Cloetta AB (publ)
Cloetta AB (publ) (CLOEF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CLOEF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Food Confectioners Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLOEF | $5.80 | +7.84% | 1.6B | 20.71 | $0.28 | +2.62% |
| COCXF | $110,001.20 | +759.38% | 34.3B | 28.01 | $3,927.55 | +2.10% |
| LDSVF | $11,900.00 | +0.85% | 27.5B | 29.86 | $398.58 | +1.94% |
| CHLSY | $11.86 | -0.42% | 26.9B | 29.16 | $0.40 | +1.94% |
| BYCBF | $1,519.85 | +0.06% | 8.3B | 27.04 | $56.20 | +2.39% |
| BRRLY | $15.34 | -0.16% | 8.2B | 26.86 | $0.56 | +2.41% |
| MGAAF | $15.51 | +0.00% | 1.3B | 20.96 | $0.74 | +2.73% |
| UELKY | $26.90 | -0.04% | 993.4M | 13.72 | $1.96 | +7.67% |
| HCHOF | $4.68 | +4.00% | 658.9M | -78.00 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| RSGUF | $4.94 | +1.78% | 619.3M | 12.38 | $0.39 | +5.40% |
Stock Comparison
CLOEF vs COCXF Comparison May 2026
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, COCXF has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $5.80, while COCXF trades at $110,001.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.71, whereas COCXF's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to COCXF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is less volatile compared to COCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.Check COCXF's competition here
CLOEF vs LDSVF Comparison May 2026
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LDSVF has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $5.80, while LDSVF trades at $11,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.71, whereas LDSVF's P/E ratio is 29.86. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LDSVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and LDSVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LDSVF's competition here
CLOEF vs CHLSY Comparison May 2026
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CHLSY has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $5.80, while CHLSY trades at $11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.71, whereas CHLSY's P/E ratio is 29.16. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHLSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is less volatile compared to CHLSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.Check CHLSY's competition here
CLOEF vs BYCBF Comparison May 2026
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BYCBF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $5.80, while BYCBF trades at $1,519.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.71, whereas BYCBF's P/E ratio is 27.04. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BYCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and BYCBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BYCBF's competition here
CLOEF vs BRRLY Comparison May 2026
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BRRLY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $5.80, while BRRLY trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.71, whereas BRRLY's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BRRLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is less volatile compared to BRRLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.Check BRRLY's competition here
CLOEF vs MGAAF Comparison May 2026
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MGAAF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $5.80, while MGAAF trades at $15.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.71, whereas MGAAF's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MGAAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and MGAAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MGAAF's competition here
CLOEF vs UELKY Comparison May 2026
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UELKY has a market cap of 993.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $5.80, while UELKY trades at $26.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.71, whereas UELKY's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UELKY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and UELKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UELKY's competition here
CLOEF vs HCHOF Comparison May 2026
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HCHOF has a market cap of 658.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $5.80, while HCHOF trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.71, whereas HCHOF's P/E ratio is -78.00. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HCHOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and HCHOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HCHOF's competition here
CLOEF vs RSGUF Comparison May 2026
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RSGUF has a market cap of 619.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $5.80, while RSGUF trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.71, whereas RSGUF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RSGUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF is less volatile compared to RSGUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CLOEF.Check RSGUF's competition here
CLOEF vs PEFDF Comparison May 2026
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PEFDF has a market cap of 482.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $5.80, while PEFDF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.71, whereas PEFDF's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PEFDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and PEFDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PEFDF's competition here
CLOEF vs FVGCF Comparison May 2026
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FVGCF has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $5.80, while FVGCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.71, whereas FVGCF's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FVGCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and FVGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FVGCF's competition here
CLOEF vs RLGDF Comparison May 2026
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RLGDF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $5.80, while RLGDF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.71, whereas RLGDF's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RLGDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and RLGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RLGDF's competition here
CLOEF vs YWGRF Comparison May 2026
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, YWGRF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $5.80, while YWGRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.71, whereas YWGRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YWGRF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and YWGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YWGRF's competition here
CLOEF vs GUMYF Comparison May 2026
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GUMYF has a market cap of 654.9K. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $5.80, while GUMYF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.71, whereas GUMYF's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GUMYF's ROE of -2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and GUMYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GUMYF's competition here
CLOEF vs GNGR Comparison May 2026
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GNGR has a market cap of 109.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $5.80, while GNGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.71, whereas GNGR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GNGR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and GNGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNGR's competition here
CLOEF vs EVRN Comparison May 2026
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EVRN has a market cap of 32K. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $5.80, while EVRN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.71, whereas EVRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EVRN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and EVRN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EVRN's competition here
CLOEF vs HWVI Comparison May 2026
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HWVI has a market cap of 11.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $5.80, while HWVI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.71, whereas HWVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HWVI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and HWVI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HWVI's competition here
CLOEF vs GUMYD Comparison May 2026
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GUMYD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $5.80, while GUMYD trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.71, whereas GUMYD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GUMYD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and GUMYD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GUMYD's competition here
CLOEF vs ASCS Comparison May 2026
CLOEF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CLOEF stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ASCS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CLOEF is priced at $5.80, while ASCS trades at $5,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CLOEF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.71, whereas ASCS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CLOEF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASCS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CLOEF and ASCS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASCS's competition here