Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ)
Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget SCA (publ) SCABY Peers
See (SCABY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCABY | $14.30 | +0.00% | 9.2B | 26.00 | $0.55 | +2.06% |
| KLBAY | $6.99 | -4.12% | 22.4B | 66.91 | $0.11 | +5.62% |
| UPMMY | $28.66 | +5.10% | 15.1B | 42.82 | $0.67 | +6.06% |
| UPMKF | $26.69 | -4.10% | 14.1B | 40.44 | $0.66 | +6.07% |
| SVCBF | $13.13 | -1.61% | 9.2B | 23.87 | $0.55 | +2.28% |
| SEOAY | $11.32 | +5.06% | 9B | -75.20 | -$0.15 | +2.15% |
| MONDF | $18.53 | +5.14% | 8.2B | 9.70 | $1.91 | N/A |
| MONDY | $33.90 | +1.19% | 7.5B | 29.72 | $1.13 | +4.95% |
| SEOJF | $8.56 | +0.00% | 6.8B | -57.07 | -$0.15 | +3.02% |
| HLMNY | $21.25 | +0.00% | 6.1B | 25.91 | $0.82 | +1.62% |
Stock Comparison
SCABY vs KLBAY Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, KLBAY has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while KLBAY trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas KLBAY's P/E ratio is 66.91. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KLBAY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to KLBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs UPMMY Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, UPMMY has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while UPMMY trades at $28.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas UPMMY's P/E ratio is 42.82. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UPMMY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to UPMMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs UPMKF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, UPMKF has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while UPMKF trades at $26.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas UPMKF's P/E ratio is 40.44. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UPMKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to UPMKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs SVCBF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SVCBF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while SVCBF trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas SVCBF's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SVCBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to SVCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs SEOAY Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SEOAY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while SEOAY trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas SEOAY's P/E ratio is -75.20. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SEOAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to SEOAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs MONDF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MONDF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while MONDF trades at $18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas MONDF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MONDF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to MONDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs MONDY Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, MONDY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while MONDY trades at $33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas MONDY's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MONDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to MONDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs SEOJF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SEOJF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while SEOJF trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas SEOJF's P/E ratio is -57.07. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SEOJF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is less volatile compared to SEOJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs HLMNY Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, HLMNY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while HLMNY trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas HLMNY's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HLMNY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to HLMNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs OJIPF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, OJIPF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while OJIPF trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas OJIPF's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OJIPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is less volatile compared to OJIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs OJIPY Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, OJIPY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while OJIPY trades at $48.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas OJIPY's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OJIPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to OJIPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs STLJF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, STLJF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while STLJF trades at $57.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas STLJF's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STLJF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to STLJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs BLRDF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BLRDF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while BLRDF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas BLRDF's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BLRDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is less volatile compared to BLRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs POELF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, POELF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while POELF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas POELF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to POELF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is less volatile compared to POELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs NDGPY Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NDGPY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while NDGPY trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas NDGPY's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NDGPY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to NDGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs PIKQF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PIKQF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while PIKQF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas PIKQF's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PIKQF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is less volatile compared to PIKQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs NDGPF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NDGPF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while NDGPF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas NDGPF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NDGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to NDGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs CFPZF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CFPZF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while CFPZF trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas CFPZF's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CFPZF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to CFPZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs LMPMF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LMPMF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while LMPMF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas LMPMF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LMPMF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to LMPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs SPPJY Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SPPJY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while SPPJY trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas SPPJY's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SPPJY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to SPPJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs LMPMY Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, LMPMY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while LMPMY trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas LMPMY's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LMPMY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to LMPMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs NIJPF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, NIJPF has a market cap of 782.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while NIJPF trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas NIJPF's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NIJPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is less volatile compared to NIJPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs TKFTF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TKFTF has a market cap of 703.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while TKFTF trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas TKFTF's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TKFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to TKFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs IFSPF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, IFSPF has a market cap of 498.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while IFSPF trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas IFSPF's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IFSPF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to IFSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs PKNOF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, PKNOF has a market cap of 319.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while PKNOF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas PKNOF's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PKNOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to PKNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs ACAZF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ACAZF has a market cap of 234.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while ACAZF trades at $13.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas ACAZF's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACAZF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to ACAZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs ACSYF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ACSYF has a market cap of 201.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while ACSYF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas ACSYF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACSYF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is less volatile compared to ACSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs RTTNY Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, RTTNY has a market cap of 175.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while RTTNY trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas RTTNY's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RTTNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to RTTNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs RTERF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, RTERF has a market cap of 144.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while RTERF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas RTERF's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RTERF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to RTERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs WFSTF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, WFSTF has a market cap of 85.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while WFSTF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas WFSTF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WFSTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to WFSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs GFELF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, GFELF has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while GFELF trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas GFELF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GFELF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to GFELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs ICLTF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ICLTF has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while ICLTF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas ICLTF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ICLTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to ICLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs KEWL Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, KEWL has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while KEWL trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas KEWL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KEWL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to KEWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs RUBNF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, RUBNF has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while RUBNF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas RUBNF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RUBNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is less volatile compared to RUBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs CFPUF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CFPUF has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while CFPUF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas CFPUF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CFPUF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to CFPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs BRGSF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BRGSF has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while BRGSF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas BRGSF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BRGSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to BRGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs TCOR Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, TCOR has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while TCOR trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas TCOR's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TCOR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to TCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs SUPBF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SUPBF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while SUPBF trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas SUPBF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SUPBF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to SUPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs CFXTF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, CFXTF has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while CFXTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas CFXTF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CFXTF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is less volatile compared to CFXTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs WBNEF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, WBNEF has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while WBNEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas WBNEF's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WBNEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is less volatile compared to WBNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs SGTM Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SGTM has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while SGTM trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas SGTM's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGTM's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is less volatile compared to SGTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs BMSPF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BMSPF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while BMSPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas BMSPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BMSPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is less volatile compared to BMSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs HMTC Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, HMTC has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while HMTC trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas HMTC's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HMTC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to HMTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs BSTO Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BSTO has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while BSTO trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas BSTO's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BSTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to BSTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs SGMD Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, SGMD has a market cap of 6.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while SGMD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas SGMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGMD's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to SGMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs EXRG Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, EXRG has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while EXRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas EXRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EXRG's ROE of +2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is less volatile compared to EXRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs ZMGD Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, ZMGD has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while ZMGD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas ZMGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZMGD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is less volatile compared to ZMGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs BPMI Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, BPMI has a market cap of 617. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while BPMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas BPMI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BPMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to BPMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs VRDSF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, VRDSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while VRDSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas VRDSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VRDSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to VRDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs HAIPF Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, HAIPF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while HAIPF trades at $101.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas HAIPF's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HAIPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to HAIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.
SCABY vs KPCM Comparison
SCABY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SCABY stands at 9.2B. In comparison, KPCM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SCABY is priced at $14.30, while KPCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SCABY currently has a P/E ratio of 26.00, whereas KPCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCABY's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KPCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCABY is more volatile compared to KPCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCABY.