Rubfila International Limited
Rubfila International Limited (RUBFILA.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RUBFILA.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Specialties Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUBFILA.BO | ₹68.49 | +0.87% | 3.7B | 11.92 | ₹5.70 | +2.94% |
| KAMAHOLD.BO | ₹2,630.00 | -4.18% | 86.9B | 9.64 | ₹281.05 | +1.33% |
| ELANTAS.BO | ₹9,050.00 | -2.19% | 72.8B | 52.78 | ₹173.95 | +0.08% |
| INDOKEM.BO | ₹553.55 | -9.51% | 16.2B | 306.66 | ₹1.90 | N/A |
| TINNARUBR.BO | ₹711.95 | -5.92% | 13.4B | 27.24 | ₹27.24 | +0.54% |
| JYOTIRES.BO | ₹834.85 | +0.36% | 10.3B | 14.69 | ₹58.56 | +1.05% |
| VIPULORG.BO | ₹208.00 | -0.76% | 3.7B | 62.74 | ₹3.29 | +0.39% |
| KELENRG.BO | ₹3,298.95 | +1.99% | 3.3B | 12.16 | ₹271.06 | +0.05% |
| INNOVATORS.BO | ₹166.50 | -6.93% | 3.2B | 24.60 | ₹6.85 | N/A |
| MULTIBASE.BO | ₹208.10 | -3.16% | 2.7B | 23.26 | ₹9.19 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RUBFILA.BO vs KAMAHOLD.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, KAMAHOLD.BO has a market cap of 86.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while KAMAHOLD.BO trades at ₹2,630.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas KAMAHOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KAMAHOLD.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to KAMAHOLD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check KAMAHOLD.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs ELANTAS.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ELANTAS.BO has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while ELANTAS.BO trades at ₹9,050.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas ELANTAS.BO's P/E ratio is 52.78. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELANTAS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to ELANTAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check ELANTAS.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs INDOKEM.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, INDOKEM.BO has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while INDOKEM.BO trades at ₹553.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas INDOKEM.BO's P/E ratio is 306.66. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDOKEM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to INDOKEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check INDOKEM.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs TINNARUBR.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, TINNARUBR.BO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while TINNARUBR.BO trades at ₹711.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas TINNARUBR.BO's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TINNARUBR.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to TINNARUBR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check TINNARUBR.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs JYOTIRES.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, JYOTIRES.BO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while JYOTIRES.BO trades at ₹834.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas JYOTIRES.BO's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JYOTIRES.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to JYOTIRES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check JYOTIRES.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs VIPULORG.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VIPULORG.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while VIPULORG.BO trades at ₹208.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas VIPULORG.BO's P/E ratio is 62.74. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VIPULORG.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to VIPULORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check VIPULORG.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs KELENRG.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, KELENRG.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while KELENRG.BO trades at ₹3,298.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas KELENRG.BO's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KELENRG.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to KELENRG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check KELENRG.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs INNOVATORS.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, INNOVATORS.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while INNOVATORS.BO trades at ₹166.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas INNOVATORS.BO's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INNOVATORS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to INNOVATORS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check INNOVATORS.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs MULTIBASE.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MULTIBASE.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while MULTIBASE.BO trades at ₹208.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas MULTIBASE.BO's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MULTIBASE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to MULTIBASE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check MULTIBASE.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs NIKHILAD.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NIKHILAD.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while NIKHILAD.BO trades at ₹61.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas NIKHILAD.BO's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NIKHILAD.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to NIKHILAD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check NIKHILAD.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs KESARPE.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, KESARPE.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while KESARPE.BO trades at ₹21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas KESARPE.BO's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KESARPE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to KESARPE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check KESARPE.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs WAAREE.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, WAAREE.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while WAAREE.BO trades at ₹164.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas WAAREE.BO's P/E ratio is -37.41. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WAAREE.BO's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to WAAREE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check WAAREE.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs HINDADH.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, HINDADH.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while HINDADH.BO trades at ₹290.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas HINDADH.BO's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HINDADH.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to HINDADH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check HINDADH.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs BRIGHTBR.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BRIGHTBR.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while BRIGHTBR.BO trades at ₹221.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas BRIGHTBR.BO's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRIGHTBR.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to BRIGHTBR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check BRIGHTBR.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs DHINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, DHINDIA.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while DHINDIA.BO trades at ₹135.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas DHINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DHINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to DHINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check DHINDIA.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs CDG.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CDG.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while CDG.BO trades at ₹108.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas CDG.BO's P/E ratio is 67.74. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDG.BO's ROE of +10.66%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to CDG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check CDG.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs GMPL.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GMPL.BO has a market cap of 928.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while GMPL.BO trades at ₹64.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas GMPL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GMPL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to GMPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check GMPL.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs RETINA.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RETINA.BO has a market cap of 915M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while RETINA.BO trades at ₹55.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas RETINA.BO's P/E ratio is 81.71. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RETINA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to RETINA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check RETINA.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs HARDCAS.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, HARDCAS.BO has a market cap of 591.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while HARDCAS.BO trades at ₹686.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas HARDCAS.BO's P/E ratio is 15.57. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HARDCAS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to HARDCAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check HARDCAS.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs SHREYASI.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SHREYASI.BO has a market cap of 505.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while SHREYASI.BO trades at ₹7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas SHREYASI.BO's P/E ratio is -41.94. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHREYASI.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to SHREYASI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check SHREYASI.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs MMRUBBR-B.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MMRUBBR-B.BO has a market cap of 458M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while MMRUBBR-B.BO trades at ₹73.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas MMRUBBR-B.BO's P/E ratio is -31.68. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MMRUBBR-B.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to MMRUBBR-B.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check MMRUBBR-B.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs AXELPOLY.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AXELPOLY.BO has a market cap of 390.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while AXELPOLY.BO trades at ₹43.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas AXELPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AXELPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to AXELPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check AXELPOLY.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs DYNAMIND.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, DYNAMIND.BO has a market cap of 325.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while DYNAMIND.BO trades at ₹106.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas DYNAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DYNAMIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to DYNAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check DYNAMIND.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs CFL.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CFL.BO has a market cap of 284.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while CFL.BO trades at ₹45.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas CFL.BO's P/E ratio is -245.00. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFL.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to CFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check CFL.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs DUROPACK.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, DUROPACK.BO has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while DUROPACK.BO trades at ₹57.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas DUROPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DUROPACK.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to DUROPACK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check DUROPACK.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs ORGCOAT.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ORGCOAT.BO has a market cap of 218.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while ORGCOAT.BO trades at ₹20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas ORGCOAT.BO's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORGCOAT.BO's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to ORGCOAT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check ORGCOAT.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs VINYOFL.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VINYOFL.BO has a market cap of 213.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while VINYOFL.BO trades at ₹49.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas VINYOFL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VINYOFL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to VINYOFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check VINYOFL.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs YUG.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, YUG.BO has a market cap of 174.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while YUG.BO trades at ₹16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas YUG.BO's P/E ratio is 32.84. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YUG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to YUG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check YUG.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs VIVIDIND.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VIVIDIND.BO has a market cap of 166.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while VIVIDIND.BO trades at ₹18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas VIVIDIND.BO's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VIVIDIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to VIVIDIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check VIVIDIND.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs SAMYAKINT.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SAMYAKINT.BO has a market cap of 146.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while SAMYAKINT.BO trades at ₹18.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas SAMYAKINT.BO's P/E ratio is -20.64. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAMYAKINT.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to SAMYAKINT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check SAMYAKINT.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs MITSHI.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MITSHI.BO has a market cap of 125M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while MITSHI.BO trades at ₹14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas MITSHI.BO's P/E ratio is 473.33. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MITSHI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to MITSHI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check MITSHI.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs UNQTYMI.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, UNQTYMI.BO has a market cap of 117.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while UNQTYMI.BO trades at ₹15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas UNQTYMI.BO's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UNQTYMI.BO's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to UNQTYMI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check UNQTYMI.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs ADVPETR-B.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ADVPETR-B.BO has a market cap of 101.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while ADVPETR-B.BO trades at ₹107.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas ADVPETR-B.BO's P/E ratio is 213.02. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADVPETR-B.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to ADVPETR-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check ADVPETR-B.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs TRIVENIGQ.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, TRIVENIGQ.BO has a market cap of 99.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while TRIVENIGQ.BO trades at ₹7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas TRIVENIGQ.BO's P/E ratio is -52.80. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRIVENIGQ.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to TRIVENIGQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check TRIVENIGQ.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs GAGAN.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GAGAN.BO has a market cap of 93.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while GAGAN.BO trades at ₹20.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas GAGAN.BO's P/E ratio is 79.23. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GAGAN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to GAGAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check GAGAN.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs BPTEX.BO Comparison February 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BPTEX.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹68.49, while BPTEX.BO trades at ₹53.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.92, whereas BPTEX.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BPTEX.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to BPTEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check BPTEX.BO's competition here