Rusoro Mining Ltd.
Rusoro Mining Ltd. RMLFF Peers
See (RMLFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMLFF | $0.48 | +0.42% | 293.02M | -11.89 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| ZIJMF | $2.25 | +0.44% | 64.20B | 12.50 | $0.18 | +1.87% |
| OPYGY | $21.00 | N/A | 28.45B | 2.50 | $8.39 | +0.37% |
| GFIOF | $23.13 | N/A | 20.70B | 16.76 | $1.38 | +2.36% |
| NESRF | $11.70 | -4.10% | 16.73B | 22.50 | $0.52 | +1.79% |
| NSTYY | $12.40 | +25.38% | 14.26B | 33.51 | $0.37 | +1.43% |
| HCHDY | $27.14 | N/A | 13.96B | 12.92 | $2.10 | N/A |
| NCMGY | $15.59 | +2.84% | 13.94B | 17.92 | $0.87 | N/A |
| NCMGF | $15.20 | -2.53% | 13.59B | 17.47 | $0.87 | N/A |
| KOZAY | $3.55 | -42.70% | 11.37B | 6.96 | $0.51 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RMLFF vs ZIJMF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, ZIJMF has a market cap of 64.20B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while ZIJMF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas ZIJMF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZIJMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to ZIJMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs OPYGY Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, OPYGY has a market cap of 28.45B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while OPYGY trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas OPYGY's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OPYGY's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to OPYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs GFIOF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, GFIOF has a market cap of 20.70B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while GFIOF trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas GFIOF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GFIOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to GFIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs NESRF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, NESRF has a market cap of 16.73B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while NESRF trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas NESRF's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NESRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to NESRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs NSTYY Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, NSTYY has a market cap of 14.26B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while NSTYY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas NSTYY's P/E ratio is 33.51. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NSTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to NSTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs HCHDY Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, HCHDY has a market cap of 13.96B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while HCHDY trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas HCHDY's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HCHDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to HCHDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs NCMGY Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, NCMGY has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while NCMGY trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas NCMGY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NCMGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to NCMGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs NCMGF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, NCMGF has a market cap of 13.59B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while NCMGF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas NCMGF's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NCMGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to NCMGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs KOZAY Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, KOZAY has a market cap of 11.37B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while KOZAY trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas KOZAY's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KOZAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to KOZAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs HGMCF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, HGMCF has a market cap of 9.80B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while HGMCF trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas HGMCF's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HGMCF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to HGMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs CAHPF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, CAHPF has a market cap of 9.65B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while CAHPF trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas CAHPF's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CAHPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to CAHPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs LUGDF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, LUGDF has a market cap of 9.53B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while LUGDF trades at $39.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas LUGDF's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LUGDF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to LUGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs ZHAOF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, ZHAOF has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while ZHAOF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas ZHAOF's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZHAOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to ZHAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs AULGF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, AULGF has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while AULGF trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas AULGF's P/E ratio is 159.00. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AULGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to AULGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs EDVMF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, EDVMF has a market cap of 6.63B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while EDVMF trades at $27.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas EDVMF's P/E ratio is -65.39. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EDVMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to EDVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs DGMLF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, DGMLF has a market cap of 3.71B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while DGMLF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas DGMLF's P/E ratio is -154.50. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DGMLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to DGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs SBYSF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, SBYSF has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while SBYSF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas SBYSF's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SBYSF's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to SBYSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs ZIJMY Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, ZIJMY has a market cap of 3.23B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while ZIJMY trades at $45.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas ZIJMY's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZIJMY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to ZIJMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs ARGTF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, ARGTF has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while ARGTF trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas ARGTF's P/E ratio is -128.54. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ARGTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to ARGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs PMNXF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, PMNXF has a market cap of 2.89B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while PMNXF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas PMNXF's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PMNXF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to PMNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs OCANF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, OCANF has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while OCANF trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas OCANF's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OCANF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to OCANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs CRNLF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, CRNLF has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while CRNLF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas CRNLF's P/E ratio is 44.23. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRNLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to CRNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs TORXF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, TORXF has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while TORXF trades at $28.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas TORXF's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TORXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to TORXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs DPMLF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, DPMLF has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while DPMLF trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas DPMLF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DPMLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to DPMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs GSISF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, GSISF has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while GSISF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas GSISF's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GSISF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to GSISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs ELKMF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, ELKMF has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while ELKMF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas ELKMF's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ELKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to ELKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs CELTF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, CELTF has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while CELTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas CELTF's P/E ratio is 26.86. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CELTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to CELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs KNTNF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, KNTNF has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while KNTNF trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas KNTNF's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KNTNF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to KNTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs REDLF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, REDLF has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while REDLF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas REDLF's P/E ratio is 31.54. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to REDLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to REDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs GRLGF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, GRLGF has a market cap of 2.12B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while GRLGF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas GRLGF's P/E ratio is -16.19. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GRLGF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to GRLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs RGRNF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, RGRNF has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while RGRNF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas RGRNF's P/E ratio is -270.00. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RGRNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to RGRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs RMLRF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, RMLRF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while RMLRF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas RMLRF's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RMLRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to RMLRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs EOGSF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, EOGSF has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while EOGSF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas EOGSF's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EOGSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to EOGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs WDOFF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, WDOFF has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while WDOFF trades at $11.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas WDOFF's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WDOFF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to WDOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs HCHDF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, HCHDF has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while HCHDF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas HCHDF's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HCHDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to HCHDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs CXBMF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, CXBMF has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while CXBMF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas CXBMF's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CXBMF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to CXBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs WFRSF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, WFRSF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while WFRSF trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas WFRSF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WFRSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to WFRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs ORAAF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, ORAAF has a market cap of 1.37B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while ORAAF trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas ORAAF's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ORAAF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to ORAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs DRDGF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, DRDGF has a market cap of 1.35B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while DRDGF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas DRDGF's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DRDGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to DRDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs PAFRF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, PAFRF has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while PAFRF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas PAFRF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PAFRF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to PAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs OBNNF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, OBNNF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while OBNNF trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas OBNNF's P/E ratio is -351.00. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OBNNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to OBNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs AURQF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, AURQF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while AURQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas AURQF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AURQF's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to AURQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs MAUTF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, MAUTF has a market cap of 946.27M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while MAUTF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas MAUTF's P/E ratio is -14.83. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MAUTF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to MAUTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs SVLKF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, SVLKF has a market cap of 927.83M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while SVLKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas SVLKF's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SVLKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to SVLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs BELGF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, BELGF has a market cap of 918.81M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while BELGF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas BELGF's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BELGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to BELGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs SGSVF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, SGSVF has a market cap of 880.06M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while SGSVF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas SGSVF's P/E ratio is -79.00. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SGSVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to SGSVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs SNWGF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, SNWGF has a market cap of 867.36M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while SNWGF trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas SNWGF's P/E ratio is -38.57. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SNWGF's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to SNWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs KRRGF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, KRRGF has a market cap of 862.91M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while KRRGF trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas KRRGF's P/E ratio is 80.50. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KRRGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to KRRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs MWSNF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, MWSNF has a market cap of 788.98M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while MWSNF trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas MWSNF's P/E ratio is -70.82. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MWSNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to MWSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs RMGGF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, RMGGF has a market cap of 770.72M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while RMGGF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas RMGGF's P/E ratio is -36.20. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RMGGF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to RMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs RUPRF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, RUPRF has a market cap of 755.83M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while RUPRF trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas RUPRF's P/E ratio is -161.47. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RUPRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to RUPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs WTGRF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, WTGRF has a market cap of 677.28M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while WTGRF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas WTGRF's P/E ratio is 143.00. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WTGRF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to WTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs RGDFF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, RGDFF has a market cap of 676.83M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while RGDFF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas RGDFF's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RGDFF's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to RGDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs PDIYF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, PDIYF has a market cap of 655.09M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while PDIYF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas PDIYF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PDIYF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to PDIYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs GUYGF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, GUYGF has a market cap of 517.05M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while GUYGF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas GUYGF's P/E ratio is -71.67. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GUYGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to GUYGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs NVMLF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, NVMLF has a market cap of 512.17M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while NVMLF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas NVMLF's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NVMLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to NVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs ARNGF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, ARNGF has a market cap of 468.73M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while ARNGF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas ARNGF's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ARNGF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to ARNGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs MNSAF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, MNSAF has a market cap of 434.62M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while MNSAF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas MNSAF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MNSAF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to MNSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs ECRTF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, ECRTF has a market cap of 412.13M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while ECRTF trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas ECRTF's P/E ratio is -9.93. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ECRTF's ROE of -6.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to ECRTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs KSKGF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, KSKGF has a market cap of 407.25M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while KSKGF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas KSKGF's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KSKGF's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to KSKGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs ORZCF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, ORZCF has a market cap of 383.71M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while ORZCF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas ORZCF's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ORZCF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to ORZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs ASGOF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, ASGOF has a market cap of 381.68M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while ASGOF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas ASGOF's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ASGOF's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to ASGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs LMGDF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, LMGDF has a market cap of 354.83M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while LMGDF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas LMGDF's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LMGDF's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to LMGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs TPRXF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, TPRXF has a market cap of 343.46M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while TPRXF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas TPRXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TPRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to TPRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs MNDJF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, MNDJF has a market cap of 324.69M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while MNDJF trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas MNDJF's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MNDJF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to MNDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs RSRBF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, RSRBF has a market cap of 321.75M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while RSRBF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas RSRBF's P/E ratio is -31.86. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RSRBF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to RSRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs RIOFF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, RIOFF has a market cap of 318.37M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while RIOFF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas RIOFF's P/E ratio is -14.99. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RIOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to RIOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs PROBF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, PROBF has a market cap of 287.58M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while PROBF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas PROBF's P/E ratio is -14.10. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PROBF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to PROBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs FDMIF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, FDMIF has a market cap of 287.18M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while FDMIF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas FDMIF's P/E ratio is -33.56. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FDMIF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to FDMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs ALKEF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, ALKEF has a market cap of 286.24M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while ALKEF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas ALKEF's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ALKEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to ALKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs MGDPF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, MGDPF has a market cap of 278.68M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while MGDPF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas MGDPF's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MGDPF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to MGDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs THXPF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, THXPF has a market cap of 267.00M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while THXPF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas THXPF's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to THXPF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to THXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs OGNRF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, OGNRF has a market cap of 263.15M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while OGNRF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas OGNRF's P/E ratio is 130.50. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OGNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to OGNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs OSIIF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, OSIIF has a market cap of 254.63M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while OSIIF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas OSIIF's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OSIIF's ROE of +6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to OSIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs ERRSF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, ERRSF has a market cap of 250.91M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while ERRSF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas ERRSF's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ERRSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to ERRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs TTTNF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, TTTNF has a market cap of 250.28M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while TTTNF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas TTTNF's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TTTNF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to TTTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs MAKOF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, MAKOF has a market cap of 249.38M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while MAKOF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas MAKOF's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MAKOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to MAKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs ELEMF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, ELEMF has a market cap of 237.65M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while ELEMF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas ELEMF's P/E ratio is 96.70. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ELEMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to ELEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs WRLGF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, WRLGF has a market cap of 203.07M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while WRLGF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas WRLGF's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WRLGF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to WRLGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs SAAGF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, SAAGF has a market cap of 193.88M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while SAAGF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas SAAGF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SAAGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to SAAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs CNLMF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, CNLMF has a market cap of 193.34M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while CNLMF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas CNLMF's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CNLMF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to CNLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs OMGGF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, OMGGF has a market cap of 182.88M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while OMGGF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas OMGGF's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OMGGF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to OMGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs DCCNF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, DCCNF has a market cap of 182.52M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while DCCNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas DCCNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DCCNF's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to DCCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs SRBIF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, SRBIF has a market cap of 178.28M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while SRBIF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas SRBIF's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SRBIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to SRBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs CNMXF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, CNMXF has a market cap of 175.85M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while CNMXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas CNMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CNMXF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to CNMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs HSTXF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, HSTXF has a market cap of 174.29M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while HSTXF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas HSTXF's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HSTXF's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to HSTXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs GDRZF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, GDRZF has a market cap of 174.08M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while GDRZF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas GDRZF's P/E ratio is -15.40. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GDRZF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to GDRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs JAGGF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, JAGGF has a market cap of 172.90M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while JAGGF trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas JAGGF's P/E ratio is -27.25. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to JAGGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to JAGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs STBMF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, STBMF has a market cap of 170.01M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while STBMF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas STBMF's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STBMF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to STBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs THSGF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, THSGF has a market cap of 165.29M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while THSGF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas THSGF's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to THSGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to THSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs KFFLF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, KFFLF has a market cap of 159.62M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while KFFLF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas KFFLF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KFFLF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to KFFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs EEYMF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, EEYMF has a market cap of 156.25M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while EEYMF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas EEYMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EEYMF's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to EEYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs AGXKF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, AGXKF has a market cap of 151.94M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while AGXKF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas AGXKF's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AGXKF's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to AGXKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs STPGF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, STPGF has a market cap of 151.22M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while STPGF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas STPGF's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STPGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to STPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs DNGDF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, DNGDF has a market cap of 143.94M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while DNGDF trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas DNGDF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DNGDF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to DNGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs NVOOF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, NVOOF has a market cap of 142.65M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while NVOOF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas NVOOF's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NVOOF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to NVOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs GGAZF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, GGAZF has a market cap of 133.29M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while GGAZF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas GGAZF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GGAZF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to GGAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs MAIFF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, MAIFF has a market cap of 131.81M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while MAIFF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas MAIFF's P/E ratio is -8.01. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MAIFF's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is less volatile compared to MAIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.
RMLFF vs MFGCF Comparison
RMLFF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMLFF stands at 293.02M. In comparison, MFGCF has a market cap of 126.77M. Regarding current trading prices, RMLFF is priced at $0.48, while MFGCF trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -11.89, whereas MFGCF's P/E ratio is -12.89. In terms of profitability, RMLFF's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MFGCF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, RMLFF is more volatile compared to MFGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMLFF.