Ruparel Food Products Limited
Ruparel Food Products Limited (RFL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RFL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Mortgages Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFL.BO | ₹106.15 | -0.23% | 311.6M | -183.82 | -₹0.55 | N/A |
| HDFC.NS | ₹2,732.00 | +0.28% | 5.1T | 19.16 | ₹142.59 | N/A |
| BAJAJHFL.NS | ₹77.32 | +1.94% | 608.7B | 24.61 | ₹2.97 | N/A |
| LICHSGFIN.NS | ₹515.50 | +1.87% | 272.4B | 4.97 | ₹99.74 | +2.02% |
| LICHSGFIN.BO | ₹516.00 | +1.94% | 272.4B | 4.97 | ₹99.72 | +2.02% |
| PNBHOUSING.BO | ₹793.85 | -0.07% | 197.1B | 9.03 | ₹83.81 | +0.66% |
| PNBHOUSING.NS | ₹794.50 | -0.02% | 196.7B | 9.01 | ₹83.76 | +0.66% |
| AADHARHFC.NS | ₹451.55 | -1.05% | 195.2B | 19.23 | ₹23.34 | N/A |
| SAMMAANCAP.NS | ₹149.93 | +1.07% | 121.5B | 8.14 | ₹18.37 | N/A |
| SAMMAANCAP.BO | ₹150.00 | +1.08% | 121.5B | 8.14 | ₹18.37 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RFL.BO vs HDFC.NS Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, HDFC.NS has a market cap of 5.1T. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while HDFC.NS trades at ₹2,732.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas HDFC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HDFC.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to HDFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check HDFC.NS's competition here
RFL.BO vs BAJAJHFL.NS Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, BAJAJHFL.NS has a market cap of 608.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while BAJAJHFL.NS trades at ₹77.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas BAJAJHFL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BAJAJHFL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to BAJAJHFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check BAJAJHFL.NS's competition here
RFL.BO vs LICHSGFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, LICHSGFIN.NS has a market cap of 272.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while LICHSGFIN.NS trades at ₹515.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas LICHSGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LICHSGFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to LICHSGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check LICHSGFIN.NS's competition here
RFL.BO vs LICHSGFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, LICHSGFIN.BO has a market cap of 272.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while LICHSGFIN.BO trades at ₹516.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas LICHSGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LICHSGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to LICHSGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check LICHSGFIN.BO's competition here
RFL.BO vs PNBHOUSING.BO Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, PNBHOUSING.BO has a market cap of 197.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while PNBHOUSING.BO trades at ₹793.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas PNBHOUSING.BO's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PNBHOUSING.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to PNBHOUSING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check PNBHOUSING.BO's competition here
RFL.BO vs PNBHOUSING.NS Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, PNBHOUSING.NS has a market cap of 196.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while PNBHOUSING.NS trades at ₹794.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas PNBHOUSING.NS's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PNBHOUSING.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to PNBHOUSING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check PNBHOUSING.NS's competition here
RFL.BO vs AADHARHFC.NS Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, AADHARHFC.NS has a market cap of 195.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while AADHARHFC.NS trades at ₹451.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas AADHARHFC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AADHARHFC.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to AADHARHFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check AADHARHFC.NS's competition here
RFL.BO vs SAMMAANCAP.NS Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, SAMMAANCAP.NS has a market cap of 121.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while SAMMAANCAP.NS trades at ₹149.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas SAMMAANCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SAMMAANCAP.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to SAMMAANCAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check SAMMAANCAP.NS's competition here
RFL.BO vs SAMMAANCAP.BO Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, SAMMAANCAP.BO has a market cap of 121.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while SAMMAANCAP.BO trades at ₹150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas SAMMAANCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SAMMAANCAP.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to SAMMAANCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check SAMMAANCAP.BO's competition here
RFL.BO vs CANFINHOME.BO Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, CANFINHOME.BO has a market cap of 105.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while CANFINHOME.BO trades at ₹811.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas CANFINHOME.BO's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CANFINHOME.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to CANFINHOME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check CANFINHOME.BO's competition here
RFL.BO vs CANFINHOME.NS Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, CANFINHOME.NS has a market cap of 105.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while CANFINHOME.NS trades at ₹814.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas CANFINHOME.NS's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CANFINHOME.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to CANFINHOME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check CANFINHOME.NS's competition here
RFL.BO vs IBULHSGFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, IBULHSGFIN.NS has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while IBULHSGFIN.NS trades at ₹164.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas IBULHSGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IBULHSGFIN.NS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to IBULHSGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check IBULHSGFIN.NS's competition here
RFL.BO vs APTUS.BO Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, APTUS.BO has a market cap of 97.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while APTUS.BO trades at ₹205.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas APTUS.BO's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to APTUS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to APTUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check APTUS.BO's competition here
RFL.BO vs APTUS.NS Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, APTUS.NS has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while APTUS.NS trades at ₹204.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas APTUS.NS's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to APTUS.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to APTUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check APTUS.NS's competition here
RFL.BO vs IBULHSGFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, IBULHSGFIN.BO has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while IBULHSGFIN.BO trades at ₹164.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas IBULHSGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IBULHSGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to IBULHSGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check IBULHSGFIN.BO's competition here
RFL.BO vs HOMEFIRST.NS Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, HOMEFIRST.NS has a market cap of 94.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while HOMEFIRST.NS trades at ₹946.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas HOMEFIRST.NS's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HOMEFIRST.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to HOMEFIRST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check HOMEFIRST.NS's competition here
RFL.BO vs HOMEFIRST.BO Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, HOMEFIRST.BO has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while HOMEFIRST.BO trades at ₹945.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas HOMEFIRST.BO's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HOMEFIRST.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to HOMEFIRST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check HOMEFIRST.BO's competition here
RFL.BO vs AAVAS.BO Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, AAVAS.BO has a market cap of 85.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while AAVAS.BO trades at ₹1,120.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas AAVAS.BO's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AAVAS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to AAVAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check AAVAS.BO's competition here
RFL.BO vs AAVAS.NS Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, AAVAS.NS has a market cap of 85.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while AAVAS.NS trades at ₹1,124.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas AAVAS.NS's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AAVAS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to AAVAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check AAVAS.NS's competition here
RFL.BO vs INDIASHLTR.NS Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, INDIASHLTR.NS has a market cap of 82.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while INDIASHLTR.NS trades at ₹751.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas INDIASHLTR.NS's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INDIASHLTR.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to INDIASHLTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check INDIASHLTR.NS's competition here
RFL.BO vs INDIASHLTR.BO Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, INDIASHLTR.BO has a market cap of 81.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while INDIASHLTR.BO trades at ₹752.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas INDIASHLTR.BO's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INDIASHLTR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to INDIASHLTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check INDIASHLTR.BO's competition here
RFL.BO vs REPCOHOME.BO Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, REPCOHOME.BO has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while REPCOHOME.BO trades at ₹365.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas REPCOHOME.BO's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to REPCOHOME.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to REPCOHOME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check REPCOHOME.BO's competition here
RFL.BO vs REPCOHOME.NS Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, REPCOHOME.NS has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while REPCOHOME.NS trades at ₹365.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas REPCOHOME.NS's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to REPCOHOME.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to REPCOHOME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check REPCOHOME.NS's competition here
RFL.BO vs GICHSGFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, GICHSGFIN.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while GICHSGFIN.BO trades at ₹139.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas GICHSGFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 5.21. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GICHSGFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to GICHSGFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check GICHSGFIN.BO's competition here
RFL.BO vs GICHSGFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, GICHSGFIN.NS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while GICHSGFIN.NS trades at ₹140.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas GICHSGFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GICHSGFIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to GICHSGFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check GICHSGFIN.NS's competition here
RFL.BO vs SRGHFL.NS Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, SRGHFL.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while SRGHFL.NS trades at ₹253.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas SRGHFL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SRGHFL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to SRGHFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check SRGHFL.NS's competition here
RFL.BO vs SRGHFL.BO Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, SRGHFL.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while SRGHFL.BO trades at ₹230.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas SRGHFL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SRGHFL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to SRGHFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check SRGHFL.BO's competition here
RFL.BO vs RELHOME.BO Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, RELHOME.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while RELHOME.BO trades at ₹6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas RELHOME.BO's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RELHOME.BO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to RELHOME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check RELHOME.BO's competition here
RFL.BO vs RHFL.BO Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, RHFL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while RHFL.BO trades at ₹2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas RHFL.BO's P/E ratio is -30.62. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RHFL.BO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO and RHFL.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RHFL.BO's competition here
RFL.BO vs RHFL.NS Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, RHFL.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while RHFL.NS trades at ₹2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas RHFL.NS's P/E ratio is -30.62. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RHFL.NS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO and RHFL.NS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RHFL.NS's competition here
RFL.BO vs TFL.NS Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, TFL.NS has a market cap of 613.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while TFL.NS trades at ₹11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas TFL.NS's P/E ratio is -10.12. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TFL.NS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to TFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check TFL.NS's competition here
RFL.BO vs TFL.BO Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, TFL.BO has a market cap of 606.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while TFL.BO trades at ₹12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas TFL.BO's P/E ratio is -10.01. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TFL.BO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to TFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check TFL.BO's competition here
RFL.BO vs CMXLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, CMXLTD.BO has a market cap of 303.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while CMXLTD.BO trades at ₹25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas CMXLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -52.53. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CMXLTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO is less volatile compared to CMXLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFL.BO.Check CMXLTD.BO's competition here
RFL.BO vs DHFL.NS Comparison April 2026
RFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFL.BO stands at 311.6M. In comparison, DHFL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RFL.BO is priced at ₹106.15, while DHFL.NS trades at ₹16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -183.82, whereas DHFL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, RFL.BO's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DHFL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RFL.BO and DHFL.NS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DHFL.NS's competition here