Ridley Corporation Limited
Ridley Corporation Limited RIC.AX Peers
See (RIC.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaged Foods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIC.AX | A$2.83 | +0.71% | 1.1B | 23.58 | A$0.12 | +3.30% |
| A2M.AX | A$7.84 | +1.03% | 5.7B | 35.64 | A$0.22 | +0.84% |
| BKL.AX | A$94.73 | +0.03% | 1.8B | 53.82 | A$1.76 | N/A |
| BGA.AX | A$5.14 | +0.19% | 1.6B | 46.73 | A$0.11 | +1.95% |
| CBO.AX | A$2.44 | +1.67% | 1B | 48.80 | A$0.05 | +1.35% |
| SHV.AX | A$3.56 | -2.20% | 505.9M | 15.48 | A$0.23 | N/A |
| SM1.AX | A$0.58 | +3.60% | 346.8M | -0.76 | -A$0.76 | N/A |
| BUB.AX | A$0.18 | +2.94% | 156.3M | -17.50 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| BXN.AX | A$0.04 | -4.44% | 93.1M | -4.30 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| CLV.AX | A$0.53 | -1.87% | 87.7M | 17.50 | A$0.03 | +2.86% |
Stock Comparison
RIC.AX vs A2M.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, A2M.AX has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while A2M.AX trades at A$7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas A2M.AX's P/E ratio is 35.64. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to A2M.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to A2M.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs BKL.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BKL.AX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while BKL.AX trades at A$94.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas BKL.AX's P/E ratio is 53.82. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BKL.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to BKL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs BGA.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BGA.AX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while BGA.AX trades at A$5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas BGA.AX's P/E ratio is 46.73. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BGA.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to BGA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs CBO.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CBO.AX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while CBO.AX trades at A$2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas CBO.AX's P/E ratio is 48.80. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBO.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to CBO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs SHV.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SHV.AX has a market cap of 505.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while SHV.AX trades at A$3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas SHV.AX's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHV.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to SHV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs SM1.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SM1.AX has a market cap of 346.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while SM1.AX trades at A$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas SM1.AX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SM1.AX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to SM1.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs BUB.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BUB.AX has a market cap of 156.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while BUB.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas BUB.AX's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BUB.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to BUB.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs BXN.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BXN.AX has a market cap of 93.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while BXN.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas BXN.AX's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BXN.AX's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to BXN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs CLV.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CLV.AX has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while CLV.AX trades at A$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas CLV.AX's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLV.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to CLV.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs NOU.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NOU.AX has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while NOU.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas NOU.AX's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOU.AX's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to NOU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs AHF.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AHF.AX has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while AHF.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas AHF.AX's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AHF.AX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to AHF.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs JAT.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JAT.AX has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while JAT.AX trades at A$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas JAT.AX's P/E ratio is -31.70. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JAT.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to JAT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs FOD.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FOD.AX has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while FOD.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas FOD.AX's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FOD.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to FOD.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs HCT.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HCT.AX has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while HCT.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas HCT.AX's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HCT.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to HCT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs MBH.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MBH.AX has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while MBH.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas MBH.AX's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MBH.AX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to MBH.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs NUC.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NUC.AX has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while NUC.AX trades at A$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas NUC.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NUC.AX's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to NUC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs WNX.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WNX.AX has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while WNX.AX trades at A$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas WNX.AX's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WNX.AX's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to WNX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs CCO.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CCO.AX has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while CCO.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas CCO.AX's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCO.AX's ROE of -5.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to CCO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs EVE.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EVE.AX has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while EVE.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas EVE.AX's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVE.AX's ROE of -2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to EVE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs BFC.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BFC.AX has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while BFC.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas BFC.AX's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BFC.AX's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to BFC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs OJC.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OJC.AX has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while OJC.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas OJC.AX's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OJC.AX's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to OJC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs HPP.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HPP.AX has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while HPP.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas HPP.AX's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HPP.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to HPP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs FFF.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FFF.AX has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while FFF.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas FFF.AX's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FFF.AX's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to FFF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs NGS.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NGS.AX has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while NGS.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas NGS.AX's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NGS.AX's ROE of +2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to NGS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs CSF.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CSF.AX has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while CSF.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas CSF.AX's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSF.AX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to CSF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs HLF.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HLF.AX has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while HLF.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas HLF.AX's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLF.AX's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to HLF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs TFL.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TFL.AX has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while TFL.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas TFL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TFL.AX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is less volatile compared to TFL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs PFT.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PFT.AX has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while PFT.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas PFT.AX's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PFT.AX's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to PFT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs HVM.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HVM.AX has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while HVM.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas HVM.AX's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HVM.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to HVM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs FIJ.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FIJ.AX has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while FIJ.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas FIJ.AX's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FIJ.AX's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to FIJ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs MBX.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MBX.AX has a market cap of 556.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while MBX.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas MBX.AX's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MBX.AX's ROE of +19.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to MBX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.
RIC.AX vs NZS.AX Comparison
RIC.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIC.AX stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NZS.AX has a market cap of 333.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RIC.AX is priced at A$2.83, while NZS.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 23.58, whereas NZS.AX's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RIC.AX's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NZS.AX's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RIC.AX is more volatile compared to NZS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIC.AX.