QIWI plc
QIWI plc QIWI Peers
See (QIWI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QIWI | $5.67 | N/A | 355.58M | 1.15 | $4.94 | N/A |
| MSFT | $449.14 | -0.03% | 3.34T | 34.66 | $12.96 | +0.70% |
| ORCL | $162.28 | +3.22% | 455.07B | 38.09 | $4.26 | +1.05% |
| PLTR | $128.10 | +8.14% | 302.30B | 556.96 | $0.23 | N/A |
| ADBE | $397.40 | +0.37% | 169.37B | 26.27 | $15.13 | N/A |
| PANW | $192.00 | -0.78% | 127.12B | 108.47 | $1.77 | N/A |
| CRWD | $440.20 | +2.51% | 109.64B | -5502.50 | -$0.08 | N/A |
| FTNT | $105.05 | +2.95% | 80.41B | 46.48 | $2.26 | N/A |
| SNPS | $515.71 | +2.00% | 79.74B | 62.06 | $8.31 | N/A |
| VMW | $142.48 | -4.96% | 61.52B | 42.92 | $3.32 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QIWI vs MSFT Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, MSFT has a market cap of 3.34T. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while MSFT trades at $449.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas MSFT's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MSFT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to MSFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs ORCL Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, ORCL has a market cap of 455.07B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while ORCL trades at $162.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas ORCL's P/E ratio is 38.09. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ORCL's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to ORCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs PLTR Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, PLTR has a market cap of 302.30B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while PLTR trades at $128.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas PLTR's P/E ratio is 556.96. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to PLTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs ADBE Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 169.37B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while ADBE trades at $397.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 26.27. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs PANW Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, PANW has a market cap of 127.12B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while PANW trades at $192.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas PANW's P/E ratio is 108.47. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PANW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to PANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs CRWD Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, CRWD has a market cap of 109.64B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while CRWD trades at $440.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas CRWD's P/E ratio is -5502.50. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRWD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to CRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs FTNT Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, FTNT has a market cap of 80.41B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while FTNT trades at $105.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas FTNT's P/E ratio is 46.48. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FTNT's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to FTNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs SNPS Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, SNPS has a market cap of 79.74B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while SNPS trades at $515.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas SNPS's P/E ratio is 62.06. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNPS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to SNPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs VMW Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, VMW has a market cap of 61.52B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while VMW trades at $142.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas VMW's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VMW's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to VMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs HOOD Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, HOOD has a market cap of 55.22B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while HOOD trades at $62.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas HOOD's P/E ratio is 35.75. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to HOOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs NET Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, NET has a market cap of 52.20B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while NET trades at $150.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas NET's P/E ratio is -653.87. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to NET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs SQ Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, SQ has a market cap of 51.73B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while SQ trades at $83.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas SQ's P/E ratio is 49.98. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to SQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs ZS Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, ZS has a market cap of 37.91B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while ZS trades at $245.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas ZS's P/E ratio is -2722.22. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to ZS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs XYZ Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, XYZ has a market cap of 35.80B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while XYZ trades at $58.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas XYZ's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XYZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to XYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs CRWV Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, CRWV has a market cap of 29.44B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while CRWV trades at $63.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas CRWV's P/E ratio is -27.27. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRWV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to CRWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs NETE Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, NETE has a market cap of 27.82B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while NETE trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas NETE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NETE's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to NETE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs GDDY Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, GDDY has a market cap of 26.71B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while GDDY trades at $187.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas GDDY's P/E ratio is 36.05. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GDDY's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to GDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs IOT Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, IOT has a market cap of 26.55B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while IOT trades at $46.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas IOT's P/E ratio is -166.54. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IOT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to IOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs SPLK Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, SPLK has a market cap of 26.44B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while SPLK trades at $156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas SPLK's P/E ratio is 103.22. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPLK's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to SPLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs VRSN Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, VRSN has a market cap of 25.91B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while VRSN trades at $275.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas VRSN's P/E ratio is 33.69. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VRSN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to VRSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs TOST Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, TOST has a market cap of 25.39B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while TOST trades at $43.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas TOST's P/E ratio is 1464.69. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to TOST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs CPAY Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, CPAY has a market cap of 24.92B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while CPAY trades at $354.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas CPAY's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPAY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to CPAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs CHKP Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, CHKP has a market cap of 23.61B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while CHKP trades at $217.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas CHKP's P/E ratio is 28.74. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHKP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to CHKP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs NTNX Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, NTNX has a market cap of 21.97B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while NTNX trades at $82.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas NTNX's P/E ratio is -316.92. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to NTNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs FLT Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, FLT has a market cap of 21.79B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while FLT trades at $303.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas FLT's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FLT's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to FLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs OKTA Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, OKTA has a market cap of 20.57B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while OKTA trades at $124.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas OKTA's P/E ratio is 2067.50. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OKTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to OKTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs GEN Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, GEN has a market cap of 17.93B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while GEN trades at $29.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas GEN's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GEN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to GEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs CYBR Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, CYBR has a market cap of 17.87B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while CYBR trades at $361.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas CYBR's P/E ratio is -169.62. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to CYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs AFRM Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 17.40B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while AFRM trades at $53.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is -87.00. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AFRM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs FFIV Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, FFIV has a market cap of 16.27B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while FFIV trades at $283.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas FFIV's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FFIV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to FFIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs MDB Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, MDB has a market cap of 15.90B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while MDB trades at $195.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas MDB's P/E ratio is -113.24. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MDB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to MDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs RBRK Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, RBRK has a market cap of 15.77B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while RBRK trades at $83.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas RBRK's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RBRK's ROE of +2.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to RBRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs KSPI Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, KSPI has a market cap of 15.34B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while KSPI trades at $80.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas KSPI's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KSPI's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to KSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs NLOK Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, NLOK has a market cap of 14.32B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while NLOK trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas NLOK's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NLOK's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to NLOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs AKAM Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, AKAM has a market cap of 11.53B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while AKAM trades at $78.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas AKAM's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AKAM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to AKAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs SAIL Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, SAIL has a market cap of 10.90B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while SAIL trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas SAIL's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to SAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs KVYO Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 10.35B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while KVYO trades at $37.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is -220.53. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KVYO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs WIX Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 10.29B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while WIX trades at $184.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 78.34. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WIX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs DOX Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, DOX has a market cap of 10.22B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while DOX trades at $91.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas DOX's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DOX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to DOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs ALTR Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, ALTR has a market cap of 9.63B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while ALTR trades at $111.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas ALTR's P/E ratio is 699.06. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI and ALTR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QIWI vs PLAN Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, PLAN has a market cap of 9.59B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while PLAN trades at $63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas PLAN's P/E ratio is -44.82. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLAN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to PLAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs DBX Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, DBX has a market cap of 8.55B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while DBX trades at $29.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas DBX's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DBX's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to DBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs CFLT Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, CFLT has a market cap of 7.87B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while CFLT trades at $23.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas CFLT's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CFLT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to CFLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs PATH Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, PATH has a market cap of 7.31B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while PATH trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas PATH's P/E ratio is -101.96. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PATH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to PATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs HCP Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, HCP has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while HCP trades at $34.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas HCP's P/E ratio is -57.97. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HCP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to HCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs JCOM Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, JCOM has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while JCOM trades at $142.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas JCOM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JCOM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to JCOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs INFA Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, INFA has a market cap of 6.73B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while INFA trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas INFA's P/E ratio is 648.33. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to INFA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to INFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs SQSP Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, SQSP has a market cap of 6.47B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while SQSP trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas SQSP's P/E ratio is -1164.25. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SQSP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to SQSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs S Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, S has a market cap of 6.42B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while S trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas S's P/E ratio is -22.12. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to S's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to S. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs FOUR Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, FOUR has a market cap of 6.21B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while FOUR trades at $92.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas FOUR's P/E ratio is 31.53. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FOUR's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to FOUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs NEWR Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, NEWR has a market cap of 6.18B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while NEWR trades at $86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas NEWR's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NEWR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to NEWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs CCCS Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, CCCS has a market cap of 5.96B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while CCCS trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas CCCS's P/E ratio is 905.00. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CCCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to CCCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs SPSC Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, SPSC has a market cap of 5.80B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while SPSC trades at $152.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas SPSC's P/E ratio is 71.34. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPSC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to SPSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs ACIW Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, ACIW has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while ACIW trades at $49.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas ACIW's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACIW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to ACIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs VRNS Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, VRNS has a market cap of 5.14B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while VRNS trades at $45.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas VRNS's P/E ratio is -56.64. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VRNS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to VRNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs QLYS Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, QLYS has a market cap of 4.97B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while QLYS trades at $136.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas QLYS's P/E ratio is 27.97. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QLYS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to QLYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs RELY Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, RELY has a market cap of 4.94B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while RELY trades at $24.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas RELY's P/E ratio is -127.47. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RELY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to RELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs NVEI Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, NVEI has a market cap of 4.84B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while NVEI trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas NVEI's P/E ratio is 212.44. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NVEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI and NVEI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QIWI vs CLBT Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, CLBT has a market cap of 4.82B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while CLBT trades at $20.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas CLBT's P/E ratio is -14.90. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLBT's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to CLBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs EEFT Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, EEFT has a market cap of 4.77B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while EEFT trades at $110.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas EEFT's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EEFT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to EEFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs WEX Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, WEX has a market cap of 4.73B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while WEX trades at $138.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas WEX's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WEX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to WEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs BOX Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, BOX has a market cap of 4.61B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while BOX trades at $31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas BOX's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BOX's ROE of +2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to BOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs AVPTW Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, AVPTW has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while AVPTW trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas AVPTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AVPTW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to AVPTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs TENB Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, TENB has a market cap of 4.09B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while TENB trades at $33.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas TENB's P/E ratio is -88.13. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TENB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to TENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs AVPT Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, AVPT has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while AVPT trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas AVPT's P/E ratio is -124.94. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AVPT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to AVPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs ESMT Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, ESMT has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while ESMT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas ESMT's P/E ratio is 153.67. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ESMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to ESMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs STNE Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, STNE has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while STNE trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas STNE's P/E ratio is -15.78. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STNE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to STNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs ODD Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, ODD has a market cap of 3.36B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while ODD trades at $60.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas ODD's P/E ratio is 34.57. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ODD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to ODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs PAGS Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, PAGS has a market cap of 3.23B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while PAGS trades at $9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas PAGS's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to PAGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs SWI Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, SWI has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while SWI trades at $18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas SWI's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SWI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to SWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs CORZZ Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, CORZZ has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while CORZZ trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas CORZZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CORZZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to CORZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs CORZ Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, CORZ has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while CORZ trades at $10.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas CORZ's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CORZ's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to CORZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs EVOP Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, EVOP has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while EVOP trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas EVOP's P/E ratio is -309.00. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EVOP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to EVOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs DOCN Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, DOCN has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while DOCN trades at $31.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas DOCN's P/E ratio is 27.87. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DOCN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to DOCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs DLO Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, DLO has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while DLO trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas DLO's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to DLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs PAYO Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, PAYO has a market cap of 2.70B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while PAYO trades at $7.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas PAYO's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAYO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to PAYO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs APPN Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, APPN has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while APPN trades at $32.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas APPN's P/E ratio is -26.11. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to APPN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to APPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs BB Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, BB has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while BB trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas BB's P/E ratio is -392.28. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to BB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs EVTC Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, EVTC has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while EVTC trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas EVTC's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EVTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to EVTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs MQ Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, MQ has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while MQ trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas MQ's P/E ratio is 96.60. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MQ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to MQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs TDC Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, TDC has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while TDC trades at $23.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas TDC's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TDC's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to TDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs FIVN Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, FIVN has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while FIVN trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas FIVN's P/E ratio is -471.00. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FIVN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to FIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs GETVV Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, GETVV has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while GETVV trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas GETVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GETVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to GETVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs EVCM Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, EVCM has a market cap of 2.03B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while EVCM trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas EVCM's P/E ratio is -50.59. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EVCM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to EVCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs AVDX Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, AVDX has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while AVDX trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas AVDX's P/E ratio is 243.00. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to AVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs RAMP Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, RAMP has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while RAMP trades at $29.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas RAMP's P/E ratio is -742.62. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAMP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to RAMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs FORG Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, FORG has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while FORG trades at $23.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas FORG's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FORG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to FORG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs CSGS Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, CSGS has a market cap of 1.90B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while CSGS trades at $65.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas CSGS's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CSGS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to CSGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs GSKY Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, GSKY has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while GSKY trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas GSKY's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GSKY's ROE of +5.47%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to GSKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs GET Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, GET has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while GET trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas GET's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GET's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to GET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs NTCT Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, NTCT has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while NTCT trades at $23.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas NTCT's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTCT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to NTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs STER Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, STER has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while STER trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas STER's P/E ratio is -98.47. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STER's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to STER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs RPD Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, RPD has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while RPD trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas RPD's P/E ratio is 61.40. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RPD's ROE of +9.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to RPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs ZUO Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, ZUO has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while ZUO trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas ZUO's P/E ratio is -19.65. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZUO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to ZUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs CORZW Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, CORZW has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while CORZW trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas CORZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CORZW's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to CORZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs SUMO Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, SUMO has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while SUMO trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas SUMO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUMO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to SUMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs GB Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, GB has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while GB trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas GB's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GB's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to GB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs TUYA Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, TUYA has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while TUYA trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas TUYA's P/E ratio is 271.50. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TUYA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to TUYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.
QIWI vs PGYWW Comparison
QIWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QIWI stands at 355.58M. In comparison, PGYWW has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, QIWI is priced at $5.67, while PGYWW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QIWI currently has a P/E ratio of 1.15, whereas PGYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QIWI's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PGYWW's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, QIWI is less volatile compared to PGYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QIWI.