Qilian International Holding Group Limited
Qilian International Holding Group Limited QLI Peers
See (QLI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLI | $5.41 | -3.57% | 38.7M | -4.92 | -$1.10 | N/A |
| ZTS | $151.19 | +2.59% | 67.3B | 27.14 | $5.57 | +1.28% |
| TAK | $14.55 | +0.76% | 46B | 63.30 | $0.23 | +4.05% |
| HLN | $9.65 | +1.26% | 43.8B | 22.96 | $0.42 | +1.75% |
| TEVA | $16.29 | -0.12% | 18.7B | -14.15 | -$1.15 | N/A |
| ITCI | $131.87 | +0.00% | 14B | -180.64 | -$0.73 | N/A |
| NBIX | $132.75 | +0.70% | 13.1B | 45.00 | $2.95 | N/A |
| RDY | $14.41 | -0.96% | 12B | 18.25 | $0.79 | +0.66% |
| CTLT | $63.48 | +0.00% | 11.5B | -27.84 | -$2.28 | N/A |
| VTRS | $9.24 | +3.82% | 10.8B | -2.91 | -$3.18 | +5.21% |
Stock Comparison
QLI vs ZTS Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, ZTS has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while ZTS trades at $151.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas ZTS's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ZTS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to ZTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs TAK Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, TAK has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while TAK trades at $14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas TAK's P/E ratio is 63.30. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TAK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to TAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs HLN Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, HLN has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while HLN trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas HLN's P/E ratio is 22.96. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HLN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to HLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs TEVA Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, TEVA has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while TEVA trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas TEVA's P/E ratio is -14.15. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TEVA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to TEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs ITCI Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, ITCI has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while ITCI trades at $131.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas ITCI's P/E ratio is -180.64. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ITCI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI and ITCI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QLI vs NBIX Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, NBIX has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while NBIX trades at $132.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas NBIX's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NBIX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to NBIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs RDY Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, RDY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while RDY trades at $14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas RDY's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to RDY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to RDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs CTLT Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, CTLT has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while CTLT trades at $63.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas CTLT's P/E ratio is -27.84. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CTLT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to CTLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs VTRS Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, VTRS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while VTRS trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas VTRS's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to VTRS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to VTRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs ELAN Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, ELAN has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while ELAN trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas ELAN's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ELAN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to ELAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs RGC Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, RGC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while RGC trades at $13.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas RGC's P/E ratio is -1366.00. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to RGC's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to RGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs LNTH Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, LNTH has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while LNTH trades at $72.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas LNTH's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to LNTH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to LNTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs PRGO Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, PRGO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while PRGO trades at $27.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas PRGO's P/E ratio is -22.97. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PRGO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to PRGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs AMRX Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, AMRX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while AMRX trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas AMRX's P/E ratio is -199.00. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AMRX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to AMRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs HCM Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, HCM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while HCM trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas HCM's P/E ratio is 88.40. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HCM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to HCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs ALVO Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, ALVO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while ALVO trades at $8.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas ALVO's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ALVO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to ALVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs BHC Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, BHC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while BHC trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas BHC's P/E ratio is -54.21. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to BHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs ALVOW Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, ALVOW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while ALVOW trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas ALVOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ALVOW's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to ALVOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs DCPH Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, DCPH has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while DCPH trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas DCPH's P/E ratio is -11.58. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DCPH's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to DCPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs BGM Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, BGM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while BGM trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas BGM's P/E ratio is -50.50. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BGM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to BGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs INDV Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, INDV has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while INDV trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas INDV's P/E ratio is -323.60. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to INDV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to INDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs EMBCV Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, EMBCV has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while EMBCV trades at $33.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas EMBCV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to EMBCV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to EMBCV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs SUPN Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, SUPN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while SUPN trades at $32.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas SUPN's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SUPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to SUPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs TARO Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, TARO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while TARO trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas TARO's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TARO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to TARO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs ANIP Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, ANIP has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while ANIP trades at $66.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas ANIP's P/E ratio is -56.22. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ANIP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to ANIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs DVAX Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, DVAX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while DVAX trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas DVAX's P/E ratio is -22.36. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DVAX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to DVAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs HROW Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, HROW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while HROW trades at $36.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas HROW's P/E ratio is -59.20. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HROW's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to HROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs EVO Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, EVO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while EVO trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas EVO's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to EVO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to EVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs FLXN Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, FLXN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while FLXN trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas FLXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FLXN's ROE of +6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI and FLXN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QLI vs PAHC Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, PAHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while PAHC trades at $29.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas PAHC's P/E ratio is 37.45. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PAHC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to PAHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs AVDL Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, AVDL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while AVDL trades at $11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas AVDL's P/E ratio is -43.21. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AVDL's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to AVDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs PCRX Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, PCRX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while PCRX trades at $22.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas PCRX's P/E ratio is -10.01. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PCRX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to PCRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs COLL Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, COLL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while COLL trades at $31.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas COLL's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to COLL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to COLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs AMPH Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, AMPH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while AMPH trades at $21.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas AMPH's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AMPH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to AMPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs PETQ Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, PETQ has a market cap of 919.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while PETQ trades at $30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas PETQ's P/E ratio is 83.73. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PETQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to PETQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs CRON Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, CRON has a market cap of 824.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while CRON trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas CRON's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CRON's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to CRON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs TLRY Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, TLRY has a market cap of 815.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while TLRY trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas TLRY's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TLRY's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to TLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs EMBC Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, EMBC has a market cap of 624.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while EMBC trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas EMBC's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to EMBC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to EMBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs EOLS Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, EOLS has a market cap of 617M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while EOLS trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas EOLS's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to EOLS's ROE of -9.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to EOLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs ORGO Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, ORGO has a market cap of 611.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while ORGO trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas ORGO's P/E ratio is -30.12. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ORGO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to ORGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs BDSI Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, BDSI has a market cap of 577.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while BDSI trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas BDSI's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BDSI's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to BDSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs SIGA Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, SIGA has a market cap of 489.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while SIGA trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas SIGA's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SIGA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to SIGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs KMDA Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, KMDA has a market cap of 439.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while KMDA trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas KMDA's P/E ratio is 27.29. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to KMDA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to KMDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs SNDL Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, SNDL has a market cap of 422M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while SNDL trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas SNDL's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SNDL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to SNDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs AQST Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, AQST has a market cap of 394.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while AQST trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas AQST's P/E ratio is -6.84. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AQST's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to AQST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs EBS Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, EBS has a market cap of 389.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while EBS trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas EBS's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to EBS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to EBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs ALIM Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, ALIM has a market cap of 301.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while ALIM trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas ALIM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ALIM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to ALIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs ACB Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, ACB has a market cap of 283.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while ACB trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas ACB's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ACB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to ACB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs LFCR Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, LFCR has a market cap of 275.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while LFCR trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas LFCR's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to LFCR's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to LFCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs LNDC Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, LNDC has a market cap of 263.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while LNDC trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas LNDC's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to LNDC's ROE of +2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to LNDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs ZYBT Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, ZYBT has a market cap of 260.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while ZYBT trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas ZYBT's P/E ratio is 183.00. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ZYBT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to ZYBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs CGC Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, CGC has a market cap of 258.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while CGC trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas CGC's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CGC's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to CGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs ESPR Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, ESPR has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while ESPR trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas ESPR's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ESPR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to ESPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs TKNO Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, TKNO has a market cap of 236.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while TKNO trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas TKNO's P/E ratio is -9.61. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TKNO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to TKNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs TYHT Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, TYHT has a market cap of 229.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while TYHT trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas TYHT's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TYHT's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to TYHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs OGI Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, OGI has a market cap of 207.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while OGI trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas OGI's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to OGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to OGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs SXTC Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, SXTC has a market cap of 204.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while SXTC trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas SXTC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SXTC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to SXTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs REPH Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, REPH has a market cap of 177.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while REPH trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas REPH's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to REPH's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to REPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs BIOA Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, BIOA has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while BIOA trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas BIOA's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BIOA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to BIOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs DERM Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, DERM has a market cap of 169.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while DERM trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas DERM's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DERM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to DERM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs THTX Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, THTX has a market cap of 145.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while THTX trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas THTX's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to THTX's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to THTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs IRWD Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, IRWD has a market cap of 126.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while IRWD trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas IRWD's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to IRWD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to IRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs SCTL Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, SCTL has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while SCTL trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas SCTL's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SCTL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to SCTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs CRDL Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, CRDL has a market cap of 115.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while CRDL trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas CRDL's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CRDL's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to CRDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs PROC Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, PROC has a market cap of 114M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while PROC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas PROC's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PROC's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to PROC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs OPTN Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, OPTN has a market cap of 97.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while OPTN trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas OPTN's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to OPTN's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI and OPTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QLI vs ZOM Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, ZOM has a market cap of 95.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while ZOM trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas ZOM's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ZOM's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to ZOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs GRVI Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, GRVI has a market cap of 88.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while GRVI trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas GRVI's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to GRVI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to GRVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs INCR Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, INCR has a market cap of 85.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while INCR trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas INCR's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to INCR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to INCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs IXHL Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, IXHL has a market cap of 78.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while IXHL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas IXHL's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to IXHL's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to IXHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs QNTM Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, QNTM has a market cap of 74.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while QNTM trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas QNTM's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to QNTM's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to QNTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs ZYNE Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, ZYNE has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while ZYNE trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas ZYNE's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ZYNE's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to ZYNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs ASRT Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, ASRT has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while ASRT trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas ASRT's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ASRT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to ASRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs SSIC Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, SSIC has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while SSIC trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas SSIC's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SSIC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to SSIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs VLNS Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, VLNS has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while VLNS trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas VLNS's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to VLNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to VLNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs CPIX Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, CPIX has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while CPIX trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas CPIX's P/E ratio is -14.17. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CPIX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to CPIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs JUPW Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, JUPW has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while JUPW trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas JUPW's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to JUPW's ROE of -9.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to JUPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs EGRX Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, EGRX has a market cap of 40.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while EGRX trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas EGRX's P/E ratio is 3.71. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to EGRX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to EGRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs RMTI Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, RMTI has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while RMTI trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas RMTI's P/E ratio is -113.00. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to RMTI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to RMTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs KALA Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, KALA has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while KALA trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas KALA's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to KALA's ROE of -3.69%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to KALA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs HEXO Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, HEXO has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while HEXO trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas HEXO's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HEXO's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to HEXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs SCYX Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, SCYX has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while SCYX trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas SCYX's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SCYX's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to SCYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs CYTH Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, CYTH has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while CYTH trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas CYTH's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CYTH's ROE of +7.50%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI and CYTH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QLI vs GELS Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, GELS has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while GELS trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas GELS's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to GELS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to GELS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs DRRX Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, DRRX has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while DRRX trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas DRRX's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DRRX's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to DRRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs PRPH Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, PRPH has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while PRPH trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas PRPH's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PRPH's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to PRPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs AYTU Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, AYTU has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while AYTU trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas AYTU's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AYTU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to AYTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs FLGC Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, FLGC has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while FLGC trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas FLGC's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FLGC's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to FLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs ACRX Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, ACRX has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while ACRX trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas ACRX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ACRX's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to ACRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs COSM Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, COSM has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while COSM trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas COSM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to COSM's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to COSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs TXMD Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, TXMD has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while TXMD trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas TXMD's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TXMD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to TXMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs AGRX Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, AGRX has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while AGRX trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas AGRX's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AGRX's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to AGRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs IMCC Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, IMCC has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while IMCC trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas IMCC's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to IMCC's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to IMCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs YCBD Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, YCBD has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while YCBD trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas YCBD's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to YCBD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to YCBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs BFRI Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, BFRI has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while BFRI trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas BFRI's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BFRI's ROE of -2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to BFRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs TLPH Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, TLPH has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while TLPH trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas TLPH's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TLPH's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to TLPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs NLTX Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, NLTX has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while NLTX trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas NLTX's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NLTX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to NLTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs SISI Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, SISI has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while SISI trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas SISI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SISI's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to SISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.
QLI vs LCI Comparison
QLI plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QLI stands at 38.7M. In comparison, LCI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QLI is priced at $5.41, while LCI trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QLI currently has a P/E ratio of -4.92, whereas LCI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, QLI's ROE is -0.16%, compared to LCI's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, QLI is less volatile compared to LCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QLI.