Redline Communications Group Inc. (TSX: RDL.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Redline Communications Group Inc. (TSX: RDL.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDL.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CSCO.NE has a market cap of 620.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDL.TO is priced at CA$0.90 on the TSX, while CSCO.NE trades at CA$54.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas CSCO.NE's P/E ratio is 15.18. In terms of profitability, RDL.TO's ROE is -0.48%, compared to CSCO.NE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RDL.TO is less volatile compared to CSCO.NE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDL.TO.Check CSCO.NE's competition here

Redline Communications Group Inc. (TSX: RDL.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDL.TO stands at 0. In comparison, CSCO.TO has a market cap of 215.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDL.TO is priced at CA$0.90 on the TSX, while CSCO.TO trades at CA$54.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas CSCO.TO's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, RDL.TO's ROE is -0.48%, compared to CSCO.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDL.TO is less volatile compared to CSCO.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDL.TO.Check CSCO.TO's competition here

Redline Communications Group Inc. (TSX: RDL.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDL.TO stands at 0. In comparison, MAXR.TO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDL.TO is priced at CA$0.90 on the TSX, while MAXR.TO trades at CA$70.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas MAXR.TO's P/E ratio is -25.65. In terms of profitability, RDL.TO's ROE is -0.48%, compared to MAXR.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDL.TO is less volatile compared to MAXR.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDL.TO.Check MAXR.TO's competition here

Redline Communications Group Inc. (TSX: RDL.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDL.TO stands at 0. In comparison, ET.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDL.TO is priced at CA$0.90 on the TSX, while ET.TO trades at CA$16.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas ET.TO's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, RDL.TO's ROE is -0.48%, compared to ET.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RDL.TO is less volatile compared to ET.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDL.TO.Check ET.TO's competition here

Redline Communications Group Inc. (TSX: RDL.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDL.TO stands at 0. In comparison, VCM.TO has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDL.TO is priced at CA$0.90 on the TSX, while VCM.TO trades at CA$13.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas VCM.TO's P/E ratio is 77.88. In terms of profitability, RDL.TO's ROE is -0.48%, compared to VCM.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDL.TO is less volatile compared to VCM.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDL.TO.Check VCM.TO's competition here

Redline Communications Group Inc. (TSX: RDL.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDL.TO stands at 0. In comparison, QTRH.TO has a market cap of 309.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDL.TO is priced at CA$0.90 on the TSX, while QTRH.TO trades at CA$2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas QTRH.TO's P/E ratio is -5.51. In terms of profitability, RDL.TO's ROE is -0.48%, compared to QTRH.TO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RDL.TO is less volatile compared to QTRH.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDL.TO.Check QTRH.TO's competition here

Redline Communications Group Inc. (TSX: RDL.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDL.TO stands at 0. In comparison, NUR.CN has a market cap of 193.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDL.TO is priced at CA$0.90 on the TSX, while NUR.CN trades at CA$6.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas NUR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, RDL.TO's ROE is -0.48%, compared to NUR.CN's ROE of +3.75%. Regarding short-term risk, RDL.TO is less volatile compared to NUR.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDL.TO.Check NUR.CN's competition here

Redline Communications Group Inc. (TSX: RDL.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDL.TO stands at 0. In comparison, BYL.TO has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDL.TO is priced at CA$0.90 on the TSX, while BYL.TO trades at CA$0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas BYL.TO's P/E ratio is -6.84. In terms of profitability, RDL.TO's ROE is -0.48%, compared to BYL.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RDL.TO is less volatile compared to BYL.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDL.TO.Check BYL.TO's competition here

Redline Communications Group Inc. (TSX: RDL.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDL.TO stands at 0. In comparison, MMAX.CN has a market cap of 92K. Regarding current trading prices, RDL.TO is priced at CA$0.90 on the TSX, while MMAX.CN trades at CA$0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas MMAX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, RDL.TO's ROE is -0.48%, compared to MMAX.CN's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDL.TO is similarly volatile compared to MMAX.CN. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDL.TO.Check MMAX.CN's competition here

Redline Communications Group Inc. (TSX: RDL.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDL.TO stands at 0. In comparison, AJX.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDL.TO is priced at CA$0.90 on the TSX, while AJX.TO trades at CA$0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas AJX.TO's P/E ratio is -11.04. In terms of profitability, RDL.TO's ROE is -0.48%, compared to AJX.TO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RDL.TO is similarly volatile compared to AJX.TO. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDL.TO.Check AJX.TO's competition here

Redline Communications Group Inc. (TSX: RDL.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDL.TO stands at 0. In comparison, EXF.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDL.TO is priced at CA$0.90 on the TSX, while EXF.TO trades at CA$7.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas EXF.TO's P/E ratio is -55.75. In terms of profitability, RDL.TO's ROE is -0.48%, compared to EXF.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDL.TO is less volatile compared to EXF.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDL.TO.Check EXF.TO's competition here

Redline Communications Group Inc. (TSX: RDL.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDL.TO stands at 0. In comparison, SW.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RDL.TO is priced at CA$0.90 on the TSX, while SW.TO trades at CA$40.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas SW.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDL.TO's ROE is -0.48%, compared to SW.TO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RDL.TO is less volatile compared to SW.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDL.TO.Check SW.TO's competition here