Rubicon Technologies, Inc.
Rubicon Technologies, Inc. RBT-WT Peers
See (RBT-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBT-WT | $0.01 | -46.94% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SAP | $289.71 | -1.29% | 337.97B | 52.67 | $5.50 | +1.36% |
| CRM | $289.12 | +0.10% | 277.40B | 45.39 | $6.37 | +0.56% |
| NOW | $1,037.11 | +2.12% | 214.68B | 140.72 | $7.37 | N/A |
| UBER | $91.70 | +4.09% | 191.76B | 16.06 | $5.71 | N/A |
| INTU | $656.80 | -0.83% | 183.62B | 61.33 | $10.71 | +0.61% |
| SHOP | $106.15 | +4.34% | 137.45B | 68.48 | $1.55 | N/A |
| APP | $370.10 | +6.38% | 125.24B | 81.88 | $4.52 | N/A |
| MSTR | $421.61 | +4.13% | 115.27B | -18.95 | -$22.25 | N/A |
| CDNS | $318.66 | +2.21% | 87.01B | 80.67 | $3.95 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RBT-WT vs SAP Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 337.97B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while SAP trades at $289.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 52.67. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs CRM Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 277.40B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while CRM trades at $289.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 45.39. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs NOW Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 214.68B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while NOW trades at $1,037.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 140.72. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs UBER Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 191.76B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while UBER trades at $91.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs INTU Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 183.62B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while INTU trades at $656.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 61.33. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs SHOP Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 137.45B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while SHOP trades at $106.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 68.48. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs APP Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 125.24B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while APP trades at $370.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 81.88. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs MSTR Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 115.27B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while MSTR trades at $421.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -18.95. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs CDNS Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 87.01B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while CDNS trades at $318.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 80.67. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs WDAY Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 72.27B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while WDAY trades at $270.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 138.47. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs ADSK Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 63.54B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while ADSK trades at $297.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 57.90. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs SNOW Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 60.45B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while SNOW trades at $180.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -46.99. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs TEAM Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 60.42B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while TEAM trades at $229.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -139.10. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs FICO Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 51.95B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while FICO trades at $2,134.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 91.79. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs DDOG Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 40.51B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while DDOG trades at $117.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 249.60. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs TTD Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 38.40B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while TTD trades at $78.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 100.18. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs HUBS Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 35.46B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while HUBS trades at $672.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 11206.00. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs ANSS Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 30.51B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while ANSS trades at $347.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 51.42. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs ZM Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 25.38B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while ZM trades at $83.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs STRK Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 24.62B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while STRK trades at $97.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to STRK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs TYL Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.49B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while TYL trades at $568.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 85.54. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs DUOL Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 24.16B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while DUOL trades at $531.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 261.80. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs STRF Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 23.59B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while STRF trades at $96.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to STRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs PTC Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 20.51B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while PTC trades at $170.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 46.97. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs GRAB Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 19.89B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while GRAB trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 503.00. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs SSNC Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 19.65B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while SSNC trades at $79.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs DOCU Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 18.29B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while DOCU trades at $90.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs GWRE Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 17.99B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while GWRE trades at $214.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is -1128.89. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GWRE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs AZPN Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.73B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs DT Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 15.12B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while DT trades at $50.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs PAYC Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 15.04B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while PAYC trades at $260.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 29.16. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs MNDY Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 14.75B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while MNDY trades at $290.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 476.21. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs BSY Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 14.05B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while BSY trades at $48.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 61.72. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs BKI Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.88B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs MANH Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.87B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while MANH trades at $195.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 56.03. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs TTAN Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 11.15B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while TTAN trades at $123.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs XM Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11.01B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs PCTY Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 11.00B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while PCTY trades at $199.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 49.81. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs CDAY Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.85B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs PCOR Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.80B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while PCOR trades at $72.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -84.22. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs NICE Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.55B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while NICE trades at $166.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs ESTC Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9.76B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while ESTC trades at $93.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -71.32. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs DSGX Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 9.74B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while DSGX trades at $114.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 69.52. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs DAY Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 9.47B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while DAY trades at $59.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 538.73. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs U Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, U has a market cap of 9.12B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while U trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas U's P/E ratio is -13.06. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs GTLB Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 8.82B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while GTLB trades at $53.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is -1334.00. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs PEGA Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 8.40B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while PEGA trades at $98.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 45.45. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs CVLT Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 8.00B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while CVLT trades at $181.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 107.93. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs NATI Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 7.97B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs SMAR Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.91B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs APPF Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 7.80B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while APPF trades at $216.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 40.40. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs OTEX Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.31B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while OTEX trades at $28.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs SRAD Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 7.25B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while SRAD trades at $23.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 212.09. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs QXO Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 7.02B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while QXO trades at $15.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -142.82. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs LYFT Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 7.02B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while LYFT trades at $17.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 283.83. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs CWAN Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.89B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while CWAN trades at $24.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs BULL Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 6.46B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while BULL trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -12.38. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BULL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs COUP Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.12B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to COUP's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs VERX Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 6.01B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while VERX trades at $37.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -111.59. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs QTWO Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.78B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while QTWO trades at $92.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -144.94. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs IDCC Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.77B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while IDCC trades at $222.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs SYT Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, SYT has a market cap of 5.72B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while SYT trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYT's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SYT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to SYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs ETWO-WT Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs BILL Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.87B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while BILL trades at $47.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is 122.38. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs FROG Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while FROG trades at $42.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -66.95. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs FRSH Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.71B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while FRSH trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -66.58. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs GRND Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.66B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while GRND trades at $23.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -32.18. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs INTA Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 4.58B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while INTA trades at $56.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -235.87. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs RUM Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while RUM trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.36. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RUM's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs RUMBW Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 4.56B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while RUMBW trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -2.67%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs LIF Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.56B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while LIF trades at $59.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is -993.67. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs SOUN Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4.51B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while SOUN trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs ASAN Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 4.29B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while ASAN trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -16.41. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs CVT Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.19B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs PYCR Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs WK Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 4.01B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while WK trades at $71.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -61.97. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs BRZE Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3.85B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while BRZE trades at $36.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -36.07. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs PWSC Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs AYX Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.53B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs ZETA Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while ZETA trades at $14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -59.62. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs ENV Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.49B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs ZI Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.49B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 128.88. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs INST Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.46B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs BL Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.44B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while BL trades at $55.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 39.97. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs COMP Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.29B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while COMP trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -20.84. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs RIOT Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 3.24B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while RIOT trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs ALKT Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 3.21B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while ALKT trades at $31.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -84.30. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs ALIT Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 3.11B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while ALIT trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -23.56. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs BLKB Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while BLKB trades at $63.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs ALRM Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while ALRM trades at $60.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 26.50. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs GBTG Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while GBTG trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -20.77. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs CALX Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 2.91B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while CALX trades at $44.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -86.35. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs PAR Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while PAR trades at $69.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -26.41. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs CLSK Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while CLSK trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -14.49. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs BTDR Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, BTDR has a market cap of 2.78B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while BTDR trades at $14.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTDR's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BTDR's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to BTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs NCNO Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while NCNO trades at $23.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -72.36. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs PRGS Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while PRGS trades at $62.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 49.23. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs RNG Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while RNG trades at $28.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RNG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to RNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.
RBT-WT vs DCT Comparison
RBT-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBT-WT stands at N/A. In comparison, DCT has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, RBT-WT is priced at $0.01, while DCT trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBT-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCT's P/E ratio is -172.64. In terms of profitability, RBT-WT's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DCT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBT-WT is more volatile compared to DCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBT-WT.