Rubfila International Limited
Rubfila International Limited (RUBFILA.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RUBFILA.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Specialties Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUBFILA.BO | ₹63.12 | +2.22% | 3.4B | 12.00 | ₹5.26 | +3.17% |
| KAMAHOLD.BO | ₹2,438.80 | -2.83% | 78.3B | 8.68 | ₹281.08 | +1.69% |
| ELANTAS.BO | ₹8,369.00 | +0.65% | 66.3B | 44.84 | ₹186.63 | +0.09% |
| INDOKEM.BO | ₹504.65 | -0.50% | 14.1B | 262.84 | ₹1.92 | N/A |
| TINNARUBR.BO | ₹610.65 | +2.35% | 11B | 22.44 | ₹27.21 | +0.66% |
| JYOTIRES.BO | ₹779.85 | +1.74% | 9.4B | 13.32 | ₹58.56 | +1.15% |
| VIPULORG.BO | ₹175.30 | -1.82% | 3.3B | 53.12 | ₹3.30 | +0.46% |
| NIKHILAD.BO | ₹69.88 | +3.80% | 3.2B | 20.74 | ₹3.37 | +0.31% |
| KELENRG.BO | ₹3,197.25 | +1.11% | 3.2B | 11.80 | ₹271.06 | +0.05% |
| DHINDIA.BO | ₹280.10 | -2.95% | 2.5B | 35.23 | ₹7.95 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RUBFILA.BO vs KAMAHOLD.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KAMAHOLD.BO has a market cap of 78.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while KAMAHOLD.BO trades at ₹2,438.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas KAMAHOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KAMAHOLD.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to KAMAHOLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check KAMAHOLD.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs ELANTAS.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ELANTAS.BO has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while ELANTAS.BO trades at ₹8,369.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas ELANTAS.BO's P/E ratio is 44.84. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELANTAS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to ELANTAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check ELANTAS.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs INDOKEM.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, INDOKEM.BO has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while INDOKEM.BO trades at ₹504.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas INDOKEM.BO's P/E ratio is 262.84. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDOKEM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to INDOKEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check INDOKEM.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs TINNARUBR.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TINNARUBR.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while TINNARUBR.BO trades at ₹610.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas TINNARUBR.BO's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TINNARUBR.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to TINNARUBR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check TINNARUBR.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs JYOTIRES.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, JYOTIRES.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while JYOTIRES.BO trades at ₹779.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas JYOTIRES.BO's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JYOTIRES.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to JYOTIRES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check JYOTIRES.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs VIPULORG.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, VIPULORG.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while VIPULORG.BO trades at ₹175.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas VIPULORG.BO's P/E ratio is 53.12. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VIPULORG.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to VIPULORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check VIPULORG.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs NIKHILAD.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, NIKHILAD.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while NIKHILAD.BO trades at ₹69.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas NIKHILAD.BO's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NIKHILAD.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to NIKHILAD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check NIKHILAD.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs KELENRG.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KELENRG.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while KELENRG.BO trades at ₹3,197.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas KELENRG.BO's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KELENRG.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to KELENRG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check KELENRG.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs DHINDIA.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DHINDIA.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while DHINDIA.BO trades at ₹280.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas DHINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DHINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to DHINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check DHINDIA.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs KESARPE.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, KESARPE.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while KESARPE.BO trades at ₹23.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas KESARPE.BO's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KESARPE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to KESARPE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check KESARPE.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs MULTIBASE.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MULTIBASE.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while MULTIBASE.BO trades at ₹177.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas MULTIBASE.BO's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MULTIBASE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to MULTIBASE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check MULTIBASE.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs INNOVATORS.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, INNOVATORS.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while INNOVATORS.BO trades at ₹106.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas INNOVATORS.BO's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INNOVATORS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to INNOVATORS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check INNOVATORS.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs WAAREE.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, WAAREE.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while WAAREE.BO trades at ₹155.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas WAAREE.BO's P/E ratio is -35.19. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WAAREE.BO's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to WAAREE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check WAAREE.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs HINDADH.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HINDADH.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while HINDADH.BO trades at ₹290.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas HINDADH.BO's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HINDADH.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to HINDADH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check HINDADH.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs BRIGHTBR.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BRIGHTBR.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while BRIGHTBR.BO trades at ₹200.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas BRIGHTBR.BO's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRIGHTBR.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to BRIGHTBR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check BRIGHTBR.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs CDG.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CDG.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while CDG.BO trades at ₹117.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas CDG.BO's P/E ratio is 69.82. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDG.BO's ROE of +17.58%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to CDG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check CDG.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs GMPL.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GMPL.BO has a market cap of 831.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while GMPL.BO trades at ₹61.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas GMPL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GMPL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to GMPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check GMPL.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs RETINA.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, RETINA.BO has a market cap of 821.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while RETINA.BO trades at ₹53.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas RETINA.BO's P/E ratio is 73.40. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RETINA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to RETINA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check RETINA.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs HARDCAS.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, HARDCAS.BO has a market cap of 579.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while HARDCAS.BO trades at ₹667.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas HARDCAS.BO's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HARDCAS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to HARDCAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check HARDCAS.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs SHREYASI.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SHREYASI.BO has a market cap of 439.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while SHREYASI.BO trades at ₹6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas SHREYASI.BO's P/E ratio is -34.44. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHREYASI.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to SHREYASI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check SHREYASI.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs MMRUBBR-B.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MMRUBBR-B.BO has a market cap of 382.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while MMRUBBR-B.BO trades at ₹61.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas MMRUBBR-B.BO's P/E ratio is -26.80. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MMRUBBR-B.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to MMRUBBR-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check MMRUBBR-B.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs AXELPOLY.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, AXELPOLY.BO has a market cap of 364.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while AXELPOLY.BO trades at ₹42.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas AXELPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AXELPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to AXELPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check AXELPOLY.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs CFL.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, CFL.BO has a market cap of 336.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while CFL.BO trades at ₹55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas CFL.BO's P/E ratio is -289.47. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFL.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to CFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check CFL.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs DYNAMIND.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DYNAMIND.BO has a market cap of 293.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while DYNAMIND.BO trades at ₹96.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas DYNAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DYNAMIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to DYNAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check DYNAMIND.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs DUROPACK.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, DUROPACK.BO has a market cap of 240.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while DUROPACK.BO trades at ₹45.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas DUROPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DUROPACK.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to DUROPACK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check DUROPACK.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs VINYOFL.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, VINYOFL.BO has a market cap of 181.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while VINYOFL.BO trades at ₹42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas VINYOFL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VINYOFL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to VINYOFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check VINYOFL.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs ORGCOAT.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ORGCOAT.BO has a market cap of 181.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while ORGCOAT.BO trades at ₹18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas ORGCOAT.BO's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORGCOAT.BO's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to ORGCOAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check ORGCOAT.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs VIVIDIND.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, VIVIDIND.BO has a market cap of 175.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while VIVIDIND.BO trades at ₹19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas VIVIDIND.BO's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VIVIDIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to VIVIDIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check VIVIDIND.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs YUG.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, YUG.BO has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while YUG.BO trades at ₹14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas YUG.BO's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YUG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to YUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check YUG.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs UNQTYMI.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, UNQTYMI.BO has a market cap of 127.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while UNQTYMI.BO trades at ₹16.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas UNQTYMI.BO's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UNQTYMI.BO's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to UNQTYMI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check UNQTYMI.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs MITSHI.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, MITSHI.BO has a market cap of 119.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while MITSHI.BO trades at ₹13.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas MITSHI.BO's P/E ratio is 681.50. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MITSHI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to MITSHI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check MITSHI.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs ADVPETR-B.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, ADVPETR-B.BO has a market cap of 112.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while ADVPETR-B.BO trades at ₹124.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas ADVPETR-B.BO's P/E ratio is 226.55. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADVPETR-B.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to ADVPETR-B.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check ADVPETR-B.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs SAMYAKINT.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, SAMYAKINT.BO has a market cap of 98.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while SAMYAKINT.BO trades at ₹12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas SAMYAKINT.BO's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAMYAKINT.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to SAMYAKINT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check SAMYAKINT.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs GAGAN.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, GAGAN.BO has a market cap of 97.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while GAGAN.BO trades at ₹21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas GAGAN.BO's P/E ratio is 83.00. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GAGAN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to GAGAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check GAGAN.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs TRIVENIGQ.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, TRIVENIGQ.BO has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while TRIVENIGQ.BO trades at ₹7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas TRIVENIGQ.BO's P/E ratio is -48.80. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRIVENIGQ.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is less volatile compared to TRIVENIGQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check TRIVENIGQ.BO's competition here
RUBFILA.BO vs BPTEX.BO Comparison April 2026
RUBFILA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUBFILA.BO stands at 3.4B. In comparison, BPTEX.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RUBFILA.BO is priced at ₹63.12, while BPTEX.BO trades at ₹53.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUBFILA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.00, whereas BPTEX.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUBFILA.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BPTEX.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUBFILA.BO is more volatile compared to BPTEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUBFILA.BO.Check BPTEX.BO's competition here