High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See HLF.TO's competitors and their performance on the TSX and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for HLF.TO and its TSX peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLF.TO | CA$14.21 | +1.14% | 399M | 11.16 | CA$1.27 | +4.95% |
| SAP.TO | CA$39.82 | -0.55% | 15.9B | 20.85 | CA$1.91 | +2.03% |
| PBH.TO | CA$76.00 | +0.21% | 3.5B | 15.48 | CA$4.91 | +4.48% |
| MFI.TO | CA$25.93 | -0.80% | 3.2B | 17.77 | CA$1.46 | +5.45% |
| JWEL.TO | CA$45.42 | +0.00% | 1.9B | 23.51 | CA$1.93 | +2.07% |
| SOY.TO | CA$8.84 | +0.57% | 1B | 49.11 | CA$0.18 | N/A |
| HBFG.CN | CA$1.51 | -2.58% | 223.9M | -12.25 | -CA$0.12 | N/A |
| SWP.TO | CA$9.20 | -1.81% | 88.2M | 18.87 | CA$0.49 | N/A |
| GFCO.CN | CA$0.63 | +5.00% | 55.1M | -21.00 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
| FRSH.CN | CA$0.85 | -5.56% | 44.4M | -6.54 | -CA$0.13 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Saputo Inc. (TSX: SAP.TO)
HLF.TO vs SAP.TO Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, SAP.TO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while SAP.TO trades at CA$39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas SAP.TO's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAP.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to SAP.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check SAP.TO's competition here
Premium Brands Holdings Corporation (TSX: PBH.TO)
HLF.TO vs PBH.TO Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, PBH.TO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while PBH.TO trades at CA$76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas PBH.TO's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PBH.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to PBH.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check PBH.TO's competition here
Maple Leaf Foods Inc. (TSX: MFI.TO)
HLF.TO vs MFI.TO Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, MFI.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while MFI.TO trades at CA$25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas MFI.TO's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MFI.TO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to MFI.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check MFI.TO's competition here
Jamieson Wellness Inc. (TSX: JWEL.TO)
HLF.TO vs JWEL.TO Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, JWEL.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while JWEL.TO trades at CA$45.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas JWEL.TO's P/E ratio is 23.51. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JWEL.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to JWEL.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check JWEL.TO's competition here
SunOpta Inc. (TSX: SOY.TO)
HLF.TO vs SOY.TO Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, SOY.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while SOY.TO trades at CA$8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas SOY.TO's P/E ratio is 49.11. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SOY.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is less volatile compared to SOY.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check SOY.TO's competition here
Happy Belly Food Group Inc. (CNQ: HBFG.CN)
HLF.TO vs HBFG.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, HBFG.CN has a market cap of 223.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while HBFG.CN trades at CA$1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas HBFG.CN's P/E ratio is -12.25. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HBFG.CN's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is less volatile compared to HBFG.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check HBFG.CN's competition here
Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee Inc. (TSX: SWP.TO)
HLF.TO vs SWP.TO Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, SWP.TO has a market cap of 88.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while SWP.TO trades at CA$9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas SWP.TO's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWP.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to SWP.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check SWP.TO's competition here
The Good Flour Corp. (CNQ: GFCO.CN)
HLF.TO vs GFCO.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, GFCO.CN has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while GFCO.CN trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas GFCO.CN's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GFCO.CN's ROE of +1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is less volatile compared to GFCO.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check GFCO.CN's competition here
The Fresh Factory B.C. Ltd. (CNQ: FRSH.CN)
HLF.TO vs FRSH.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, FRSH.CN has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while FRSH.CN trades at CA$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas FRSH.CN's P/E ratio is -6.54. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FRSH.CN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to FRSH.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check FRSH.CN's competition here
Nepra Foods Inc. (CNQ: NPRA.CN)
HLF.TO vs NPRA.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, NPRA.CN has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while NPRA.CN trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas NPRA.CN's P/E ratio is -21.50. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NPRA.CN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is less volatile compared to NPRA.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check NPRA.CN's competition here
Burcon NutraScience Corporation (TSX: BU.TO)
HLF.TO vs BU.TO Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, BU.TO has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while BU.TO trades at CA$1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas BU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BU.TO's ROE of +3.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is less volatile compared to BU.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check BU.TO's competition here
Element Nutritional Sciences Inc. (CNQ: ELMT.CN)
HLF.TO vs ELMT.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, ELMT.CN has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while ELMT.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas ELMT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELMT.CN's ROE of +5.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is less volatile compared to ELMT.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check ELMT.CN's competition here
Pangea Wellness Inc. (CNQ: PNGA.CN)
HLF.TO vs PNGA.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, PNGA.CN has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while PNGA.CN trades at CA$0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas PNGA.CN's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PNGA.CN's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is less volatile compared to PNGA.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check PNGA.CN's competition here
LeanLife Health Inc. (CNQ: LLP.CN)
HLF.TO vs LLP.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, LLP.CN has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while LLP.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas LLP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LLP.CN's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to LLP.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check LLP.CN's competition here
Emergence Global Enterprises Inc. (CNQ: EMRG.CN)
HLF.TO vs EMRG.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, EMRG.CN has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while EMRG.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas EMRG.CN's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMRG.CN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to EMRG.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check EMRG.CN's competition here
Psyched Wellness Ltd. (CNQ: PSYC.CN)
HLF.TO vs PSYC.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, PSYC.CN has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while PSYC.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas PSYC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PSYC.CN's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is less volatile compared to PSYC.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check PSYC.CN's competition here
Blender Bites Limited (CNQ: BITE.CN)
HLF.TO vs BITE.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, BITE.CN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while BITE.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas BITE.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BITE.CN's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to BITE.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check BITE.CN's competition here
Bettermoo(d) Food Corporation (CNQ: MOOO.CN)
HLF.TO vs MOOO.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, MOOO.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while MOOO.CN trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas MOOO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOOO.CN's ROE of +2.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is less volatile compared to MOOO.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check MOOO.CN's competition here
Plantable Health Inc. (NEO: PLBL.NE)
HLF.TO vs PLBL.NE Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, PLBL.NE has a market cap of 948.8K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while PLBL.NE trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas PLBL.NE's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLBL.NE's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to PLBL.NE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check PLBL.NE's competition here
Boosh Plant-Based Brands Inc. (CNQ: VEGI.CN)
HLF.TO vs VEGI.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, VEGI.CN has a market cap of 699.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while VEGI.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas VEGI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VEGI.CN's ROE of -7.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to VEGI.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check VEGI.CN's competition here
Cult Food Science Corp. (CNQ: CULT.CN)
HLF.TO vs CULT.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, CULT.CN has a market cap of 616.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while CULT.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas CULT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CULT.CN's ROE of -203.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to CULT.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check CULT.CN's competition here
Modern Plant Based Foods Inc. (CNQ: MEAT.CN)
HLF.TO vs MEAT.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, MEAT.CN has a market cap of 588.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while MEAT.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas MEAT.CN's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MEAT.CN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to MEAT.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check MEAT.CN's competition here
Koios Beverage Corp. (CNQ: FIT.CN)
HLF.TO vs FIT.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, FIT.CN has a market cap of 473.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while FIT.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas FIT.CN's P/E ratio is 0.12. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FIT.CN's ROE of -15.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to FIT.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check FIT.CN's competition here
Vegano Foods Inc. (CNQ: VAGN.CN)
HLF.TO vs VAGN.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, VAGN.CN has a market cap of 440.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while VAGN.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas VAGN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VAGN.CN's ROE of -15.88%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to VAGN.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check VAGN.CN's competition here
Komo Plant Based Foods Inc. (CNQ: YUM.CN)
HLF.TO vs YUM.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, YUM.CN has a market cap of 349.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while YUM.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas YUM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YUM.CN's ROE of +2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to YUM.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check YUM.CN's competition here
Aretto Wellness Inc. (CNQ: ARTO.CN)
HLF.TO vs ARTO.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, ARTO.CN has a market cap of 326.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while ARTO.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas ARTO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ARTO.CN's ROE of -17.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to ARTO.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check ARTO.CN's competition here
Veji Holdings Ltd. (CNQ: VEJI.CN)
HLF.TO vs VEJI.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, VEJI.CN has a market cap of 271.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while VEJI.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas VEJI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VEJI.CN's ROE of +3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is not fully comparable compared to VEJI.CN. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check VEJI.CN's competition here
Nabati Foods Global Inc. (CNQ: MEAL.CN)
HLF.TO vs MEAL.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, MEAL.CN has a market cap of 242.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while MEAL.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas MEAL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MEAL.CN's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to MEAL.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check MEAL.CN's competition here
PlantFuel Life Inc. (CNQ: FUEL.CN)
HLF.TO vs FUEL.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, FUEL.CN has a market cap of 179.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while FUEL.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas FUEL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUEL.CN's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is more volatile compared to FUEL.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check FUEL.CN's competition here
Else Nutrition Holdings Inc. (TSX: BABY.TO)
HLF.TO vs BABY.TO Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, BABY.TO has a market cap of 77.3K. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while BABY.TO trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas BABY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BABY.TO's ROE of +2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is less volatile compared to BABY.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check BABY.TO's competition here
Rritual Superfoods Inc. (CNQ: RSF.CN)
HLF.TO vs RSF.CN Comparison September 2026
High Liner Foods Incorporated (TSX: HLF.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLF.TO stands at 399M. In comparison, RSF.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLF.TO is priced at CA$14.21 on the TSX, while RSF.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLF.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.16, whereas RSF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HLF.TO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RSF.CN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLF.TO is not fully comparable compared to RSF.CN. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLF.TO.Check RSF.CN's competition here