Quess Corp Limited

QUESS.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QUESS.BO stands at 29.4B. In comparison, QUESS.NS has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUESS.BO is priced at ₹194.00, while QUESS.NS trades at ₹193.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QUESS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 47.39, whereas QUESS.NS's P/E ratio is 47.79. In terms of profitability, QUESS.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QUESS.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QUESS.BO is less volatile compared to QUESS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUESS.BO.Check QUESS.NS's competition here

QUESS.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QUESS.BO stands at 29.4B. In comparison, TEAMLEASE.NS has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUESS.BO is priced at ₹194.00, while TEAMLEASE.NS trades at ₹1,253.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QUESS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 47.39, whereas TEAMLEASE.NS's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, QUESS.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEAMLEASE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUESS.BO is less volatile compared to TEAMLEASE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUESS.BO.Check TEAMLEASE.NS's competition here

QUESS.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QUESS.BO stands at 29.4B. In comparison, TEAMLEASE.BO has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUESS.BO is priced at ₹194.00, while TEAMLEASE.BO trades at ₹1,262.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QUESS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 47.39, whereas TEAMLEASE.BO's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, QUESS.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEAMLEASE.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUESS.BO is more volatile compared to TEAMLEASE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUESS.BO.Check TEAMLEASE.BO's competition here

QUESS.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QUESS.BO stands at 29.4B. In comparison, DYNAMIC.BO has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUESS.BO is priced at ₹194.00, while DYNAMIC.BO trades at ₹476.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QUESS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 47.39, whereas DYNAMIC.BO's P/E ratio is 57.33. In terms of profitability, QUESS.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DYNAMIC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUESS.BO is more volatile compared to DYNAMIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUESS.BO.Check DYNAMIC.BO's competition here

QUESS.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QUESS.BO stands at 29.4B. In comparison, ITCONS.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUESS.BO is priced at ₹194.00, while ITCONS.BO trades at ₹347.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QUESS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 47.39, whereas ITCONS.BO's P/E ratio is 135.65. In terms of profitability, QUESS.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ITCONS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUESS.BO is more volatile compared to ITCONS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUESS.BO.Check ITCONS.BO's competition here

QUESS.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QUESS.BO stands at 29.4B. In comparison, AARVI.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUESS.BO is priced at ₹194.00, while AARVI.NS trades at ₹132.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QUESS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 47.39, whereas AARVI.NS's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, QUESS.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AARVI.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QUESS.BO is more volatile compared to AARVI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUESS.BO.Check AARVI.NS's competition here

QUESS.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QUESS.BO stands at 29.4B. In comparison, IPSL.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUESS.BO is priced at ₹194.00, while IPSL.NS trades at ₹225.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QUESS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 47.39, whereas IPSL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, QUESS.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IPSL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUESS.BO is more volatile compared to IPSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUESS.BO.Check IPSL.NS's competition here

QUESS.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QUESS.BO stands at 29.4B. In comparison, SPECTSTM.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUESS.BO is priced at ₹194.00, while SPECTSTM.NS trades at ₹73.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QUESS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 47.39, whereas SPECTSTM.NS's P/E ratio is 29.16. In terms of profitability, QUESS.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPECTSTM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUESS.BO is less volatile compared to SPECTSTM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUESS.BO.Check SPECTSTM.NS's competition here

QUESS.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QUESS.BO stands at 29.4B. In comparison, AISL.NS has a market cap of 666.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUESS.BO is priced at ₹194.00, while AISL.NS trades at ₹54.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QUESS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 47.39, whereas AISL.NS's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, QUESS.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AISL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUESS.BO is more volatile compared to AISL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUESS.BO.Check AISL.NS's competition here

QUESS.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QUESS.BO stands at 29.4B. In comparison, MINDPOOL.NS has a market cap of 344.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUESS.BO is priced at ₹194.00, while MINDPOOL.NS trades at ₹81.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QUESS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 47.39, whereas MINDPOOL.NS's P/E ratio is 353.26. In terms of profitability, QUESS.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MINDPOOL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. QUESS.BO has daily volatility of 3.97 and MINDPOOL.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check MINDPOOL.NS's competition here

QUESS.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QUESS.BO stands at 29.4B. In comparison, ACEINTEG.NS has a market cap of 188.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QUESS.BO is priced at ₹194.00, while ACEINTEG.NS trades at ₹18.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QUESS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 47.39, whereas ACEINTEG.NS's P/E ratio is -9.22. In terms of profitability, QUESS.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACEINTEG.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUESS.BO is more volatile compared to ACEINTEG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUESS.BO.Check ACEINTEG.NS's competition here