Quest for Growth Belgium
Quest for Growth Belgium (QFG.BR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QFG.BR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QFG.BR | €2.81 | -1.40% | 52.6M | -21.62 | -€0.13 | +35.59% |
| CSPX.AS | €611.32 | +0.21% | 111.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IWDA.AS | €110.37 | +0.02% | 108.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.AS | €107.85 | +0.23% | 68.7B | N/A | N/A | +0.99% |
| VWRL.AS | €140.80 | -0.17% | 52.4B | N/A | N/A | +1.41% |
| SP5H.PA | €318.05 | -0.31% | 23.3B | 25.97 | €12.25 | +1.04% |
| SP5C.PA | €412.36 | +0.21% | 23.2B | 26.63 | €15.48 | N/A |
| IUSA.AS | €56.67 | +0.17% | 18B | N/A | N/A | +0.98% |
| CSH2.PA | €108.76 | -0.02% | 17.2B | 28.29 | €3.84 | N/A |
| ISFA.AS | €11.71 | +0.72% | 17.1B | N/A | N/A | +2.90% |
Stock Comparison
QFG.BR vs CSPX.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, CSPX.AS has a market cap of 111.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while CSPX.AS trades at €611.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas CSPX.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CSPX.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to CSPX.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check CSPX.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs IWDA.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, IWDA.AS has a market cap of 108.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while IWDA.AS trades at €110.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas IWDA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IWDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to IWDA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check IWDA.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs VUSA.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, VUSA.AS has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while VUSA.AS trades at €107.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas VUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to VUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check VUSA.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs VWRL.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, VWRL.AS has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while VWRL.AS trades at €140.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas VWRL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VWRL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to VWRL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check VWRL.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs SP5H.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, SP5H.PA has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while SP5H.PA trades at €318.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas SP5H.PA's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SP5H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to SP5H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check SP5H.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs SP5C.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, SP5C.PA has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while SP5C.PA trades at €412.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas SP5C.PA's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SP5C.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to SP5C.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check SP5C.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs IUSA.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, IUSA.AS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while IUSA.AS trades at €56.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas IUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to IUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check IUSA.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs CSH2.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, CSH2.PA has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while CSH2.PA trades at €108.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas CSH2.PA's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CSH2.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to CSH2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check CSH2.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs ISFA.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, ISFA.AS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while ISFA.AS trades at €11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas ISFA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ISFA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to ISFA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check ISFA.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs HAL.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, HAL.AS has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while HAL.AS trades at €170.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas HAL.AS's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HAL.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to HAL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check HAL.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs AMUN.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, AMUN.PA has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while AMUN.PA trades at €74.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas AMUN.PA's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AMUN.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to AMUN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check AMUN.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs MEUD.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, MEUD.PA has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while MEUD.PA trades at €289.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas MEUD.PA's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MEUD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to MEUD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check MEUD.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs I500.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, I500.AS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while I500.AS trades at €10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas I500.AS's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to I500.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to I500.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check I500.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs I50D.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, I50D.AS has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while I50D.AS trades at €7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas I50D.AS's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to I50D.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to I50D.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check I50D.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs GOLD.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, GOLD.PA has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while GOLD.PA trades at €160.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas GOLD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GOLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to GOLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check GOLD.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs IMEU.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, IMEU.AS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while IMEU.AS trades at €37.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas IMEU.AS's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IMEU.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to IMEU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check IMEU.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs VHYL.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, VHYL.AS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while VHYL.AS trades at €73.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas VHYL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VHYL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to VHYL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check VHYL.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs GBLB.BR Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, GBLB.BR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while GBLB.BR trades at €78.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas GBLB.BR's P/E ratio is -29.68. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GBLB.BR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to GBLB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check GBLB.BR's competition here
QFG.BR vs PSH.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, PSH.AS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while PSH.AS trades at €51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas PSH.AS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PSH.AS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to PSH.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check PSH.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs WLDHC.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, WLDHC.PA has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while WLDHC.PA trades at €14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas WLDHC.PA's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WLDHC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to WLDHC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check WLDHC.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs WLDH.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, WLDH.PA has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while WLDH.PA trades at €233.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas WLDH.PA's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WLDH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to WLDH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check WLDH.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs WLD.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, WLD.PA has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while WLD.PA trades at €371.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas WLD.PA's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to WLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check WLD.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs CBUG.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, CBUG.AS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while CBUG.AS trades at €4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas CBUG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CBUG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to CBUG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check CBUG.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs CEUU.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, CEUU.AS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while CEUU.AS trades at €11.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas CEUU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CEUU.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to CEUU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check CEUU.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs IEMM.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, IEMM.AS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while IEMM.AS trades at €48.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas IEMM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IEMM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to IEMM.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check IEMM.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs SOF.BR Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, SOF.BR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while SOF.BR trades at €214.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas SOF.BR's P/E ratio is 65.71. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SOF.BR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to SOF.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check SOF.BR's competition here
QFG.BR vs IWRD.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, IWRD.AS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while IWRD.AS trades at €79.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas IWRD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IWRD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to IWRD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check IWRD.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs SJPD.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, SJPD.AS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while SJPD.AS trades at €7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas SJPD.AS's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SJPD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to SJPD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check SJPD.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs IEMA.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, IEMA.AS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while IEMA.AS trades at €46.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas IEMA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IEMA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to IEMA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check IEMA.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs AEME.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, AEME.PA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while AEME.PA trades at €84.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas AEME.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AEME.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to AEME.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check AEME.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs VEUR.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, VEUR.AS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while VEUR.AS trades at €46.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas VEUR.AS's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VEUR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to VEUR.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check VEUR.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs LCWD.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, LCWD.PA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while LCWD.PA trades at €19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas LCWD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to LCWD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to LCWD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check LCWD.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs PHAU.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, PHAU.AS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while PHAU.AS trades at €375.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas PHAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PHAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to PHAU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check PHAU.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs SJPE.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, SJPE.AS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while SJPE.AS trades at €13.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas SJPE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SJPE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to SJPE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check SJPE.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs CC4.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, CC4.PA has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while CC4.PA trades at €225.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas CC4.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CC4.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to CC4.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check CC4.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs ECRP.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, ECRP.PA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while ECRP.PA trades at €53.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas ECRP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ECRP.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to ECRP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check ECRP.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs IJPA.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, IJPA.AS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while IJPA.AS trades at €63.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas IJPA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IJPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to IJPA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check IJPA.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs CW8.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, CW8.PA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while CW8.PA trades at €600.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas CW8.PA's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CW8.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to CW8.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check CW8.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs TDIV.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, TDIV.AS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while TDIV.AS trades at €52.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas TDIV.AS's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TDIV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to TDIV.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check TDIV.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs EWLD.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, EWLD.PA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while EWLD.PA trades at €35.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas EWLD.PA's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EWLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to EWLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check EWLD.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs 500.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, 500.PA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while 500.PA trades at €113.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas 500.PA's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to 500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check 500.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs KBCA.BR Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, KBCA.BR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while KBCA.BR trades at €72.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas KBCA.BR's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KBCA.BR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to KBCA.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check KBCA.BR's competition here
QFG.BR vs AUEM.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, AUEM.PA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while AUEM.PA trades at €7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas AUEM.PA's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AUEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to AUEM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check AUEM.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs EUEA.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, EUEA.AS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while EUEA.AS trades at €57.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas EUEA.AS's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EUEA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to EUEA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check EUEA.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs S500.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, S500.PA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while S500.PA trades at €166.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas S500.PA's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to S500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to S500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check S500.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs ALLFG.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, ALLFG.AS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while ALLFG.AS trades at €8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas ALLFG.AS's P/E ratio is -33.08. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ALLFG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to ALLFG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check ALLFG.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs UST.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, UST.PA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while UST.PA trades at €84.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas UST.PA's P/E ratio is 32.19. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to UST.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to UST.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check UST.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs C50U.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, C50U.PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while C50U.PA trades at €173.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas C50U.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to C50U.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to C50U.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check C50U.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs S500H.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, S500H.PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while S500H.PA trades at €93.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas S500H.PA's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to S500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to S500H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check S500H.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs REINA.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, REINA.AS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while REINA.AS trades at €27.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas REINA.AS's P/E ratio is 37.57. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to REINA.AS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to REINA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check REINA.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs USAC.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, USAC.PA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while USAC.PA trades at €568.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas USAC.PA's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to USAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to USAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check USAC.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs USA.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, USA.PA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while USA.PA trades at €520.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas USA.PA's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to USA.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to USA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check USA.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs AEEM.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, AEEM.PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while AEEM.PA trades at €6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas AEEM.PA's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AEEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to AEEM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check AEEM.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs VERX.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, VERX.AS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while VERX.AS trades at €45.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas VERX.AS's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to VERX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to VERX.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check VERX.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs EXCH.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, EXCH.AS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while EXCH.AS trades at €7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas EXCH.AS's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EXCH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to EXCH.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check EXCH.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs SEMD.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, SEMD.AS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while SEMD.AS trades at €6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas SEMD.AS's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SEMD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to SEMD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check SEMD.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs CAC.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, CAC.PA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while CAC.PA trades at €78.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas CAC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to CAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check CAC.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs CACC.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, CACC.PA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while CACC.PA trades at €39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas CACC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CACC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to CACC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check CACC.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs MSE.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, MSE.PA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while MSE.PA trades at €63.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas MSE.PA's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MSE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to MSE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check MSE.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs C50.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, C50.PA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while C50.PA trades at €150.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas C50.PA's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to C50.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to C50.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check C50.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs CD5.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, CD5.PA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while CD5.PA trades at €90.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas CD5.PA's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CD5.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to CD5.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check CD5.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs ICHN.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, ICHN.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while ICHN.AS trades at €5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas ICHN.AS's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ICHN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to ICHN.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check ICHN.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs ICHD.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, ICHD.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while ICHD.AS trades at €4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas ICHD.AS's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ICHD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to ICHD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check ICHD.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs 500X.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, 500X.AS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while 500X.AS trades at €41.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas 500X.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to 500X.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to 500X.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check 500X.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs EEUE.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, EEUE.PA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while EEUE.PA trades at €18.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas EEUE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EEUE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to EEUE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check EEUE.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs WSRI.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, WSRI.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while WSRI.PA trades at €103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas WSRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WSRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to WSRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check WSRI.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs AGGD.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, AGGD.AS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while AGGD.AS trades at €5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas AGGD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AGGD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to AGGD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check AGGD.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs GLUH.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, GLUH.AS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while GLUH.AS trades at €4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas GLUH.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GLUH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to GLUH.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check GLUH.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs SRIL.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, SRIL.AS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while SRIL.AS trades at €11.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas SRIL.AS's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SRIL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to SRIL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check SRIL.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs EHYD.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, EHYD.AS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while EHYD.AS trades at €4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas EHYD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EHYD.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to EHYD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check EHYD.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs WESE.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, WESE.PA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while WESE.PA trades at €74.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas WESE.PA's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WESE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to WESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check WESE.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs ROLA.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, ROLA.AS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while ROLA.AS trades at €63.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas ROLA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ROLA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to ROLA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check ROLA.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs EHYA.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, EHYA.AS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while EHYA.AS trades at €5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas EHYA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EHYA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to EHYA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check EHYA.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs GEMU.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, GEMU.PA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while GEMU.PA trades at €9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas GEMU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GEMU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to GEMU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check GEMU.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs MF.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, MF.PA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while MF.PA trades at €79.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas MF.PA's P/E ratio is -19.88. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MF.PA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to MF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check MF.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs IDSE.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, IDSE.AS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while IDSE.AS trades at €137.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas IDSE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IDSE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to IDSE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check IDSE.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs CB3.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, CB3.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while CB3.PA trades at €219.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas CB3.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CB3.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to CB3.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check CB3.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs ISED.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, ISED.AS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while ISED.AS trades at €7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas ISED.AS's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ISED.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to ISED.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check ISED.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs BNKE.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, BNKE.PA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while BNKE.PA trades at €300.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas BNKE.PA's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BNKE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to BNKE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check BNKE.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs IMBE.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, IMBE.AS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while IMBE.AS trades at €4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas IMBE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IMBE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to IMBE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check IMBE.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs BREB.BR Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, BREB.BR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while BREB.BR trades at €103.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas BREB.BR's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BREB.BR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to BREB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check BREB.BR's competition here
QFG.BR vs ESE.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, ESE.PA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while ESE.PA trades at €28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas ESE.PA's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to ESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check ESE.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs TKO.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, TKO.PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while TKO.PA trades at €16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas TKO.PA's P/E ratio is 71.83. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TKO.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to TKO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check TKO.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs EPAB.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, EPAB.PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while EPAB.PA trades at €37.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas EPAB.PA's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EPAB.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to EPAB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check EPAB.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs SGLU.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, SGLU.AS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while SGLU.AS trades at €5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas SGLU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SGLU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to SGLU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check SGLU.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs PHAG.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, PHAG.AS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while PHAG.AS trades at €56.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas PHAG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PHAG.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is less volatile compared to PHAG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check PHAG.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs SUOA.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, SUOA.AS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while SUOA.AS trades at €5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas SUOA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SUOA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to SUOA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check SUOA.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs RF.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, RF.PA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while RF.PA trades at €41.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas RF.PA's P/E ratio is -4.65. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RF.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to RF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check RF.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs TI5A.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, TI5A.AS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while TI5A.AS trades at €115.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas TI5A.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TI5A.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to TI5A.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check TI5A.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs BNK.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, BNK.PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while BNK.PA trades at €57.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas BNK.PA's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to BNK.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to BNK.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check BNK.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs JAPB.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, JAPB.AS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while JAPB.AS trades at €922.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas JAPB.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JAPB.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to JAPB.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check JAPB.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs SEMI.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, SEMI.AS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while SEMI.AS trades at €12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas SEMI.AS's P/E ratio is 36.39. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SEMI.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is less volatile compared to SEMI.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check SEMI.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs TNOW.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, TNOW.PA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while TNOW.PA trades at €896.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas TNOW.PA's P/E ratio is 34.60. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TNOW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to TNOW.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check TNOW.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs IGLE.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, IGLE.AS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while IGLE.AS trades at €3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas IGLE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IGLE.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to IGLE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check IGLE.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs ANX.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, ANX.PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while ANX.PA trades at €237.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas ANX.PA's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ANX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to ANX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check ANX.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs IUHE.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, IUHE.AS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while IUHE.AS trades at €6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas IUHE.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IUHE.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to IUHE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check IUHE.AS's competition here
QFG.BR vs AASI.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, AASI.PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while AASI.PA trades at €47.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas AASI.PA's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AASI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to AASI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check AASI.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs USRI.PA Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, USRI.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while USRI.PA trades at €102.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas USRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to USRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to USRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check USRI.PA's competition here
QFG.BR vs EXA1.AS Comparison April 2026
QFG.BR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QFG.BR stands at 52.6M. In comparison, EXA1.AS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, QFG.BR is priced at €2.81, while EXA1.AS trades at €15.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QFG.BR currently has a P/E ratio of -21.62, whereas EXA1.AS's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, QFG.BR's ROE is -0.02%, compared to EXA1.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QFG.BR is more volatile compared to EXA1.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QFG.BR.Check EXA1.AS's competition here