Splash Beverage Group, Inc.

SBEV-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBEV-WT stands at 4.3M. In comparison, BUD has a market cap of 132.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBEV-WT is priced at $0.02, while BUD trades at $67.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBEV-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BUD's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, SBEV-WT's ROE is +2.28%, compared to BUD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBEV-WT is more volatile compared to BUD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBEV-WT.

SBEV-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBEV-WT stands at 4.3M. In comparison, ABEV has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBEV-WT is priced at $0.02, while ABEV trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBEV-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABEV's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, SBEV-WT's ROE is +2.28%, compared to ABEV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBEV-WT is more volatile compared to ABEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBEV-WT.

SBEV-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBEV-WT stands at 4.3M. In comparison, FMX has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBEV-WT is priced at $0.02, while FMX trades at $100.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBEV-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMX's P/E ratio is 26.02. In terms of profitability, SBEV-WT's ROE is +2.28%, compared to FMX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBEV-WT is more volatile compared to FMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBEV-WT.

SBEV-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBEV-WT stands at 4.3M. In comparison, TAP-A has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBEV-WT is priced at $0.02, while TAP-A trades at $54.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBEV-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAP-A's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, SBEV-WT's ROE is +2.28%, compared to TAP-A's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBEV-WT is more volatile compared to TAP-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBEV-WT.

SBEV-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBEV-WT stands at 4.3M. In comparison, TAP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBEV-WT is priced at $0.02, while TAP trades at $50.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBEV-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAP's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, SBEV-WT's ROE is +2.28%, compared to TAP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBEV-WT is more volatile compared to TAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBEV-WT.

SBEV-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBEV-WT stands at 4.3M. In comparison, CCU has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBEV-WT is priced at $0.02, while CCU trades at $12.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBEV-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCU's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, SBEV-WT's ROE is +2.28%, compared to CCU's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBEV-WT is more volatile compared to CCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBEV-WT.

SBEV-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBEV-WT stands at 4.3M. In comparison, SAM has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBEV-WT is priced at $0.02, while SAM trades at $194.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBEV-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAM's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, SBEV-WT's ROE is +2.28%, compared to SAM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBEV-WT is more volatile compared to SAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBEV-WT.

SBEV-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBEV-WT stands at 4.3M. In comparison, CASK has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, SBEV-WT is priced at $0.02, while CASK trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBEV-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CASK's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, SBEV-WT's ROE is +2.28%, compared to CASK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SBEV-WT is less volatile compared to CASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBEV-WT.

SBEV-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBEV-WT stands at 4.3M. In comparison, IBG has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBEV-WT is priced at $0.02, while IBG trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBEV-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBG's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, SBEV-WT's ROE is +2.28%, compared to IBG's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SBEV-WT is less volatile compared to IBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBEV-WT.

SBEV-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBEV-WT stands at 4.3M. In comparison, SBEV has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBEV-WT is priced at $0.02, while SBEV trades at $3.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBEV-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SBEV's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, SBEV-WT's ROE is +2.28%, compared to SBEV's ROE of +2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SBEV-WT is less volatile compared to SBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBEV-WT.

SBEV-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBEV-WT stands at 4.3M. In comparison, YHC has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SBEV-WT is priced at $0.02, while YHC trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBEV-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YHC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SBEV-WT's ROE is +2.28%, compared to YHC's ROE of -3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SBEV-WT is less volatile compared to YHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBEV-WT.