Loading...

Rogers Sugar Inc.

RSGUFPNK
Consumer Defensive
Food Confectioners
$4.19
$-0.05(-1.12%)

Rogers Sugar Inc. RSGUF Peers

See (RSGUF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

Peer Comparison Table: Food Confectioners Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

SymbolPriceChange %Market CapP/E RatioEPSDividend Yield
RSGUF$4.19-1.12%536.9M12.70$0.33+6.11%
COCXF$110,001.20+759.38%467.6B31.24$3,520.70+1.68%
LDSVF$15,947.54-4.00%36.6B44.86$355.49+0.94%
BRRLY$11.48-2.75%6.3B35.86$0.32+2.77%
BYCBF$1,072.35+0.00%5.9B33.48$32.03+2.97%
CHLSY$16.70-2.08%3.9B47.70$0.35+1.08%
MGAAF$15.51+0.00%1.3B20.96$0.74+0.02%
CLOEF$3.70+0.00%1B16.09$0.23+0.32%
UELKY$26.23+0.00%968.6M5.67$4.63+7.86%
HCHOF$4.68+4.00%658.9M-78.00-$0.06N/A
Showing 1 to 10 of 21 results
1

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

RSGUF vs COCXF Comparison

RSGUF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSGUF stands at 536.9M. In comparison, COCXF has a market cap of 467.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSGUF is priced at $4.19, while COCXF trades at $110,001.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSGUF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.70, whereas COCXF's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, RSGUF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COCXF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RSGUF is less volatile compared to COCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSGUF.

Stock Price Comparison

Loading...

Frequently Asked Questions

;