R M Drip & Sprinklers Systems Ltd. (RMDRIP.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RMDRIP.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMDRIP.NS | ₹16.11 | -1.23% | 3.9B | 19.09 | ₹0.82 | +0.19% |
| ASHOKLEY.NS | ₹143.84 | -1.00% | 828.3B | 23.86 | ₹5.91 | +2.48% |
| ASHOKLEY.BO | ₹144.20 | -0.79% | 828.2B | 25.45 | ₹5.54 | +2.48% |
| ESCORTS.NS | ₹2,798.50 | +0.61% | 308B | 22.57 | ₹124.05 | +1.29% |
| ESCORTS.BO | ₹2,801.70 | +1.14% | 307.8B | 24.68 | ₹113.38 | +1.29% |
| ACE.NS | ₹894.00 | -0.70% | 105.2B | 25.37 | ₹34.84 | +0.23% |
| ACE.BO | ₹892.30 | -0.09% | 105.1B | 25.32 | ₹34.87 | +0.23% |
| HMT.BO | ₹54.00 | -1.10% | 65.7B | -12.63 | -₹4.32 | N/A |
| HMT.NS | ₹53.01 | -5.03% | 65.6B | -14.93 | -₹3.65 | N/A |
| AJAXENGG.BO | ₹580.20 | -3.16% | 64.5B | 28.80 | ₹19.58 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RMDRIP.NS vs ASHOKLEY.NS Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ASHOKLEY.NS has a market cap of 828.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while ASHOKLEY.NS trades at ₹143.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas ASHOKLEY.NS's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ASHOKLEY.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to ASHOKLEY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check ASHOKLEY.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs ASHOKLEY.BO Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ASHOKLEY.BO has a market cap of 828.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while ASHOKLEY.BO trades at ₹144.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas ASHOKLEY.BO's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ASHOKLEY.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to ASHOKLEY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check ASHOKLEY.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs ESCORTS.NS Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ESCORTS.NS has a market cap of 308B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while ESCORTS.NS trades at ₹2,798.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas ESCORTS.NS's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ESCORTS.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to ESCORTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check ESCORTS.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs ESCORTS.BO Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ESCORTS.BO has a market cap of 307.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while ESCORTS.BO trades at ₹2,801.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas ESCORTS.BO's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ESCORTS.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to ESCORTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check ESCORTS.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs ACE.NS Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ACE.NS has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while ACE.NS trades at ₹894.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas ACE.NS's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ACE.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to ACE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check ACE.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs ACE.BO Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, ACE.BO has a market cap of 105.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while ACE.BO trades at ₹892.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas ACE.BO's P/E ratio is 25.32. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ACE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to ACE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check ACE.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs HMT.BO Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, HMT.BO has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while HMT.BO trades at ₹54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas HMT.BO's P/E ratio is -12.63. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to HMT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to HMT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check HMT.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs HMT.NS Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, HMT.NS has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while HMT.NS trades at ₹53.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas HMT.NS's P/E ratio is -14.93. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to HMT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to HMT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check HMT.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs AJAXENGG.BO Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AJAXENGG.BO has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while AJAXENGG.BO trades at ₹580.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas AJAXENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 28.80. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to AJAXENGG.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to AJAXENGG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check AJAXENGG.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs AJAXENGG.NS Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, AJAXENGG.NS has a market cap of 64.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while AJAXENGG.NS trades at ₹581.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas AJAXENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 28.80. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to AJAXENGG.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to AJAXENGG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check AJAXENGG.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs VSTTILLERS.BO Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VSTTILLERS.BO has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while VSTTILLERS.BO trades at ₹4,580.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas VSTTILLERS.BO's P/E ratio is 38.44. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to VSTTILLERS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to VSTTILLERS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check VSTTILLERS.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs VSTTILLERS.NS Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, VSTTILLERS.NS has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while VSTTILLERS.NS trades at ₹4,584.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas VSTTILLERS.NS's P/E ratio is 38.34. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to VSTTILLERS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to VSTTILLERS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check VSTTILLERS.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs JISLDVREQS.NS Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, JISLDVREQS.NS has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while JISLDVREQS.NS trades at ₹23.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas JISLDVREQS.NS's P/E ratio is -67.21. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to JISLDVREQS.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to JISLDVREQS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check JISLDVREQS.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs JISLDVREQS.BO Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, JISLDVREQS.BO has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while JISLDVREQS.BO trades at ₹22.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas JISLDVREQS.BO's P/E ratio is -67.03. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to JISLDVREQS.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to JISLDVREQS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check JISLDVREQS.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs UNIPARTS.NS Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, UNIPARTS.NS has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while UNIPARTS.NS trades at ₹640.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas UNIPARTS.NS's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to UNIPARTS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to UNIPARTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check UNIPARTS.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs UNIPARTS.BO Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, UNIPARTS.BO has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while UNIPARTS.BO trades at ₹641.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas UNIPARTS.BO's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to UNIPARTS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to UNIPARTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check UNIPARTS.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs JISLJALEQS.NS Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, JISLJALEQS.NS has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while JISLJALEQS.NS trades at ₹30.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas JISLJALEQS.NS's P/E ratio is -89.85. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to JISLJALEQS.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to JISLJALEQS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check JISLJALEQS.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs JISLJALEQS.BO Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, JISLJALEQS.BO has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while JISLJALEQS.BO trades at ₹30.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas JISLJALEQS.BO's P/E ratio is 126.96. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to JISLJALEQS.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to JISLJALEQS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check JISLJALEQS.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs TIL.BO Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TIL.BO has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while TIL.BO trades at ₹176.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas TIL.BO's P/E ratio is -38.18. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to TIL.BO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to TIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check TIL.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs TIL.NS Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TIL.NS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while TIL.NS trades at ₹178.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas TIL.NS's P/E ratio is -38.06. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to TIL.NS's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to TIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check TIL.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs EIMCOELECO.BO Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EIMCOELECO.BO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while EIMCOELECO.BO trades at ₹1,564.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas EIMCOELECO.BO's P/E ratio is 23.09. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to EIMCOELECO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to EIMCOELECO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check EIMCOELECO.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs EIMCOELECO.NS Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, EIMCOELECO.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while EIMCOELECO.NS trades at ₹1,566.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas EIMCOELECO.NS's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to EIMCOELECO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check EIMCOELECO.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs BLAL.BO Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BLAL.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while BLAL.BO trades at ₹184.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas BLAL.BO's P/E ratio is -182.10. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BLAL.BO's ROE of -10.96%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to BLAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check BLAL.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs BLAL.NS Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BLAL.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while BLAL.NS trades at ₹182.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas BLAL.NS's P/E ratio is -180.92. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BLAL.NS's ROE of -10.96%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to BLAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check BLAL.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs BAJAJINDEF.NS Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, BAJAJINDEF.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while BAJAJINDEF.NS trades at ₹240.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas BAJAJINDEF.NS's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BAJAJINDEF.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to BAJAJINDEF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check BAJAJINDEF.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs INDOFARM.NS Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, INDOFARM.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while INDOFARM.NS trades at ₹132.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas INDOFARM.NS's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to INDOFARM.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to INDOFARM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check INDOFARM.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs REVATHI.NS Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, REVATHI.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while REVATHI.NS trades at ₹1,960.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas REVATHI.NS's P/E ratio is 33.28. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to REVATHI.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to REVATHI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check REVATHI.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs TARACHAND.NS Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, TARACHAND.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while TARACHAND.NS trades at ₹55.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas TARACHAND.NS's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to TARACHAND.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to TARACHAND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check TARACHAND.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs MAHEPC.BO Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MAHEPC.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while MAHEPC.BO trades at ₹106.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas MAHEPC.BO's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MAHEPC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to MAHEPC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check MAHEPC.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs MAHEPC.NS Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, MAHEPC.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while MAHEPC.NS trades at ₹106.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas MAHEPC.NS's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MAHEPC.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to MAHEPC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check MAHEPC.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs RVTH.NS Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, RVTH.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while RVTH.NS trades at ₹695.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas RVTH.NS's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to RVTH.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to RVTH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check RVTH.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs SEMAC.BO Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SEMAC.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while SEMAC.BO trades at ₹324.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas SEMAC.BO's P/E ratio is 30.76. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SEMAC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to SEMAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check SEMAC.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs SEMAC.NS Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, SEMAC.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while SEMAC.NS trades at ₹334.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas SEMAC.NS's P/E ratio is 30.73. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SEMAC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to SEMAC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check SEMAC.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs DIL.NS Comparison June 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 3.9B. In comparison, DIL.NS has a market cap of 154.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹16.11, while DIL.NS trades at ₹0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.09, whereas DIL.NS's P/E ratio is 1.27. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.38%, compared to DIL.NS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to DIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check DIL.NS's competition here