Loading...

Richards Packaging Income Fund

RPI-UN.TOTSX
Consumer Cyclical
Packaging & Containers
CA$32.75
CA$0.75(2.34%)

Richards Packaging Income Fund (RPI-UN.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

See (RPI-UN.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

SymbolPriceChange %Market CapP/E RatioEPSDividend Yield
RPI-UN.TOCA$32.75+2.34%358.8M14.95CA$2.19+4.06%
CCL-A.TOCA$77.80+0.00%13.3B16.21CA$4.80+1.61%
CCL-B.TOCA$76.16-1.67%13.2B15.87CA$4.80+1.61%
WPK.TOCA$41.10+0.39%2.5B13.34CA$3.08+7.79%
CAS.TOCA$9.00-0.33%911.3M-225.00-CA$0.04+5.35%
SXP.TOCA$4.15+0.24%101.9M-7.83-CA$0.53+4.59%
ITP.TOCA$40.48+0.00%0-218.81-CA$0.19N/A

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

RPI-UN.TO vs CCL-A.TO Comparison August 2025

RPI-UN.TO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RPI-UN.TO stands at 358.8M. In comparison, CCL-A.TO has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RPI-UN.TO is priced at CA$32.75, while CCL-A.TO trades at CA$77.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RPI-UN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.95, whereas CCL-A.TO's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, RPI-UN.TO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CCL-A.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RPI-UN.TO is more volatile compared to CCL-A.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPI-UN.TO.Check CCL-A.TO's competition here

Stock price comparison of stocks in the Consumer Cyclical Sector

Loading...

Frequently Asked Questions

;