Ridley Corporation Limited
Ridley Corporation Limited (RIC.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RIC.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIC.AX | A$2.79 | -0.36% | 1.1B | 14.20 | A$0.20 | +3.56% |
| A2M.AX | A$6.97 | -4.26% | 5.2B | 28.52 | A$0.25 | +2.36% |
| BKL.AX | A$94.73 | +0.03% | 1.8B | 53.82 | A$1.76 | +1.26% |
| CBO.AX | A$3.79 | +1.88% | 1.8B | 37.70 | A$0.10 | +1.19% |
| BGA.AX | A$5.47 | -2.15% | 1.7B | 186.67 | A$0.03 | +2.32% |
| SHV.AX | A$3.78 | -0.53% | 540M | 17.27 | A$0.22 | N/A |
| SM1.AX | A$0.37 | +0.00% | 223.2M | -2.18 | -A$0.17 | N/A |
| CLV.AX | A$0.97 | +1.05% | 161.2M | 19.30 | A$0.05 | +2.07% |
| BXN.AX | A$0.06 | +3.45% | 136.2M | -6.00 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| BUB.AX | A$0.11 | +0.00% | 98.4M | 11.00 | A$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RIC.AX vs A2M.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, A2M.AX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while A2M.AX trades at A$6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas A2M.AX's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to A2M.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX and A2M.AX have similar daily volatility (2.13).Check A2M.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs BKL.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BKL.AX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while BKL.AX trades at A$94.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas BKL.AX's P/E ratio is 53.82. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BKL.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to BKL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check BKL.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs CBO.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CBO.AX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while CBO.AX trades at A$3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas CBO.AX's P/E ratio is 37.70. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CBO.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to CBO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check CBO.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs BGA.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BGA.AX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while BGA.AX trades at A$5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas BGA.AX's P/E ratio is 186.67. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGA.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to BGA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check BGA.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs SHV.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SHV.AX has a market cap of 540M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while SHV.AX trades at A$3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas SHV.AX's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHV.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to SHV.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check SHV.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs SM1.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SM1.AX has a market cap of 223.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while SM1.AX trades at A$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas SM1.AX's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SM1.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to SM1.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check SM1.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs CLV.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CLV.AX has a market cap of 161.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while CLV.AX trades at A$0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas CLV.AX's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLV.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to CLV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check CLV.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs BXN.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BXN.AX has a market cap of 136.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while BXN.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas BXN.AX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BXN.AX's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to BXN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check BXN.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs BUB.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BUB.AX has a market cap of 98.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while BUB.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas BUB.AX's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BUB.AX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to BUB.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check BUB.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs SPG.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SPG.AX has a market cap of 67.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while SPG.AX trades at A$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas SPG.AX's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPG.AX's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to SPG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check SPG.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs NOU.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NOU.AX has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while NOU.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas NOU.AX's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NOU.AX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to NOU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check NOU.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs MBH.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MBH.AX has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while MBH.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas MBH.AX's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MBH.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to MBH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check MBH.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs FOD.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FOD.AX has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while FOD.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas FOD.AX's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOD.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to FOD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check FOD.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs NUC.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NUC.AX has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while NUC.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas NUC.AX's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NUC.AX's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to NUC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check NUC.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs HCT.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HCT.AX has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while HCT.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas HCT.AX's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HCT.AX's ROE of -3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to HCT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check HCT.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs AHF.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AHF.AX has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while AHF.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas AHF.AX's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AHF.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to AHF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check AHF.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs JAT.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JAT.AX has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while JAT.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas JAT.AX's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JAT.AX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to JAT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check JAT.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs OMG.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OMG.AX has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while OMG.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas OMG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OMG.AX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to OMG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check OMG.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs EVE.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EVE.AX has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while EVE.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas EVE.AX's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EVE.AX's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to EVE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check EVE.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs BFC.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BFC.AX has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while BFC.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas BFC.AX's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BFC.AX's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to BFC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check BFC.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs WNX.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WNX.AX has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while WNX.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas WNX.AX's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WNX.AX's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to WNX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check WNX.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs CCO.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CCO.AX has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while CCO.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas CCO.AX's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CCO.AX's ROE of -3.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to CCO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check CCO.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs OJC.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OJC.AX has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while OJC.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas OJC.AX's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OJC.AX's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to OJC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check OJC.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs HPP.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HPP.AX has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while HPP.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas HPP.AX's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HPP.AX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to HPP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check HPP.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs FFF.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FFF.AX has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while FFF.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas FFF.AX's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FFF.AX's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to FFF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check FFF.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs PFT.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PFT.AX has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while PFT.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas PFT.AX's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PFT.AX's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to PFT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check PFT.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs CSF.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CSF.AX has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while CSF.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas CSF.AX's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSF.AX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to CSF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check CSF.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs NGS.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NGS.AX has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while NGS.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas NGS.AX's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NGS.AX's ROE of +2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to NGS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check NGS.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs HLF.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HLF.AX has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while HLF.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas HLF.AX's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLF.AX's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to HLF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check HLF.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs HVM.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HVM.AX has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while HVM.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas HVM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HVM.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to HVM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check HVM.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs TFL.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TFL.AX has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while TFL.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas TFL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TFL.AX's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to TFL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check TFL.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs FIJ.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FIJ.AX has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while FIJ.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas FIJ.AX's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FIJ.AX's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to FIJ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check FIJ.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs MBX.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MBX.AX has a market cap of 556.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while MBX.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas MBX.AX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MBX.AX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to MBX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check MBX.AX's competition here
RIC.AX vs NZS.AX Comparison April 2026
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NZS.AX has a market cap of 333.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.79, while NZS.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 14.20, whereas NZS.AX's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NZS.AX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to NZS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.Check NZS.AX's competition here