Regions Financial Corporation
Regions Financial Corporation RN70.F Peers
See (RN70.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RN70.F | $15.30 | N/A | 13.96B | N/A | N/A | +6.31% |
| BNP.DE | $79.04 | -0.10% | 89.28B | 8.32 | $9.50 | +5.82% |
| IES.DE | $4.89 | +0.01% | 86.95B | 9.78 | $0.50 | +6.59% |
| UB5.DE | $33.68 | -0.18% | 54.30B | 9.46 | $3.56 | +6.14% |
| LLD.DE | $0.88 | N/A | 52.82B | 12.57 | $0.07 | +4.27% |
| DBK.DE | $24.73 | +0.20% | 48.02B | 15.08 | $1.64 | +1.82% |
| SGE.DE | $47.21 | -0.53% | 33.25B | 8.52 | $5.54 | +1.91% |
| SGE.F | $47.08 | -1.09% | 33.16B | 8.51 | $5.53 | +1.91% |
| CBK.DE | $26.01 | +0.77% | 30.81B | 12.50 | $2.08 | N/A |
| SEBC.F | $14.80 | +1.65% | 30.23B | 9.67 | $1.53 | +0.17% |
Stock Comparison
RN70.F vs BNP.DE Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, BNP.DE has a market cap of 89.28B. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while BNP.DE trades at $79.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNP.DE's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNP.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F is less volatile compared to BNP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RN70.F.
RN70.F vs IES.DE Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, IES.DE has a market cap of 86.95B. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while IES.DE trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IES.DE's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IES.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F is less volatile compared to IES.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RN70.F.
RN70.F vs UB5.DE Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, UB5.DE has a market cap of 54.30B. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while UB5.DE trades at $33.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UB5.DE's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UB5.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F and UB5.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RN70.F vs LLD.DE Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, LLD.DE has a market cap of 52.82B. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while LLD.DE trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LLD.DE's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LLD.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F is less volatile compared to LLD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RN70.F.
RN70.F vs DBK.DE Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, DBK.DE has a market cap of 48.02B. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while DBK.DE trades at $24.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DBK.DE's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DBK.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F is less volatile compared to DBK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RN70.F.
RN70.F vs SGE.DE Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, SGE.DE has a market cap of 33.25B. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while SGE.DE trades at $47.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGE.DE's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGE.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F is less volatile compared to SGE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RN70.F.
RN70.F vs SGE.F Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, SGE.F has a market cap of 33.16B. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while SGE.F trades at $47.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGE.F's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGE.F's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F is less volatile compared to SGE.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RN70.F.
RN70.F vs CBK.DE Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, CBK.DE has a market cap of 30.81B. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while CBK.DE trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBK.DE's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBK.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F is less volatile compared to CBK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RN70.F.
RN70.F vs SEBC.F Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, SEBC.F has a market cap of 30.23B. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while SEBC.F trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEBC.F's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEBC.F's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F and SEBC.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RN70.F vs 4FY.F Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, 4FY.F has a market cap of 13.54B. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while 4FY.F trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 4FY.F's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 4FY.F's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F and 4FY.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RN70.F vs BIRG.DE Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, BIRG.DE has a market cap of 11.35B. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while BIRG.DE trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIRG.DE's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BIRG.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F is less volatile compared to BIRG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RN70.F.
RN70.F vs KTB1.F Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, KTB1.F has a market cap of 9.17B. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while KTB1.F trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KTB1.F's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KTB1.F's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F is less volatile compared to KTB1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RN70.F.
RN70.F vs RAW.DE Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, RAW.DE has a market cap of 8.72B. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while RAW.DE trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAW.DE's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RAW.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F is less volatile compared to RAW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RN70.F.
RN70.F vs TMLF.F Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, TMLF.F has a market cap of 5.09B. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while TMLF.F trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMLF.F's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TMLF.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F and TMLF.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RN70.F vs 47T.F Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, 47T.F has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while 47T.F trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 47T.F's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to 47T.F's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F and 47T.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RN70.F vs ARLN.DE Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, ARLN.DE has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while ARLN.DE trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARLN.DE's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARLN.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F is less volatile compared to ARLN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RN70.F.
RN70.F vs ARL.DE Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, ARL.DE has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while ARL.DE trades at $33.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARL.DE's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARL.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F is less volatile compared to ARL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RN70.F.
RN70.F vs ARLN.F Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, ARLN.F has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while ARLN.F trades at $33.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARLN.F's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARLN.F's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F is less volatile compared to ARLN.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RN70.F.
RN70.F vs PCZ.DE Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, PCZ.DE has a market cap of 641.99M. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while PCZ.DE trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCZ.DE's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PCZ.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F is less volatile compared to PCZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RN70.F.
RN70.F vs ZYE1.F Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, ZYE1.F has a market cap of 376.10M. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while ZYE1.F trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZYE1.F's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZYE1.F's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F and ZYE1.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RN70.F vs UBK.DE Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, UBK.DE has a market cap of 186.36M. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while UBK.DE trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBK.DE's P/E ratio is 258.00. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UBK.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F is less volatile compared to UBK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RN70.F.
RN70.F vs QB7.DE Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, QB7.DE has a market cap of 156.29M. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while QB7.DE trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QB7.DE's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QB7.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F and QB7.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RN70.F vs MBK.DE Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, MBK.DE has a market cap of 121.35M. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while MBK.DE trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBK.DE's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBK.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F is less volatile compared to MBK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RN70.F.
RN70.F vs VG8.DE Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, VG8.DE has a market cap of 27.92M. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while VG8.DE trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VG8.DE's P/E ratio is 3.09. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VG8.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F and VG8.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RN70.F vs MBC.DE Comparison
RN70.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RN70.F stands at 13.96B. In comparison, MBC.DE has a market cap of 4.22M. Regarding current trading prices, RN70.F is priced at $15.30, while MBC.DE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RN70.F currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBC.DE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RN70.F's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBC.DE's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RN70.F is less volatile compared to MBC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RN70.F.