Renren Inc.
Renren Inc. RENN Peers
See (RENN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RENN | $1.65 | -2.94% | 30.90M | -0.54 | -$3.04 | N/A |
| SAP | $288.51 | -0.42% | 336.67B | 52.55 | $5.49 | +1.38% |
| CRM | $290.73 | +0.54% | 278.95B | 45.71 | $6.36 | +0.56% |
| NOW | $1,027.29 | -0.91% | 212.65B | 139.58 | $7.36 | N/A |
| UBER | $90.38 | -1.46% | 189.00B | 15.83 | $5.71 | N/A |
| INTU | $652.83 | -0.60% | 182.51B | 60.96 | $10.71 | +0.61% |
| SHOP | $106.15 | +4.34% | 137.45B | 68.48 | $1.55 | N/A |
| APP | $376.54 | +1.74% | 127.42B | 68.34 | $5.51 | N/A |
| MSTR | $416.75 | -1.15% | 113.94B | -18.72 | -$22.26 | N/A |
| CDNS | $319.39 | +0.23% | 87.21B | 81.27 | $3.93 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RENN vs SAP Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 336.67B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while SAP trades at $288.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 52.55. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs CRM Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 278.95B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while CRM trades at $290.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 45.71. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs NOW Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 212.65B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while NOW trades at $1,027.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 139.58. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs UBER Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 189.00B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while UBER trades at $90.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs INTU Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 182.51B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while INTU trades at $652.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 60.96. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs SHOP Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 137.45B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while SHOP trades at $106.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 68.48. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs APP Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 127.42B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while APP trades at $376.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 68.34. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs MSTR Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 113.94B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while MSTR trades at $416.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -18.72. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs CDNS Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 87.21B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while CDNS trades at $319.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 81.27. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs WDAY Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 72.57B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while WDAY trades at $271.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 139.06. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs ADSK Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 63.23B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while ADSK trades at $295.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 57.61. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs SNOW Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 60.52B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while SNOW trades at $181.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -46.99. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs TEAM Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 59.20B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while TEAM trades at $224.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -136.29. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs FICO Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 51.77B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while FICO trades at $2,126.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 91.60. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs DDOG Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 41.12B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while DDOG trades at $119.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 253.32. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs TTD Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 38.89B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while TTD trades at $79.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 96.51. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs HUBS Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 35.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while HUBS trades at $669.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1425.30. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs ANSS Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 30.58B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while ANSS trades at $347.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 51.61. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs ZM Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 25.40B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while ZM trades at $83.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs DUOL Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 24.58B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while DUOL trades at $540.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 267.66. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs STRK Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 24.39B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while STRK trades at $96.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to STRK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs TYL Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.23B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while TYL trades at $561.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 84.62. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs STRF Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 23.74B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while STRF trades at $97.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to STRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs GRAB Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 20.76B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while GRAB trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 525.00. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs PTC Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 20.57B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while PTC trades at $171.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 47.24. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs SSNC Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 19.55B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while SSNC trades at $79.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs DOCU Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 18.28B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while DOCU trades at $90.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs GWRE Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 18.02B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while GWRE trades at $214.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is -1130.45. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GWRE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs AZPN Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.73B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs DT Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.01B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while DT trades at $53.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs PAYC Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 14.88B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while PAYC trades at $257.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 36.60. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs MNDY Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 14.87B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while MNDY trades at $292.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 295.79. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs BSY Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 13.99B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while BSY trades at $47.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 61.47. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs BKI Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.88B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs MANH Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.79B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while MANH trades at $194.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 55.33. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs TTAN Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 11.39B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while TTAN trades at $125.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -14.73. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs PCTY Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 11.02B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while PCTY trades at $199.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 49.87. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs XM Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11.01B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs CDAY Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.85B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs NICE Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.72B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while NICE trades at $169.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs PCOR Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.72B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while PCOR trades at $71.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -83.53. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs ESTC Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9.72B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while ESTC trades at $93.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -70.50. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs DSGX Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9.61B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while DSGX trades at $112.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 68.59. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs DAY Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.49B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while DAY trades at $59.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 371.06. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs U Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 8.95B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while U trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas U's P/E ratio is -19.21. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs GTLB Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 8.83B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while GTLB trades at $53.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -1335.75. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs PEGA Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 8.37B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while PEGA trades at $97.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 45.29. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs QXO Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 8.32B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while QXO trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -45.86. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs NATI Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs CVLT Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.93B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while CVLT trades at $179.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 107.61. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs SMAR Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.91B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs APPF Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 7.64B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while APPF trades at $212.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 39.65. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs SRAD Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 7.29B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while SRAD trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 123.42. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs OTEX Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.22B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while OTEX trades at $27.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs LYFT Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.95B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while LYFT trades at $16.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 112.40. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs CWAN Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.83B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while CWAN trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs BULL Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 6.24B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while BULL trades at $13.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -12.07. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BULL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs VERX Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 6.15B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while VERX trades at $38.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -133.79. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs COUP Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.12B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to COUP's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs QTWO Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.72B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while QTWO trades at $91.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -269.99. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs IDCC Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.62B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while IDCC trades at $216.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs ETWO-WT Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 5.41B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs SYT Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, SYT has a market cap of 5.32B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while SYT trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas SYT's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SYT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to SYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs BILL Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.94B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while BILL trades at $47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2399.50. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs FROG Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.90B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while FROG trades at $42.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -60.24. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs GRND Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while GRND trades at $24.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -40.18. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs SOUN Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.71B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while SOUN trades at $11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -19.28. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is less volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs FRSH Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.64B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while FRSH trades at $15.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -65.58. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs RUMBW Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 4.60B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while RUMBW trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs INTA Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 4.60B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while INTA trades at $56.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -236.50. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs RUM Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while RUM trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -7.09. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs LIF Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.45B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while LIF trades at $58.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is -971.17. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs ASAN Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 4.25B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while ASAN trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -15.99. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs CVT Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.19B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs PYCR Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs WK Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 4.02B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while WK trades at $72.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -62.19. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs BRZE Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.84B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while BRZE trades at $36.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -36.01. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs PWSC Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs ZI Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 128.88. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs AYX Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.53B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs ENV Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.49B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs INST Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.46B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs ZETA Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while ZETA trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -58.34. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs BL Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while BL trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 39.86. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs COMP Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.22B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while COMP trades at $6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -48.73. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs RIOT Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while RIOT trades at $8.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs ALKT Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while ALKT trades at $30.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -81.03. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs ALIT Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while ALIT trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -97.35. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs BLKB Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.06B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while BLKB trades at $63.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs ALRM Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while ALRM trades at $59.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 25.30. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs GBTG Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while GBTG trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -61.50. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs CALX Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 2.91B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while CALX trades at $44.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -84.59. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs PAR Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while PAR trades at $69.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -26.05. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs NCNO Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while NCNO trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -73.55. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs BTDR Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.72B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while BTDR trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs DAVEW Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 2.70B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while DAVEW trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -3.46. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs CLSK Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.70B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while CLSK trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs PRGS Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while PRGS trades at $61.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 48.66. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.
RENN vs RNG Comparison
RENN plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RENN stands at 30.90M. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, RENN is priced at $1.65, while RNG trades at $27.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RENN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.54, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is -64.83. In terms of profitability, RENN's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RNG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RENN is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENN.