RBC Strategic Global Dividend Leaders ETF
RBC Strategic Global Dividend Leaders ETF RLD.TO Peers
See (RLD.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Global Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLD.TO | $24.92 | +0.81% | 9.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IGAF.TO | $14.94 | -1.26% | 3.2B | N/A | N/A | +0.89% |
| TEC.TO | $43.67 | +1.65% | 2.9B | 34.27 | $1.27 | +0.12% |
| XGD.TO | $30.24 | +0.20% | 1.7B | 20.18 | $1.50 | +0.65% |
| TGED.TO | $26.68 | +2.10% | 1.1B | 30.02 | $0.89 | +3.41% |
| DXG.TO | $65.60 | +1.16% | 676.7M | 29.33 | $2.24 | +12.52% |
| CIF.TO | $51.06 | +1.07% | 609.2M | 13.65 | $3.74 | +2.81% |
| FSF.TO | $32.15 | N/A | 569.1M | N/A | N/A | +1.18% |
| XHC.TO | $61.81 | +0.03% | 515.7M | 23.65 | $2.61 | +4.60% |
| XDG.TO | $27.61 | +1.10% | 463.8M | 17.28 | $1.60 | +2.98% |
Stock Comparison
RLD.TO vs IGAF.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, IGAF.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while IGAF.TO trades at $14.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IGAF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGAF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and IGAF.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs TEC.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, TEC.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while TEC.TO trades at $43.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEC.TO's P/E ratio is 34.27. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to TEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs XGD.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, XGD.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while XGD.TO trades at $30.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGD.TO's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to XGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs TGED.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, TGED.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while TGED.TO trades at $26.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGED.TO's P/E ratio is 30.02. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGED.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to TGED.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs DXG.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, DXG.TO has a market cap of 676.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while DXG.TO trades at $65.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXG.TO's P/E ratio is 29.33. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to DXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs CIF.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, CIF.TO has a market cap of 609.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while CIF.TO trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIF.TO's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to CIF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs FSF.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, FSF.TO has a market cap of 569.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while FSF.TO trades at $32.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to FSF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs XHC.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, XHC.TO has a market cap of 515.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while XHC.TO trades at $61.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XHC.TO's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XHC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to XHC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs XDG.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, XDG.TO has a market cap of 463.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while XDG.TO trades at $27.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDG.TO's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to XDG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs TQGD.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, TQGD.TO has a market cap of 375.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while TQGD.TO trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TQGD.TO's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TQGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to TQGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs CINF.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, CINF.TO has a market cap of 366.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while CINF.TO trades at $28.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CINF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CINF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and CINF.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs CWW.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, CWW.TO has a market cap of 303.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while CWW.TO trades at $61.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWW.TO's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CWW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to CWW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs 0P0001ED1S.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, 0P0001ED1S.TO has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while 0P0001ED1S.TO trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001ED1S.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001ED1S.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and 0P0001ED1S.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs ZWG.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, ZWG.TO has a market cap of 264.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while ZWG.TO trades at $31.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZWG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to ZWG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs COW.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, COW.TO has a market cap of 247M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while COW.TO trades at $67.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COW.TO's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to COW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to COW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs 0P0001ODDT.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, 0P0001ODDT.TO has a market cap of 223.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while 0P0001ODDT.TO trades at $23.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001ODDT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001ODDT.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and 0P0001ODDT.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs CGR.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, CGR.TO has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while CGR.TO trades at $29.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGR.TO's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to CGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs VMO.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, VMO.TO has a market cap of 202.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while VMO.TO trades at $66.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VMO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to VMO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs LIFE.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, LIFE.TO has a market cap of 176.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while LIFE.TO trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIFE.TO's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LIFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to LIFE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs GDV.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, GDV.TO has a market cap of 174.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while GDV.TO trades at $10.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDV.TO's P/E ratio is 3.59. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDV.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to GDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs ZGD.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, ZGD.TO has a market cap of 149.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while ZGD.TO trades at $149.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZGD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to ZGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs CYH.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, CYH.TO has a market cap of 144.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while CYH.TO trades at $22.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYH.TO's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to CYH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs XGI.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, XGI.TO has a market cap of 116.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while XGI.TO trades at $57.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XGI.TO's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and XGI.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs CGLO.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, CGLO.TO has a market cap of 104.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while CGLO.TO trades at $28.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGLO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGLO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and CGLO.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs XMY.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, XMY.TO has a market cap of 100.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while XMY.TO trades at $33.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XMY.TO's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XMY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and XMY.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs PMNT.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, PMNT.TO has a market cap of 98.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while PMNT.TO trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMNT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMNT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and PMNT.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs XDGH.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, XDGH.TO has a market cap of 95.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while XDGH.TO trades at $27.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XDGH.TO's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDGH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to XDGH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs TGRE.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, TGRE.TO has a market cap of 81.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while TGRE.TO trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGRE.TO's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGRE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and TGRE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs XCD.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, XCD.TO has a market cap of 66.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while XCD.TO trades at $59.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCD.TO's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to XCD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs LONG.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, LONG.TO has a market cap of 62M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while LONG.TO trades at $34.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LONG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LONG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and LONG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs VVO.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, VVO.TO has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while VVO.TO trades at $38.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VVO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VVO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and VVO.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs ONEQ.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, ONEQ.TO has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while ONEQ.TO trades at $43.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONEQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONEQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to ONEQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs 0P0001NDFE.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, 0P0001NDFE.TO has a market cap of 46.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while 0P0001NDFE.TO trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001NDFE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001NDFE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and 0P0001NDFE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs GIQG.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, GIQG.TO has a market cap of 45.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while GIQG.TO trades at $29.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIQG.TO's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIQG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and GIQG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs ESGG.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, ESGG.TO has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while ESGG.TO trades at $48.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and ESGG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs TGGR.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, TGGR.TO has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while TGGR.TO trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGGR.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGGR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to TGGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs DXN.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, DXN.TO has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while DXN.TO trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXN.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to DXN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs VAH.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, VAH.TO has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while VAH.TO trades at $28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VAH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VAH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to VAH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs ZMT.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, ZMT.TO has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while ZMT.TO trades at $68.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZMT.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to ZMT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs HGGG.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, HGGG.TO has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while HGGG.TO trades at $49.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGGG.TO's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and HGGG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs 0P0001N8LS.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, 0P0001N8LS.TO has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while 0P0001N8LS.TO trades at $36.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 0P0001N8LS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 0P0001N8LS.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and 0P0001N8LS.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs CGAA.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, CGAA.TO has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while CGAA.TO trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGAA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CGAA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and CGAA.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs MIVG.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, MIVG.TO has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while MIVG.TO trades at $36.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIVG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MIVG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to MIVG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs PINV.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, PINV.TO has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while PINV.TO trades at $21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PINV.TO's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PINV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and PINV.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs SOL.CN Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, SOL.CN has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while SOL.CN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOL.CN's ROE of +8.78%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to SOL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs RWU.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, RWU.TO has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while RWU.TO trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and RWU.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs VLQ.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, VLQ.TO has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while VLQ.TO trades at $32.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VLQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and VLQ.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs FLGD.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, FLGD.TO has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while FLGD.TO trades at $29.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLGD.TO's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLGD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and FLGD.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs RIG.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, RIG.TO has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while RIG.TO trades at $18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIG.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and RIG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs HRA.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, HRA.TO has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while HRA.TO trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HRA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to HRA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs SHZ.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, SHZ.TO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while SHZ.TO trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHZ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SHZ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and SHZ.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs EATS.CN Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, EATS.CN has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while EATS.CN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EATS.CN's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EATS.CN's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to EATS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs DFD.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, DFD.TO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while DFD.TO trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFD.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and DFD.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs HLTH.CN Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, HLTH.CN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while HLTH.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HLTH.CN's ROE of -140.65%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and HLTH.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs DFE.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, DFE.TO has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while DFE.TO trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and DFE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs RLE.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, RLE.TO has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while RLE.TO trades at $28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RLE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO is less volatile compared to RLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLD.TO.
RLD.TO vs HGM.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, HGM.TO has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while HGM.TO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HGM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HGM.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and HGM.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs PSY.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, PSY.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while PSY.TO trades at $30.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSY.TO's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and PSY.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLD.TO vs PXG.TO Comparison
RLD.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLD.TO stands at 9.2M. In comparison, PXG.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RLD.TO is priced at $24.92, while PXG.TO trades at $28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLD.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PXG.TO's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, RLD.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PXG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RLD.TO and PXG.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).