CI MSCI USA Low Risk Weighted ETF (CAD Hedged) Common
CI MSCI USA Low Risk Weighted ETF (CAD Hedged) Common (RWU.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RWU.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RWU.TO | CA$20.96 | -0.43% | 12.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IGAF.TO | CA$15.50 | -1.84% | 3.4B | N/A | N/A | +0.86% |
| TEC.TO | CA$48.15 | +0.99% | 3.2B | 37.78 | CA$1.27 | +0.11% |
| XGD.TO | CA$34.57 | +7.96% | 2B | 23.07 | CA$1.50 | +0.75% |
| TGED.TO | CA$28.12 | +0.68% | 1.2B | 31.64 | CA$0.89 | +3.50% |
| DXG.TO | CA$73.58 | +0.88% | 759M | 32.90 | CA$2.24 | +11.26% |
| CIF.TO | CA$54.46 | +1.83% | 706.7M | 14.56 | CA$3.74 | +2.90% |
| FSF.TO | CA$32.98 | -2.08% | 601M | N/A | N/A | +1.25% |
| XDG.TO | CA$27.94 | +0.98% | 487.5M | 17.54 | CA$1.59 | +3.04% |
| XHC.TO | CA$61.82 | +0.90% | 477M | 23.72 | CA$2.61 | +4.71% |
Stock Comparison
RWU.TO vs IGAF.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, IGAF.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while IGAF.TO trades at CA$15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGAF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to IGAF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and IGAF.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IGAF.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs TEC.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, TEC.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while TEC.TO trades at CA$48.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEC.TO's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to TEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check TEC.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs XGD.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, XGD.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while XGD.TO trades at CA$34.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGD.TO's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to XGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check XGD.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs TGED.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, TGED.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while TGED.TO trades at CA$28.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGED.TO's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TGED.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to TGED.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check TGED.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs DXG.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, DXG.TO has a market cap of 759M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while DXG.TO trades at CA$73.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXG.TO's P/E ratio is 32.90. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to DXG.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to DXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check DXG.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs CIF.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, CIF.TO has a market cap of 706.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while CIF.TO trades at CA$54.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIF.TO's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to CIF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check CIF.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs FSF.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, FSF.TO has a market cap of 601M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while FSF.TO trades at CA$32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to FSF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to FSF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check FSF.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs XDG.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, XDG.TO has a market cap of 487.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while XDG.TO trades at CA$27.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDG.TO's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XDG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to XDG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check XDG.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs XHC.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, XHC.TO has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while XHC.TO trades at CA$61.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XHC.TO's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XHC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to XHC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check XHC.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs CINF.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, CINF.TO has a market cap of 457.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while CINF.TO trades at CA$29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CINF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CINF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to CINF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check CINF.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs TQGD.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, TQGD.TO has a market cap of 416.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while TQGD.TO trades at CA$21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TQGD.TO's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TQGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to TQGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check TQGD.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs 0P0001ED1S.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, 0P0001ED1S.TO has a market cap of 323.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while 0P0001ED1S.TO trades at CA$13.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001ED1S.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P0001ED1S.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and 0P0001ED1S.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P0001ED1S.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs CWW.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, CWW.TO has a market cap of 306.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while CWW.TO trades at CA$63.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWW.TO's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CWW.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to CWW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check CWW.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs ZWG.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, ZWG.TO has a market cap of 276.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while ZWG.TO trades at CA$30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZWG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZWG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to ZWG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check ZWG.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs COW.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, COW.TO has a market cap of 256.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while COW.TO trades at CA$68.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COW.TO's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to COW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to COW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check COW.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs VMO.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, VMO.TO has a market cap of 235.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while VMO.TO trades at CA$70.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VMO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to VMO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check VMO.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs CGR.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, CGR.TO has a market cap of 230.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while CGR.TO trades at CA$30.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGR.TO's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CGR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to CGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check CGR.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs 0P0001ODDT.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, 0P0001ODDT.TO has a market cap of 229.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while 0P0001ODDT.TO trades at CA$23.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001ODDT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P0001ODDT.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and 0P0001ODDT.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P0001ODDT.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs GDV.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, GDV.TO has a market cap of 176.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while GDV.TO trades at CA$11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDV.TO's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to GDV.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to GDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check GDV.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs LIFE.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, LIFE.TO has a market cap of 172.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while LIFE.TO trades at CA$18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIFE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to LIFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to LIFE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check LIFE.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs CYH.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, CYH.TO has a market cap of 153.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while CYH.TO trades at CA$23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYH.TO's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CYH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to CYH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check CYH.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs ZGD.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, ZGD.TO has a market cap of 135.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while ZGD.TO trades at CA$166.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZGD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZGD.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to ZGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check ZGD.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs XGI.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, XGI.TO has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while XGI.TO trades at CA$60.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGI.TO's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XGI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to XGI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check XGI.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs CGLO.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, CGLO.TO has a market cap of 120.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while CGLO.TO trades at CA$30.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGLO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CGLO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to CGLO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check CGLO.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs XDGH.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, XDGH.TO has a market cap of 99.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while XDGH.TO trades at CA$27.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDGH.TO's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XDGH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to XDGH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check XDGH.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs PMNT.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, PMNT.TO has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while PMNT.TO trades at CA$18.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMNT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PMNT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and PMNT.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PMNT.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs XMY.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, XMY.TO has a market cap of 95.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while XMY.TO trades at CA$32.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMY.TO's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XMY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to XMY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check XMY.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs TGRE.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, TGRE.TO has a market cap of 84.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while TGRE.TO trades at CA$14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGRE.TO's P/E ratio is 26.24. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TGRE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to TGRE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check TGRE.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs XCD.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, XCD.TO has a market cap of 69.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while XCD.TO trades at CA$58.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCD.TO's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XCD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to XCD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check XCD.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs LONG.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, LONG.TO has a market cap of 63.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while LONG.TO trades at CA$36.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LONG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to LONG.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and LONG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LONG.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs ONEQ.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, ONEQ.TO has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while ONEQ.TO trades at CA$46.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONEQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ONEQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to ONEQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check ONEQ.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs 0P0001NDFE.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, 0P0001NDFE.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while 0P0001NDFE.TO trades at CA$13.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001NDFE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P0001NDFE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and 0P0001NDFE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P0001NDFE.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs GIQG.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, GIQG.TO has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while GIQG.TO trades at CA$30.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIQG.TO's P/E ratio is 33.52. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to GIQG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and GIQG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GIQG.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs ESGG.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, ESGG.TO has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while ESGG.TO trades at CA$52.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ESGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to ESGG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check ESGG.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs TGGR.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, TGGR.TO has a market cap of 39.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while TGGR.TO trades at CA$27.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGGR.TO's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TGGR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to TGGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check TGGR.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs VVO.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, VVO.TO has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while VVO.TO trades at CA$39.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VVO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VVO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to VVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check VVO.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs DXN.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, DXN.TO has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while DXN.TO trades at CA$23.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to DXN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to DXN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check DXN.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs HGGG.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, HGGG.TO has a market cap of 27M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while HGGG.TO trades at CA$53.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGGG.TO's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to HGGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and HGGG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HGGG.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs ZMT.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, ZMT.TO has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while ZMT.TO trades at CA$74.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZMT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and ZMT.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZMT.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs 0P0001N8LS.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, 0P0001N8LS.TO has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while 0P0001N8LS.TO trades at CA$38.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001N8LS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to 0P0001N8LS.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and 0P0001N8LS.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 0P0001N8LS.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs VAH.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, VAH.TO has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while VAH.TO trades at CA$28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VAH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to VAH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check VAH.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs PINV.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, PINV.TO has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while PINV.TO trades at CA$23.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PINV.TO's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PINV.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and PINV.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PINV.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs MIVG.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, MIVG.TO has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while MIVG.TO trades at CA$37.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIVG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to MIVG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to MIVG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check MIVG.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs CGAA.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, CGAA.TO has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while CGAA.TO trades at CA$28.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGAA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CGAA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to CGAA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check CGAA.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs VLQ.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, VLQ.TO has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while VLQ.TO trades at CA$32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VLQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and VLQ.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLQ.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs FLGD.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, FLGD.TO has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while FLGD.TO trades at CA$29.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLGD.TO's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to FLGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and FLGD.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLGD.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs RIG.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, RIG.TO has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while RIG.TO trades at CA$18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to RIG.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and RIG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RIG.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs HRA.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, HRA.TO has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while HRA.TO trades at CA$10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to HRA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to HRA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check HRA.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs SOL.CN Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, SOL.CN has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while SOL.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to SOL.CN's ROE of +8.78%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to SOL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check SOL.CN's competition here
RWU.TO vs RLD.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, RLD.TO has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while RLD.TO trades at CA$24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to RLD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and RLD.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RLD.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs EATS.CN Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, EATS.CN has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while EATS.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EATS.CN's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to EATS.CN's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to EATS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check EATS.CN's competition here
RWU.TO vs SHZ.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, SHZ.TO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while SHZ.TO trades at CA$7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHZ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to SHZ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and SHZ.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHZ.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs DFD.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, DFD.TO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while DFD.TO trades at CA$21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to DFD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and DFD.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DFD.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs HLTH.CN Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, HLTH.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while HLTH.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to HLTH.CN's ROE of -140.65%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and HLTH.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLTH.CN's competition here
RWU.TO vs DFE.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, DFE.TO has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while DFE.TO trades at CA$17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to DFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and DFE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DFE.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs RLE.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, RLE.TO has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while RLE.TO trades at CA$28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to RLE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO is less volatile compared to RLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWU.TO.Check RLE.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs HGM.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, HGM.TO has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while HGM.TO trades at CA$11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to HGM.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and HGM.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HGM.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs PSY.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, PSY.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while PSY.TO trades at CA$30.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSY.TO's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PSY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and PSY.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSY.TO's competition here
RWU.TO vs PXG.TO Comparison August 2025
RWU.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWU.TO stands at 12.2M. In comparison, PXG.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RWU.TO is priced at CA$20.96, while PXG.TO trades at CA$28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXG.TO's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, RWU.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PXG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWU.TO and PXG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PXG.TO's competition here