Rishi Laser Limited
Rishi Laser Limited (RISHILASE.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RISHILASE.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RISHILASE.BO | ₹108.40 | +1.26% | 992.3M | 11.76 | ₹9.18 | N/A |
| ULTRACEMCO.BO | ₹12,975.45 | +0.18% | 3.8T | 50.01 | ₹260.79 | +0.59% |
| ULTRACEMCO.NS | ₹12,999.00 | +0.30% | 3.8T | 50.00 | ₹260.82 | +0.59% |
| GRASIM.NS | ₹2,882.90 | +0.13% | 2T | 43.24 | ₹66.57 | +0.35% |
| GRASIM.BO | ₹2,879.50 | +0.06% | 1.9T | 45.10 | ₹63.73 | +0.35% |
| AMBUJACEM.NS | ₹513.25 | -0.24% | 1.3T | 34.07 | ₹15.00 | +0.39% |
| AMBUJACEM.BO | ₹513.05 | -0.23% | 1.3T | 34.12 | ₹14.98 | +0.39% |
| SHREECEM.NS | ₹26,870.00 | +1.30% | 969.3B | 54.11 | ₹496.49 | +0.52% |
| SHREECEM.BO | ₹26,878.40 | +1.39% | 968.4B | 56.37 | ₹476.14 | +0.52% |
| JKCEMENT.BO | ₹5,664.10 | +0.78% | 437.8B | 42.28 | ₹134.01 | +0.26% |
Stock Comparison
RISHILASE.BO vs ULTRACEMCO.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, ULTRACEMCO.BO has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while ULTRACEMCO.BO trades at ₹12,975.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas ULTRACEMCO.BO's P/E ratio is 50.01. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ULTRACEMCO.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to ULTRACEMCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check ULTRACEMCO.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs ULTRACEMCO.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, ULTRACEMCO.NS has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while ULTRACEMCO.NS trades at ₹12,999.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas ULTRACEMCO.NS's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ULTRACEMCO.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to ULTRACEMCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check ULTRACEMCO.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs GRASIM.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, GRASIM.NS has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while GRASIM.NS trades at ₹2,882.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas GRASIM.NS's P/E ratio is 43.24. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRASIM.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to GRASIM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check GRASIM.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs GRASIM.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, GRASIM.BO has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while GRASIM.BO trades at ₹2,879.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas GRASIM.BO's P/E ratio is 45.10. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRASIM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to GRASIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check GRASIM.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs AMBUJACEM.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, AMBUJACEM.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while AMBUJACEM.NS trades at ₹513.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas AMBUJACEM.NS's P/E ratio is 34.07. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMBUJACEM.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to AMBUJACEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check AMBUJACEM.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs AMBUJACEM.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, AMBUJACEM.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while AMBUJACEM.BO trades at ₹513.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas AMBUJACEM.BO's P/E ratio is 34.12. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMBUJACEM.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to AMBUJACEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check AMBUJACEM.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs SHREECEM.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, SHREECEM.NS has a market cap of 969.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while SHREECEM.NS trades at ₹26,870.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas SHREECEM.NS's P/E ratio is 54.11. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHREECEM.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to SHREECEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check SHREECEM.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs SHREECEM.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, SHREECEM.BO has a market cap of 968.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while SHREECEM.BO trades at ₹26,878.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas SHREECEM.BO's P/E ratio is 56.37. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHREECEM.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to SHREECEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check SHREECEM.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs JKCEMENT.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, JKCEMENT.BO has a market cap of 437.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while JKCEMENT.BO trades at ₹5,664.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas JKCEMENT.BO's P/E ratio is 42.28. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JKCEMENT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to JKCEMENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check JKCEMENT.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs JKCEMENT.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, JKCEMENT.NS has a market cap of 437.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while JKCEMENT.NS trades at ₹5,650.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas JKCEMENT.NS's P/E ratio is 42.18. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JKCEMENT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to JKCEMENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check JKCEMENT.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs DALBHARAT.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, DALBHARAT.BO has a market cap of 386.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while DALBHARAT.BO trades at ₹2,074.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas DALBHARAT.BO's P/E ratio is 32.57. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DALBHARAT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to DALBHARAT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check DALBHARAT.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs DALBHARAT.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, DALBHARAT.NS has a market cap of 383.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while DALBHARAT.NS trades at ₹2,065.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas DALBHARAT.NS's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DALBHARAT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to DALBHARAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check DALBHARAT.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs ACC.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, ACC.NS has a market cap of 304.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while ACC.NS trades at ₹1,621.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas ACC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACC.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to ACC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check ACC.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs ACC.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, ACC.BO has a market cap of 304.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while ACC.BO trades at ₹1,619.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas ACC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACC.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to ACC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check ACC.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs RAMCOCEM.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, RAMCOCEM.BO has a market cap of 272.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while RAMCOCEM.BO trades at ₹1,144.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas RAMCOCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 47.43. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RAMCOCEM.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to RAMCOCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check RAMCOCEM.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs RAMCOCEM.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, RAMCOCEM.NS has a market cap of 272.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while RAMCOCEM.NS trades at ₹1,143.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas RAMCOCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 47.29. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RAMCOCEM.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to RAMCOCEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check RAMCOCEM.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs JSWCEMENT.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, JSWCEMENT.BO has a market cap of 167.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while JSWCEMENT.BO trades at ₹124.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas JSWCEMENT.BO's P/E ratio is -15.30. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JSWCEMENT.BO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to JSWCEMENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check JSWCEMENT.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs JSWCEMENT.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, JSWCEMENT.NS has a market cap of 167.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while JSWCEMENT.NS trades at ₹124.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas JSWCEMENT.NS's P/E ratio is -15.29. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JSWCEMENT.NS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to JSWCEMENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check JSWCEMENT.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs INDIACEM.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, INDIACEM.BO has a market cap of 130.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while INDIACEM.BO trades at ₹425.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas INDIACEM.BO's P/E ratio is -119.69. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDIACEM.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to INDIACEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check INDIACEM.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs INDIACEM.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, INDIACEM.NS has a market cap of 130.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while INDIACEM.NS trades at ₹425.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas INDIACEM.NS's P/E ratio is -119.67. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDIACEM.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to INDIACEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check INDIACEM.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs NUVOCO.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, NUVOCO.NS has a market cap of 118.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while NUVOCO.NS trades at ₹334.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas NUVOCO.NS's P/E ratio is 30.89. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NUVOCO.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to NUVOCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check NUVOCO.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs NUVOCO.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, NUVOCO.BO has a market cap of 118.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while NUVOCO.BO trades at ₹334.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas NUVOCO.BO's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NUVOCO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to NUVOCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check NUVOCO.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs JKLAKSHMI.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, JKLAKSHMI.BO has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while JKLAKSHMI.BO trades at ₹731.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas JKLAKSHMI.BO's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JKLAKSHMI.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to JKLAKSHMI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check JKLAKSHMI.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs JKLAKSHMI.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, JKLAKSHMI.NS has a market cap of 90.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while JKLAKSHMI.NS trades at ₹731.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas JKLAKSHMI.NS's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JKLAKSHMI.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to JKLAKSHMI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check JKLAKSHMI.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs STARCEMENT.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, STARCEMENT.BO has a market cap of 88B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while STARCEMENT.BO trades at ₹216.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas STARCEMENT.BO's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STARCEMENT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to STARCEMENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check STARCEMENT.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs STARCEMENT.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, STARCEMENT.NS has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while STARCEMENT.NS trades at ₹216.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas STARCEMENT.NS's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STARCEMENT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to STARCEMENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check STARCEMENT.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs BIRLACORPN.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, BIRLACORPN.BO has a market cap of 77B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while BIRLACORPN.BO trades at ₹996.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas BIRLACORPN.BO's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIRLACORPN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to BIRLACORPN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check BIRLACORPN.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs BIRLACORPN.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, BIRLACORPN.NS has a market cap of 77B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while BIRLACORPN.NS trades at ₹995.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas BIRLACORPN.NS's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIRLACORPN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to BIRLACORPN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check BIRLACORPN.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs PRSMJOHNSN.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, PRSMJOHNSN.NS has a market cap of 63.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while PRSMJOHNSN.NS trades at ₹125.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas PRSMJOHNSN.NS's P/E ratio is 32.36. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRSMJOHNSN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to PRSMJOHNSN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check PRSMJOHNSN.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs PRSMJOHNSN.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, PRSMJOHNSN.BO has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while PRSMJOHNSN.BO trades at ₹125.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas PRSMJOHNSN.BO's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRSMJOHNSN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to PRSMJOHNSN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check PRSMJOHNSN.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs HEIDELBERG.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, HEIDELBERG.BO has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while HEIDELBERG.BO trades at ₹164.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas HEIDELBERG.BO's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HEIDELBERG.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to HEIDELBERG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check HEIDELBERG.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs HEIDELBERG.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, HEIDELBERG.NS has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while HEIDELBERG.NS trades at ₹164.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas HEIDELBERG.NS's P/E ratio is 26.69. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HEIDELBERG.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to HEIDELBERG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check HEIDELBERG.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs ORIENTCEM.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, ORIENTCEM.NS has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while ORIENTCEM.NS trades at ₹157.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas ORIENTCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORIENTCEM.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to ORIENTCEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check ORIENTCEM.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs ORIENTCEM.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, ORIENTCEM.BO has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while ORIENTCEM.BO trades at ₹157.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas ORIENTCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORIENTCEM.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to ORIENTCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check ORIENTCEM.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs MANGLMCEM.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, MANGLMCEM.BO has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while MANGLMCEM.BO trades at ₹917.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas MANGLMCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 32.88. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MANGLMCEM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to MANGLMCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check MANGLMCEM.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs MANGLMCEM.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, MANGLMCEM.NS has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while MANGLMCEM.NS trades at ₹927.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas MANGLMCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 31.47. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MANGLMCEM.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to MANGLMCEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check MANGLMCEM.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs SAGCEM.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, SAGCEM.NS has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while SAGCEM.NS trades at ₹195.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas SAGCEM.NS's P/E ratio is -15.13. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAGCEM.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to SAGCEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check SAGCEM.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs SAGCEM.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, SAGCEM.BO has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while SAGCEM.BO trades at ₹194.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas SAGCEM.BO's P/E ratio is -15.09. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAGCEM.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to SAGCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check SAGCEM.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs EPACK.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, EPACK.NS has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while EPACK.NS trades at ₹256.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas EPACK.NS's P/E ratio is 58.15. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EPACK.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to EPACK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check EPACK.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs KCP.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, KCP.BO has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while KCP.BO trades at ₹161.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas KCP.BO's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KCP.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to KCP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check KCP.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs KCP.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, KCP.NS has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while KCP.NS trades at ₹161.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas KCP.NS's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KCP.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to KCP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check KCP.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs UDAICEMENT.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, UDAICEMENT.NS has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while UDAICEMENT.NS trades at ₹36.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas UDAICEMENT.NS's P/E ratio is 201.28. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UDAICEMENT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to UDAICEMENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check UDAICEMENT.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs UDAICEMENT.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, UDAICEMENT.BO has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while UDAICEMENT.BO trades at ₹36.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas UDAICEMENT.BO's P/E ratio is 201.06. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UDAICEMENT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to UDAICEMENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check UDAICEMENT.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs SANGHIIND.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, SANGHIIND.BO has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while SANGHIIND.BO trades at ₹61.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas SANGHIIND.BO's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SANGHIIND.BO's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to SANGHIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check SANGHIIND.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs SANGHIIND.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, SANGHIIND.NS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while SANGHIIND.NS trades at ₹61.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas SANGHIIND.NS's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SANGHIIND.NS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to SANGHIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check SANGHIIND.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs IFGLEXPOR.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, IFGLEXPOR.NS has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while IFGLEXPOR.NS trades at ₹172.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas IFGLEXPOR.NS's P/E ratio is 43.06. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IFGLEXPOR.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to IFGLEXPOR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check IFGLEXPOR.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs IFGLEXPOR.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, IFGLEXPOR.BO has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while IFGLEXPOR.BO trades at ₹172.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas IFGLEXPOR.BO's P/E ratio is 42.73. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IFGLEXPOR.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to IFGLEXPOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check IFGLEXPOR.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs SHREDIGCEM.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, SHREDIGCEM.BO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while SHREDIGCEM.BO trades at ₹71.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas SHREDIGCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHREDIGCEM.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to SHREDIGCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check SHREDIGCEM.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs SHREDIGCEM.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, SHREDIGCEM.NS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while SHREDIGCEM.NS trades at ₹71.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas SHREDIGCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 29.97. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHREDIGCEM.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to SHREDIGCEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check SHREDIGCEM.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs DECCANCE.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, DECCANCE.NS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while DECCANCE.NS trades at ₹719.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas DECCANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DECCANCE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to DECCANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check DECCANCE.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs DECCANCE.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, DECCANCE.BO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while DECCANCE.BO trades at ₹711.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas DECCANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 29.77. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DECCANCE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to DECCANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check DECCANCE.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs APOLLOPIPES.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, APOLLOPIPES.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while APOLLOPIPES.BO trades at ₹686.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas APOLLOPIPES.BO's P/E ratio is 46.89. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APOLLOPIPES.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to APOLLOPIPES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check APOLLOPIPES.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs ORIRAIL.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, ORIRAIL.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while ORIRAIL.BO trades at ₹132.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas ORIRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORIRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to ORIRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check ORIRAIL.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs NCLIND.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, NCLIND.NS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while NCLIND.NS trades at ₹184.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas NCLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NCLIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to NCLIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check NCLIND.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs NCLIND.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, NCLIND.BO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while NCLIND.BO trades at ₹182.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas NCLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NCLIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to NCLIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check NCLIND.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs SAURASHCEM.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, SAURASHCEM.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while SAURASHCEM.NS trades at ₹68.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas SAURASHCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAURASHCEM.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to SAURASHCEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check SAURASHCEM.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs SAURASHCEM.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, SAURASHCEM.BO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while SAURASHCEM.BO trades at ₹67.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas SAURASHCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAURASHCEM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to SAURASHCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check SAURASHCEM.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs SHIVACEM.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, SHIVACEM.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while SHIVACEM.BO trades at ₹18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas SHIVACEM.BO's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHIVACEM.BO's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to SHIVACEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check SHIVACEM.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs ACL.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, ACL.NS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while ACL.NS trades at ₹55.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas ACL.NS's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACL.NS's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to ACL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check ACL.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs ACL.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, ACL.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while ACL.BO trades at ₹56.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas ACL.BO's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACL.BO's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to ACL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check ACL.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs APCL.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, APCL.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while APCL.BO trades at ₹129.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas APCL.BO's P/E ratio is -9.22. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APCL.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to APCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check APCL.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs GSLSU.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, GSLSU.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while GSLSU.BO trades at ₹88.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas GSLSU.BO's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GSLSU.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to GSLSU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check GSLSU.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs APCL.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, APCL.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while APCL.NS trades at ₹128.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas APCL.NS's P/E ratio is -9.02. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APCL.NS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is less volatile compared to APCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check APCL.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs GSLSU.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, GSLSU.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while GSLSU.NS trades at ₹89.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas GSLSU.NS's P/E ratio is -20.23. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GSLSU.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is less volatile compared to GSLSU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check GSLSU.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs ZODIAC.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, ZODIAC.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while ZODIAC.BO trades at ₹251.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas ZODIAC.BO's P/E ratio is -58.53. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZODIAC.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to ZODIAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check ZODIAC.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs ZODIAC.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, ZODIAC.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while ZODIAC.NS trades at ₹245.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas ZODIAC.NS's P/E ratio is 65.91. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZODIAC.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to ZODIAC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check ZODIAC.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs NAVKAR.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, NAVKAR.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while NAVKAR.BO trades at ₹14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas NAVKAR.BO's P/E ratio is 145.10. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NAVKAR.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is less volatile compared to NAVKAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check NAVKAR.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs GSCLCEMENT.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, GSCLCEMENT.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while GSCLCEMENT.NS trades at ₹33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas GSCLCEMENT.NS's P/E ratio is -87.37. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GSCLCEMENT.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to GSCLCEMENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check GSCLCEMENT.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs KESORAMIND.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, KESORAMIND.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while KESORAMIND.NS trades at ₹8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas KESORAMIND.NS's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KESORAMIND.NS's ROE of +18.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to KESORAMIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check KESORAMIND.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs SAHYADRI.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, SAHYADRI.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while SAHYADRI.NS trades at ₹253.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas SAHYADRI.NS's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAHYADRI.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to SAHYADRI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check SAHYADRI.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs KESORAMIND.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, KESORAMIND.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while KESORAMIND.BO trades at ₹8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas KESORAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KESORAMIND.BO's ROE of +18.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to KESORAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check KESORAMIND.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs SKCIL.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, SKCIL.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while SKCIL.BO trades at ₹153.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas SKCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 7735.00. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKCIL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to SKCIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check SKCIL.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs ASIIL.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, ASIIL.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while ASIIL.BO trades at ₹27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas ASIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASIIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to ASIIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check ASIIL.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs GLITTEKG.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, GLITTEKG.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while GLITTEKG.BO trades at ₹76.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas GLITTEKG.BO's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLITTEKG.BO's ROE of +4.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to GLITTEKG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check GLITTEKG.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs BRPL.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, BRPL.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while BRPL.BO trades at ₹119.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas BRPL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRPL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to BRPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check BRPL.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs NAVKARURB.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, NAVKARURB.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while NAVKARURB.BO trades at ₹1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas NAVKARURB.BO's P/E ratio is -15.22. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NAVKARURB.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is less volatile compared to NAVKARURB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check NAVKARURB.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs NAVKARURB.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, NAVKARURB.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while NAVKARURB.NS trades at ₹1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas NAVKARURB.NS's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NAVKARURB.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is less volatile compared to NAVKARURB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check NAVKARURB.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs KEIL.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, KEIL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while KEIL.BO trades at ₹16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas KEIL.BO's P/E ratio is -1648.00. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEIL.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to KEIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check KEIL.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs TRL.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, TRL.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while TRL.BO trades at ₹103.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas TRL.BO's P/E ratio is 51.11. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is less volatile compared to TRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check TRL.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs PANCM.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, PANCM.BO has a market cap of 987M. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while PANCM.BO trades at ₹123.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas PANCM.BO's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PANCM.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to PANCM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check PANCM.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs BVCL.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, BVCL.BO has a market cap of 934.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while BVCL.BO trades at ₹43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas BVCL.BO's P/E ratio is 4217.00. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BVCL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to BVCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check BVCL.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs BVCL.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, BVCL.NS has a market cap of 931.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while BVCL.NS trades at ₹42.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas BVCL.NS's P/E ratio is 4204.00. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BVCL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to BVCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check BVCL.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs PACIFICI.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, PACIFICI.BO has a market cap of 928.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while PACIFICI.BO trades at ₹136.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas PACIFICI.BO's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PACIFICI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to PACIFICI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check PACIFICI.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs KAKATCEM.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, KAKATCEM.BO has a market cap of 897.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while KAKATCEM.BO trades at ₹113.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas KAKATCEM.BO's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KAKATCEM.BO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to KAKATCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check KAKATCEM.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs KAKATCEM.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, KAKATCEM.NS has a market cap of 892.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while KAKATCEM.NS trades at ₹113.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas KAKATCEM.NS's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KAKATCEM.NS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to KAKATCEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check KAKATCEM.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs ELEMARB.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, ELEMARB.BO has a market cap of 739.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while ELEMARB.BO trades at ₹202.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas ELEMARB.BO's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELEMARB.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to ELEMARB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check ELEMARB.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs CEETAIN.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, CEETAIN.BO has a market cap of 691.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while CEETAIN.BO trades at ₹47.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas CEETAIN.BO's P/E ratio is 207.39. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEETAIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to CEETAIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check CEETAIN.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs NILACHAL.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, NILACHAL.BO has a market cap of 683.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while NILACHAL.BO trades at ₹35.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas NILACHAL.BO's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NILACHAL.BO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is less volatile compared to NILACHAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check NILACHAL.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs AHMDSTE.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, AHMDSTE.BO has a market cap of 672.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while AHMDSTE.BO trades at ₹170.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas AHMDSTE.BO's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHMDSTE.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to AHMDSTE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check AHMDSTE.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs RESTILE.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, RESTILE.BO has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while RESTILE.BO trades at ₹6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas RESTILE.BO's P/E ratio is -92.57. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RESTILE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to RESTILE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check RESTILE.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs BURNPUR.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, BURNPUR.NS has a market cap of 568.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while BURNPUR.NS trades at ₹33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas BURNPUR.NS's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BURNPUR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is less volatile compared to BURNPUR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check BURNPUR.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs BHEEMACEM.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, BHEEMACEM.BO has a market cap of 526.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while BHEEMACEM.BO trades at ₹16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas BHEEMACEM.BO's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHEEMACEM.BO's ROE of -5.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is less volatile compared to BHEEMACEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check BHEEMACEM.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs DIVSHKT.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, DIVSHKT.BO has a market cap of 513M. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while DIVSHKT.BO trades at ₹50.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas DIVSHKT.BO's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DIVSHKT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to DIVSHKT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check DIVSHKT.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs PRATIK.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, PRATIK.BO has a market cap of 463.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while PRATIK.BO trades at ₹7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas PRATIK.BO's P/E ratio is 55.85. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRATIK.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to PRATIK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check PRATIK.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs ANDHRACEMT.NS Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, ANDHRACEMT.NS has a market cap of 456.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while ANDHRACEMT.NS trades at ₹4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas ANDHRACEMT.NS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANDHRACEMT.NS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is less volatile compared to ANDHRACEMT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check ANDHRACEMT.NS's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs ZWELCAST.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, ZWELCAST.BO has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while ZWELCAST.BO trades at ₹745.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas ZWELCAST.BO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZWELCAST.BO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to ZWELCAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check ZWELCAST.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs KEERTHI.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, KEERTHI.BO has a market cap of 432.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while KEERTHI.BO trades at ₹54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas KEERTHI.BO's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEERTHI.BO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to KEERTHI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check KEERTHI.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs MAYUKH.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, MAYUKH.BO has a market cap of 432M. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while MAYUKH.BO trades at ₹2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas MAYUKH.BO's P/E ratio is 56.25. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAYUKH.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is more volatile compared to MAYUKH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check MAYUKH.BO's competition here
RISHILASE.BO vs RALEGRA.BO Comparison February 2026
RISHILASE.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RISHILASE.BO stands at 992.3M. In comparison, RALEGRA.BO has a market cap of 429.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RISHILASE.BO is priced at ₹108.40, while RALEGRA.BO trades at ₹35.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RISHILASE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 11.76, whereas RALEGRA.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RISHILASE.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RALEGRA.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RISHILASE.BO is less volatile compared to RALEGRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RISHILASE.BO.Check RALEGRA.BO's competition here