UHF Logistics Group, Inc.
UHF Logistics Group, Inc. RGLG Peers
See (RGLG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Shell Companies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGLG | $1.13 | +11.88% | 342.8M | -0.11 | -$10.00 | N/A |
| QMIS | $0.25 | N/A | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GSHN | $22.70 | +2.71% | 9.3B | -2270.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| KATX | $1.05 | N/A | 1.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CCYC | $11.25 | N/A | 1.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ZSYC | $2.00 | N/A | 1B | -2.12 | -$0.95 | N/A |
| WPCBF | $0.00 | +100.00% | 700.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NOTR | $13.00 | N/A | 570.9M | -433.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| WCHS | $5.01 | N/A | 531.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FZRO | $2.00 | N/A | 346.2M | -0.00 | -$4,243,300.50 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RGLG vs QMIS Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, QMIS has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while QMIS trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas QMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to QMIS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to QMIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs GSHN Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, GSHN has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while GSHN trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas GSHN's P/E ratio is -2270.00. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to GSHN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to GSHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs KATX Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, KATX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while KATX trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas KATX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to KATX's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is less volatile compared to KATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs CCYC Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, CCYC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while CCYC trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CCYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to CCYC's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to CCYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs ZSYC Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, ZSYC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while ZSYC trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ZSYC's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to ZSYC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to ZSYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs WPCBF Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, WPCBF has a market cap of 700.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while WPCBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas WPCBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to WPCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to WPCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs NOTR Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, NOTR has a market cap of 570.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while NOTR trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas NOTR's P/E ratio is -433.33. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to NOTR's ROE of -65.90%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to NOTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs WCHS Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, WCHS has a market cap of 531.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while WCHS trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas WCHS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to WCHS's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to WCHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs FZRO Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, FZRO has a market cap of 346.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while FZRO trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas FZRO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to FZRO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to FZRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs CINV Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, CINV has a market cap of 338.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while CINV trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CINV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to CINV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to CINV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs DVTC Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, DVTC has a market cap of 272.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while DVTC trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas DVTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to DVTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to DVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs BTOW Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, BTOW has a market cap of 251.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while BTOW trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas BTOW's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to BTOW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to BTOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs AMRR Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, AMRR has a market cap of 250.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while AMRR trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AMRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to AMRR's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to AMRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs KAST Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, KAST has a market cap of 164.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while KAST trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas KAST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to KAST's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is less volatile compared to KAST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs GIPL Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, GIPL has a market cap of 118.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while GIPL trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas GIPL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to GIPL's ROE of +3391.68%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to GIPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs AOAO Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, AOAO has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while AOAO trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AOAO's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to AOAO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to AOAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs TRFE Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, TRFE has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while TRFE trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas TRFE's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to TRFE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to TRFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs DSAQW Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, DSAQW has a market cap of 99M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while DSAQW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas DSAQW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to DSAQW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to DSAQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs NMTT Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, NMTT has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while NMTT trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas NMTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to NMTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to NMTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs RMGCF Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, RMGCF has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while RMGCF trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas RMGCF's P/E ratio is -14.41. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to RMGCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to RMGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs WAYS Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, WAYS has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while WAYS trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas WAYS's P/E ratio is -49.72. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to WAYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to WAYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs SCGX Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, SCGX has a market cap of 86.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while SCGX trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SCGX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to SCGX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to SCGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs ATAQF Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, ATAQF has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while ATAQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ATAQF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to ATAQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to ATAQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs WWHC Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, WWHC has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while WWHC trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas WWHC's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to WWHC's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to WWHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs CHAAW Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, CHAAW has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while CHAAW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CHAAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to CHAAW's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to CHAAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs CMCAF Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, CMCAF has a market cap of 76.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while CMCAF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CMCAF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to CMCAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to CMCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs CREEF Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, CREEF has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while CREEF trades at $10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CREEF's P/E ratio is 36.47. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to CREEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to CREEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs TGLO Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, TGLO has a market cap of 70.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while TGLO trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas TGLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to TGLO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to TGLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs ARAT Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, ARAT has a market cap of 62.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while ARAT trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ARAT's P/E ratio is -8.17. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to ARAT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to ARAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs IDIG Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, IDIG has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while IDIG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas IDIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to IDIG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to IDIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs CAHO Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, CAHO has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while CAHO trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CAHO's P/E ratio is -162.00. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to CAHO's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to CAHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs GWIN Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, GWIN has a market cap of 59.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while GWIN trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas GWIN's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to GWIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to GWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs PTCP Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, PTCP has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while PTCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas PTCP's P/E ratio is -27.78. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to PTCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to PTCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs ATMS Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, ATMS has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while ATMS trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ATMS's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to ATMS's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to ATMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs SSHT Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, SSHT has a market cap of 51.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while SSHT trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SSHT's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to SSHT's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to SSHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs GGAAF Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, GGAAF has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while GGAAF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas GGAAF's P/E ratio is -133.33. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to GGAAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to GGAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs AASP Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, AASP has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while AASP trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AASP's P/E ratio is -17.24. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to AASP's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to AASP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs JMTM Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, JMTM has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while JMTM trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas JMTM's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to JMTM's ROE of +4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to JMTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs MDWK Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, MDWK has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while MDWK trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas MDWK's P/E ratio is -21.50. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to MDWK's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to MDWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs KWACW Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, KWACW has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while KWACW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas KWACW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to KWACW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to KWACW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs KWAC Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, KWAC has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while KWAC trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas KWAC's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to KWAC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to KWAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs AWCA Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, AWCA has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while AWCA trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AWCA's P/E ratio is -11.98. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to AWCA's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to AWCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs PMVCW Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, PMVCW has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while PMVCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas PMVCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to PMVCW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to PMVCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs XTPT Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, XTPT has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while XTPT trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas XTPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to XTPT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to XTPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs WBQNL Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, WBQNL has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while WBQNL trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas WBQNL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to WBQNL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to WBQNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs AVNI Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, AVNI has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while AVNI trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AVNI's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to AVNI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to AVNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs CNXX Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, CNXX has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while CNXX trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CNXX's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to CNXX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to CNXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs ACBD Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, ACBD has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while ACBD trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ACBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to ACBD's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to ACBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs NPFC Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, NPFC has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while NPFC trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas NPFC's P/E ratio is -17.86. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to NPFC's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to NPFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs CRSQ Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, CRSQ has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while CRSQ trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CRSQ's P/E ratio is -250.75. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to CRSQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is less volatile compared to CRSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs CBBB Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, CBBB has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while CBBB trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CBBB's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to CBBB's ROE of +10.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is less volatile compared to CBBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs ADCV Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, ADCV has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while ADCV trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ADCV's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to ADCV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to ADCV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs PSCO Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, PSCO has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while PSCO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas PSCO's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to PSCO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to PSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs EVTK Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, EVTK has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while EVTK trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas EVTK's P/E ratio is -475.00. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to EVTK's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to EVTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs XITO Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, XITO has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while XITO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas XITO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to XITO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to XITO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs AGSS Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, AGSS has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while AGSS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AGSS's P/E ratio is -6.35. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to AGSS's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to AGSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs GTVI Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, GTVI has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while GTVI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas GTVI's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to GTVI's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to GTVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs BOREF Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, BOREF has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while BOREF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas BOREF's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to BOREF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to BOREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs STLY Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, STLY has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while STLY trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas STLY's P/E ratio is -33.44. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to STLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to STLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs PCMC Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, PCMC has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while PCMC trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas PCMC's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to PCMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to PCMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs ECGR Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, ECGR has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while ECGR trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ECGR's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to ECGR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to ECGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs USBL Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, USBL has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while USBL trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas USBL's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to USBL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to USBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs ELLH Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, ELLH has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while ELLH trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ELLH's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to ELLH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to ELLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs WRPT Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, WRPT has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while WRPT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas WRPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to WRPT's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to WRPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs NIHL Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, NIHL has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while NIHL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas NIHL's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to NIHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to NIHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs AZRH Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, AZRH has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while AZRH trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AZRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to AZRH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to AZRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs AMLH Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, AMLH has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while AMLH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas AMLH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to AMLH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to AMLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs LWLW Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, LWLW has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while LWLW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas LWLW's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to LWLW's ROE of -3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to LWLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs ITRX Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, ITRX has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while ITRX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ITRX's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to ITRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to ITRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs ADIA Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, ADIA has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while ADIA trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ADIA's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to ADIA's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to ADIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs NGRC Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, NGRC has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while NGRC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas NGRC's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to NGRC's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to NGRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs BDCM Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, BDCM has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while BDCM trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas BDCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to BDCM's ROE of +20.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to BDCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs FUNR Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, FUNR has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while FUNR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas FUNR's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to FUNR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to FUNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs SLTN Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, SLTN has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while SLTN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SLTN's P/E ratio is -21.47. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to SLTN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to SLTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs CHYL Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, CHYL has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while CHYL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CHYL's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to CHYL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is less volatile compared to CHYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs CDSG Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, CDSG has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while CDSG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CDSG's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to CDSG's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to CDSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs NXMH Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, NXMH has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while NXMH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas NXMH's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to NXMH's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to NXMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs TCRI Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, TCRI has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while TCRI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas TCRI's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to TCRI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to TCRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs XCPT Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, XCPT has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while XCPT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas XCPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to XCPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to XCPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs WHLT Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, WHLT has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while WHLT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas WHLT's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to WHLT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to WHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs ASNB Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, ASNB has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while ASNB trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ASNB's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to ASNB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to ASNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs USCTF Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, USCTF has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while USCTF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas USCTF's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to USCTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to USCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs MTRI Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, MTRI has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while MTRI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas MTRI's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to MTRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to MTRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs LRGR Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, LRGR has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while LRGR trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas LRGR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to LRGR's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to LRGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs SITS Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, SITS has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while SITS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SITS's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to SITS's ROE of -3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to SITS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs FORW Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, FORW has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while FORW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas FORW's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to FORW's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to FORW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs NRCD Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, NRCD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while NRCD trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas NRCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to NRCD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to NRCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs CDBT Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, CDBT has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while CDBT trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CDBT's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to CDBT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to CDBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs HKBT Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, HKBT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while HKBT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas HKBT's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to HKBT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is less volatile compared to HKBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs WNFT Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, WNFT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while WNFT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas WNFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to WNFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to WNFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs ETER Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, ETER has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while ETER trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ETER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to ETER's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to ETER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs XSVT Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, XSVT has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while XSVT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas XSVT's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to XSVT's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to XSVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs FWFW Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, FWFW has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while FWFW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas FWFW's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to FWFW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to FWFW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs GDVM Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, GDVM has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while GDVM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas GDVM's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to GDVM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to GDVM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs CBGH Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, CBGH has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while CBGH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas CBGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to CBGH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to CBGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs ENGA Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, ENGA has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while ENGA trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas ENGA's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to ENGA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to ENGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs SIPN Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, SIPN has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while SIPN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas SIPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to SIPN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to SIPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs INOQ Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, INOQ has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while INOQ trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas INOQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to INOQ's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to INOQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.
RGLG vs QUAN Comparison
RGLG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLG stands at 342.8M. In comparison, QUAN has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLG is priced at $1.13, while QUAN trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLG currently has a P/E ratio of -0.11, whereas QUAN's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, RGLG's ROE is -1.03%, compared to QUAN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLG is more volatile compared to QUAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLG.