Russel Metals Inc.
Russel Metals Inc. (RUSMF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RUSMF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Distribution Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSMF | $33.81 | -1.46% | 1.9B | 15.65 | $2.16 | +3.68% |
| TMTNF | $143.38 | +3.86% | 11.7B | 32.89 | $4.36 | +1.07% |
| IDDWF | $26.45 | +0.00% | 9.6B | 34.35 | $0.77 | +1.12% |
| FINGF | $61.80 | +0.02% | 8.1B | 21.91 | $2.82 | +1.41% |
| ADRZY | $14.83 | +8.41% | 7.3B | 13.73 | $1.08 | +2.58% |
| ADRZF | $67.22 | +0.00% | 6.6B | 12.29 | $5.47 | +3.34% |
| REECF | $7.10 | +0.00% | 4.4B | 21.52 | $0.33 | +1.64% |
| EENEF | $9.18 | +0.00% | 4.3B | 20.40 | $0.45 | +3.30% |
| GROUF | $12.74 | +0.00% | 2.5B | 11.69 | $1.09 | +3.93% |
| HDIUF | $24.15 | +0.00% | 585.5M | 8.91 | $2.71 | +1.82% |
Stock Comparison
RUSMF vs TMTNF Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TMTNF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while TMTNF trades at $143.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas TMTNF's P/E ratio is 32.89. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TMTNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is more volatile compared to TMTNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check TMTNF's competition here
RUSMF vs IDDWF Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IDDWF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while IDDWF trades at $26.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas IDDWF's P/E ratio is 34.35. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDDWF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is less volatile compared to IDDWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check IDDWF's competition here
RUSMF vs FINGF Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FINGF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while FINGF trades at $61.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas FINGF's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FINGF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is less volatile compared to FINGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check FINGF's competition here
RUSMF vs ADRZY Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ADRZY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while ADRZY trades at $14.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas ADRZY's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADRZY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is less volatile compared to ADRZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check ADRZY's competition here
RUSMF vs ADRZF Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ADRZF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while ADRZF trades at $67.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas ADRZF's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADRZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is more volatile compared to ADRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check ADRZF's competition here
RUSMF vs REECF Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, REECF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while REECF trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas REECF's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REECF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is less volatile compared to REECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check REECF's competition here
RUSMF vs EENEF Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EENEF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while EENEF trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas EENEF's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EENEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is less volatile compared to EENEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check EENEF's competition here
RUSMF vs GROUF Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GROUF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while GROUF trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas GROUF's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GROUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is more volatile compared to GROUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check GROUF's competition here
RUSMF vs HDIUF Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HDIUF has a market cap of 585.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while HDIUF trades at $24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas HDIUF's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HDIUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is more volatile compared to HDIUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check HDIUF's competition here
RUSMF vs WJXFF Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WJXFF has a market cap of 512.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while WJXFF trades at $23.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas WJXFF's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WJXFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is less volatile compared to WJXFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check WJXFF's competition here
RUSMF vs PRKCF Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PRKCF has a market cap of 112.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while PRKCF trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas PRKCF's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRKCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is more volatile compared to PRKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check PRKCF's competition here
RUSMF vs KHDHF Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KHDHF has a market cap of 94.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while KHDHF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas KHDHF's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KHDHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is more volatile compared to KHDHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check KHDHF's competition here
RUSMF vs CVTYF Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CVTYF has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while CVTYF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas CVTYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVTYF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is more volatile compared to CVTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check CVTYF's competition here
RUSMF vs HPURF Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HPURF has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while HPURF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas HPURF's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HPURF's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is less volatile compared to HPURF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check HPURF's competition here
RUSMF vs EMPS Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EMPS has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while EMPS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas EMPS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EMPS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is more volatile compared to EMPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check EMPS's competition here
RUSMF vs VVWT Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VVWT has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while VVWT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas VVWT's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VVWT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is less volatile compared to VVWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check VVWT's competition here
RUSMF vs TXHG Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TXHG has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while TXHG trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas TXHG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TXHG's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is less volatile compared to TXHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check TXHG's competition here
RUSMF vs GYOG Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GYOG has a market cap of 150.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while GYOG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas GYOG's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GYOG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is more volatile compared to GYOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check GYOG's competition here
RUSMF vs CDIIQ Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CDIIQ has a market cap of 9.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while CDIIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas CDIIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDIIQ's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is less volatile compared to CDIIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check CDIIQ's competition here
RUSMF vs MJHI Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MJHI has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while MJHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas MJHI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MJHI's ROE of -88.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is more volatile compared to MJHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check MJHI's competition here
RUSMF vs WARM Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WARM has a market cap of 8.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while WARM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas WARM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WARM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is less volatile compared to WARM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check WARM's competition here
RUSMF vs PHOT Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PHOT has a market cap of 5.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while PHOT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas PHOT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PHOT's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is more volatile compared to PHOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check PHOT's competition here
RUSMF vs UMAM Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, UMAM has a market cap of 5.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while UMAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas UMAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UMAM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is more volatile compared to UMAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check UMAM's competition here
RUSMF vs ORGH Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ORGH has a market cap of 4.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while ORGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas ORGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORGH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is less volatile compared to ORGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check ORGH's competition here
RUSMF vs PUDA Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PUDA has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while PUDA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas PUDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PUDA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is more volatile compared to PUDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check PUDA's competition here
RUSMF vs VALV Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VALV has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while VALV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas VALV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VALV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is more volatile compared to VALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check VALV's competition here
RUSMF vs SLUP Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SLUP has a market cap of 548. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while SLUP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas SLUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SLUP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is less volatile compared to SLUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check SLUP's competition here
RUSMF vs CGDI Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CGDI has a market cap of 66. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while CGDI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas CGDI's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CGDI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is more volatile compared to CGDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check CGDI's competition here
RUSMF vs HESV Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HESV has a market cap of 17. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while HESV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas HESV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HESV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is more volatile compared to HESV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check HESV's competition here
RUSMF vs ZAHA Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZAHA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while ZAHA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas ZAHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZAHA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is more volatile compared to ZAHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check ZAHA's competition here
RUSMF vs WPMLF Comparison April 2026
RUSMF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUSMF stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WPMLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RUSMF is priced at $33.81, while WPMLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUSMF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.65, whereas WPMLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUSMF's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WPMLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUSMF is less volatile compared to WPMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUSMF.Check WPMLF's competition here