Rapidtron, Inc.
Rapidtron, Inc. (RPDT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RPDT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPDT | $0.00 | -0.00% | 2.2K | N/A | -$0.16 | N/A |
| ERIXF | $7.47 | +0.00% | 25.1B | 13.83 | $0.54 | +3.65% |
| ZTCOF | $3.65 | +14.06% | 23.8B | 15.21 | $0.24 | +2.35% |
| NOKBF | $4.37 | -1.35% | 23.5B | 16.81 | $0.26 | +3.25% |
| FXCNY | $11.51 | +0.00% | 18.8B | -44.27 | -$0.26 | N/A |
| AACAY | $5.07 | +1.43% | 6B | 24.14 | $0.21 | +0.61% |
| AACAF | $4.98 | +0.00% | 5.9B | 23.71 | $0.21 | +0.62% |
| YZOFF | $1.03 | +0.00% | 3.2B | 4.90 | $0.21 | +0.51% |
| HMNKF | $42.20 | +0.00% | 2.1B | 54.81 | $0.77 | N/A |
| ETCMY | $1.03 | -2.83% | 2B | -1.72 | -$0.60 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RPDT vs ERIXF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ERIXF has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while ERIXF trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERIXF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to ERIXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and ERIXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERIXF's competition here
RPDT vs ZTCOF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ZTCOF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while ZTCOF trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZTCOF's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to ZTCOF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and ZTCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZTCOF's competition here
RPDT vs NOKBF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, NOKBF has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while NOKBF trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOKBF's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to NOKBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to NOKBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check NOKBF's competition here
RPDT vs FXCNY Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, FXCNY has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while FXCNY trades at $11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FXCNY's P/E ratio is -44.27. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to FXCNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to FXCNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check FXCNY's competition here
RPDT vs AACAY Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, AACAY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while AACAY trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AACAY's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to AACAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to AACAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check AACAY's competition here
RPDT vs AACAF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, AACAF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while AACAF trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AACAF's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to AACAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and AACAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AACAF's competition here
RPDT vs YZOFF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, YZOFF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while YZOFF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YZOFF's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to YZOFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and YZOFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YZOFF's competition here
RPDT vs HMNKF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, HMNKF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while HMNKF trades at $42.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HMNKF's P/E ratio is 54.81. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to HMNKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and HMNKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMNKF's competition here
RPDT vs ETCMY Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ETCMY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while ETCMY trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETCMY's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to ETCMY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to ETCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check ETCMY's competition here
RPDT vs EUTLF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, EUTLF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while EUTLF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUTLF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to EUTLF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to EUTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check EUTLF's competition here
RPDT vs VTKLF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, VTKLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while VTKLF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTKLF's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to VTKLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and VTKLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTKLF's competition here
RPDT vs VTKLY Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, VTKLY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while VTKLY trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTKLY's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to VTKLY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to VTKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check VTKLY's competition here
RPDT vs FXCNF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, FXCNF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while FXCNF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FXCNF's P/E ratio is -41.67. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to FXCNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to FXCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check FXCNF's competition here
RPDT vs ADVOF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ADVOF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while ADVOF trades at $24.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADVOF's P/E ratio is -17.58. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to ADVOF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and ADVOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADVOF's competition here
RPDT vs HTCKF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, HTCKF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while HTCKF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTCKF's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to HTCKF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and HTCKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HTCKF's competition here
RPDT vs UBLXF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, UBLXF has a market cap of 969M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while UBLXF trades at $128.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBLXF's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to UBLXF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to UBLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check UBLXF's competition here
RPDT vs OKIEY Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, OKIEY has a market cap of 934.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while OKIEY trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKIEY's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to OKIEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to OKIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check OKIEY's competition here
RPDT vs EVTZF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, EVTZF has a market cap of 667.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while EVTZF trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTZF's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to EVTZF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and EVTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EVTZF's competition here
RPDT vs EVSBY Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, EVSBY has a market cap of 659.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while EVSBY trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVSBY's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to EVSBY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and EVSBY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EVSBY's competition here
RPDT vs COBJF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, COBJF has a market cap of 648.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while COBJF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COBJF's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to COBJF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to COBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check COBJF's competition here
RPDT vs OKIEF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, OKIEF has a market cap of 577.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while OKIEF trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OKIEF's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to OKIEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and OKIEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OKIEF's competition here
RPDT vs SATOF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, SATOF has a market cap of 465.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while SATOF trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SATOF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to SATOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and SATOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SATOF's competition here
RPDT vs FLTCF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, FLTCF has a market cap of 435.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while FLTCF trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLTCF's P/E ratio is 33.17. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to FLTCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to FLTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check FLTCF's competition here
RPDT vs PAOTF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, PAOTF has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while PAOTF trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAOTF's P/E ratio is -38.74. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to PAOTF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and PAOTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PAOTF's competition here
RPDT vs VNWTF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, VNWTF has a market cap of 194M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while VNWTF trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNWTF's P/E ratio is 72.55. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to VNWTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and VNWTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VNWTF's competition here
RPDT vs SIMTF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, SIMTF has a market cap of 111.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while SIMTF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIMTF's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to SIMTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to SIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check SIMTF's competition here
RPDT vs QTRHF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, QTRHF has a market cap of 110.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while QTRHF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTRHF's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to QTRHF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and QTRHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QTRHF's competition here
RPDT vs ATSKF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ATSKF has a market cap of 92.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while ATSKF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATSKF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to ATSKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to ATSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check ATSKF's competition here
RPDT vs NPNZF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, NPNZF has a market cap of 90.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while NPNZF trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPNZF's P/E ratio is -11.23. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to NPNZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and NPNZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPNZF's competition here
RPDT vs BEWFF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, BEWFF has a market cap of 55.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while BEWFF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEWFF's P/E ratio is 62.50. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to BEWFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and BEWFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BEWFF's competition here
RPDT vs ELSLF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ELSLF has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while ELSLF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELSLF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to ELSLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and ELSLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELSLF's competition here
RPDT vs WSTL Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, WSTL has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while WSTL trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSTL's P/E ratio is -8.83. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to WSTL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to WSTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check WSTL's competition here
RPDT vs ASROF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ASROF has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while ASROF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASROF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to ASROF's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and ASROF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASROF's competition here
RPDT vs BYLTF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, BYLTF has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while BYLTF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BYLTF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to BYLTF's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to BYLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check BYLTF's competition here
RPDT vs CYSNF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, CYSNF has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while CYSNF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYSNF's P/E ratio is -69.90. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to CYSNF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and CYSNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYSNF's competition here
RPDT vs ENAFF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ENAFF has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while ENAFF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENAFF's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to ENAFF's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to ENAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check ENAFF's competition here
RPDT vs VMNT Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, VMNT has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while VMNT trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMNT's P/E ratio is -10.05. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to VMNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to VMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check VMNT's competition here
RPDT vs MILOF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, MILOF has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while MILOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MILOF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to MILOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and MILOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MILOF's competition here
RPDT vs KPIFF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, KPIFF has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while KPIFF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KPIFF's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to KPIFF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and KPIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KPIFF's competition here
RPDT vs ATGN Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ATGN has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while ATGN trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATGN's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to ATGN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to ATGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check ATGN's competition here
RPDT vs MOYFF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, MOYFF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while MOYFF trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOYFF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to MOYFF's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to MOYFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check MOYFF's competition here
RPDT vs CYCA Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, CYCA has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while CYCA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYCA's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to CYCA's ROE of +5.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to CYCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check CYCA's competition here
RPDT vs LTCCF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, LTCCF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while LTCCF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTCCF's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to LTCCF's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and LTCCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LTCCF's competition here
RPDT vs ISEYF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ISEYF has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while ISEYF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISEYF's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to ISEYF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to ISEYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check ISEYF's competition here
RPDT vs TTLTF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, TTLTF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while TTLTF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTLTF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to TTLTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to TTLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check TTLTF's competition here
RPDT vs HPNN Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, HPNN has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while HPNN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPNN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to HPNN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and HPNN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HPNN's competition here
RPDT vs STRH Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, STRH has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while STRH trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRH's P/E ratio is -6.27. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to STRH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to STRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check STRH's competition here
RPDT vs WLAN Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, WLAN has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while WLAN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to WLAN's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to WLAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check WLAN's competition here
RPDT vs NVRVF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, NVRVF has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while NVRVF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVRVF's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to NVRVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and NVRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NVRVF's competition here
RPDT vs NRRWF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, NRRWF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while NRRWF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRRWF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to NRRWF's ROE of -8.90%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to NRRWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check NRRWF's competition here
RPDT vs LMGR Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, LMGR has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while LMGR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to LMGR's ROE of +93.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to LMGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check LMGR's competition here
RPDT vs CNTFY Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, CNTFY has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while CNTFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to CNTFY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and CNTFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNTFY's competition here
RPDT vs MFCO Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, MFCO has a market cap of 954.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while MFCO trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFCO's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to MFCO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to MFCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check MFCO's competition here
RPDT vs TPTW Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, TPTW has a market cap of 735.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while TPTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPTW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to TPTW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and TPTW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TPTW's competition here
RPDT vs BDRL Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, BDRL has a market cap of 475.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while BDRL trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDRL's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to BDRL's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and BDRL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BDRL's competition here
RPDT vs AXBSF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, AXBSF has a market cap of 425.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while AXBSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXBSF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to AXBSF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to AXBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check AXBSF's competition here
RPDT vs CRMK Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, CRMK has a market cap of 375.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while CRMK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to CRMK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and CRMK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRMK's competition here
RPDT vs BKSD Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, BKSD has a market cap of 273.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while BKSD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKSD's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to BKSD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and BKSD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BKSD's competition here
RPDT vs MLRT Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, MLRT has a market cap of 233.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while MLRT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLRT's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to MLRT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to MLRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check MLRT's competition here
RPDT vs ATCLF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ATCLF has a market cap of 224.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while ATCLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATCLF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to ATCLF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to ATCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check ATCLF's competition here
RPDT vs WGNR Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, WGNR has a market cap of 203.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while WGNR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WGNR's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to WGNR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to WGNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check WGNR's competition here
RPDT vs AAPJ Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, AAPJ has a market cap of 178K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while AAPJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAPJ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to AAPJ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and AAPJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AAPJ's competition here
RPDT vs CAMPQ Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, CAMPQ has a market cap of 120.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while CAMPQ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAMPQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to CAMPQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to CAMPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check CAMPQ's competition here
RPDT vs VCTY Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, VCTY has a market cap of 95.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while VCTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to VCTY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to VCTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check VCTY's competition here
RPDT vs ERFB Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ERFB has a market cap of 84.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while ERFB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to ERFB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and ERFB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERFB's competition here
RPDT vs PDXP Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, PDXP has a market cap of 81.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while PDXP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PDXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to PDXP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and PDXP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PDXP's competition here
RPDT vs EZEN Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, EZEN has a market cap of 72.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while EZEN trades at $3,300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EZEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to EZEN's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RPDT has daily volatility of 0.00 and EZEN has daily volatility of N/A.Check EZEN's competition here
RPDT vs PMOZ Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, PMOZ has a market cap of 68.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while PMOZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMOZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to PMOZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and PMOZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PMOZ's competition here
RPDT vs CRLI Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, CRLI has a market cap of 60.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while CRLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to CRLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and CRLI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CRLI's competition here
RPDT vs ELST Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ELST has a market cap of 49.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while ELST trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELST's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to ELST's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to ELST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check ELST's competition here
RPDT vs IPTK Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, IPTK has a market cap of 28.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while IPTK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPTK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to IPTK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and IPTK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPTK's competition here
RPDT vs ETCIA Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ETCIA has a market cap of 25.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while ETCIA trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETCIA's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to ETCIA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to ETCIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check ETCIA's competition here
RPDT vs LTTC Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, LTTC has a market cap of 12K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while LTTC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to LTTC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and LTTC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LTTC's competition here
RPDT vs FBCE Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, FBCE has a market cap of 10K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while FBCE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBCE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to FBCE's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to FBCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check FBCE's competition here
RPDT vs OTOW Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, OTOW has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while OTOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to OTOW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and OTOW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OTOW's competition here
RPDT vs UTRK Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, UTRK has a market cap of 5.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while UTRK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UTRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to UTRK's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and UTRK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UTRK's competition here
RPDT vs JUMT Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, JUMT has a market cap of 4.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while JUMT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JUMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to JUMT's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to JUMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check JUMT's competition here
RPDT vs AVSR Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, AVSR has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while AVSR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVSR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to AVSR's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and AVSR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVSR's competition here
RPDT vs MPEG Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, MPEG has a market cap of 3.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while MPEG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPEG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to MPEG's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and MPEG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MPEG's competition here
RPDT vs WIRX Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, WIRX has a market cap of 3.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while WIRX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to WIRX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and WIRX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WIRX's competition here
RPDT vs CYBD Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, CYBD has a market cap of 3.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while CYBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to CYBD's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and CYBD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYBD's competition here
RPDT vs VRCM Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, VRCM has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while VRCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VRCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to VRCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and VRCM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VRCM's competition here
RPDT vs IZNN Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, IZNN has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while IZNN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IZNN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to IZNN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to IZNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check IZNN's competition here
RPDT vs PRXM Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, PRXM has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while PRXM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRXM's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to PRXM's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and PRXM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRXM's competition here
RPDT vs XCOMQ Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, XCOMQ has a market cap of 1.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while XCOMQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCOMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to XCOMQ's ROE of +2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to XCOMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check XCOMQ's competition here
RPDT vs RITT Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, RITT has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while RITT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RITT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to RITT's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to RITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check RITT's competition here
RPDT vs ZSTN Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ZSTN has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while ZSTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZSTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to ZSTN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and ZSTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZSTN's competition here
RPDT vs ABILF Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ABILF has a market cap of 799. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while ABILF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABILF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to ABILF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and ABILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABILF's competition here
RPDT vs TCCO Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, TCCO has a market cap of 371. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while TCCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to TCCO's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and TCCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCCO's competition here
RPDT vs GNRD Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, GNRD has a market cap of 353. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while GNRD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNRD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to GNRD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and GNRD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNRD's competition here
RPDT vs ZTNO Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ZTNO has a market cap of 301. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while ZTNO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZTNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to ZTNO's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and ZTNO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZTNO's competition here
RPDT vs ORSX Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, ORSX has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while ORSX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to ORSX's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and ORSX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ORSX's competition here
RPDT vs HDIH Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, HDIH has a market cap of 45. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while HDIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HDIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to HDIH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and HDIH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HDIH's competition here
RPDT vs LMSC Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, LMSC has a market cap of 31. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while LMSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to LMSC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and LMSC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LMSC's competition here
RPDT vs STCI Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, STCI has a market cap of 20. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while STCI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STCI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to STCI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and STCI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STCI's competition here
RPDT vs BETW Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, BETW has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while BETW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BETW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to BETW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to BETW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check BETW's competition here
RPDT vs DGIV Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, DGIV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while DGIV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to DGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT is less volatile compared to DGIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RPDT.Check DGIV's competition here
RPDT vs AXCP Comparison July 2025
RPDT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RPDT stands at 2.2K. In comparison, AXCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RPDT is priced at $0.00, while AXCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RPDT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RPDT's ROE is +3.16%, compared to AXCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RPDT and AXCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AXCP's competition here