Rottneros AB (publ)
Rottneros AB (publ) (RTTNY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RTTNY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTTNY | $22.97 | +0.00% | 175.2M | 18.09 | $1.27 | +2.19% |
| KLBAY | $7.50 | +2.32% | 23B | 83.33 | $0.09 | +4.63% |
| UPMMY | $31.48 | +5.67% | 16.5B | 29.71 | $1.05 | +2.39% |
| UPMKF | $29.16 | +0.00% | 15.4B | 27.00 | $1.08 | +5.75% |
| SEOAY | $11.89 | +3.84% | 9.4B | 11.63 | $1.02 | +1.15% |
| SEOJF | $11.08 | +0.00% | 8.7B | 10.86 | $1.02 | +2.28% |
| SCABY | $12.13 | +0.00% | 8.5B | 25.27 | $0.48 | +1.37% |
| SVCBF | $11.75 | +0.00% | 8.3B | 23.98 | $0.49 | +5.23% |
| MONDF | $18.53 | +5.14% | 8.2B | 9.70 | $1.91 | +4.26% |
| HLMNY | $17.98 | -15.39% | 5.5B | 21.92 | $0.82 | +1.92% |
Stock Comparison
RTTNY vs KLBAY Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, KLBAY has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while KLBAY trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas KLBAY's P/E ratio is 83.33. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to KLBAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to KLBAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check KLBAY's competition here
RTTNY vs UPMMY Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, UPMMY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while UPMMY trades at $31.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas UPMMY's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to UPMMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to UPMMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check UPMMY's competition here
RTTNY vs UPMKF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, UPMKF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while UPMKF trades at $29.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas UPMKF's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to UPMKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and UPMKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UPMKF's competition here
RTTNY vs SEOAY Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, SEOAY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while SEOAY trades at $11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas SEOAY's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SEOAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to SEOAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check SEOAY's competition here
RTTNY vs SEOJF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, SEOJF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while SEOJF trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas SEOJF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SEOJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to SEOJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check SEOJF's competition here
RTTNY vs SCABY Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, SCABY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while SCABY trades at $12.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas SCABY's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SCABY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to SCABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check SCABY's competition here
RTTNY vs SVCBF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, SVCBF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while SVCBF trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas SVCBF's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SVCBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to SVCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check SVCBF's competition here
RTTNY vs MONDF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, MONDF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while MONDF trades at $18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas MONDF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MONDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and MONDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MONDF's competition here
RTTNY vs HLMNY Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, HLMNY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while HLMNY trades at $17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas HLMNY's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to HLMNY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and HLMNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLMNY's competition here
RTTNY vs OJIPF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, OJIPF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while OJIPF trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas OJIPF's P/E ratio is 26.36. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to OJIPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and OJIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OJIPF's competition here
RTTNY vs MONDY Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, MONDY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while MONDY trades at $22.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas MONDY's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to MONDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to MONDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check MONDY's competition here
RTTNY vs OJIPY Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, OJIPY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while OJIPY trades at $50.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas OJIPY's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to OJIPY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and OJIPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OJIPY's competition here
RTTNY vs NDGPF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, NDGPF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while NDGPF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas NDGPF's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NDGPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to NDGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check NDGPF's competition here
RTTNY vs NDGPY Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, NDGPY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while NDGPY trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas NDGPY's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NDGPY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to NDGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check NDGPY's competition here
RTTNY vs STLJF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, STLJF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while STLJF trades at $67.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas STLJF's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to STLJF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to STLJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check STLJF's competition here
RTTNY vs PIKQF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, PIKQF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while PIKQF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas PIKQF's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PIKQF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to PIKQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check PIKQF's competition here
RTTNY vs POELF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, POELF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while POELF trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas POELF's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to POELF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to POELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check POELF's competition here
RTTNY vs BLRDF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, BLRDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while BLRDF trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas BLRDF's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BLRDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to BLRDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check BLRDF's competition here
RTTNY vs LMPMF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, LMPMF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while LMPMF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas LMPMF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to LMPMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and LMPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LMPMF's competition here
RTTNY vs LMPMY Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, LMPMY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while LMPMY trades at $4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas LMPMY's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to LMPMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to LMPMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check LMPMY's competition here
RTTNY vs CFPZF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, CFPZF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while CFPZF trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas CFPZF's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CFPZF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to CFPZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check CFPZF's competition here
RTTNY vs NIJPF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, NIJPF has a market cap of 820.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while NIJPF trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas NIJPF's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NIJPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and NIJPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NIJPF's competition here
RTTNY vs TKFTF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, TKFTF has a market cap of 703.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while TKFTF trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas TKFTF's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TKFTF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and TKFTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKFTF's competition here
RTTNY vs SPPJY Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, SPPJY has a market cap of 607.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while SPPJY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas SPPJY's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SPPJY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and SPPJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPPJY's competition here
RTTNY vs IFSPF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, IFSPF has a market cap of 406.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while IFSPF trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas IFSPF's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to IFSPF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to IFSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check IFSPF's competition here
RTTNY vs ACAZF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, ACAZF has a market cap of 227M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while ACAZF trades at $12.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas ACAZF's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ACAZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to ACAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check ACAZF's competition here
RTTNY vs ACSYF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, ACSYF has a market cap of 199.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while ACSYF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas ACSYF's P/E ratio is 82.00. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ACSYF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to ACSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check ACSYF's competition here
RTTNY vs RTERF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, RTERF has a market cap of 144.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while RTERF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas RTERF's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RTERF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and RTERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTERF's competition here
RTTNY vs WFSTF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, WFSTF has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while WFSTF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas WFSTF's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to WFSTF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and WFSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WFSTF's competition here
RTTNY vs GFELF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, GFELF has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while GFELF trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas GFELF's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to GFELF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to GFELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check GFELF's competition here
RTTNY vs KEWL Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, KEWL has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while KEWL trades at $49.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas KEWL's P/E ratio is 0.57. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to KEWL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and KEWL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KEWL's competition here
RTTNY vs SGTM Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, SGTM has a market cap of 37.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while SGTM trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas SGTM's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SGTM's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to SGTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check SGTM's competition here
RTTNY vs ICLTF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, ICLTF has a market cap of 34.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while ICLTF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas ICLTF's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ICLTF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and ICLTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ICLTF's competition here
RTTNY vs RUBNF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, RUBNF has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while RUBNF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas RUBNF's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RUBNF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and RUBNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RUBNF's competition here
RTTNY vs CFPUF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, CFPUF has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while CFPUF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas CFPUF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CFPUF's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to CFPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check CFPUF's competition here
RTTNY vs BRGSF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, BRGSF has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while BRGSF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas BRGSF's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BRGSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and BRGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRGSF's competition here
RTTNY vs TCOR Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, TCOR has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while TCOR trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas TCOR's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TCOR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and TCOR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCOR's competition here
RTTNY vs SUPBF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, SUPBF has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while SUPBF trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas SUPBF's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SUPBF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and SUPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUPBF's competition here
RTTNY vs WBNEF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, WBNEF has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while WBNEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas WBNEF's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to WBNEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to WBNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check WBNEF's competition here
RTTNY vs PKNOF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, PKNOF has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while PKNOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas PKNOF's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PKNOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and PKNOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PKNOF's competition here
RTTNY vs CFXTF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, CFXTF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while CFXTF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas CFXTF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CFXTF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to CFXTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check CFXTF's competition here
RTTNY vs BSTO Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, BSTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while BSTO trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas BSTO's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BSTO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to BSTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check BSTO's competition here
RTTNY vs HMTC Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, HMTC has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while HMTC trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas HMTC's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to HMTC's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and HMTC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMTC's competition here
RTTNY vs BMSPF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, BMSPF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while BMSPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas BMSPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BMSPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and BMSPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BMSPF's competition here
RTTNY vs PTBTQ Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, PTBTQ has a market cap of 24.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while PTBTQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas PTBTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to PTBTQ's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to PTBTQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check PTBTQ's competition here
RTTNY vs SGMD Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, SGMD has a market cap of 13.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while SGMD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas SGMD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SGMD's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and SGMD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGMD's competition here
RTTNY vs EXRG Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, EXRG has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while EXRG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas EXRG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EXRG's ROE of +2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to EXRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check EXRG's competition here
RTTNY vs ZMGD Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, ZMGD has a market cap of 5.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while ZMGD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas ZMGD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ZMGD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY is less volatile compared to ZMGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTTNY.Check ZMGD's competition here
RTTNY vs BPMI Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, BPMI has a market cap of 617. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while BPMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas BPMI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BPMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and BPMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BPMI's competition here
RTTNY vs KPCM Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, KPCM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while KPCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas KPCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to KPCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and KPCM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KPCM's competition here
RTTNY vs VRDSF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, VRDSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while VRDSF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas VRDSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VRDSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and VRDSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VRDSF's competition here
RTTNY vs HAIPF Comparison April 2026
RTTNY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTTNY stands at 175.2M. In comparison, HAIPF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RTTNY is priced at $22.97, while HAIPF trades at $101.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTTNY currently has a P/E ratio of 18.09, whereas HAIPF's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, RTTNY's ROE is -0.27%, compared to HAIPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RTTNY and HAIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HAIPF's competition here