Sato Holdings Corporation

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, ERIXF has a market cap of 27.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while ERIXF trades at $8.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas ERIXF's P/E ratio is 167.50. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ERIXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and ERIXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, NOKBF has a market cap of 26.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while NOKBF trades at $5.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas NOKBF's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NOKBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to NOKBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, ZTCOF has a market cap of 20.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while ZTCOF trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas ZTCOF's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ZTCOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and ZTCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, AACAY has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while AACAY trades at $5.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas AACAY's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AACAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to AACAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, AACAF has a market cap of 5.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while AACAF trades at $4.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas AACAF's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AACAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to AACAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, YZOFF has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while YZOFF trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas YZOFF's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to YZOFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to YZOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, ETCMY has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while ETCMY trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas ETCMY's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ETCMY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to ETCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, HMNKF has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while HMNKF trades at $36.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas HMNKF's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HMNKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and HMNKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, VTKLY has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while VTKLY trades at $7.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas VTKLY's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VTKLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to VTKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, VTKLF has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while VTKLF trades at $5.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas VTKLF's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VTKLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to VTKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, ADVOF has a market cap of 1.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while ADVOF trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas ADVOF's P/E ratio is -40.88. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ADVOF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to ADVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, EUTLF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while EUTLF trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas EUTLF's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EUTLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to EUTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, HTCKF has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while HTCKF trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas HTCKF's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HTCKF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and HTCKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, UBLXF has a market cap of 793.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while UBLXF trades at $105.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas UBLXF's P/E ratio is -7.21. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UBLXF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and UBLXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, FXCNY has a market cap of 764.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while FXCNY trades at $1.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas FXCNY's P/E ratio is -38.80. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FXCNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and FXCNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, COBJF has a market cap of 702.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while COBJF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas COBJF's P/E ratio is -7.59. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to COBJF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to COBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, EVTZF has a market cap of 633.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while EVTZF trades at $8.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas EVTZF's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EVTZF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to EVTZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, FXCNF has a market cap of 630.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while FXCNF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas FXCNF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FXCNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to FXCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, OKIEF has a market cap of 577.92M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while OKIEF trades at $6.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas OKIEF's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OKIEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to OKIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, OKIEY has a market cap of 528.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while OKIEY trades at $6.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas OKIEY's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OKIEY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to OKIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, EVSBY has a market cap of 526.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while EVSBY trades at $9.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas EVSBY's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EVSBY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and EVSBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, FLTCF has a market cap of 348.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while FLTCF trades at $1.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas FLTCF's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FLTCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and FLTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, PAOTF has a market cap of 245.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while PAOTF trades at $8.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas PAOTF's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PAOTF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and PAOTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, VNWTF has a market cap of 179.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while VNWTF trades at $7.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas VNWTF's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VNWTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and VNWTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, QTRHF has a market cap of 128.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while QTRHF trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas QTRHF's P/E ratio is -11.10. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to QTRHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to QTRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, ATSKF has a market cap of 93.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while ATSKF trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas ATSKF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ATSKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to ATSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, NPNZF has a market cap of 91.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while NPNZF trades at $8.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas NPNZF's P/E ratio is -11.23. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NPNZF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and NPNZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, ELSLF has a market cap of 48.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while ELSLF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas ELSLF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ELSLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and ELSLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, SIMTF has a market cap of 45.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while SIMTF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas SIMTF's P/E ratio is 1.05. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SIMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to SIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, BEWFF has a market cap of 44.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while BEWFF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas BEWFF's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BEWFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to BEWFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, ASROF has a market cap of 36.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while ASROF trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas ASROF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ASROF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and ASROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, BYLTF has a market cap of 30.83M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while BYLTF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas BYLTF's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BYLTF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to BYLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, CYSNF has a market cap of 30.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while CYSNF trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas CYSNF's P/E ratio is -71.54. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CYSNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and CYSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, WSTL has a market cap of 21.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while WSTL trades at $1.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas WSTL's P/E ratio is -8.97. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WSTL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to WSTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, MILOF has a market cap of 12.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while MILOF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas MILOF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MILOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and MILOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, KPIFF has a market cap of 9.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while KPIFF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas KPIFF's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KPIFF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to KPIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, CYCA has a market cap of 9.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while CYCA trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas CYCA's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CYCA's ROE of +5.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to CYCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, ATGN has a market cap of 8.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while ATGN trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas ATGN's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ATGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to ATGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, ENAFF has a market cap of 7.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while ENAFF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas ENAFF's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ENAFF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to ENAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, LTCCF has a market cap of 6.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while LTCCF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas LTCCF's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LTCCF's ROE of +8.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and LTCCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, VMNT has a market cap of 5.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while VMNT trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas VMNT's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VMNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to VMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, MOYFF has a market cap of 5.07M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while MOYFF trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas MOYFF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MOYFF's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to MOYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, HPNN has a market cap of 4.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while HPNN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas HPNN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HPNN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and HPNN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, ISEYF has a market cap of 4.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while ISEYF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas ISEYF's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ISEYF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to ISEYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, STRH has a market cap of 3.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while STRH trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas STRH's P/E ratio is -6.76. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STRH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to STRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, TTLTF has a market cap of 3.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while TTLTF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas TTLTF's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TTLTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to TTLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, WLAN has a market cap of 2.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while WLAN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas WLAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WLAN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to WLAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, NRRWF has a market cap of 1.92M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while NRRWF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas NRRWF's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NRRWF's ROE of -8.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to NRRWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, NVRVF has a market cap of 1.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while NVRVF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas NVRVF's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NVRVF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and NVRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, TPTW has a market cap of 1.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while TPTW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas TPTW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TPTW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and TPTW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, LMGR has a market cap of 1.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while LMGR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas LMGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LMGR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to LMGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, CNTFY has a market cap of 1.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while CNTFY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas CNTFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CNTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and CNTFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, MFCO has a market cap of 928440.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while MFCO trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas MFCO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MFCO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to MFCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, BDRL has a market cap of 668425.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while BDRL trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas BDRL's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BDRL's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and BDRL have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, MLRT has a market cap of 561892.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while MLRT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas MLRT's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MLRT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to MLRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, ELST has a market cap of 494650.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while ELST trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas ELST's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ELST's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to ELST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, ATCLF has a market cap of 493528.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while ATCLF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas ATCLF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ATCLF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to ATCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, VCTY has a market cap of 479580.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while VCTY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas VCTY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VCTY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to VCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, CRMK has a market cap of 441374.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while CRMK trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas CRMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRMK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to CRMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, AXBSF has a market cap of 425865.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while AXBSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas AXBSF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AXBSF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to AXBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, BKSD has a market cap of 273869.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while BKSD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas BKSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BKSD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and BKSD have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, WGNR has a market cap of 241609.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while WGNR trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas WGNR's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WGNR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to WGNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, CAMPQ has a market cap of 120572.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while CAMPQ trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas CAMPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CAMPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to CAMPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, AAPJ has a market cap of 88994.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while AAPJ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas AAPJ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AAPJ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and AAPJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, ERFB has a market cap of 84128.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while ERFB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas ERFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ERFB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and ERFB have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, PDXP has a market cap of 81715.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while PDXP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas PDXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PDXP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to PDXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, EZEN has a market cap of 72600.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while EZEN trades at $3,300.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas EZEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EZEN's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SATOF has daily volatility of 0.00 and EZEN has daily volatility of N/A.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, PMOZ has a market cap of 68195.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while PMOZ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas PMOZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PMOZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and PMOZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, CRLI has a market cap of 60539.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while CRLI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas CRLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and CRLI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, ETCIA has a market cap of 55198.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while ETCIA trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas ETCIA's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ETCIA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and ETCIA have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, IPTK has a market cap of 28651.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while IPTK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas IPTK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IPTK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to IPTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, FBCE has a market cap of 9988.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while FBCE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas FBCE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FBCE's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to FBCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, OTOW has a market cap of 8778.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while OTOW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas OTOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OTOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and OTOW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, UTRK has a market cap of 5912.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while UTRK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas UTRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UTRK's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to UTRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, LTTC has a market cap of 4788.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while LTTC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas LTTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LTTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to LTTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, JUMT has a market cap of 4647.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while JUMT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas JUMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JUMT's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to JUMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, AVSR has a market cap of 4086.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while AVSR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas AVSR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AVSR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and AVSR have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, MPEG has a market cap of 3799.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while MPEG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas MPEG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MPEG's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to MPEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, WIRX has a market cap of 3500.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while WIRX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas WIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WIRX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to WIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, CYBD has a market cap of 3353.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while CYBD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas CYBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CYBD's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and CYBD have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, VRCM has a market cap of 2980.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while VRCM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas VRCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VRCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to VRCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, IZNN has a market cap of 2468.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while IZNN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas IZNN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IZNN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to IZNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, PRXM has a market cap of 2386.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while PRXM trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas PRXM's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PRXM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and PRXM have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, RPDT has a market cap of 2170.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while RPDT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas RPDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RPDT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to RPDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, XCOMQ has a market cap of 1722.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while XCOMQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas XCOMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to XCOMQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to XCOMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, RITT has a market cap of 1554.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while RITT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas RITT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RITT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to RITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, ZSTN has a market cap of 1160.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while ZSTN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas ZSTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ZSTN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to ZSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, ABILF has a market cap of 799.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while ABILF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas ABILF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ABILF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and ABILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, GNRD has a market cap of 353.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while GNRD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas GNRD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GNRD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and GNRD have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, ZTNO has a market cap of 301.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while ZTNO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas ZTNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ZTNO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to ZTNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, ORSX has a market cap of 300.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while ORSX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas ORSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ORSX's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to ORSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, TCCO has a market cap of 185.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while TCCO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas TCCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TCCO's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and TCCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, HDIH has a market cap of 45.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while HDIH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas HDIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HDIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and HDIH have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, LMSC has a market cap of 31.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while LMSC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas LMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LMSC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and LMSC have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, STCI has a market cap of 20.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while STCI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas STCI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF and STCI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

SATOF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SATOF stands at 465.20M. In comparison, BETW has a market cap of 3.00. Regarding current trading prices, SATOF is priced at $14.33, while BETW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SATOF currently has a P/E ratio of 10.61, whereas BETW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SATOF's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BETW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SATOF is less volatile compared to BETW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATOF.