R M Drip & Sprinklers Systems Ltd.
R M Drip & Sprinklers Systems Ltd. (RMDRIP.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RMDRIP.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMDRIP.NS | ₹37.73 | +0.16% | 9.4B | 26.02 | ₹1.45 | +0.13% |
| ASHOKLEY.NS | ₹163.09 | -4.60% | 958B | 29.02 | ₹5.62 | +1.92% |
| ASHOKLEY.BO | ₹163.00 | -4.65% | 957.4B | 29.42 | ₹5.54 | +1.92% |
| ESCORTS.NS | ₹2,842.40 | -4.21% | 312.7B | 23.71 | ₹119.88 | +1.27% |
| ESCORTS.BO | ₹2,840.55 | -4.30% | 312.5B | 25.05 | ₹113.38 | +1.27% |
| ACE.BO | ₹781.30 | -4.52% | 93B | 22.00 | ₹35.51 | +0.26% |
| ACE.NS | ₹780.70 | -4.64% | 92.9B | 21.97 | ₹35.53 | +0.26% |
| OLECTRA.BO | ₹1,026.70 | -3.37% | 84.3B | 58.90 | ₹17.43 | +0.04% |
| HMT.BO | ₹60.42 | +0.75% | 72.8B | -13.99 | -₹4.32 | N/A |
| HMT.NS | ₹59.60 | -1.29% | 71.8B | -16.33 | -₹3.65 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RMDRIP.NS vs ASHOKLEY.NS Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ASHOKLEY.NS has a market cap of 958B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while ASHOKLEY.NS trades at ₹163.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas ASHOKLEY.NS's P/E ratio is 29.02. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ASHOKLEY.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to ASHOKLEY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check ASHOKLEY.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs ASHOKLEY.BO Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ASHOKLEY.BO has a market cap of 957.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while ASHOKLEY.BO trades at ₹163.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas ASHOKLEY.BO's P/E ratio is 29.42. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ASHOKLEY.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to ASHOKLEY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check ASHOKLEY.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs ESCORTS.NS Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ESCORTS.NS has a market cap of 312.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while ESCORTS.NS trades at ₹2,842.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas ESCORTS.NS's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ESCORTS.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to ESCORTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check ESCORTS.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs ESCORTS.BO Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ESCORTS.BO has a market cap of 312.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while ESCORTS.BO trades at ₹2,840.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas ESCORTS.BO's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ESCORTS.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to ESCORTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check ESCORTS.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs ACE.BO Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ACE.BO has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while ACE.BO trades at ₹781.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas ACE.BO's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ACE.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to ACE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check ACE.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs ACE.NS Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, ACE.NS has a market cap of 92.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while ACE.NS trades at ₹780.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas ACE.NS's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ACE.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to ACE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check ACE.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs OLECTRA.BO Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, OLECTRA.BO has a market cap of 84.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while OLECTRA.BO trades at ₹1,026.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas OLECTRA.BO's P/E ratio is 58.90. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to OLECTRA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to OLECTRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check OLECTRA.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs HMT.BO Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, HMT.BO has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while HMT.BO trades at ₹60.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas HMT.BO's P/E ratio is -13.99. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to HMT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to HMT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check HMT.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs HMT.NS Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, HMT.NS has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while HMT.NS trades at ₹59.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas HMT.NS's P/E ratio is -16.33. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to HMT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to HMT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check HMT.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs AJAXENGG.NS Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, AJAXENGG.NS has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while AJAXENGG.NS trades at ₹426.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas AJAXENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AJAXENGG.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is less volatile compared to AJAXENGG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check AJAXENGG.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs AJAXENGG.BO Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, AJAXENGG.BO has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while AJAXENGG.BO trades at ₹425.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas AJAXENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AJAXENGG.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is less volatile compared to AJAXENGG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check AJAXENGG.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs VSTTILLERS.NS Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, VSTTILLERS.NS has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while VSTTILLERS.NS trades at ₹4,904.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas VSTTILLERS.NS's P/E ratio is 34.30. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to VSTTILLERS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to VSTTILLERS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check VSTTILLERS.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs VSTTILLERS.BO Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, VSTTILLERS.BO has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while VSTTILLERS.BO trades at ₹4,900.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas VSTTILLERS.BO's P/E ratio is 34.23. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to VSTTILLERS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to VSTTILLERS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check VSTTILLERS.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs JISLDVREQS.BO Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, JISLDVREQS.BO has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while JISLDVREQS.BO trades at ₹20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas JISLDVREQS.BO's P/E ratio is 84.88. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to JISLDVREQS.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is less volatile compared to JISLDVREQS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check JISLDVREQS.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs JISLDVREQS.NS Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, JISLDVREQS.NS has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while JISLDVREQS.NS trades at ₹20.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas JISLDVREQS.NS's P/E ratio is 84.00. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to JISLDVREQS.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is less volatile compared to JISLDVREQS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check JISLDVREQS.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs JISLJALEQS.BO Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, JISLJALEQS.BO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while JISLJALEQS.BO trades at ₹29.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas JISLJALEQS.BO's P/E ratio is 123.08. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to JISLJALEQS.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to JISLJALEQS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check JISLJALEQS.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs JISLJALEQS.NS Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, JISLJALEQS.NS has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while JISLJALEQS.NS trades at ₹29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas JISLJALEQS.NS's P/E ratio is 122.96. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to JISLJALEQS.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to JISLJALEQS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check JISLJALEQS.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs UNIPARTS.NS Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, UNIPARTS.NS has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while UNIPARTS.NS trades at ₹460.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas UNIPARTS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to UNIPARTS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to UNIPARTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check UNIPARTS.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs UNIPARTS.BO Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, UNIPARTS.BO has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while UNIPARTS.BO trades at ₹459.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas UNIPARTS.BO's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to UNIPARTS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to UNIPARTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check UNIPARTS.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs TIL.NS Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, TIL.NS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while TIL.NS trades at ₹168.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas TIL.NS's P/E ratio is -104.45. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to TIL.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is less volatile compared to TIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check TIL.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs TIL.BO Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, TIL.BO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while TIL.BO trades at ₹167.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas TIL.BO's P/E ratio is -103.43. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to TIL.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to TIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check TIL.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs EIMCOELECO.NS Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, EIMCOELECO.NS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while EIMCOELECO.NS trades at ₹1,525.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas EIMCOELECO.NS's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to EIMCOELECO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check EIMCOELECO.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs EIMCOELECO.BO Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, EIMCOELECO.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while EIMCOELECO.BO trades at ₹1,523.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas EIMCOELECO.BO's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to EIMCOELECO.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to EIMCOELECO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check EIMCOELECO.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs BLAL.BO Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, BLAL.BO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while BLAL.BO trades at ₹160.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas BLAL.BO's P/E ratio is -160.75. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to BLAL.BO's ROE of -8.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to BLAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check BLAL.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs BAJAJINDEF.NS Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, BAJAJINDEF.NS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while BAJAJINDEF.NS trades at ₹209.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas BAJAJINDEF.NS's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to BAJAJINDEF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJINDEF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check BAJAJINDEF.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs BLAL.NS Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, BLAL.NS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while BLAL.NS trades at ₹160.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas BLAL.NS's P/E ratio is -160.51. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to BLAL.NS's ROE of -8.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to BLAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check BLAL.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs REVATHI.NS Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, REVATHI.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while REVATHI.NS trades at ₹1,960.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas REVATHI.NS's P/E ratio is 33.28. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to REVATHI.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to REVATHI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check REVATHI.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs INDOFARM.NS Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, INDOFARM.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while INDOFARM.NS trades at ₹115.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas INDOFARM.NS's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to INDOFARM.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to INDOFARM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check INDOFARM.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs TARACHAND.NS Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, TARACHAND.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while TARACHAND.NS trades at ₹54.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas TARACHAND.NS's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to TARACHAND.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to TARACHAND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check TARACHAND.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs MAHEPC.NS Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, MAHEPC.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while MAHEPC.NS trades at ₹100.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas MAHEPC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MAHEPC.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to MAHEPC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check MAHEPC.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs MAHEPC.BO Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, MAHEPC.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while MAHEPC.BO trades at ₹100.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas MAHEPC.BO's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MAHEPC.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is less volatile compared to MAHEPC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check MAHEPC.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs RVTH.NS Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, RVTH.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while RVTH.NS trades at ₹518.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas RVTH.NS's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to RVTH.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is less volatile compared to RVTH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check RVTH.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs SEMAC.BO Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, SEMAC.BO has a market cap of 854.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while SEMAC.BO trades at ₹274.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas SEMAC.BO's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SEMAC.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to SEMAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check SEMAC.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs SEMAC.NS Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, SEMAC.NS has a market cap of 729.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while SEMAC.NS trades at ₹233.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas SEMAC.NS's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SEMAC.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to SEMAC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check SEMAC.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs DIL.NS Comparison April 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 9.4B. In comparison, DIL.NS has a market cap of 183.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹37.73, while DIL.NS trades at ₹1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.02, whereas DIL.NS's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to DIL.NS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to DIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check DIL.NS's competition here