Rritual Superfoods Inc.
Rritual Superfoods Inc. (RSF.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RSF.CN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSF.CN | CA$0.01 | -50.00% | 0 | -0.04 | -CA$0.13 | N/A |
| SAP.TO | CA$28.55 | -1.75% | 11.8B | -69.63 | -CA$0.41 | +2.66% |
| PBH.TO | CA$87.11 | -0.83% | 3.9B | 33.00 | CA$2.64 | +3.90% |
| MFI.TO | CA$28.93 | -1.06% | 3.6B | 38.07 | CA$0.76 | +3.17% |
| JWEL.TO | CA$33.65 | +0.03% | 1.4B | 27.58 | CA$1.22 | +2.50% |
| SOY.TO | CA$7.89 | -2.11% | 927.4M | -65.75 | -CA$0.12 | N/A |
| HLF.TO | CA$17.14 | +1.18% | 498.1M | 6.52 | CA$2.63 | +4.95% |
| BOIL.CN | CA$2.63 | -0.38% | 184.9M | -7.31 | -CA$0.36 | N/A |
| HBFG.CN | CA$1.02 | -0.97% | 132.1M | -51.00 | -CA$0.02 | N/A |
| GFCO.CN | CA$0.63 | +5.00% | 55.1M | -21.00 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RSF.CN vs SAP.TO Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, SAP.TO has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while SAP.TO trades at CA$28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SAP.TO's P/E ratio is -69.63. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SAP.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SAP.TO has daily volatility of 2.09.Check SAP.TO's competition here
RSF.CN vs PBH.TO Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, PBH.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while PBH.TO trades at CA$87.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PBH.TO's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PBH.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PBH.TO has daily volatility of 1.04.Check PBH.TO's competition here
RSF.CN vs MFI.TO Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, MFI.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while MFI.TO trades at CA$28.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MFI.TO's P/E ratio is 38.07. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MFI.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MFI.TO has daily volatility of 1.24.Check MFI.TO's competition here
RSF.CN vs JWEL.TO Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, JWEL.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while JWEL.TO trades at CA$33.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas JWEL.TO's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JWEL.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and JWEL.TO has daily volatility of 1.64.Check JWEL.TO's competition here
RSF.CN vs SOY.TO Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, SOY.TO has a market cap of 927.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while SOY.TO trades at CA$7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SOY.TO's P/E ratio is -65.75. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOY.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SOY.TO has daily volatility of 5.00.Check SOY.TO's competition here
RSF.CN vs HLF.TO Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, HLF.TO has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while HLF.TO trades at CA$17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HLF.TO's P/E ratio is 6.52. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLF.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and HLF.TO has daily volatility of 9.93.Check HLF.TO's competition here
RSF.CN vs BOIL.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, BOIL.CN has a market cap of 184.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while BOIL.CN trades at CA$2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BOIL.CN's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOIL.CN's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and BOIL.CN has daily volatility of 3.45.Check BOIL.CN's competition here
RSF.CN vs HBFG.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, HBFG.CN has a market cap of 132.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while HBFG.CN trades at CA$1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HBFG.CN's P/E ratio is -51.00. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBFG.CN's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and HBFG.CN has daily volatility of 0.99.Check HBFG.CN's competition here
RSF.CN vs GFCO.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, GFCO.CN has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while GFCO.CN trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GFCO.CN's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GFCO.CN's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and GFCO.CN has daily volatility of 6.56.Check GFCO.CN's competition here
RSF.CN vs FRSH.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, FRSH.CN has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while FRSH.CN trades at CA$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FRSH.CN's P/E ratio is -6.54. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FRSH.CN's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FRSH.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check FRSH.CN's competition here
RSF.CN vs SWP.TO Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, SWP.TO has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while SWP.TO trades at CA$4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SWP.TO's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWP.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and SWP.TO has daily volatility of 2.57.Check SWP.TO's competition here
RSF.CN vs BU.TO Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, BU.TO has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while BU.TO trades at CA$2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BU.TO's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BU.TO's ROE of -3.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and BU.TO has daily volatility of 0.00.Check BU.TO's competition here
RSF.CN vs ELMT.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, ELMT.CN has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while ELMT.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ELMT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELMT.CN's ROE of +5.69%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ELMT.CN has daily volatility of 5.41.Check ELMT.CN's competition here
RSF.CN vs NPRA.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, NPRA.CN has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while NPRA.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NPRA.CN's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPRA.CN's ROE of +3.79%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and NPRA.CN has daily volatility of 11.11.Check NPRA.CN's competition here
RSF.CN vs BABY.TO Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, BABY.TO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while BABY.TO trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BABY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BABY.TO's ROE of -3.79%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and BABY.TO has daily volatility of 0.00.Check BABY.TO's competition here
RSF.CN vs PNGA.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, PNGA.CN has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while PNGA.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PNGA.CN's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PNGA.CN's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PNGA.CN has daily volatility of 8.70.Check PNGA.CN's competition here
RSF.CN vs PSYC.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, PSYC.CN has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while PSYC.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PSYC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSYC.CN's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PSYC.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check PSYC.CN's competition here
RSF.CN vs LLP.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, LLP.CN has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while LLP.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LLP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LLP.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and LLP.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check LLP.CN's competition here
RSF.CN vs EMRG.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, EMRG.CN has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while EMRG.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas EMRG.CN's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMRG.CN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and EMRG.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check EMRG.CN's competition here
RSF.CN vs BITE.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, BITE.CN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while BITE.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BITE.CN's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BITE.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and BITE.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check BITE.CN's competition here
RSF.CN vs MOOO.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, MOOO.CN has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while MOOO.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MOOO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MOOO.CN's ROE of -19.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MOOO.CN has daily volatility of 6.06.Check MOOO.CN's competition here
RSF.CN vs PLBL.NE Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, PLBL.NE has a market cap of 948.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while PLBL.NE trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PLBL.NE's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLBL.NE's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and PLBL.NE has daily volatility of 0.00.Check PLBL.NE's competition here
RSF.CN vs CULT.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, CULT.CN has a market cap of 935.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while CULT.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CULT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CULT.CN's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and CULT.CN has daily volatility of 40.00.Check CULT.CN's competition here
RSF.CN vs VEGI.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, VEGI.CN has a market cap of 699.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while VEGI.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VEGI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEGI.CN's ROE of -7.37%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VEGI.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check VEGI.CN's competition here
RSF.CN vs MEAT.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, MEAT.CN has a market cap of 493.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while MEAT.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MEAT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEAT.CN's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MEAT.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check MEAT.CN's competition here
RSF.CN vs FIT.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, FIT.CN has a market cap of 473.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while FIT.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FIT.CN's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIT.CN's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FIT.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check FIT.CN's competition here
RSF.CN vs VAGN.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, VAGN.CN has a market cap of 436.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while VAGN.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VAGN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAGN.CN's ROE of -15.88%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VAGN.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check VAGN.CN's competition here
RSF.CN vs YUM.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, YUM.CN has a market cap of 349.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while YUM.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas YUM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to YUM.CN's ROE of +2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and YUM.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check YUM.CN's competition here
RSF.CN vs ARTO.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, ARTO.CN has a market cap of 326.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while ARTO.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ARTO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ARTO.CN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and ARTO.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check ARTO.CN's competition here
RSF.CN vs VEJI.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, VEJI.CN has a market cap of 271.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while VEJI.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VEJI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEJI.CN's ROE of +3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and VEJI.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check VEJI.CN's competition here
RSF.CN vs MEAL.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, MEAL.CN has a market cap of 242.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while MEAL.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MEAL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEAL.CN's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and MEAL.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check MEAL.CN's competition here
RSF.CN vs FUEL.CN Comparison August 2025
RSF.CN plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSF.CN stands at 0. In comparison, FUEL.CN has a market cap of 179.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RSF.CN is priced at CA$0.01, while FUEL.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSF.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FUEL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RSF.CN's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUEL.CN's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RSF.CN has daily volatility of N/A and FUEL.CN has daily volatility of 0.00.Check FUEL.CN's competition here