Quintegra Solutions Ltd.
Quintegra Solutions Ltd. (QUINTEGRA.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QUINTEGRA.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUINTEGRA.NS | ₹1.24 | -4.62% | 33.2M | -31.00 | -₹0.04 | N/A |
| TCS.BO | ₹2,652.90 | +3.05% | 9.5T | 19.93 | ₹131.92 | +4.15% |
| TCS.NS | ₹2,650.60 | +2.99% | 9.5T | 19.93 | ₹131.94 | +4.15% |
| INFY.BO | ₹1,298.60 | +1.73% | 5.2T | 18.50 | ₹69.73 | +3.49% |
| INFY.NS | ₹1,297.90 | +1.76% | 5.2T | 18.47 | ₹69.83 | +3.49% |
| HCLTECH.NS | ₹1,382.50 | +3.23% | 3.7T | 22.72 | ₹60.67 | +3.92% |
| HCLTECH.BO | ₹1,386.30 | +3.50% | 3.7T | 22.69 | ₹60.67 | +3.92% |
| WIPRO.NS | ₹200.82 | +0.34% | 2.1T | 15.99 | ₹12.63 | +5.45% |
| WIPRO.BO | ₹201.35 | +0.60% | 2.1T | 15.98 | ₹12.63 | +5.45% |
| LTIM.BO | ₹4,555.40 | +1.26% | 1.4T | 28.46 | ₹160.36 | +1.47% |
Stock Comparison
QUINTEGRA.NS vs TCS.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, TCS.BO has a market cap of 9.5T. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while TCS.BO trades at ₹2,652.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas TCS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TCS.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to TCS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check TCS.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs TCS.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, TCS.NS has a market cap of 9.5T. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while TCS.NS trades at ₹2,650.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas TCS.NS's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TCS.NS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to TCS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check TCS.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs INFY.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, INFY.BO has a market cap of 5.2T. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while INFY.BO trades at ₹1,298.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas INFY.BO's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INFY.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to INFY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check INFY.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs INFY.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, INFY.NS has a market cap of 5.2T. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while INFY.NS trades at ₹1,297.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas INFY.NS's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INFY.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to INFY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check INFY.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs HCLTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, HCLTECH.NS has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while HCLTECH.NS trades at ₹1,382.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas HCLTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HCLTECH.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to HCLTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check HCLTECH.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs HCLTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, HCLTECH.BO has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while HCLTECH.BO trades at ₹1,386.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas HCLTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HCLTECH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to HCLTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check HCLTECH.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs WIPRO.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, WIPRO.NS has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while WIPRO.NS trades at ₹200.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas WIPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WIPRO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to WIPRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check WIPRO.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs WIPRO.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, WIPRO.BO has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while WIPRO.BO trades at ₹201.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas WIPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WIPRO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to WIPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check WIPRO.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs LTIM.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, LTIM.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while LTIM.BO trades at ₹4,555.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas LTIM.BO's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LTIM.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to LTIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check LTIM.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs LTIM.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, LTIM.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while LTIM.NS trades at ₹4,542.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas LTIM.NS's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LTIM.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to LTIM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check LTIM.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs TECHM.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, TECHM.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while TECHM.BO trades at ₹1,375.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas TECHM.BO's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TECHM.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to TECHM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check TECHM.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs TECHM.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, TECHM.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while TECHM.NS trades at ₹1,373.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas TECHM.NS's P/E ratio is 26.11. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TECHM.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to TECHM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check TECHM.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs PERSISTENT.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, PERSISTENT.BO has a market cap of 739.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while PERSISTENT.BO trades at ₹4,868.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas PERSISTENT.BO's P/E ratio is 42.73. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PERSISTENT.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to PERSISTENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check PERSISTENT.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs PERSISTENT.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, PERSISTENT.NS has a market cap of 739.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while PERSISTENT.NS trades at ₹4,858.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas PERSISTENT.NS's P/E ratio is 42.81. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PERSISTENT.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to PERSISTENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check PERSISTENT.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs MPHASIS.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, MPHASIS.BO has a market cap of 430.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while MPHASIS.BO trades at ₹2,267.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas MPHASIS.BO's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MPHASIS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to MPHASIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check MPHASIS.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs MPHASIS.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, MPHASIS.NS has a market cap of 430.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while MPHASIS.NS trades at ₹2,263.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas MPHASIS.NS's P/E ratio is 23.96. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MPHASIS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to MPHASIS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check MPHASIS.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs COFORGE.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, COFORGE.BO has a market cap of 407.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while COFORGE.BO trades at ₹1,217.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas COFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 36.29. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to COFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check COFORGE.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs COFORGE.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, COFORGE.NS has a market cap of 407.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while COFORGE.NS trades at ₹1,213.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas COFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 36.25. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to COFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check COFORGE.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs LTTS.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, LTTS.NS has a market cap of 347.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while LTTS.NS trades at ₹3,280.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas LTTS.NS's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LTTS.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to LTTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check LTTS.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs LTTS.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, LTTS.BO has a market cap of 346.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while LTTS.BO trades at ₹3,270.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas LTTS.BO's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LTTS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to LTTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check LTTS.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs HEXT.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, HEXT.NS has a market cap of 284.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while HEXT.NS trades at ₹473.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas HEXT.NS's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HEXT.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to HEXT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check HEXT.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs TATATECH.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, TATATECH.NS has a market cap of 234.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while TATATECH.NS trades at ₹580.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas TATATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 44.10. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TATATECH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to TATATECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check TATATECH.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs TATATECH.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, TATATECH.BO has a market cap of 234.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while TATATECH.BO trades at ₹582.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas TATATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 44.06. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TATATECH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to TATATECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check TATATECH.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs KPITTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, KPITTECH.NS has a market cap of 214.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while KPITTECH.NS trades at ₹799.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas KPITTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KPITTECH.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to KPITTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check KPITTECH.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs KPITTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, KPITTECH.BO has a market cap of 214.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while KPITTECH.BO trades at ₹802.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas KPITTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KPITTECH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to KPITTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check KPITTECH.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs REDINGTON.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, REDINGTON.BO has a market cap of 189.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while REDINGTON.BO trades at ₹240.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas REDINGTON.BO's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REDINGTON.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to REDINGTON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check REDINGTON.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs REDINGTON.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, REDINGTON.NS has a market cap of 189.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while REDINGTON.NS trades at ₹239.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas REDINGTON.NS's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REDINGTON.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to REDINGTON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check REDINGTON.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs ECLERX.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, ECLERX.BO has a market cap of 155.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while ECLERX.BO trades at ₹3,350.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas ECLERX.BO's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ECLERX.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to ECLERX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check ECLERX.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs ECLERX.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, ECLERX.NS has a market cap of 152.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while ECLERX.NS trades at ₹3,347.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas ECLERX.NS's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ECLERX.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to ECLERX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check ECLERX.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs FSL.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, FSL.NS has a market cap of 151.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while FSL.NS trades at ₹221.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas FSL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FSL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to FSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check FSL.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs FSL.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, FSL.BO has a market cap of 151.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while FSL.BO trades at ₹221.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas FSL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.48. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FSL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to FSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check FSL.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs ZENSARTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, ZENSARTECH.BO has a market cap of 123.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while ZENSARTECH.BO trades at ₹567.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas ZENSARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZENSARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to ZENSARTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check ZENSARTECH.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs ZENSARTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, ZENSARTECH.NS has a market cap of 123B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while ZENSARTECH.NS trades at ₹566.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas ZENSARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZENSARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to ZENSARTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check ZENSARTECH.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs BSOFT.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, BSOFT.BO has a market cap of 103.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while BSOFT.BO trades at ₹386.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas BSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 22.34. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to BSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check BSOFT.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs BSOFT.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, BSOFT.NS has a market cap of 103.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while BSOFT.NS trades at ₹386.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas BSOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BSOFT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to BSOFT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check BSOFT.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs SONATSOFTW.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, SONATSOFTW.NS has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while SONATSOFTW.NS trades at ₹275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas SONATSOFTW.NS's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SONATSOFTW.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to SONATSOFTW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check SONATSOFTW.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs SONATSOFTW.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, SONATSOFTW.BO has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while SONATSOFTW.BO trades at ₹275.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas SONATSOFTW.BO's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SONATSOFTW.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to SONATSOFTW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check SONATSOFTW.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs RSYSTEMINT.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, RSYSTEMINT.BO has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while RSYSTEMINT.BO trades at ₹531.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas RSYSTEMINT.BO's P/E ratio is 106.05. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RSYSTEMINT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to RSYSTEMINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check RSYSTEMINT.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs HAPPSTMNDS.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, HAPPSTMNDS.BO has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while HAPPSTMNDS.BO trades at ₹364.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas HAPPSTMNDS.BO's P/E ratio is 29.21. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HAPPSTMNDS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to HAPPSTMNDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check HAPPSTMNDS.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs HAPPSTMNDS.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, HAPPSTMNDS.NS has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while HAPPSTMNDS.NS trades at ₹362.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas HAPPSTMNDS.NS's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HAPPSTMNDS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to HAPPSTMNDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check HAPPSTMNDS.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs MASTEK.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, MASTEK.BO has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while MASTEK.BO trades at ₹1,601.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas MASTEK.BO's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MASTEK.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to MASTEK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check MASTEK.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs MASTEK.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, MASTEK.NS has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while MASTEK.NS trades at ₹1,594.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas MASTEK.NS's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MASTEK.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to MASTEK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check MASTEK.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs DATAMATICS.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, DATAMATICS.BO has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while DATAMATICS.BO trades at ₹779.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas DATAMATICS.BO's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DATAMATICS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to DATAMATICS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check DATAMATICS.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs DATAMATICS.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, DATAMATICS.NS has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while DATAMATICS.NS trades at ₹775.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas DATAMATICS.NS's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DATAMATICS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to DATAMATICS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check DATAMATICS.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs CAMS.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, CAMS.NS has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while CAMS.NS trades at ₹706.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas CAMS.NS's P/E ratio is 38.27. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CAMS.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to CAMS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check CAMS.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs CAMS.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, CAMS.BO has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while CAMS.BO trades at ₹710.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas CAMS.BO's P/E ratio is 38.24. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CAMS.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to CAMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check CAMS.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs RSYSTEMS.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, RSYSTEMS.NS has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while RSYSTEMS.NS trades at ₹298.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas RSYSTEMS.NS's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RSYSTEMS.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to RSYSTEMS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check RSYSTEMS.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs RSYSTEMS.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, RSYSTEMS.BO has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while RSYSTEMS.BO trades at ₹299.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas RSYSTEMS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RSYSTEMS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to RSYSTEMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check RSYSTEMS.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs CIGNITITEC.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, CIGNITITEC.NS has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while CIGNITITEC.NS trades at ₹1,199.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas CIGNITITEC.NS's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIGNITITEC.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to CIGNITITEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check CIGNITITEC.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs CIGNITITEC.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, CIGNITITEC.BO has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while CIGNITITEC.BO trades at ₹1,199.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas CIGNITITEC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIGNITITEC.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to CIGNITITEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check CIGNITITEC.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs ASMTEC.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, ASMTEC.BO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while ASMTEC.BO trades at ₹2,358.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas ASMTEC.BO's P/E ratio is 59.67. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASMTEC.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to ASMTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check ASMTEC.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs PROTEAN.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, PROTEAN.BO has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while PROTEAN.BO trades at ₹606.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas PROTEAN.BO's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PROTEAN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to PROTEAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check PROTEAN.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs PROTEAN.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, PROTEAN.NS has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while PROTEAN.NS trades at ₹603.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas PROTEAN.NS's P/E ratio is 26.21. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PROTEAN.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to PROTEAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check PROTEAN.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs RPSGVENT.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, RPSGVENT.NS has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while RPSGVENT.NS trades at ₹679.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas RPSGVENT.NS's P/E ratio is -23.32. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RPSGVENT.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to RPSGVENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check RPSGVENT.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs RPSGVENT.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, RPSGVENT.BO has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while RPSGVENT.BO trades at ₹673.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas RPSGVENT.BO's P/E ratio is -23.22. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RPSGVENT.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to RPSGVENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check RPSGVENT.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs SAKSOFT.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, SAKSOFT.NS has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while SAKSOFT.NS trades at ₹147.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas SAKSOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SAKSOFT.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to SAKSOFT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check SAKSOFT.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs SAKSOFT.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, SAKSOFT.BO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while SAKSOFT.BO trades at ₹148.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas SAKSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SAKSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to SAKSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check SAKSOFT.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs SILVERTUC.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, SILVERTUC.BO has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while SILVERTUC.BO trades at ₹1,449.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas SILVERTUC.BO's P/E ratio is 57.30. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SILVERTUC.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to SILVERTUC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check SILVERTUC.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs SILVERTUC.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, SILVERTUC.NS has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while SILVERTUC.NS trades at ₹1,448.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas SILVERTUC.NS's P/E ratio is 57.41. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SILVERTUC.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to SILVERTUC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check SILVERTUC.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs ACCELYA.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, ACCELYA.NS has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while ACCELYA.NS trades at ₹1,205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas ACCELYA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACCELYA.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to ACCELYA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check ACCELYA.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs ACCELYA.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, ACCELYA.BO has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while ACCELYA.BO trades at ₹1,203.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas ACCELYA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACCELYA.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to ACCELYA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check ACCELYA.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs SASKEN.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, SASKEN.BO has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while SASKEN.BO trades at ₹1,152.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas SASKEN.BO's P/E ratio is 46.47. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SASKEN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to SASKEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check SASKEN.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs SASKEN.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, SASKEN.NS has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while SASKEN.NS trades at ₹1,141.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas SASKEN.NS's P/E ratio is 46.18. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SASKEN.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to SASKEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check SASKEN.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs MCLOUD.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, MCLOUD.NS has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while MCLOUD.NS trades at ₹24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas MCLOUD.NS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MCLOUD.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to MCLOUD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check MCLOUD.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs MCLOUD.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, MCLOUD.BO has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while MCLOUD.BO trades at ₹25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas MCLOUD.BO's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MCLOUD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to MCLOUD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check MCLOUD.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs AURUM.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, AURUM.NS has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while AURUM.NS trades at ₹178.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas AURUM.NS's P/E ratio is -53.53. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AURUM.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to AURUM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check AURUM.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs AURUM.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, AURUM.BO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while AURUM.BO trades at ₹179.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas AURUM.BO's P/E ratio is -53.25. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AURUM.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to AURUM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check AURUM.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs ORIENTTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, ORIENTTECH.NS has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while ORIENTTECH.NS trades at ₹300.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas ORIENTTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 64.39. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ORIENTTECH.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check ORIENTTECH.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs EXPLEOSOL.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, EXPLEOSOL.BO has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while EXPLEOSOL.BO trades at ₹776.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas EXPLEOSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EXPLEOSOL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to EXPLEOSOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check EXPLEOSOL.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs EXPLEOSOL.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, EXPLEOSOL.NS has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while EXPLEOSOL.NS trades at ₹773.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas EXPLEOSOL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EXPLEOSOL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to EXPLEOSOL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check EXPLEOSOL.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs DSSL.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, DSSL.BO has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while DSSL.BO trades at ₹922.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas DSSL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DSSL.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to DSSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check DSSL.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs DSSL.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, DSSL.NS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while DSSL.NS trades at ₹911.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas DSSL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DSSL.NS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to DSSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check DSSL.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs MMWL.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, MMWL.BO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while MMWL.BO trades at ₹10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas MMWL.BO's P/E ratio is 255.75. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MMWL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to MMWL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check MMWL.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs BGDL.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, BGDL.BO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while BGDL.BO trades at ₹102.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas BGDL.BO's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BGDL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to BGDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check BGDL.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs 3IINFOTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, 3IINFOTECH.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while 3IINFOTECH.BO trades at ₹54.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas 3IINFOTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 111.67. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 3IINFOTECH.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to 3IINFOTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check 3IINFOTECH.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs XCHANGING.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, XCHANGING.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while XCHANGING.NS trades at ₹64.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas XCHANGING.NS's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XCHANGING.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to XCHANGING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check XCHANGING.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs XCHANGING.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, XCHANGING.BO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while XCHANGING.BO trades at ₹65.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas XCHANGING.BO's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XCHANGING.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to XCHANGING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check XCHANGING.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs VAKRANGEE.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, VAKRANGEE.NS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while VAKRANGEE.NS trades at ₹6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas VAKRANGEE.NS's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VAKRANGEE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to VAKRANGEE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check VAKRANGEE.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs VAKRANGEE.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, VAKRANGEE.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while VAKRANGEE.BO trades at ₹6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas VAKRANGEE.BO's P/E ratio is 59.91. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VAKRANGEE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to VAKRANGEE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check VAKRANGEE.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs MINDTECK.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, MINDTECK.BO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while MINDTECK.BO trades at ₹212.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas MINDTECK.BO's P/E ratio is 24.34. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MINDTECK.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to MINDTECK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check MINDTECK.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs MINDTECK.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, MINDTECK.NS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while MINDTECK.NS trades at ₹213.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas MINDTECK.NS's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MINDTECK.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to MINDTECK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check MINDTECK.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs ADSL.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, ADSL.BO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while ADSL.BO trades at ₹119.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas ADSL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.76. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ADSL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to ADSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check ADSL.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs ADSL.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, ADSL.NS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while ADSL.NS trades at ₹118.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas ADSL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ADSL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to ADSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check ADSL.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs ONWARDTEC.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, ONWARDTEC.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while ONWARDTEC.BO trades at ₹271.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas ONWARDTEC.BO's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ONWARDTEC.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to ONWARDTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check ONWARDTEC.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs ONWARDTEC.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, ONWARDTEC.NS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while ONWARDTEC.NS trades at ₹274.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas ONWARDTEC.NS's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ONWARDTEC.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to ONWARDTEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check ONWARDTEC.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs NINSYS.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, NINSYS.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while NINSYS.BO trades at ₹348.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas NINSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NINSYS.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is less volatile compared to NINSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check NINSYS.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs NINSYS.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, NINSYS.NS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while NINSYS.NS trades at ₹345.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas NINSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NINSYS.NS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is less volatile compared to NINSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check NINSYS.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs TERASOFT.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, TERASOFT.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while TERASOFT.BO trades at ₹375.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas TERASOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TERASOFT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to TERASOFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check TERASOFT.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs TERASOFT.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, TERASOFT.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while TERASOFT.NS trades at ₹377.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas TERASOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TERASOFT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to TERASOFT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check TERASOFT.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs DIGISPICE.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, DIGISPICE.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while DIGISPICE.NS trades at ₹19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas DIGISPICE.NS's P/E ratio is -28.84. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DIGISPICE.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to DIGISPICE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check DIGISPICE.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs DIGISPICE.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, DIGISPICE.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while DIGISPICE.BO trades at ₹19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas DIGISPICE.BO's P/E ratio is -28.74. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DIGISPICE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to DIGISPICE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check DIGISPICE.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs SIGMA.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, SIGMA.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while SIGMA.BO trades at ₹38.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas SIGMA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SIGMA.BO's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to SIGMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check SIGMA.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs SIGMA.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, SIGMA.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while SIGMA.NS trades at ₹38.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas SIGMA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SIGMA.NS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to SIGMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check SIGMA.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs XTGLOBAL.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, XTGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while XTGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹33.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas XTGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 38.94. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is less volatile compared to XTGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check XTGLOBAL.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs CYBERTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, CYBERTECH.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while CYBERTECH.BO trades at ₹117.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas CYBERTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CYBERTECH.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to CYBERTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check CYBERTECH.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs CYBERTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, CYBERTECH.NS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while CYBERTECH.NS trades at ₹116.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas CYBERTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CYBERTECH.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to CYBERTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check CYBERTECH.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs INSPIRISYS.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, INSPIRISYS.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while INSPIRISYS.BO trades at ₹88.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas INSPIRISYS.BO's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INSPIRISYS.BO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to INSPIRISYS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check INSPIRISYS.BO's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs INSPIRISYS.NS Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, INSPIRISYS.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while INSPIRISYS.NS trades at ₹85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas INSPIRISYS.NS's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INSPIRISYS.NS's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to INSPIRISYS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check INSPIRISYS.NS's competition here
QUINTEGRA.NS vs ASMS.BO Comparison February 2026
QUINTEGRA.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUINTEGRA.NS stands at 33.2M. In comparison, ASMS.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUINTEGRA.NS is priced at ₹1.24, while ASMS.BO trades at ₹10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUINTEGRA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -31.00, whereas ASMS.BO's P/E ratio is 98.00. In terms of profitability, QUINTEGRA.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ASMS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QUINTEGRA.NS is more volatile compared to ASMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUINTEGRA.NS.Check ASMS.BO's competition here