Eurazeo SE
Eurazeo SE (RF.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RF.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RF.PA | €57.35 | +1.59% | 4B | -6.44 | -€8.90 | +4.62% |
| IWDA.AS | €105.11 | +0.54% | 102B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.AS | €104.74 | +0.41% | 63.2B | N/A | N/A | +1.07% |
| VWRL.AS | €133.92 | +0.69% | 37.7B | N/A | N/A | +1.53% |
| SP5H.PA | €319.25 | +1.43% | 20.9B | 27.18 | €11.74 | +1.17% |
| SP5C.PA | €397.67 | +0.52% | 20.8B | 26.81 | €14.83 | N/A |
| IUSA.AS | €55.10 | +0.50% | 16.8B | N/A | N/A | +1.03% |
| ISFA.AS | €10.55 | +0.01% | 15.3B | N/A | N/A | +3.35% |
| AMUN.PA | €66.40 | +1.14% | 13.6B | 8.16 | €8.14 | +6.40% |
| HAL.AS | €129.60 | +0.15% | 11.7B | 9.68 | €13.39 | +2.24% |
Stock Comparison
RF.PA vs IWDA.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, IWDA.AS has a market cap of 102B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while IWDA.AS trades at €105.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas IWDA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IWDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to IWDA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check IWDA.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs VUSA.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, VUSA.AS has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while VUSA.AS trades at €104.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas VUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to VUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check VUSA.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs VWRL.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, VWRL.AS has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while VWRL.AS trades at €133.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas VWRL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VWRL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to VWRL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check VWRL.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs SP5H.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, SP5H.PA has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while SP5H.PA trades at €319.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas SP5H.PA's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SP5H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to SP5H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check SP5H.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs SP5C.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, SP5C.PA has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while SP5C.PA trades at €397.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas SP5C.PA's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SP5C.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to SP5C.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check SP5C.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs IUSA.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, IUSA.AS has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while IUSA.AS trades at €55.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas IUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to IUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check IUSA.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs ISFA.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, ISFA.AS has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while ISFA.AS trades at €10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas ISFA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ISFA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to ISFA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check ISFA.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs AMUN.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, AMUN.PA has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while AMUN.PA trades at €66.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas AMUN.PA's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AMUN.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to AMUN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check AMUN.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs HAL.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, HAL.AS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while HAL.AS trades at €129.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas HAL.AS's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HAL.AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to HAL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check HAL.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs IMEU.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, IMEU.AS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while IMEU.AS trades at €34.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas IMEU.AS's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IMEU.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to IMEU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check IMEU.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs CSH2.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, CSH2.PA has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while CSH2.PA trades at €107.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas CSH2.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CSH2.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to CSH2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check CSH2.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs WLDHC.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, WLDHC.PA has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while WLDHC.PA trades at €14.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas WLDHC.PA's P/E ratio is 24.21. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WLDHC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to WLDHC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check WLDHC.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs WLDH.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, WLDH.PA has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while WLDH.PA trades at €229.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas WLDH.PA's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WLDH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to WLDH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check WLDH.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs WLD.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, WLD.PA has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while WLD.PA trades at €358.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas WLD.PA's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to WLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check WLD.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs GBLB.BR Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, GBLB.BR has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while GBLB.BR trades at €76.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas GBLB.BR's P/E ratio is -98.33. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GBLB.BR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to GBLB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check GBLB.BR's competition here
RF.PA vs PSH.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, PSH.AS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while PSH.AS trades at €51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas PSH.AS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PSH.AS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is less volatile compared to PSH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check PSH.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs MEUD.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, MEUD.PA has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while MEUD.PA trades at €269.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas MEUD.PA's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MEUD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to MEUD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check MEUD.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs SOF.BR Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, SOF.BR has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while SOF.BR trades at €266.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas SOF.BR's P/E ratio is 6.65. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SOF.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to SOF.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check SOF.BR's competition here
RF.PA vs CBUG.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, CBUG.AS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while CBUG.AS trades at €4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas CBUG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CBUG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to CBUG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check CBUG.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs I500.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, I500.AS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while I500.AS trades at €10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas I500.AS's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to I500.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to I500.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check I500.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs I50D.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, I50D.AS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while I50D.AS trades at €7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas I50D.AS's P/E ratio is 27.04. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to I50D.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to I50D.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check I50D.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs GOLD.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, GOLD.PA has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while GOLD.PA trades at €114.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas GOLD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GOLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to GOLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check GOLD.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs CEUU.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, CEUU.AS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while CEUU.AS trades at €10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas CEUU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CEUU.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to CEUU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check CEUU.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs IWRD.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, IWRD.AS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while IWRD.AS trades at €76.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas IWRD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IWRD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to IWRD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check IWRD.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs LCWD.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, LCWD.PA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while LCWD.PA trades at €19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas LCWD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LCWD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to LCWD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check LCWD.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs SJPD.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, SJPD.AS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while SJPD.AS trades at €7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas SJPD.AS's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SJPD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to SJPD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check SJPD.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs SJPE.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, SJPE.AS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while SJPE.AS trades at €11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas SJPE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SJPE.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to SJPE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check SJPE.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs VHYL.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, VHYL.AS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while VHYL.AS trades at €66.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas VHYL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VHYL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to VHYL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check VHYL.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs CC4.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, CC4.PA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while CC4.PA trades at €225.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas CC4.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CC4.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to CC4.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check CC4.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs ECRP.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, ECRP.PA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while ECRP.PA trades at €53.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas ECRP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ECRP.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to ECRP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check ECRP.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs 500.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, 500.PA has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while 500.PA trades at €109.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas 500.PA's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to 500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check 500.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs AEME.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, AEME.PA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while AEME.PA trades at €73.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas AEME.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AEME.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to AEME.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check AEME.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs IJPA.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, IJPA.AS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while IJPA.AS trades at €56.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas IJPA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IJPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to IJPA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check IJPA.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs CW8.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, CW8.PA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while CW8.PA trades at €573.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas CW8.PA's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CW8.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to CW8.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check CW8.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs UST.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, UST.PA has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while UST.PA trades at €81.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas UST.PA's P/E ratio is 32.81. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UST.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to UST.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check UST.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs VEUR.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, VEUR.AS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while VEUR.AS trades at €43.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas VEUR.AS's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VEUR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to VEUR.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check VEUR.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs KBCA.BR Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, KBCA.BR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while KBCA.BR trades at €68.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas KBCA.BR's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KBCA.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to KBCA.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check KBCA.BR's competition here
RF.PA vs PHAU.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, PHAU.AS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while PHAU.AS trades at €268.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas PHAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PHAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to PHAU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check PHAU.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs S500H.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, S500H.PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while S500H.PA trades at €91.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas S500H.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to S500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to S500H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check S500H.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs S500.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, S500.PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while S500.PA trades at €158.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas S500.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to S500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to S500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check S500.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs USAC.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, USAC.PA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while USAC.PA trades at €559.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas USAC.PA's P/E ratio is 33.08. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to USAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to USAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check USAC.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs USA.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, USA.PA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while USA.PA trades at €516.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas USA.PA's P/E ratio is 32.46. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to USA.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to USA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check USA.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs IEMM.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, IEMM.AS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while IEMM.AS trades at €43.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas IEMM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IEMM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to IEMM.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check IEMM.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs REINA.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, REINA.AS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while REINA.AS trades at €26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas REINA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to REINA.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to REINA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check REINA.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs EUEA.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, EUEA.AS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while EUEA.AS trades at €55.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas EUEA.AS's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EUEA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to EUEA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check EUEA.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs 500X.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, 500X.AS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while 500X.AS trades at €39.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas 500X.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to 500X.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to 500X.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check 500X.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs AUEM.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, AUEM.PA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while AUEM.PA trades at €6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas AUEM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AUEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to AUEM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check AUEM.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs C50U.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, C50U.PA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while C50U.PA trades at €168.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas C50U.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to C50U.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to C50U.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check C50U.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs CACC.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, CACC.PA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while CACC.PA trades at €39.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas CACC.PA's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CACC.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to CACC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check CACC.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs CAC.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, CAC.PA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while CAC.PA trades at €80.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas CAC.PA's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to CAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check CAC.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs WSRI.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, WSRI.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while WSRI.PA trades at €103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas WSRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WSRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to WSRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check WSRI.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs SRIL.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, SRIL.AS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while SRIL.AS trades at €11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas SRIL.AS's P/E ratio is 26.23. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SRIL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to SRIL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check SRIL.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs ICHN.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, ICHN.AS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while ICHN.AS trades at €6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas ICHN.AS's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ICHN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to ICHN.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check ICHN.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs ICHD.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, ICHD.AS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while ICHD.AS trades at €5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas ICHD.AS's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ICHD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to ICHD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check ICHD.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs ALLFG.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, ALLFG.AS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while ALLFG.AS trades at €6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas ALLFG.AS's P/E ratio is -24.15. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ALLFG.AS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to ALLFG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check ALLFG.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs VERX.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, VERX.AS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while VERX.AS trades at €43.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas VERX.AS's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VERX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to VERX.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check VERX.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs MSE.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, MSE.PA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while MSE.PA trades at €60.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas MSE.PA's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MSE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to MSE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check MSE.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs AGGD.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, AGGD.AS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while AGGD.AS trades at €5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas AGGD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AGGD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to AGGD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check AGGD.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs AEEM.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, AEEM.PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while AEEM.PA trades at €5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas AEEM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AEEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to AEEM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check AEEM.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs MF.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, MF.PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while MF.PA trades at €85.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas MF.PA's P/E ratio is -40.33. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MF.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to MF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check MF.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs IDSE.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, IDSE.AS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while IDSE.AS trades at €139.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas IDSE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IDSE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to IDSE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check IDSE.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs ISED.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, ISED.AS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while ISED.AS trades at €7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas ISED.AS's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ISED.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to ISED.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check ISED.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs GLUH.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, GLUH.AS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while GLUH.AS trades at €4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas GLUH.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GLUH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to GLUH.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check GLUH.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs CD5.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, CD5.PA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while CD5.PA trades at €88.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas CD5.PA's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CD5.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to CD5.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check CD5.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs C50.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, C50.PA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while C50.PA trades at €143.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas C50.PA's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to C50.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to C50.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check C50.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs ROLA.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, ROLA.AS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while ROLA.AS trades at €64.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas ROLA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ROLA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to ROLA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check ROLA.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs EHYA.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, EHYA.AS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while EHYA.AS trades at €5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas EHYA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EHYA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to EHYA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check EHYA.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs EHYD.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, EHYD.AS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while EHYD.AS trades at €4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas EHYD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EHYD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to EHYD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check EHYD.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs WESE.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, WESE.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while WESE.PA trades at €73.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas WESE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to WESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check WESE.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs TKO.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, TKO.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while TKO.PA trades at €20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas TKO.PA's P/E ratio is 19.75. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TKO.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to TKO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check TKO.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs BREB.BR Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, BREB.BR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while BREB.BR trades at €115.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas BREB.BR's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BREB.BR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to BREB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check BREB.BR's competition here
RF.PA vs SEMD.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, SEMD.AS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while SEMD.AS trades at €6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas SEMD.AS's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SEMD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to SEMD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check SEMD.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs EEUE.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, EEUE.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while EEUE.PA trades at €17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas EEUE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EEUE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to EEUE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check EEUE.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs IMBE.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, IMBE.AS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while IMBE.AS trades at €4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas IMBE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IMBE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to IMBE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check IMBE.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs CB3.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, CB3.PA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while CB3.PA trades at €219.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas CB3.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CB3.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to CB3.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check CB3.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs EXCH.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, EXCH.AS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while EXCH.AS trades at €6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas EXCH.AS's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EXCH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to EXCH.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check EXCH.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs ESE.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, ESE.PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while ESE.PA trades at €27.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas ESE.PA's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to ESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check ESE.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs TDIV.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, TDIV.AS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while TDIV.AS trades at €45.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas TDIV.AS's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TDIV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to TDIV.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check TDIV.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs IGLE.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, IGLE.AS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while IGLE.AS trades at €4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas IGLE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IGLE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to IGLE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check IGLE.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs SGLU.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, SGLU.AS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while SGLU.AS trades at €4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas SGLU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SGLU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to SGLU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check SGLU.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs GEMU.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, GEMU.PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while GEMU.PA trades at €9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas GEMU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GEMU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to GEMU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check GEMU.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs SUOA.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, SUOA.AS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while SUOA.AS trades at €5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas SUOA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SUOA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to SUOA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check SUOA.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs BNKE.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, BNKE.PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while BNKE.PA trades at €285.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas BNKE.PA's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BNKE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to BNKE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check BNKE.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs EUSRI.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, EUSRI.PA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while EUSRI.PA trades at €83.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas EUSRI.PA's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EUSRI.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to EUSRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check EUSRI.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs ANX.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, ANX.PA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while ANX.PA trades at €229.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas ANX.PA's P/E ratio is 32.53. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ANX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to ANX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check ANX.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs EPAB.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, EPAB.PA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while EPAB.PA trades at €36.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas EPAB.PA's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EPAB.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to EPAB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check EPAB.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs TNOW.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, TNOW.PA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while TNOW.PA trades at €882.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas TNOW.PA's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TNOW.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to TNOW.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check TNOW.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs IUHE.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, IUHE.AS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while IUHE.AS trades at €6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas IUHE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IUHE.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to IUHE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check IUHE.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs TI5A.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, TI5A.AS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while TI5A.AS trades at €113.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas TI5A.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TI5A.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to TI5A.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check TI5A.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs USRI.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, USRI.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while USRI.PA trades at €102.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas USRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to USRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to USRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check USRI.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs ANTIN.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, ANTIN.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while ANTIN.PA trades at €11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas ANTIN.PA's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ANTIN.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is less volatile compared to ANTIN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check ANTIN.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs CMUD.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, CMUD.PA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while CMUD.PA trades at €69.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas CMUD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CMUD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to CMUD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check CMUD.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs PEUG.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, PEUG.PA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while PEUG.PA trades at €79.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas PEUG.PA's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PEUG.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to PEUG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check PEUG.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs ACWI.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, ACWI.PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while ACWI.PA trades at €497.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas ACWI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ACWI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to ACWI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check ACWI.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs PHAG.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, PHAG.AS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while PHAG.AS trades at €30.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas PHAG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PHAG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to PHAG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check PHAG.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs EGOV.PA Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, EGOV.PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while EGOV.PA trades at €49.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas EGOV.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EGOV.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to EGOV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check EGOV.PA's competition here
RF.PA vs MUSD.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, MUSD.AS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while MUSD.AS trades at €8.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas MUSD.AS's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MUSD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to MUSD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check MUSD.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs DHYE.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, DHYE.AS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while DHYE.AS trades at €5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas DHYE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DHYE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to DHYE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check DHYE.AS's competition here
RF.PA vs CNYB.AS Comparison August 2025
RF.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RF.PA stands at 4B. In comparison, CNYB.AS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RF.PA is priced at €57.35, while CNYB.AS trades at €5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RF.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -6.44, whereas CNYB.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RF.PA's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CNYB.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RF.PA is more volatile compared to CNYB.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RF.PA.Check CNYB.AS's competition here