Richards Packaging Income Fund (TSX: RPI-UN.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Richards Packaging Income Fund (TSX: RPI-UN.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RPI-UN.TO stands at 333.4M. In comparison, CCL-A.TO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RPI-UN.TO is priced at CA$30.43 on the TSX, while CCL-A.TO trades at CA$96.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RPI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas CCL-A.TO's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, RPI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CCL-A.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RPI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to CCL-A.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPI-UN.TO.Check CCL-A.TO's competition here

Richards Packaging Income Fund (TSX: RPI-UN.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RPI-UN.TO stands at 333.4M. In comparison, CCL-B.TO has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RPI-UN.TO is priced at CA$30.43 on the TSX, while CCL-B.TO trades at CA$94.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RPI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas CCL-B.TO's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, RPI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CCL-B.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RPI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to CCL-B.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPI-UN.TO.Check CCL-B.TO's competition here

Richards Packaging Income Fund (TSX: RPI-UN.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RPI-UN.TO stands at 333.4M. In comparison, WPK.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RPI-UN.TO is priced at CA$30.43 on the TSX, while WPK.TO trades at CA$43.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RPI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas WPK.TO's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, RPI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WPK.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RPI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to WPK.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPI-UN.TO.Check WPK.TO's competition here

Richards Packaging Income Fund (TSX: RPI-UN.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RPI-UN.TO stands at 333.4M. In comparison, CAS.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RPI-UN.TO is priced at CA$30.43 on the TSX, while CAS.TO trades at CA$16.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RPI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas CAS.TO's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, RPI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CAS.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RPI-UN.TO is less volatile compared to CAS.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPI-UN.TO.Check CAS.TO's competition here

Richards Packaging Income Fund (TSX: RPI-UN.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RPI-UN.TO stands at 333.4M. In comparison, TCL-A.TO has a market cap of 476.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RPI-UN.TO is priced at CA$30.43 on the TSX, while TCL-A.TO trades at CA$5.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RPI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas TCL-A.TO's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, RPI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TCL-A.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RPI-UN.TO is less volatile compared to TCL-A.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPI-UN.TO.Check TCL-A.TO's competition here

Richards Packaging Income Fund (TSX: RPI-UN.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RPI-UN.TO stands at 333.4M. In comparison, TCL-B.TO has a market cap of 413.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RPI-UN.TO is priced at CA$30.43 on the TSX, while TCL-B.TO trades at CA$6.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RPI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas TCL-B.TO's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, RPI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TCL-B.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RPI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to TCL-B.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPI-UN.TO.Check TCL-B.TO's competition here

Richards Packaging Income Fund (TSX: RPI-UN.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RPI-UN.TO stands at 333.4M. In comparison, SXP.TO has a market cap of 86.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RPI-UN.TO is priced at CA$30.43 on the TSX, while SXP.TO trades at CA$3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RPI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas SXP.TO's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, RPI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SXP.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RPI-UN.TO is less volatile compared to SXP.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPI-UN.TO.Check SXP.TO's competition here

Richards Packaging Income Fund (TSX: RPI-UN.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RPI-UN.TO stands at 333.4M. In comparison, ITP.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RPI-UN.TO is priced at CA$30.43 on the TSX, while ITP.TO trades at CA$40.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RPI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.93, whereas ITP.TO's P/E ratio is -218.81. In terms of profitability, RPI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ITP.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RPI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to ITP.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPI-UN.TO.Check ITP.TO's competition here