Quanergy Systems, Inc.
Quanergy Systems, Inc. QNGYQ Peers
See (QNGYQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QNGYQ | $0.00 | -99.00% | 1.6K | -0.00 | -$15.24 | N/A |
| KYCCF | $433.58 | +4.98% | 105.2B | 37.90 | $11.44 | +0.54% |
| HNHPF | $10.27 | +0.98% | 71.3B | 12.68 | $0.81 | +0.11% |
| HNHAF | $3.26 | -0.12% | 45.2B | 9.58 | $0.34 | +0.17% |
| MRAAF | $15.32 | +2.11% | 28.5B | 17.60 | $0.87 | +2.53% |
| MRAAY | $7.28 | +2.68% | 27.2B | 16.55 | $0.44 | +0.74% |
| HXGBY | $10.12 | +1.04% | 26.9B | 24.68 | $0.41 | +1.55% |
| HXGBF | $10.04 | +7.26% | 25.8B | 24.49 | $0.41 | +1.58% |
| TTDKY | $11.10 | +3.66% | 21.1B | 18.20 | $0.61 | +0.88% |
| TTDKF | $10.71 | -4.48% | 20.3B | 17.55 | $0.61 | +1.92% |
Stock Comparison
QNGYQ vs KYCCF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, KYCCF has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while KYCCF trades at $433.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KYCCF's P/E ratio is 37.90. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to KYCCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to KYCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs HNHPF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, HNHPF has a market cap of 71.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while HNHPF trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HNHPF's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HNHPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to HNHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs HNHAF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, HNHAF has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while HNHAF trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HNHAF's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HNHAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to HNHAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs MRAAF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, MRAAF has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while MRAAF trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MRAAF's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MRAAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to MRAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs MRAAY Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, MRAAY has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while MRAAY trades at $7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MRAAY's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MRAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to MRAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs HXGBY Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, HXGBY has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while HXGBY trades at $10.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HXGBY's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HXGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to HXGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs HXGBF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, HXGBF has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while HXGBF trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HXGBF's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HXGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to HXGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs TTDKY Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, TTDKY has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while TTDKY trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TTDKY's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to TTDKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to TTDKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs TTDKF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, TTDKF has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while TTDKF trades at $10.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TTDKF's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to TTDKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to TTDKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs VEMLY Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, VEMLY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while VEMLY trades at $45.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VEMLY's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to VEMLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to VEMLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs BYDIY Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BYDIY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while BYDIY trades at $224.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BYDIY's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to BYDIY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to BYDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs BYDIF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BYDIF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while BYDIF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BYDIF's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to BYDIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to BYDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs SNPTF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, SNPTF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while SNPTF trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SNPTF's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to SNPTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to SNPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs SOTGY Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, SOTGY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while SOTGY trades at $78.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SOTGY's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to SOTGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to SOTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs SHMZF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, SHMZF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while SHMZF trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SHMZF's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to SHMZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to SHMZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs MNBEY Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, MNBEY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while MNBEY trades at $38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MNBEY's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MNBEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to MNBEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs MNBEF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, MNBEF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while MNBEF trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MNBEF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MNBEF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to MNBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs OMRNY Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, OMRNY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while OMRNY trades at $26.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas OMRNY's P/E ratio is 46.75. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to OMRNY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to OMRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs IBIDF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, IBIDF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while IBIDF trades at $35.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IBIDF's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to IBIDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to IBIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs AUOTY Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, AUOTY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while AUOTY trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AUOTY's P/E ratio is 37.75. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to AUOTY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to AUOTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs HRSEF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, HRSEF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while HRSEF trades at $105.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HRSEF's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HRSEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to HRSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs HPHTF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, HPHTF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while HPHTF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HPHTF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HPHTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to HPHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs VEMLF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, VEMLF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while VEMLF trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VEMLF's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to VEMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to VEMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs SEPJF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, SEPJF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while SEPJF trades at $26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SEPJF's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to SEPJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to SEPJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs HRIBF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, HRIBF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while HRIBF trades at $61.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HRIBF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HRIBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to HRIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs SEPJY Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, SEPJY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while SEPJY trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SEPJY's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to SEPJY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to SEPJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs TOPCF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, TOPCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while TOPCF trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TOPCF's P/E ratio is 746.13. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to TOPCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to TOPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs HPHTY Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, HPHTY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while HPHTY trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HPHTY's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HPHTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to HPHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs RNSHF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, RNSHF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while RNSHF trades at $29.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RNSHF's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to RNSHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to RNSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs APELF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, APELF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while APELF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas APELF's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to APELF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to APELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs TYOYY Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, TYOYY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while TYOYY trades at $63.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TYOYY's P/E ratio is 140.56. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to TYOYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to TYOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs APELY Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, APELY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while APELY trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas APELY's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to APELY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to APELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs CODAF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, CODAF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while CODAF trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CODAF's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CODAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to CODAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs KGBLY Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, KGBLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while KGBLY trades at $15.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KGBLY's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to KGBLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to KGBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs FITGF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, FITGF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while FITGF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FITGF's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to FITGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to FITGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs AMANF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, AMANF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while AMANF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AMANF's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to AMANF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to AMANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs NPEGF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, NPEGF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while NPEGF trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NPEGF's P/E ratio is -156.79. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to NPEGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to NPEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs VAIAF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, VAIAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while VAIAF trades at $47.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VAIAF's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to VAIAF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to VAIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs JELLF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, JELLF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while JELLF trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JELLF's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to JELLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to JELLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs NILRF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, NILRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while NILRF trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NILRF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to NILRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to NILRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs JNPKF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, JNPKF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while JNPKF trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JNPKF's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to JNPKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to JNPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs JPAVF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, JPAVF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while JPAVF trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JPAVF's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to JPAVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to JPAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs BCNAF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BCNAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while BCNAF trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BCNAF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to BCNAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to BCNAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs AITUF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, AITUF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while AITUF trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AITUF's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to AITUF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to AITUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs AUDGF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, AUDGF has a market cap of 833.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while AUDGF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AUDGF's P/E ratio is 333.33. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to AUDGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to AUDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs CAZGF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, CAZGF has a market cap of 784.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while CAZGF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CAZGF's P/E ratio is -99.00. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CAZGF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to CAZGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs ASAAF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, ASAAF has a market cap of 725.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while ASAAF trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ASAAF's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ASAAF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to ASAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs BCNAY Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BCNAY has a market cap of 598.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while BCNAY trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BCNAY's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to BCNAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to BCNAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs VARXF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, VARXF has a market cap of 531.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while VARXF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VARXF's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to VARXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to VARXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs JNNDF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, JNNDF has a market cap of 488.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while JNNDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JNNDF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to JNNDF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to JNNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs KRKNF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, KRKNF has a market cap of 478.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while KRKNF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KRKNF's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to KRKNF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to KRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs JPDYY Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, JPDYY has a market cap of 457.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while JPDYY trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JPDYY's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to JPDYY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to JPDYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs HNMUF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, HNMUF has a market cap of 441.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while HNMUF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HNMUF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HNMUF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to HNMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs KACPF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, KACPF has a market cap of 438M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while KACPF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KACPF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to KACPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to KACPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs HROEY Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, HROEY has a market cap of 371.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while HROEY trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HROEY's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HROEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to HROEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs TRUHF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, TRUHF has a market cap of 364.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while TRUHF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TRUHF's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to TRUHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to TRUHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs NNFTF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, NNFTF has a market cap of 330.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while NNFTF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NNFTF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to NNFTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to NNFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs BMNR Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BMNR has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while BMNR trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BMNR's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to BMNR's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to BMNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs TTGPF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, TTGPF has a market cap of 204.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while TTGPF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TTGPF's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to TTGPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to TTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs SMOPF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, SMOPF has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while SMOPF trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SMOPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to SMOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to SMOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs NPTSF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, NPTSF has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while NPTSF trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NPTSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to NPTSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to NPTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs CHAEF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, CHAEF has a market cap of 154.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while CHAEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CHAEF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to CHAEF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to CHAEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs FUBAF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, FUBAF has a market cap of 126.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while FUBAF trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FUBAF's P/E ratio is -59.54. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to FUBAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to FUBAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs HUDLF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, HUDLF has a market cap of 122.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while HUDLF trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HUDLF's P/E ratio is -18.39. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to HUDLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to HUDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs ENMPF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, ENMPF has a market cap of 119.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while ENMPF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ENMPF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ENMPF's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to ENMPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs IACYF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, IACYF has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while IACYF trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IACYF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to IACYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to IACYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs ENMPY Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, ENMPY has a market cap of 99.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while ENMPY trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ENMPY's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ENMPY's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to ENMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs IKGPF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, IKGPF has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while IKGPF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IKGPF's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to IKGPF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to IKGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs ODYS Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 87.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while ODYS trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs SDIIF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, SDIIF has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while SDIIF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SDIIF's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to SDIIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to SDIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs MPAD Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, MPAD has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while MPAD trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MPAD's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MPAD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to MPAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs SILLF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, SILLF has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while SILLF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SILLF's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to SILLF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to SILLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs ACFN Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, ACFN has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while ACFN trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ACFN's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ACFN's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to ACFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs AATC Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, AATC has a market cap of 41.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while AATC trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AATC's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to AATC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to AATC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs ERMG Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, ERMG has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while ERMG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ERMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ERMG's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to ERMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs NSCIF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, NSCIF has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while NSCIF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NSCIF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to NSCIF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to NSCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs YNVYF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, YNVYF has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while YNVYF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas YNVYF's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to YNVYF's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to YNVYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs IEHC Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, IEHC has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while IEHC trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IEHC's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to IEHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to IEHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs INRD Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, INRD has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while INRD trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas INRD's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to INRD's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to INRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs WELX Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, WELX has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while WELX trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WELX's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to WELX's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to WELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs KESPF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, KESPF has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while KESPF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KESPF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to KESPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to KESPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs FGRRF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, FGRRF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while FGRRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FGRRF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to FGRRF's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to FGRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs ROBOF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, ROBOF has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while ROBOF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ROBOF's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ROBOF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to ROBOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs AAIRF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, AAIRF has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while AAIRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AAIRF's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to AAIRF's ROE of -4.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to AAIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs BNSOF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, BNSOF has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while BNSOF trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BNSOF's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to BNSOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to BNSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs SCND Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, SCND has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while SCND trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SCND's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to SCND's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to SCND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs LCTC Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, LCTC has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while LCTC trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LCTC's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to LCTC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to LCTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs SIGL Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, SIGL has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while SIGL trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SIGL's P/E ratio is -20.32. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to SIGL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to SIGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs ZTSTF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, ZTSTF has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while ZTSTF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ZTSTF's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ZTSTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to ZTSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs GNCLF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, GNCLF has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while GNCLF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GNCLF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to GNCLF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to GNCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs ESHSF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, ESHSF has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while ESHSF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ESHSF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to ESHSF's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to ESHSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs TNLX Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, TNLX has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while TNLX trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TNLX's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to TNLX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to TNLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs RMTD Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, RMTD has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while RMTD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RMTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to RMTD's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to RMTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs DPLS Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, DPLS has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while DPLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DPLS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to DPLS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to DPLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs MRRYF Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, MRRYF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while MRRYF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MRRYF's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to MRRYF's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to MRRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs TRCK Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, TRCK has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while TRCK trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TRCK's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to TRCK's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to TRCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs VPER Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, VPER has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while VPER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VPER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to VPER's ROE of -3.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to VPER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs SRMX Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, SRMX has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while SRMX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SRMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to SRMX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to SRMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.
QNGYQ vs VPIM Comparison
QNGYQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QNGYQ stands at 1.6K. In comparison, VPIM has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QNGYQ is priced at $0.00, while VPIM trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QNGYQ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VPIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QNGYQ's ROE is +0.50%, compared to VPIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QNGYQ is more volatile compared to VPIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QNGYQ.