TISCO Financial Group Public Company Limited (47T.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (47T.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47T.F | €2.94 | +0.68% | 2.4B | 13.36 | €0.22 | +6.93% |
| CRIN.DE | €71.74 | -1.05% | 107.3B | 9.85 | €7.27 | +4.40% |
| BNP.DE | €93.20 | +0.15% | 102.7B | 8.80 | €10.60 | +5.53% |
| IES.DE | €5.60 | +0.16% | 98.5B | 10.46 | €0.54 | +6.65% |
| LLD.DE | €1.14 | -1.34% | 66.4B | 12.67 | €0.09 | +3.70% |
| DBK.DE | €27.29 | -0.07% | 52.3B | 8.66 | €3.16 | +3.66% |
| SGE.DE | €69.85 | +0.09% | 51.4B | 10.00 | €7.04 | +2.29% |
| SGE.F | €70.43 | +1.27% | 50.9B | 9.91 | €7.04 | +2.31% |
| CBK.DE | €36.70 | +0.82% | 40.5B | 17.04 | €2.17 | +2.98% |
| EBO.DE | €101.30 | +0.60% | 39.6B | 11.89 | €8.57 | +0.74% |
Stock Comparison
47T.F vs CRIN.DE Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CRIN.DE has a market cap of 107.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while CRIN.DE trades at €71.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas CRIN.DE's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRIN.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to CRIN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check CRIN.DE's competition here
47T.F vs BNP.DE Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BNP.DE has a market cap of 102.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while BNP.DE trades at €93.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas BNP.DE's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BNP.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to BNP.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check BNP.DE's competition here
47T.F vs IES.DE Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IES.DE has a market cap of 98.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while IES.DE trades at €5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas IES.DE's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IES.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to IES.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check IES.DE's competition here
47T.F vs LLD.DE Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LLD.DE has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while LLD.DE trades at €1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas LLD.DE's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LLD.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to LLD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check LLD.DE's competition here
47T.F vs DBK.DE Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, DBK.DE has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while DBK.DE trades at €27.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas DBK.DE's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DBK.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to DBK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check DBK.DE's competition here
47T.F vs SGE.DE Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SGE.DE has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while SGE.DE trades at €69.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas SGE.DE's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGE.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to SGE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check SGE.DE's competition here
47T.F vs SGE.F Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SGE.F has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while SGE.F trades at €70.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas SGE.F's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SGE.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to SGE.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check SGE.F's competition here
47T.F vs CBK.DE Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CBK.DE has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while CBK.DE trades at €36.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas CBK.DE's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CBK.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to CBK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check CBK.DE's competition here
47T.F vs EBO.DE Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, EBO.DE has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while EBO.DE trades at €101.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas EBO.DE's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EBO.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to EBO.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check EBO.DE's competition here
47T.F vs FRYA.F Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, FRYA.F has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while FRYA.F trades at €30.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas FRYA.F's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FRYA.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to FRYA.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check FRYA.F's competition here
47T.F vs SEBC.F Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SEBC.F has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while SEBC.F trades at €16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas SEBC.F's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SEBC.F's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F and SEBC.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEBC.F's competition here
47T.F vs BIRG.DE Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, BIRG.DE has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while BIRG.DE trades at €17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas BIRG.DE's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BIRG.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to BIRG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check BIRG.DE's competition here
47T.F vs RAW.DE Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RAW.DE has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while RAW.DE trades at €48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas RAW.DE's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RAW.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to RAW.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check RAW.DE's competition here
47T.F vs KTB1.F Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, KTB1.F has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while KTB1.F trades at €0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas KTB1.F's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KTB1.F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to KTB1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check KTB1.F's competition here
47T.F vs 4FY.F Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, 4FY.F has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while 4FY.F trades at €2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas 4FY.F's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to 4FY.F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F and 4FY.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check 4FY.F's competition here
47T.F vs RN70.F Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RN70.F has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while RN70.F trades at €13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas RN70.F's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RN70.F's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F and RN70.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RN70.F's competition here
47T.F vs TMLF.F Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TMLF.F has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while TMLF.F trades at €0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas TMLF.F's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TMLF.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F and TMLF.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMLF.F's competition here
47T.F vs ARLN.DE Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ARLN.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while ARLN.DE trades at €33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas ARLN.DE's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARLN.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to ARLN.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check ARLN.DE's competition here
47T.F vs ARL.DE Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ARL.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while ARL.DE trades at €33.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas ARL.DE's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARL.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to ARL.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check ARL.DE's competition here
47T.F vs ARLN.F Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ARLN.F has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while ARLN.F trades at €33.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas ARLN.F's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARLN.F's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to ARLN.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check ARLN.F's competition here
47T.F vs ZYE1.F Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ZYE1.F has a market cap of 507.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while ZYE1.F trades at €26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas ZYE1.F's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZYE1.F's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F and ZYE1.F have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZYE1.F's competition here
47T.F vs PCZ.DE Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PCZ.DE has a market cap of 462.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while PCZ.DE trades at €7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas PCZ.DE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PCZ.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to PCZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check PCZ.DE's competition here
47T.F vs PBB.DE Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PBB.DE has a market cap of 451.8M. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while PBB.DE trades at €3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas PBB.DE's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PBB.DE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to PBB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check PBB.DE's competition here
47T.F vs UBK.DE Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, UBK.DE has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while UBK.DE trades at €3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas UBK.DE's P/E ratio is 188.00. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UBK.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F and UBK.DE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UBK.DE's competition here
47T.F vs QB7.DE Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, QB7.DE has a market cap of 151.1M. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while QB7.DE trades at €3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas QB7.DE's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QB7.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to QB7.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check QB7.DE's competition here
47T.F vs MULT.DE Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MULT.DE has a market cap of 118.6M. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while MULT.DE trades at €5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas MULT.DE's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MULT.DE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to MULT.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check MULT.DE's competition here
47T.F vs MBK.DE Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MBK.DE has a market cap of 108.9M. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while MBK.DE trades at €14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas MBK.DE's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MBK.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to MBK.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check MBK.DE's competition here
47T.F vs VG80.DE Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, VG80.DE has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while VG80.DE trades at €2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas VG80.DE's P/E ratio is 52.40. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VG80.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to VG80.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check VG80.DE's competition here
47T.F vs VG8.DE Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, VG8.DE has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while VG8.DE trades at €2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas VG8.DE's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VG8.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to VG8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check VG8.DE's competition here
47T.F vs MBC.DE Comparison June 2026
47T.F plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, 47T.F stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MBC.DE has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, 47T.F is priced at €2.94, while MBC.DE trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
47T.F currently has a P/E ratio of 13.36, whereas MBC.DE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, 47T.F's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MBC.DE's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, 47T.F is less volatile compared to MBC.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for 47T.F.Check MBC.DE's competition here