Rent-A-Center, Inc.
Rent-A-Center, Inc. RCII Peers
See (RCII) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Rental & Leasing Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCII | $26.78 | -0.11% | 1.5B | 81.15 | $0.33 | N/A |
| URI | $706.91 | +1.11% | 45.9B | 18.49 | $38.24 | +0.97% |
| AER | $116.79 | +0.80% | 20.6B | 10.38 | $11.25 | +0.66% |
| CTOS-WT | $0.11 | -7.93% | 18B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FTAI | $129.17 | +4.60% | 13.2B | 561.61 | $0.23 | +0.70% |
| UHAL-B | $57.06 | +0.97% | 11.3B | 33.76 | $1.69 | N/A |
| UHAL | $62.81 | -0.08% | 11.1B | 37.17 | $1.69 | N/A |
| AL | $57.64 | +1.02% | 6.4B | 10.08 | $5.72 | +1.51% |
| R | $150.59 | +1.61% | 6.2B | 13.30 | $11.32 | +2.15% |
| AL-PA | $35.02 | -0.61% | 5.9B | -26.35 | -$1.33 | +1.51% |
Stock Comparison
RCII vs URI Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, URI has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while URI trades at $706.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas URI's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to URI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to URI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs AER Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AER has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while AER trades at $116.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas AER's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to AER's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to AER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs CTOS-WT Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CTOS-WT has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while CTOS-WT trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas CTOS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CTOS-WT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is less volatile compared to CTOS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs FTAI Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAI has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while FTAI trades at $129.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas FTAI's P/E ratio is 561.61. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to FTAI's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to FTAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs UHAL-B Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UHAL-B has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while UHAL-B trades at $57.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas UHAL-B's P/E ratio is 33.76. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to UHAL-B's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to UHAL-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs UHAL Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UHAL has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while UHAL trades at $62.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas UHAL's P/E ratio is 37.17. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to UHAL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to UHAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs AL Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AL has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while AL trades at $57.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas AL's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to AL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to AL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs R Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, R has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while R trades at $150.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas R's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to R's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to R. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs AL-PA Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AL-PA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while AL-PA trades at $35.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas AL-PA's P/E ratio is -26.35. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to AL-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to AL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs GATX Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GATX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while GATX trades at $157.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas GATX's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to GATX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to GATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs WSC Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WSC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while WSC trades at $28.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas WSC's P/E ratio is 352.75. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to WSC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to WSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs PONY Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PONY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while PONY trades at $13.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas PONY's P/E ratio is -16.39. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to PONY's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is less volatile compared to PONY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs TRTN Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRTN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while TRTN trades at $79.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas TRTN's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to TRTN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to TRTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs CAR Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CAR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while CAR trades at $123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas CAR's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CAR's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to CAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs HRI Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HRI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while HRI trades at $121.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas HRI's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HRI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to HRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs HEES Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HEES has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while HEES trades at $94.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas HEES's P/E ratio is 38.01. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HEES's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to HEES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs MGRC Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MGRC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while MGRC trades at $114.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas MGRC's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MGRC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to MGRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs FTAIM Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAIM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while FTAIM trades at $26.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas FTAIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to FTAIM's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to FTAIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs FTAIO Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAIO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while FTAIO trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas FTAIO's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to FTAIO's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to FTAIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs TRTN-PA Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRTN-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while TRTN-PA trades at $25.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas TRTN-PA's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to TRTN-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to TRTN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs FTAIP Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAIP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while FTAIP trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas FTAIP's P/E ratio is -7.32. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to FTAIP's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to FTAIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs FTAIN Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAIN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while FTAIN trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas FTAIN's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to FTAIN's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to FTAIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs TRTN-PB Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRTN-PB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while TRTN-PB trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas TRTN-PB's P/E ratio is 3.08. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to TRTN-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to TRTN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs TRTN-PC Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRTN-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while TRTN-PC trades at $23.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas TRTN-PC's P/E ratio is 2.86. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to TRTN-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to TRTN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs TRTN-PD Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRTN-PD has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while TRTN-PD trades at $21.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas TRTN-PD's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to TRTN-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to TRTN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs TGH Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TGH has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while TGH trades at $49.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas TGH's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to TGH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to TGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs HTZWW Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HTZWW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while HTZWW trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas HTZWW's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HTZWW's ROE of -4.93%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to HTZWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs HTZ Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HTZ has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while HTZ trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas HTZ's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HTZ's ROE of -4.93%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to HTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs TRTN-PE Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRTN-PE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while TRTN-PE trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas TRTN-PE's P/E ratio is 2.25. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to TRTN-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to TRTN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs CAI Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CAI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while CAI trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas CAI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CAI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to CAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs PRG Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PRG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while PRG trades at $29.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas PRG's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to PRG's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to PRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs CTOS Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CTOS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while CTOS trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas CTOS's P/E ratio is -33.32. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CTOS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to CTOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs TGH-PA Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TGH-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while TGH-PA trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas TGH-PA's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to TGH-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to TGH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs TGH-PB Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TGH-PB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while TGH-PB trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas TGH-PB's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to TGH-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to TGH-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs WLFC Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WLFC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while WLFC trades at $145.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas WLFC's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to WLFC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to WLFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs VSTS Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VSTS has a market cap of 828.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while VSTS trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas VSTS's P/E ratio is -33.11. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to VSTS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to VSTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs ALTG-PA Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ALTG-PA has a market cap of 828.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while ALTG-PA trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas ALTG-PA's P/E ratio is -40.93. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ALTG-PA's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to ALTG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs AAN Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AAN has a market cap of 318.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while AAN trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas AAN's P/E ratio is -7.26. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to AAN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to AAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs ALTG Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ALTG has a market cap of 197.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while ALTG trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas ALTG's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ALTG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to ALTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs MTMT Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MTMT has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while MTMT trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas MTMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MTMT's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to MTMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs MPU Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MPU has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while MPU trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas MPU's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MPU's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to MPU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs FPAY Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FPAY has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while FPAY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas FPAY's P/E ratio is -6.85. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to FPAY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to FPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs MWG Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MWG has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while MWG trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas MWG's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MWG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to MWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs ZCAR Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZCAR has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while ZCAR trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas ZCAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ZCAR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is less volatile compared to ZCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs BRDS Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BRDS has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while BRDS trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas BRDS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to BRDS's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is less volatile compared to BRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs HYRE Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HYRE has a market cap of 486.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while HYRE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas HYRE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HYRE's ROE of -46.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to HYRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs ZCARW Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZCARW has a market cap of 1.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while ZCARW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas ZCARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ZCARW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is less volatile compared to ZCARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs ACY Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ACY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while ACY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas ACY's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ACY's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is less volatile compared to ACY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs GFNCP Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GFNCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while GFNCP trades at $101.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas GFNCP's P/E ratio is 146.89. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to GFNCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to GFNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs FTAI-PA Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAI-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while FTAI-PA trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas FTAI-PA's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to FTAI-PA's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to FTAI-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs FTAI-PC Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while FTAI-PC trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas FTAI-PC's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to FTAI-PC's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to FTAI-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs UHALB Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UHALB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while UHALB trades at $53.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas UHALB's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to UHALB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to UHALB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.
RCII vs FTAI-PB Comparison
RCII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCII stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FTAI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RCII is priced at $26.78, while FTAI-PB trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCII currently has a P/E ratio of 81.15, whereas FTAI-PB's P/E ratio is -12.26. In terms of profitability, RCII's ROE is +0.50%, compared to FTAI-PB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, RCII is more volatile compared to FTAI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCII.