R M Drip & Sprinklers Systems Ltd.
R M Drip & Sprinklers Systems Ltd. (RMDRIP.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RMDRIP.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMDRIP.NS | ₹97.95 | -20.00% | 24.5B | 67.09 | ₹1.46 | +0.04% |
| ASHOKLEY.NS | ₹211.61 | +0.68% | 1.2T | 37.52 | ₹5.64 | +1.49% |
| ASHOKLEY.BO | ₹211.50 | +0.67% | 1.2T | 38.18 | ₹5.54 | +1.49% |
| ESCORTS.NS | ₹3,602.80 | +1.05% | 396.3B | 30.07 | ₹119.80 | +1.01% |
| ESCORTS.BO | ₹3,596.90 | +0.87% | 395.7B | 31.72 | ₹113.38 | +1.01% |
| ACE.NS | ₹871.20 | +0.65% | 103.7B | 24.52 | ₹35.53 | +0.23% |
| ACE.BO | ₹871.05 | +0.74% | 103.7B | 24.54 | ₹35.49 | +0.23% |
| OLECTRA.BO | ₹1,011.95 | -1.19% | 83.1B | 57.96 | ₹17.46 | +0.04% |
| HMT.BO | ₹55.53 | +4.99% | 66.9B | -12.85 | -₹4.32 | N/A |
| HMT.NS | ₹55.29 | +4.99% | 66.6B | -15.15 | -₹3.65 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RMDRIP.NS vs ASHOKLEY.NS Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, ASHOKLEY.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while ASHOKLEY.NS trades at ₹211.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas ASHOKLEY.NS's P/E ratio is 37.52. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ASHOKLEY.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to ASHOKLEY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check ASHOKLEY.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs ASHOKLEY.BO Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, ASHOKLEY.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while ASHOKLEY.BO trades at ₹211.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas ASHOKLEY.BO's P/E ratio is 38.18. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ASHOKLEY.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to ASHOKLEY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check ASHOKLEY.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs ESCORTS.NS Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, ESCORTS.NS has a market cap of 396.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while ESCORTS.NS trades at ₹3,602.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas ESCORTS.NS's P/E ratio is 30.07. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ESCORTS.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to ESCORTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check ESCORTS.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs ESCORTS.BO Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, ESCORTS.BO has a market cap of 395.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while ESCORTS.BO trades at ₹3,596.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas ESCORTS.BO's P/E ratio is 31.72. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ESCORTS.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to ESCORTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check ESCORTS.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs ACE.NS Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, ACE.NS has a market cap of 103.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while ACE.NS trades at ₹871.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas ACE.NS's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ACE.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to ACE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check ACE.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs ACE.BO Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, ACE.BO has a market cap of 103.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while ACE.BO trades at ₹871.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas ACE.BO's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ACE.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to ACE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check ACE.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs OLECTRA.BO Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, OLECTRA.BO has a market cap of 83.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while OLECTRA.BO trades at ₹1,011.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas OLECTRA.BO's P/E ratio is 57.96. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to OLECTRA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to OLECTRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check OLECTRA.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs HMT.BO Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, HMT.BO has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while HMT.BO trades at ₹55.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas HMT.BO's P/E ratio is -12.85. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to HMT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to HMT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check HMT.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs HMT.NS Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, HMT.NS has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while HMT.NS trades at ₹55.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas HMT.NS's P/E ratio is -15.15. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to HMT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to HMT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check HMT.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs AJAXENGG.BO Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, AJAXENGG.BO has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while AJAXENGG.BO trades at ₹491.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas AJAXENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AJAXENGG.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to AJAXENGG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check AJAXENGG.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs AJAXENGG.NS Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, AJAXENGG.NS has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while AJAXENGG.NS trades at ₹490.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas AJAXENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AJAXENGG.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to AJAXENGG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check AJAXENGG.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs VSTTILLERS.BO Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, VSTTILLERS.BO has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while VSTTILLERS.BO trades at ₹5,854.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas VSTTILLERS.BO's P/E ratio is 40.89. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to VSTTILLERS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to VSTTILLERS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check VSTTILLERS.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs VSTTILLERS.NS Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, VSTTILLERS.NS has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while VSTTILLERS.NS trades at ₹5,844.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas VSTTILLERS.NS's P/E ratio is 40.84. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to VSTTILLERS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to VSTTILLERS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check VSTTILLERS.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs JISLDVREQS.NS Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, JISLDVREQS.NS has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while JISLDVREQS.NS trades at ₹22.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas JISLDVREQS.NS's P/E ratio is 92.33. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to JISLDVREQS.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to JISLDVREQS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check JISLDVREQS.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs JISLDVREQS.BO Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, JISLDVREQS.BO has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while JISLDVREQS.BO trades at ₹21.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas JISLDVREQS.BO's P/E ratio is 91.17. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to JISLDVREQS.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to JISLDVREQS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check JISLDVREQS.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs JISLJALEQS.BO Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, JISLJALEQS.BO has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while JISLJALEQS.BO trades at ₹34.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas JISLJALEQS.BO's P/E ratio is 144.42. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to JISLJALEQS.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to JISLJALEQS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check JISLJALEQS.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs JISLJALEQS.NS Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, JISLJALEQS.NS has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while JISLJALEQS.NS trades at ₹34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas JISLJALEQS.NS's P/E ratio is 144.38. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to JISLJALEQS.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to JISLJALEQS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check JISLJALEQS.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs UNIPARTS.NS Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, UNIPARTS.NS has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while UNIPARTS.NS trades at ₹473.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas UNIPARTS.NS's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to UNIPARTS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to UNIPARTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check UNIPARTS.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs UNIPARTS.BO Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, UNIPARTS.BO has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while UNIPARTS.BO trades at ₹472.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas UNIPARTS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to UNIPARTS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to UNIPARTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check UNIPARTS.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs TIL.NS Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, TIL.NS has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while TIL.NS trades at ₹208.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas TIL.NS's P/E ratio is -179.98. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to TIL.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to TIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check TIL.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs TIL.BO Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, TIL.BO has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while TIL.BO trades at ₹208.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas TIL.BO's P/E ratio is -176.91. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to TIL.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to TIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check TIL.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs EIMCOELECO.NS Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, EIMCOELECO.NS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while EIMCOELECO.NS trades at ₹1,595.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas EIMCOELECO.NS's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to EIMCOELECO.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to EIMCOELECO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check EIMCOELECO.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs EIMCOELECO.BO Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, EIMCOELECO.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while EIMCOELECO.BO trades at ₹1,592.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas EIMCOELECO.BO's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to EIMCOELECO.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to EIMCOELECO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check EIMCOELECO.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs BAJAJINDEF.NS Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, BAJAJINDEF.NS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while BAJAJINDEF.NS trades at ₹249.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas BAJAJINDEF.NS's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to BAJAJINDEF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to BAJAJINDEF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check BAJAJINDEF.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs BLAL.NS Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, BLAL.NS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while BLAL.NS trades at ₹187.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas BLAL.NS's P/E ratio is -189.55. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to BLAL.NS's ROE of -8.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to BLAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check BLAL.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs BLAL.BO Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, BLAL.BO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while BLAL.BO trades at ₹186.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas BLAL.BO's P/E ratio is -186.60. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to BLAL.BO's ROE of -8.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to BLAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check BLAL.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs INDOFARM.NS Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, INDOFARM.NS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while INDOFARM.NS trades at ₹138.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas INDOFARM.NS's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to INDOFARM.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to INDOFARM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check INDOFARM.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs REVATHI.NS Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, REVATHI.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while REVATHI.NS trades at ₹1,960.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas REVATHI.NS's P/E ratio is 33.28. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to REVATHI.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to REVATHI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check REVATHI.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs TARACHAND.NS Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, TARACHAND.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while TARACHAND.NS trades at ₹61.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas TARACHAND.NS's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to TARACHAND.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to TARACHAND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check TARACHAND.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs MAHEPC.NS Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, MAHEPC.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while MAHEPC.NS trades at ₹119.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas MAHEPC.NS's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MAHEPC.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to MAHEPC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check MAHEPC.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs MAHEPC.BO Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, MAHEPC.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while MAHEPC.BO trades at ₹119.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas MAHEPC.BO's P/E ratio is 23.51. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MAHEPC.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to MAHEPC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check MAHEPC.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs RVTH.NS Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, RVTH.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while RVTH.NS trades at ₹643.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas RVTH.NS's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to RVTH.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to RVTH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check RVTH.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs SEMAC.NS Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, SEMAC.NS has a market cap of 771.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while SEMAC.NS trades at ₹247.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas SEMAC.NS's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SEMAC.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to SEMAC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check SEMAC.NS's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs SEMAC.BO Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, SEMAC.BO has a market cap of 754.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while SEMAC.BO trades at ₹242.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas SEMAC.BO's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SEMAC.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to SEMAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check SEMAC.BO's competition here
RMDRIP.NS vs DIL.NS Comparison February 2026
RMDRIP.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMDRIP.NS stands at 24.5B. In comparison, DIL.NS has a market cap of 221.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMDRIP.NS is priced at ₹97.95, while DIL.NS trades at ₹1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMDRIP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 67.09, whereas DIL.NS's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, RMDRIP.NS's ROE is +0.42%, compared to DIL.NS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RMDRIP.NS is more volatile compared to DIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMDRIP.NS.Check DIL.NS's competition here