCBGF vs FRFTF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, FRFTF has a market cap of 926.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while FRFTF trades at $42.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas FRFTF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FRFTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF is less volatile compared to FRFTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBGF.Check FRFTF's competition here
SCBGF vs ELPKF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ELPKF has a market cap of 755.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while ELPKF trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas ELPKF's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELPKF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF is less volatile compared to ELPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBGF.Check ELPKF's competition here
SCBGF vs PCTGY Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, PCTGY has a market cap of 731M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while PCTGY trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas PCTGY's P/E ratio is 57.91. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PCTGY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and PCTGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCTGY's competition here
SCBGF vs CADNF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CADNF has a market cap of 668.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while CADNF trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas CADNF's P/E ratio is -220.00. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CADNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and CADNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CADNF's competition here
SCBGF vs GRVWF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, GRVWF has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while GRVWF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas GRVWF's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GRVWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and GRVWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRVWF's competition here
SCBGF vs JSPCF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, JSPCF has a market cap of 385.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while JSPCF trades at $14.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas JSPCF's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JSPCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and JSPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JSPCF's competition here
SCBGF vs HXGCF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, HXGCF has a market cap of 358.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while HXGCF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas HXGCF's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HXGCF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF is less volatile compared to HXGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBGF.Check HXGCF's competition here
SCBGF vs SNGSF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SNGSF has a market cap of 173.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while SNGSF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas SNGSF's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SNGSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and SNGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNGSF's competition here
SCBGF vs VKSC Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, VKSC has a market cap of 171.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while VKSC trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas VKSC's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VKSC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and VKSC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VKSC's competition here
SCBGF vs SUMXF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SUMXF has a market cap of 75.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while SUMXF trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas SUMXF's P/E ratio is -7.85. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SUMXF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and SUMXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUMXF's competition here
SCBGF vs IFLXF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, IFLXF has a market cap of 52.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while IFLXF trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas IFLXF's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IFLXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and IFLXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IFLXF's competition here
SCBGF vs YIKWF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, YIKWF has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while YIKWF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas YIKWF's P/E ratio is 2.30. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YIKWF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and YIKWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YIKWF's competition here
SCBGF vs SPQDF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SPQDF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while SPQDF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas SPQDF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPQDF's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF is less volatile compared to SPQDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBGF.Check SPQDF's competition here
SCBGF vs NEXNF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, NEXNF has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while NEXNF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas NEXNF's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NEXNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and NEXNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEXNF's competition here
SCBGF vs IDND Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, IDND has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while IDND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas IDND's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IDND's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF is less volatile compared to IDND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBGF.Check IDND's competition here
SCBGF vs MAYX Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, MAYX has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while MAYX trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas MAYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and MAYX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAYX's competition here
SCBGF vs RDVA Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, RDVA has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while RDVA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas RDVA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RDVA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF is less volatile compared to RDVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBGF.Check RDVA's competition here
SCBGF vs GDNPF Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, GDNPF has a market cap of 976K. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while GDNPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas GDNPF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GDNPF's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and GDNPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GDNPF's competition here
SCBGF vs SINC Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SINC has a market cap of 180.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while SINC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas SINC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SINC's ROE of +6.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and SINC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SINC's competition here
SCBGF vs EPTI Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, EPTI has a market cap of 134.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while EPTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas EPTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EPTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF is less volatile compared to EPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBGF.Check EPTI's competition here
SCBGF vs TZPC Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, TZPC has a market cap of 41.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while TZPC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas TZPC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TZPC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF is less volatile compared to TZPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBGF.Check TZPC's competition here
SCBGF vs ACGX Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ACGX has a market cap of 36.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while ACGX trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas ACGX's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACGX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and ACGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACGX's competition here
SCBGF vs PGOG Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, PGOG has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while PGOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas PGOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PGOG's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and PGOG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PGOG's competition here
SCBGF vs ACTX Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ACTX has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while ACTX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas ACTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and ACTX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACTX's competition here
SCBGF vs GPRC Comparison July 2025
SCBGF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCBGF stands at 6.5B. In comparison, GPRC has a market cap of 10. Regarding current trading prices, SCBGF is priced at $17.10, while GPRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCBGF currently has a P/E ratio of 28.50, whereas GPRC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCBGF's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GPRC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCBGF and GPRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GPRC's competition here