Rare Foods Australia Limited
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for RFA.AX
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for RFA.AX
Rare Foods Australia Limited (RFA.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RFA.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFA.AX | A$0.01 | +0.00% | 1.4M | -0.50 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| CGC.AX | A$3.19 | -0.31% | 1.5B | 63.80 | A$0.05 | +1.57% |
| GNC.AX | A$6.58 | +0.00% | 1.5B | 36.56 | A$0.18 | +7.29% |
| ELD.AX | A$7.55 | -0.66% | 1.4B | 27.96 | A$0.27 | +4.77% |
| SGLLV.AX | A$13.36 | -1.40% | 910.4M | 12.26 | A$1.09 | +5.24% |
| AAC.AX | A$1.34 | +1.90% | 804.7M | 13.35 | A$0.10 | N/A |
| ING.AX | A$2.02 | -2.88% | 750.8M | 13.47 | A$0.15 | +5.94% |
| LGL.AX | A$2.15 | +0.00% | 262.5M | -71.67 | -A$0.03 | +6.51% |
| NAM.AX | A$0.77 | +0.26% | 159.9M | 25.73 | A$0.03 | +1.94% |
| NZK.AX | A$0.18 | -2.78% | 94.2M | -8.75 | -A$0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RFA.AX vs CGC.AX Comparison April 2026
RFA.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFA.AX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, CGC.AX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RFA.AX is priced at A$0.01, while CGC.AX trades at A$3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas CGC.AX's P/E ratio is 63.80. In terms of profitability, RFA.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CGC.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RFA.AX is more volatile compared to CGC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFA.AX.Check CGC.AX's competition here
RFA.AX vs GNC.AX Comparison April 2026
RFA.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFA.AX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, GNC.AX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RFA.AX is priced at A$0.01, while GNC.AX trades at A$6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GNC.AX's P/E ratio is 36.56. In terms of profitability, RFA.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to GNC.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RFA.AX is more volatile compared to GNC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFA.AX.Check GNC.AX's competition here
RFA.AX vs ELD.AX Comparison April 2026
RFA.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFA.AX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ELD.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RFA.AX is priced at A$0.01, while ELD.AX trades at A$7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ELD.AX's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, RFA.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ELD.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RFA.AX is more volatile compared to ELD.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFA.AX.Check ELD.AX's competition here
RFA.AX vs SGLLV.AX Comparison April 2026
RFA.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFA.AX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SGLLV.AX has a market cap of 910.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RFA.AX is priced at A$0.01, while SGLLV.AX trades at A$13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SGLLV.AX's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, RFA.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SGLLV.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RFA.AX is more volatile compared to SGLLV.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFA.AX.Check SGLLV.AX's competition here
RFA.AX vs AAC.AX Comparison April 2026
RFA.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFA.AX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, AAC.AX has a market cap of 804.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RFA.AX is priced at A$0.01, while AAC.AX trades at A$1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AAC.AX's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, RFA.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to AAC.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RFA.AX is more volatile compared to AAC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFA.AX.Check AAC.AX's competition here
RFA.AX vs ING.AX Comparison April 2026
RFA.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFA.AX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ING.AX has a market cap of 750.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RFA.AX is priced at A$0.01, while ING.AX trades at A$2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ING.AX's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, RFA.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to ING.AX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RFA.AX is more volatile compared to ING.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFA.AX.Check ING.AX's competition here
RFA.AX vs LGL.AX Comparison April 2026
RFA.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFA.AX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, LGL.AX has a market cap of 262.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RFA.AX is priced at A$0.01, while LGL.AX trades at A$2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LGL.AX's P/E ratio is -71.67. In terms of profitability, RFA.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to LGL.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RFA.AX is more volatile compared to LGL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFA.AX.Check LGL.AX's competition here
RFA.AX vs NAM.AX Comparison April 2026
RFA.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFA.AX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, NAM.AX has a market cap of 159.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RFA.AX is priced at A$0.01, while NAM.AX trades at A$0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NAM.AX's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, RFA.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to NAM.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RFA.AX is more volatile compared to NAM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFA.AX.Check NAM.AX's competition here
RFA.AX vs NZK.AX Comparison April 2026
RFA.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFA.AX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, NZK.AX has a market cap of 94.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RFA.AX is priced at A$0.01, while NZK.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NZK.AX's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, RFA.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to NZK.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RFA.AX is more volatile compared to NZK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFA.AX.Check NZK.AX's competition here
RFA.AX vs FRM.AX Comparison April 2026
RFA.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFA.AX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, FRM.AX has a market cap of 55.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RFA.AX is priced at A$0.01, while FRM.AX trades at A$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas FRM.AX's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, RFA.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to FRM.AX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RFA.AX is more volatile compared to FRM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFA.AX.Check FRM.AX's competition here
RFA.AX vs MCA.AX Comparison April 2026
RFA.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFA.AX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, MCA.AX has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RFA.AX is priced at A$0.01, while MCA.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MCA.AX's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, RFA.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MCA.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RFA.AX is more volatile compared to MCA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFA.AX.Check MCA.AX's competition here
RFA.AX vs DBF.AX Comparison April 2026
RFA.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFA.AX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, DBF.AX has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RFA.AX is priced at A$0.01, while DBF.AX trades at A$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas DBF.AX's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, RFA.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to DBF.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RFA.AX is more volatile compared to DBF.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFA.AX.Check DBF.AX's competition here
RFA.AX vs CSS.AX Comparison April 2026
RFA.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFA.AX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, CSS.AX has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RFA.AX is priced at A$0.01, while CSS.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas CSS.AX's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, RFA.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to CSS.AX's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RFA.AX is more volatile compared to CSS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFA.AX.Check CSS.AX's competition here
RFA.AX vs AAP.AX Comparison April 2026
RFA.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFA.AX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, AAP.AX has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RFA.AX is priced at A$0.01, while AAP.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AAP.AX's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, RFA.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to AAP.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RFA.AX is more volatile compared to AAP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFA.AX.Check AAP.AX's competition here
RFA.AX vs E33.AX Comparison April 2026
RFA.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFA.AX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, E33.AX has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RFA.AX is priced at A$0.01, while E33.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas E33.AX's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, RFA.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to E33.AX's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RFA.AX is more volatile compared to E33.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFA.AX.Check E33.AX's competition here
RFA.AX vs MRG.AX Comparison April 2026
RFA.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFA.AX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, MRG.AX has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RFA.AX is priced at A$0.01, while MRG.AX trades at A$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MRG.AX's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, RFA.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to MRG.AX's ROE of -2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, RFA.AX is more volatile compared to MRG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFA.AX.Check MRG.AX's competition here
RFA.AX vs SFG.AX Comparison April 2026
RFA.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFA.AX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SFG.AX has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RFA.AX is priced at A$0.01, while SFG.AX trades at A$0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SFG.AX's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, RFA.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to SFG.AX's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RFA.AX is more volatile compared to SFG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFA.AX.Check SFG.AX's competition here
RFA.AX vs WOA.AX Comparison April 2026
RFA.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFA.AX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, WOA.AX has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RFA.AX is priced at A$0.01, while WOA.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas WOA.AX's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, RFA.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to WOA.AX's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, RFA.AX is more volatile compared to WOA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFA.AX.Check WOA.AX's competition here
RFA.AX vs WNR.AX Comparison April 2026
RFA.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFA.AX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, WNR.AX has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RFA.AX is priced at A$0.01, while WNR.AX trades at A$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas WNR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, RFA.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to WNR.AX's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, RFA.AX is more volatile compared to WNR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFA.AX.Check WNR.AX's competition here
RFA.AX vs TGR.AX Comparison April 2026
RFA.AX plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFA.AX stands at 1.4M. In comparison, TGR.AX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RFA.AX is priced at A$0.01, while TGR.AX trades at A$5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFA.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TGR.AX's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, RFA.AX's ROE is -0.39%, compared to TGR.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RFA.AX is more volatile compared to TGR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFA.AX.Check TGR.AX's competition here