National Asset Recovery Corp.
National Asset Recovery Corp. (REPO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (REPO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REPO | $0.03 | +5.86% | 4.7M | -0.31 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| BXBLY | $35.22 | +1.50% | 24B | 26.30 | $1.34 | +2.16% |
| BMBLF | $16.93 | -1.28% | 23B | 25.27 | $0.67 | +2.52% |
| WOLTF | $71.69 | -0.71% | 16.8B | 13.17 | $5.63 | +3.83% |
| WTKWY | $73.65 | +4.35% | 16.6B | 13.09 | $5.63 | +3.43% |
| RKLIF | $6.06 | +0.00% | 15.2B | 46.62 | $0.13 | +1.95% |
| IKTSF | $62.78 | +0.59% | 9.6B | 20.52 | $3.06 | +3.44% |
| IKTSY | $62.94 | +2.34% | 9.6B | 20.51 | $3.04 | +3.24% |
| DNPLY | $10.20 | +1.31% | 9.5B | 13.49 | $0.78 | +0.92% |
| INPOF | $18.02 | +80.38% | 9B | 36.04 | $0.50 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
REPO vs BXBLY Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BXBLY has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while BXBLY trades at $35.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BXBLY's P/E ratio is 26.30. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BXBLY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to BXBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check BXBLY's competition here
REPO vs BMBLF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BMBLF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while BMBLF trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BMBLF's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BMBLF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to BMBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check BMBLF's competition here
REPO vs WOLTF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, WOLTF has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while WOLTF trades at $71.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WOLTF's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WOLTF's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to WOLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check WOLTF's competition here
REPO vs WTKWY Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, WTKWY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while WTKWY trades at $73.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WTKWY's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WTKWY's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to WTKWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check WTKWY's competition here
REPO vs RKLIF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, RKLIF has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while RKLIF trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RKLIF's P/E ratio is 46.62. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RKLIF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to RKLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check RKLIF's competition here
REPO vs IKTSF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, IKTSF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while IKTSF trades at $62.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas IKTSF's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IKTSF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to IKTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check IKTSF's competition here
REPO vs IKTSY Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, IKTSY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while IKTSY trades at $62.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas IKTSY's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IKTSY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to IKTSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check IKTSY's competition here
REPO vs DNPLY Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, DNPLY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while DNPLY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas DNPLY's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DNPLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to DNPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check DNPLY's competition here
REPO vs INPOF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, INPOF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while INPOF trades at $18.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas INPOF's P/E ratio is 36.04. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INPOF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to INPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check INPOF's competition here
REPO vs INPOY Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, INPOY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while INPOY trades at $8.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas INPOY's P/E ratio is 35.58. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INPOY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to INPOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check INPOY's competition here
REPO vs TOPPY Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, TOPPY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while TOPPY trades at $15.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TOPPY's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TOPPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to TOPPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check TOPPY's competition here
REPO vs SDXAY Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SDXAY has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while SDXAY trades at $11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SDXAY's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SDXAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to SDXAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check SDXAY's competition here
REPO vs DNPCF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, DNPCF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while DNPCF trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas DNPCF's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DNPCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to DNPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check DNPCF's competition here
REPO vs SDXOF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SDXOF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while SDXOF trades at $56.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SDXOF's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SDXOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to SDXOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check SDXOF's competition here
REPO vs TONPF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, TONPF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while TONPF trades at $28.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TONPF's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TONPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to TONPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check TONPF's competition here
REPO vs ELSSF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ELSSF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while ELSSF trades at $31.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ELSSF's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ELSSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to ELSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check ELSSF's competition here
REPO vs CTAGY Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CTAGY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while CTAGY trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CTAGY's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CTAGY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to CTAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check CTAGY's competition here
REPO vs ISFFF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ISFFF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while ISFFF trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ISFFF's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ISFFF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to ISFFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check ISFFF's competition here
REPO vs SCGPY Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SCGPY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while SCGPY trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SCGPY's P/E ratio is 52.14. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SCGPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to SCGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check SCGPY's competition here
REPO vs TLPFF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, TLPFF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while TLPFF trades at $58.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TLPFF's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TLPFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to TLPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check TLPFF's competition here
REPO vs TLPFY Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, TLPFY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while TLPFY trades at $29.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TLPFY's P/E ratio is 6.26. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TLPFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to TLPFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check TLPFY's competition here
REPO vs SECCF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SECCF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while SECCF trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SECCF's P/E ratio is 50.57. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SECCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to SECCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check SECCF's competition here
REPO vs MITFF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, MITFF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while MITFF trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MITFF's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MITFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to MITFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check MITFF's competition here
REPO vs MITFY Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, MITFY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while MITFY trades at $9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MITFY's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MITFY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to MITFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check MITFY's competition here
REPO vs ACENY Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ACENY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while ACENY trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ACENY's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ACENY's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is less volatile compared to ACENY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check ACENY's competition here
REPO vs APLUF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, APLUF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while APLUF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas APLUF's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to APLUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to APLUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check APLUF's competition here
REPO vs RELOF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, RELOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while RELOF trades at $11.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RELOF's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RELOF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to RELOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check RELOF's competition here
REPO vs ISSDY Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ISSDY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while ISSDY trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ISSDY's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ISSDY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to ISSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check ISSDY's competition here
REPO vs TCLAF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, TCLAF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while TCLAF trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TCLAF's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TCLAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to TCLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check TCLAF's competition here
REPO vs TCLCF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, TCLCF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while TCLCF trades at $12.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas TCLCF's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TCLCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to TCLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check TCLCF's competition here
REPO vs DLUEY Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, DLUEY has a market cap of 979.7M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while DLUEY trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas DLUEY's P/E ratio is -15.63. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DLUEY's ROE of -5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to DLUEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check DLUEY's competition here
REPO vs STGXF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, STGXF has a market cap of 789.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while STGXF trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas STGXF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to STGXF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to STGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check STGXF's competition here
REPO vs JSVGF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, JSVGF has a market cap of 683.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while JSVGF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas JSVGF's P/E ratio is 117.73. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JSVGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to JSVGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check JSVGF's competition here
REPO vs IRMTF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, IRMTF has a market cap of 649.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while IRMTF trades at $34.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas IRMTF's P/E ratio is 32.48. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IRMTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to IRMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check IRMTF's competition here
REPO vs CLNFF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CLNFF has a market cap of 635.5M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while CLNFF trades at $55.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CLNFF's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CLNFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to CLNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check CLNFF's competition here
REPO vs GDIFF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, GDIFF has a market cap of 620.6M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while GDIFF trades at $26.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas GDIFF's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GDIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to GDIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check GDIFF's competition here
REPO vs HZNOF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, HZNOF has a market cap of 580.1M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while HZNOF trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HZNOF's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HZNOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to HZNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check HZNOF's competition here
REPO vs IPHLF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, IPHLF has a market cap of 546.5M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while IPHLF trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas IPHLF's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IPHLF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to IPHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check IPHLF's competition here
REPO vs GLCDF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, GLCDF has a market cap of 540.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while GLCDF trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas GLCDF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GLCDF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to GLCDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check GLCDF's competition here
REPO vs RKSLF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, RKSLF has a market cap of 524.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while RKSLF trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RKSLF's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RKSLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to RKSLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check RKSLF's competition here
REPO vs ITEPF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ITEPF has a market cap of 448.6M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while ITEPF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ITEPF's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ITEPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to ITEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check ITEPF's competition here
REPO vs CTAGF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CTAGF has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while CTAGF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CTAGF's P/E ratio is 64.17. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CTAGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to CTAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check CTAGF's competition here
REPO vs KBRLF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, KBRLF has a market cap of 339.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while KBRLF trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas KBRLF's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KBRLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to KBRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check KBRLF's competition here
REPO vs DELRF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, DELRF has a market cap of 328M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while DELRF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas DELRF's P/E ratio is -15.18. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DELRF's ROE of -5.33%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to DELRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check DELRF's competition here
REPO vs VSSPY Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, VSSPY has a market cap of 302.1M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while VSSPY trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas VSSPY's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VSSPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to VSSPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check VSSPY's competition here
REPO vs ITEGY Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ITEGY has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while ITEGY trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ITEGY's P/E ratio is -7.46. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ITEGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to ITEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check ITEGY's competition here
REPO vs KPGHF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, KPGHF has a market cap of 204.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while KPGHF trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas KPGHF's P/E ratio is 90.20. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KPGHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to KPGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check KPGHF's competition here
REPO vs PGWFF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PGWFF has a market cap of 190.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while PGWFF trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas PGWFF's P/E ratio is 126.00. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PGWFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is less volatile compared to PGWFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check PGWFF's competition here
REPO vs PCRRF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PCRRF has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while PCRRF trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas PCRRF's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PCRRF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to PCRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check PCRRF's competition here
REPO vs CERGF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CERGF has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while CERGF trades at $4.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CERGF's P/E ratio is 63.71. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CERGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to CERGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check CERGF's competition here
REPO vs AJISF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, AJISF has a market cap of 130.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while AJISF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas AJISF's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AJISF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to AJISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check AJISF's competition here
REPO vs PCOA Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PCOA has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while PCOA trades at $150,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas PCOA's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PCOA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. REPO has daily volatility of 20.47 and PCOA has daily volatility of N/A.Check PCOA's competition here
REPO vs CTGL Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CTGL has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while CTGL trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CTGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CTGL's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to CTGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check CTGL's competition here
REPO vs FLNCF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, FLNCF has a market cap of 67.6M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while FLNCF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas FLNCF's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FLNCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to FLNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check FLNCF's competition here
REPO vs RDCPF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, RDCPF has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while RDCPF trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RDCPF's P/E ratio is 173.50. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RDCPF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to RDCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check RDCPF's competition here
REPO vs WTLLF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, WTLLF has a market cap of 58.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while WTLLF trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WTLLF's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WTLLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to WTLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check WTLLF's competition here
REPO vs DCMDF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, DCMDF has a market cap of 58.9M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while DCMDF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas DCMDF's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DCMDF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to DCMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check DCMDF's competition here
REPO vs SRRPF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SRRPF has a market cap of 54.6M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while SRRPF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SRRPF's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SRRPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to SRRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check SRRPF's competition here
REPO vs ASFH Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ASFH has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while ASFH trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ASFH's P/E ratio is 61.00. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ASFH's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to ASFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check ASFH's competition here
REPO vs ESTTF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ESTTF has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while ESTTF trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ESTTF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ESTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to ESTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check ESTTF's competition here
REPO vs UWHGF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, UWHGF has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while UWHGF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas UWHGF's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UWHGF's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to UWHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check UWHGF's competition here
REPO vs CRKT Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CRKT has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while CRKT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CRKT's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRKT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to CRKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check CRKT's competition here
REPO vs FTBGF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, FTBGF has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while FTBGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas FTBGF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FTBGF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to FTBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check FTBGF's competition here
REPO vs SFRX Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SFRX has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while SFRX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SFRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SFRX's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to SFRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check SFRX's competition here
REPO vs GNOLF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, GNOLF has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while GNOLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas GNOLF's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GNOLF's ROE of +4.99%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to GNOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check GNOLF's competition here
REPO vs NSYC Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, NSYC has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while NSYC trades at $378.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NSYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NSYC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to NSYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check NSYC's competition here
REPO vs RLFTY Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, RLFTY has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while RLFTY trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas RLFTY's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RLFTY's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to RLFTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check RLFTY's competition here
REPO vs ELVG Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ELVG has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while ELVG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ELVG's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ELVG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to ELVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check ELVG's competition here
REPO vs GPOX Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, GPOX has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while GPOX trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas GPOX's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GPOX's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to GPOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check GPOX's competition here
REPO vs ADMQ Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ADMQ has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while ADMQ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ADMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADMQ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to ADMQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check ADMQ's competition here
REPO vs AWAW Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, AWAW has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while AWAW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas AWAW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AWAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to AWAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check AWAW's competition here
REPO vs LMTI Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, LMTI has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while LMTI trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas LMTI's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LMTI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is less volatile compared to LMTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check LMTI's competition here
REPO vs CGRW Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CGRW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while CGRW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CGRW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CGRW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to CGRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check CGRW's competition here
REPO vs OODH Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, OODH has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while OODH trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas OODH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OODH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is less volatile compared to OODH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check OODH's competition here
REPO vs ANMP Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ANMP has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while ANMP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ANMP's P/E ratio is 2.35. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ANMP's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to ANMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check ANMP's competition here
REPO vs SAYFF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SAYFF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while SAYFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SAYFF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SAYFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to SAYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check SAYFF's competition here
REPO vs UNDR Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, UNDR has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while UNDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas UNDR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UNDR's ROE of +1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to UNDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check UNDR's competition here
REPO vs HHGI Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, HHGI has a market cap of 607.4K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while HHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas HHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HHGI's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to HHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check HHGI's competition here
REPO vs ECOX Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, ECOX has a market cap of 438.5K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while ECOX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas ECOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ECOX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is less volatile compared to ECOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check ECOX's competition here
REPO vs JFIL Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, JFIL has a market cap of 419.7K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while JFIL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas JFIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JFIL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is less volatile compared to JFIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check JFIL's competition here
REPO vs MTPR Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, MTPR has a market cap of 393.6K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while MTPR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas MTPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MTPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to MTPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check MTPR's competition here
REPO vs DTSL Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, DTSL has a market cap of 391.3K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while DTSL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas DTSL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to DTSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check DTSL's competition here
REPO vs WLDPF Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, WLDPF has a market cap of 360.7K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while WLDPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas WLDPF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WLDPF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to WLDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check WLDPF's competition here
REPO vs XCPL Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, XCPL has a market cap of 337K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while XCPL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas XCPL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XCPL's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to XCPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check XCPL's competition here
REPO vs DPUI Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, DPUI has a market cap of 299.6K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while DPUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas DPUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DPUI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to DPUI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check DPUI's competition here
REPO vs IJJP Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, IJJP has a market cap of 221.4K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while IJJP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas IJJP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IJJP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to IJJP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check IJJP's competition here
REPO vs OPMG Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, OPMG has a market cap of 219.2K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while OPMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas OPMG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OPMG's ROE of +15.86%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to OPMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check OPMG's competition here
REPO vs IMJX Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, IMJX has a market cap of 112.7K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while IMJX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas IMJX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IMJX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to IMJX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check IMJX's competition here
REPO vs INCC Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, INCC has a market cap of 109.4K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while INCC trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas INCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INCC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is less volatile compared to INCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check INCC's competition here
REPO vs PIFR Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PIFR has a market cap of 103.6K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while PIFR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas PIFR's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PIFR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to PIFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check PIFR's competition here
REPO vs NNFC Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, NNFC has a market cap of 97.8K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while NNFC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas NNFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NNFC's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to NNFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check NNFC's competition here
REPO vs UCPC Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, UCPC has a market cap of 56.2K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while UCPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas UCPC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to UCPC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is less volatile compared to UCPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check UCPC's competition here
REPO vs PPMT Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, PPMT has a market cap of 54.3K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while PPMT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas PPMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PPMT's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to PPMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check PPMT's competition here
REPO vs GFGU Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, GFGU has a market cap of 48.5K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while GFGU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas GFGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GFGU's ROE of +15.99%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to GFGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check GFGU's competition here
REPO vs BFLD Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, BFLD has a market cap of 43.8K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while BFLD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas BFLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BFLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is less volatile compared to BFLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check BFLD's competition here
REPO vs CBMJ Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, CBMJ has a market cap of 40K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while CBMJ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas CBMJ's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CBMJ's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to CBMJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check CBMJ's competition here
REPO vs SGLS Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, SGLS has a market cap of 39.5K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while SGLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas SGLS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SGLS's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to SGLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check SGLS's competition here
REPO vs OPUS Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, OPUS has a market cap of 34.3K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while OPUS trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas OPUS's P/E ratio is 0.18. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to OPUS's ROE of +12.10%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to OPUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check OPUS's competition here
REPO vs AXCG Comparison February 2026
REPO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REPO stands at 4.7M. In comparison, AXCG has a market cap of 31.5K. Regarding current trading prices, REPO is priced at $0.03, while AXCG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REPO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.31, whereas AXCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REPO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AXCG's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, REPO is more volatile compared to AXCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REPO.Check AXCG's competition here