QMIS Finance Securities Corporation
QMIS Finance Securities Corporation (QMIS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QMIS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Shell Companies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMIS | $0.25 | +0.00% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GSHN | $22.70 | +2.71% | 9.3B | -2270.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| KATX | $1.05 | +0.00% | 1.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CCYC | $11.25 | +0.00% | 1.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ZSYC | $2.00 | +0.00% | 1B | -2.12 | -$0.95 | N/A |
| WPCBF | $0.00 | +100.00% | 700.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NOTR | $13.00 | +0.00% | 570.9M | -433.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| WCHS | $5.01 | +0.00% | 531.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FZRO | $2.00 | N/A | 346.2M | -0.00 | -$4,243,300.50 | N/A |
| RGLG | $1.13 | +11.88% | 342.8M | -0.11 | -$10.00 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QMIS vs GSHN Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, GSHN has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while GSHN trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSHN's P/E ratio is -2270.00. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to GSHN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and GSHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GSHN's competition here
QMIS vs KATX Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, KATX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while KATX trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KATX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to KATX's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to KATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check KATX's competition here
QMIS vs CCYC Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, CCYC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while CCYC trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to CCYC's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and CCYC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCYC's competition here
QMIS vs ZSYC Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, ZSYC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while ZSYC trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZSYC's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to ZSYC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to ZSYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check ZSYC's competition here
QMIS vs WPCBF Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, WPCBF has a market cap of 700.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while WPCBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPCBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to WPCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and WPCBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WPCBF's competition here
QMIS vs NOTR Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, NOTR has a market cap of 570.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while NOTR trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOTR's P/E ratio is -433.33. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to NOTR's ROE of -65.90%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to NOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check NOTR's competition here
QMIS vs WCHS Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, WCHS has a market cap of 531.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while WCHS trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WCHS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to WCHS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to WCHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check WCHS's competition here
QMIS vs FZRO Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, FZRO has a market cap of 346.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while FZRO trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FZRO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to FZRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and FZRO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FZRO's competition here
QMIS vs RGLG Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, RGLG has a market cap of 342.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while RGLG trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGLG's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to RGLG's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to RGLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check RGLG's competition here
QMIS vs CINV Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, CINV has a market cap of 338.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while CINV trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CINV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to CINV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and CINV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CINV's competition here
QMIS vs DVTC Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, DVTC has a market cap of 272.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while DVTC trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to DVTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and DVTC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DVTC's competition here
QMIS vs AMRR Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, AMRR has a market cap of 250.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while AMRR trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to AMRR's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and AMRR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMRR's competition here
QMIS vs KAST Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, KAST has a market cap of 164.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while KAST trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KAST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to KAST's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to KAST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check KAST's competition here
QMIS vs XTPT Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, XTPT has a market cap of 141.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while XTPT trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XTPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to XTPT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to XTPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check XTPT's competition here
QMIS vs SCGX Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, SCGX has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while SCGX trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCGX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to SCGX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to SCGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check SCGX's competition here
QMIS vs TGLO Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, TGLO has a market cap of 119.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while TGLO trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to TGLO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and TGLO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TGLO's competition here
QMIS vs TRFE Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, TRFE has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while TRFE trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRFE's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to TRFE's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and TRFE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRFE's competition here
QMIS vs NMTT Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, NMTT has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while NMTT trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to NMTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and NMTT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NMTT's competition here
QMIS vs RMGCF Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, RMGCF has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while RMGCF trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMGCF's P/E ratio is -14.41. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to RMGCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to RMGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check RMGCF's competition here
QMIS vs WAYS Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, WAYS has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while WAYS trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAYS's P/E ratio is -49.72. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to WAYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and WAYS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WAYS's competition here
QMIS vs ATAQF Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, ATAQF has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while ATAQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATAQF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to ATAQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to ATAQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check ATAQF's competition here
QMIS vs WWHC Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, WWHC has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while WWHC trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WWHC's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to WWHC's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and WWHC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WWHC's competition here
QMIS vs CHAAW Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, CHAAW has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while CHAAW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHAAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to CHAAW's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and CHAAW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHAAW's competition here
QMIS vs CREEF Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, CREEF has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while CREEF trades at $10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREEF's P/E ratio is 36.47. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to CREEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to CREEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check CREEF's competition here
QMIS vs NOHO Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, NOHO has a market cap of 74.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while NOHO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to NOHO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to NOHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check NOHO's competition here
QMIS vs CMCAF Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, CMCAF has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while CMCAF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCAF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to CMCAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and CMCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMCAF's competition here
QMIS vs GWIN Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, GWIN has a market cap of 66.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while GWIN trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWIN's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to GWIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and GWIN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GWIN's competition here
QMIS vs PTCP Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, PTCP has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while PTCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTCP's P/E ratio is -27.78. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to PTCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and PTCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTCP's competition here
QMIS vs ATMS Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, ATMS has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while ATMS trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATMS's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to ATMS's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and ATMS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATMS's competition here
QMIS vs AASP Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, AASP has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while AASP trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AASP's P/E ratio is -16.97. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to AASP's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to AASP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check AASP's competition here
QMIS vs GGAAF Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, GGAAF has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while GGAAF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGAAF's P/E ratio is -133.33. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to GGAAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to GGAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check GGAAF's competition here
QMIS vs JMTM Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, JMTM has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while JMTM trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JMTM's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to JMTM's ROE of +3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to JMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check JMTM's competition here
QMIS vs AWCA Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, AWCA has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while AWCA trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AWCA's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to AWCA's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to AWCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check AWCA's competition here
QMIS vs KWAC Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, KWAC has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while KWAC trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWAC's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to KWAC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and KWAC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KWAC's competition here
QMIS vs KWACW Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, KWACW has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while KWACW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KWACW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to KWACW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and KWACW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KWACW's competition here
QMIS vs USCTF Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, USCTF has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while USCTF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USCTF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to USCTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and USCTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check USCTF's competition here
QMIS vs PMVCW Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, PMVCW has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while PMVCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMVCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to PMVCW's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to PMVCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check PMVCW's competition here
QMIS vs MDWK Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, MDWK has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while MDWK trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDWK's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to MDWK's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and MDWK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDWK's competition here
QMIS vs WBQNL Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, WBQNL has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while WBQNL trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBQNL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to WBQNL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to WBQNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check WBQNL's competition here
QMIS vs AOAO Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, AOAO has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while AOAO trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOAO's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to AOAO's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to AOAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check AOAO's competition here
QMIS vs XCPT Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, XCPT has a market cap of 38.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while XCPT trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XCPT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to XCPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to XCPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check XCPT's competition here
QMIS vs ATMH Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, ATMH has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while ATMH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATMH's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to ATMH's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to ATMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check ATMH's competition here
QMIS vs CNXX Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, CNXX has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while CNXX trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNXX's P/E ratio is -8.81. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to CNXX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to CNXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check CNXX's competition here
QMIS vs CAHO Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, CAHO has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while CAHO trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAHO's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to CAHO's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to CAHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check CAHO's competition here
QMIS vs IDIG Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, IDIG has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while IDIG trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to IDIG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to IDIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check IDIG's competition here
QMIS vs PSCO Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, PSCO has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while PSCO trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSCO's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to PSCO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and PSCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSCO's competition here
QMIS vs ACBD Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, ACBD has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while ACBD trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to ACBD's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to ACBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check ACBD's competition here
QMIS vs NPFC Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, NPFC has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while NPFC trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPFC's P/E ratio is -17.86. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to NPFC's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and NPFC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPFC's competition here
QMIS vs AVNI Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, AVNI has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while AVNI trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVNI's P/E ratio is -21.62. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to AVNI's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to AVNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check AVNI's competition here
QMIS vs CRSQ Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, CRSQ has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while CRSQ trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRSQ's P/E ratio is -250.75. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to CRSQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to CRSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check CRSQ's competition here
QMIS vs CBBB Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, CBBB has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while CBBB trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBBB's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to CBBB's ROE of +10.78%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to CBBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check CBBB's competition here
QMIS vs ADCV Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, ADCV has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while ADCV trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADCV's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to ADCV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and ADCV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADCV's competition here
QMIS vs EVTK Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, EVTK has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while EVTK trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVTK's P/E ratio is -424.00. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to EVTK's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to EVTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check EVTK's competition here
QMIS vs FWFW Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, FWFW has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while FWFW trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWFW's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to FWFW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and FWFW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FWFW's competition here
QMIS vs PCMC Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, PCMC has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while PCMC trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCMC's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to PCMC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and PCMC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCMC's competition here
QMIS vs NXMH Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, NXMH has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while NXMH trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXMH's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to NXMH's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to NXMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check NXMH's competition here
QMIS vs GTVI Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, GTVI has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while GTVI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTVI's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to GTVI's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and GTVI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTVI's competition here
QMIS vs AZRH Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, AZRH has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while AZRH trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to AZRH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to AZRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check AZRH's competition here
QMIS vs ECGR Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, ECGR has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while ECGR trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECGR's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to ECGR's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to ECGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check ECGR's competition here
QMIS vs USBL Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, USBL has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while USBL trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USBL's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to USBL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to USBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check USBL's competition here
QMIS vs STLY Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, STLY has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while STLY trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STLY's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to STLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and STLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STLY's competition here
QMIS vs WRPT Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, WRPT has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while WRPT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to WRPT's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to WRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check WRPT's competition here
QMIS vs NIHL Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, NIHL has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while NIHL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NIHL's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to NIHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to NIHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check NIHL's competition here
QMIS vs ELLH Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, ELLH has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while ELLH trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELLH's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to ELLH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to ELLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check ELLH's competition here
QMIS vs NHICW Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, NHICW has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while NHICW trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NHICW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to NHICW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and NHICW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NHICW's competition here
QMIS vs ADHI Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, ADHI has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while ADHI trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADHI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to ADHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to ADHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check ADHI's competition here
QMIS vs ITRX Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, ITRX has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while ITRX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITRX's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to ITRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to ITRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check ITRX's competition here
QMIS vs LWLW Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, LWLW has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while LWLW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LWLW's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to LWLW's ROE of -4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and LWLW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LWLW's competition here
QMIS vs BOREF Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, BOREF has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while BOREF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOREF's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to BOREF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and BOREF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOREF's competition here
QMIS vs LNMG Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, LNMG has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while LNMG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNMG's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to LNMG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to LNMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check LNMG's competition here
QMIS vs FUNR Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, FUNR has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while FUNR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUNR's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to FUNR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to FUNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check FUNR's competition here
QMIS vs XITO Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, XITO has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while XITO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XITO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to XITO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to XITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check XITO's competition here
QMIS vs LRGR Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, LRGR has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while LRGR trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LRGR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to LRGR's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to LRGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check LRGR's competition here
QMIS vs CHYL Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, CHYL has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while CHYL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHYL's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to CHYL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to CHYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check CHYL's competition here
QMIS vs SSHT Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, SSHT has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while SSHT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSHT's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to SSHT's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and SSHT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSHT's competition here
QMIS vs NRCD Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, NRCD has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while NRCD trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to NRCD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and NRCD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRCD's competition here
QMIS vs TCRI Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, TCRI has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while TCRI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCRI's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to TCRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to TCRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check TCRI's competition here
QMIS vs TAKD Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, TAKD has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while TAKD trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAKD's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to TAKD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and TAKD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TAKD's competition here
QMIS vs SLTN Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, SLTN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while SLTN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLTN's P/E ratio is -17.33. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to SLTN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and SLTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLTN's competition here
QMIS vs ASNB Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, ASNB has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while ASNB trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASNB's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to ASNB's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to ASNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check ASNB's competition here
QMIS vs PVRS Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, PVRS has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while PVRS trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PVRS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to PVRS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and PVRS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PVRS's competition here
QMIS vs ADIA Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, ADIA has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while ADIA trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADIA's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to ADIA's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and ADIA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADIA's competition here
QMIS vs NGRC Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, NGRC has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while NGRC trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGRC's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to NGRC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to NGRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check NGRC's competition here
QMIS vs GIPL Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, GIPL has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while GIPL trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIPL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to GIPL's ROE of +438.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and GIPL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GIPL's competition here
QMIS vs SMPP Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, SMPP has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while SMPP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMPP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to SMPP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to SMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check SMPP's competition here
QMIS vs MTRI Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, MTRI has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while MTRI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTRI's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to MTRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to MTRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check MTRI's competition here
QMIS vs SITS Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, SITS has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while SITS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SITS's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to SITS's ROE of -4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to SITS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check SITS's competition here
QMIS vs PLPL Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, PLPL has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while PLPL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLPL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to PLPL's ROE of +59.74%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to PLPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check PLPL's competition here
QMIS vs SIPN Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, SIPN has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while SIPN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to SIPN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to SIPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check SIPN's competition here
QMIS vs WNFT Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, WNFT has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while WNFT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WNFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to WNFT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to WNFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check WNFT's competition here
QMIS vs CDBT Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, CDBT has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while CDBT trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDBT's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to CDBT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to CDBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check CDBT's competition here
QMIS vs MVCO Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, MVCO has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while MVCO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MVCO's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to MVCO's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and MVCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MVCO's competition here
QMIS vs HKBT Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, HKBT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while HKBT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKBT's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to HKBT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to HKBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check HKBT's competition here
QMIS vs IWSH Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, IWSH has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while IWSH trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWSH's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to IWSH's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and IWSH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IWSH's competition here
QMIS vs XSVT Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, XSVT has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while XSVT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XSVT's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to XSVT's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and XSVT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XSVT's competition here
QMIS vs GDVM Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, GDVM has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while GDVM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDVM's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to GDVM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to GDVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check GDVM's competition here
QMIS vs HPIL Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, HPIL has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while HPIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to HPIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to HPIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check HPIL's competition here
QMIS vs GRNL Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, GRNL has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while GRNL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRNL's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to GRNL's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS is less volatile compared to GRNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QMIS.Check GRNL's competition here
QMIS vs ENGA Comparison August 2025
QMIS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QMIS stands at 30.5B. In comparison, ENGA has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QMIS is priced at $0.25, while ENGA trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QMIS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENGA's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, QMIS's ROE is N/A, compared to ENGA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QMIS and ENGA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENGA's competition here