Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF
Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF QCN.TO Peers
See (QCN.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCN.TO | CA$162.51 | +0.49% | 1.9B | 20.79 | CA$7.82 | +2.63% |
| BLK.NE | CA$26.00 | +0.15% | 207.2B | 23.85 | CA$1.09 | N/A |
| BN.TO | CA$80.86 | +0.07% | 133.2B | 202.15 | CA$0.40 | +0.78% |
| BAM.TO | CA$76.32 | +0.08% | 123.1B | 41.03 | CA$1.86 | +2.20% |
| VFV.TO | CA$146.33 | -0.28% | 20.7B | 25.64 | CA$5.71 | +1.05% |
| ZSP.TO | CA$90.17 | -0.33% | 17.6B | N/A | N/A | +0.94% |
| PHYS.TO | CA$34.89 | +0.52% | 16.2B | 3.69 | CA$9.45 | N/A |
| XIU.TO | CA$39.96 | +0.40% | 14.1B | 21.66 | CA$1.85 | +2.82% |
| XEF.TO | CA$42.63 | -0.14% | 11.4B | 16.75 | CA$2.55 | +2.44% |
| VUN.TO | CA$109.96 | -0.34% | 10.6B | 24.86 | CA$4.42 | +0.97% |
Stock Comparison
QCN.TO vs BLK.NE Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BLK.NE has a market cap of 207.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while BLK.NE trades at CA$26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas BLK.NE's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLK.NE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to BLK.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs BN.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BN.TO has a market cap of 133.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while BN.TO trades at CA$80.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas BN.TO's P/E ratio is 202.15. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BN.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to BN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs BAM.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BAM.TO has a market cap of 123.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while BAM.TO trades at CA$76.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas BAM.TO's P/E ratio is 41.03. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAM.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to BAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VFV.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VFV.TO has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while VFV.TO trades at CA$146.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas VFV.TO's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VFV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZSP.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZSP.TO has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while ZSP.TO trades at CA$90.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas ZSP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZSP.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs PHYS.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PHYS.TO has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while PHYS.TO trades at CA$34.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas PHYS.TO's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHYS.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to PHYS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XIU.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XIU.TO has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XIU.TO trades at CA$39.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XIU.TO's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XIU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XEF.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XEF.TO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XEF.TO trades at CA$42.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XEF.TO's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VUN.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VUN.TO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while VUN.TO trades at CA$109.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas VUN.TO's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VUN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs IGM.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IGM.TO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while IGM.TO trades at CA$43.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas IGM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGM.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to IGM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZCN.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZCN.TO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while ZCN.TO trades at CA$35.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas ZCN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZEA.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZEA.TO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while ZEA.TO trades at CA$25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas ZEA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs PSLV.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PSLV.TO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while PSLV.TO trades at CA$16.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas PSLV.TO's P/E ratio is 3.98. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSLV.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to PSLV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XIC.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XIC.TO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XIC.TO trades at CA$42.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XIC.TO's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIC.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XIC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XSP.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XSP.TO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XSP.TO trades at CA$62.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XSP.TO's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VCN.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VCN.TO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while VCN.TO trades at CA$54.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas VCN.TO's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XUS.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XUS.TO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XUS.TO trades at CA$51.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XUS.TO's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XUS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs CEF.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CEF.TO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while CEF.TO trades at CA$41.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas CEF.TO's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEF.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to CEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ONEX.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ONEX.TO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while ONEX.TO trades at CA$106.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas ONEX.TO's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONEX.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ONEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XEQT.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XEQT.TO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XEQT.TO trades at CA$35.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XEQT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VEQT.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VEQT.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while VEQT.TO trades at CA$46.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas VEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VEQT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs CASH.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CASH.TO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while CASH.TO trades at CA$50.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas CASH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CASH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to CASH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VGRO.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VGRO.TO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while VGRO.TO trades at CA$38.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas VGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VGRO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs CSAV.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CSAV.TO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while CSAV.TO trades at CA$50.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas CSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to CSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VIU.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VIU.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while VIU.TO trades at CA$38.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas VIU.TO's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VIU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZEB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZEB.TO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while ZEB.TO trades at CA$44.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas ZEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZEB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZMMK.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZMMK.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while ZMMK.TO trades at CA$49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas ZMMK.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMMK.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to ZMMK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs PSA.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PSA.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while PSA.TO trades at CA$50.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas PSA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to PSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZLB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZLB.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while ZLB.TO trades at CA$52.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas ZLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZLB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs CIX.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CIX.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while CIX.TO trades at CA$31.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas CIX.TO's P/E ratio is -17.06. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIX.TO's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to CIX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VSP.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VSP.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while VSP.TO trades at CA$96.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas VSP.TO's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZCS.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZCS.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while ZCS.TO trades at CA$13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas ZCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to ZCS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs HXS.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HXS.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while HXS.TO trades at CA$84.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas HXS.TO's P/E ratio is 25.98. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to HXS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs HXT.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HXT.TO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while HXT.TO trades at CA$69.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas HXT.TO's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to HXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs QUU.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, QUU.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while QUU.TO trades at CA$237.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas QUU.TO's P/E ratio is 26.40. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QUU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to QUU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VDY.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VDY.TO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while VDY.TO trades at CA$51.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas VDY.TO's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VDY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XUU.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XUU.TO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XUU.TO trades at CA$60.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XUU.TO's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XUU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VBAL.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VBAL.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while VBAL.TO trades at CA$34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas VBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VBAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XSEM.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XSEM.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XSEM.TO trades at CA$23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XSEM.TO's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to XSEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZUE.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZUE.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while ZUE.TO trades at CA$82.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas ZUE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZUE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZUE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs TPU.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TPU.TO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while TPU.TO trades at CA$46.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas TPU.TO's P/E ratio is 26.42. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to TPU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XQQ.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XQQ.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XQQ.TO trades at CA$54.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XQQ.TO's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XQQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XQQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZWB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZWB.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while ZWB.TO trades at CA$20.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas ZWB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZWB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs TTP.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TTP.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while TTP.TO trades at CA$30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas TTP.TO's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TTP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to TTP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XGRO.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XGRO.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XGRO.TO trades at CA$31.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XGRO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XAW.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XAW.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XAW.TO trades at CA$45.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XAW.TO's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XAW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs TPE.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TPE.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while TPE.TO trades at CA$24.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas TPE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to TPE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs BBUC.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BBUC.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while BBUC.TO trades at CA$39.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas BBUC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBUC.TO's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to BBUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XBB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XBB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XBB.TO trades at CA$28.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XBB.TO's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to XBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VEE.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VEE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while VEE.TO trades at CA$40.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas VEE.TO's P/E ratio is 15.49. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO and VEE.TO have similar daily volatility (0.30).
QCN.TO vs NSCE.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NSCE.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while NSCE.TO trades at CA$48.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas NSCE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSCE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to NSCE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VXC.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VXC.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while VXC.TO trades at CA$65.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas VXC.TO's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VXC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VXC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XEC.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XEC.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XEC.TO trades at CA$31.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XEC.TO's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs SII.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SII.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while SII.TO trades at CA$85.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas SII.TO's P/E ratio is 32.64. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SII.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to SII.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs PFMN.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PFMN.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while PFMN.TO trades at CA$15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas PFMN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFMN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to PFMN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VCE.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VCE.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while VCE.TO trades at CA$58.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas VCE.TO's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VCE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XDIV.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XDIV.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XDIV.TO trades at CA$31.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XDIV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDIV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XDIV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XCB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XCB.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XCB.TO trades at CA$20.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to XCB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZLU.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZLU.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while ZLU.TO trades at CA$54.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas ZLU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZLU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZLU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZQQ.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZQQ.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while ZQQ.TO trades at CA$151.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas ZQQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZQQ.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZQQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs CMR.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CMR.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while CMR.TO trades at CA$50.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas CMR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to CMR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VGG.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VGG.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while VGG.TO trades at CA$93.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas VGG.TO's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VGG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs MNY.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MNY.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while MNY.TO trades at CA$100.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas MNY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to MNY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XBAL.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XBAL.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XBAL.TO trades at CA$30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to XBAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs HSAV.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HSAV.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while HSAV.TO trades at CA$115.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas HSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to HSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XIN.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XIN.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XIN.TO trades at CA$39.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XIN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XIN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XEI.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XEI.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XEI.TO trades at CA$28.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XEI.TO's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XEI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZWU.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZWU.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while ZWU.TO trades at CA$10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas ZWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZWU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs FIH-U.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FIH-U.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while FIH-U.TO trades at CA$18.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas FIH-U.TO's P/E ratio is 60.20. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIH-U.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to FIH-U.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XFN.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XFN.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XFN.TO trades at CA$63.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XFN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XFN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XFN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs CYB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CYB.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while CYB.TO trades at CA$79.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas CYB.TO's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYB.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to CYB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XDV.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XDV.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XDV.TO trades at CA$33.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XDV.TO's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs QQC.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, QQC.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while QQC.TO trades at CA$35.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas QQC.TO's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QQC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to QQC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs CACB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CACB.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while CACB.TO trades at CA$20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas CACB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to CACB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs CBIL.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CBIL.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while CBIL.TO trades at CA$50.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas CBIL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBIL.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to CBIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ISIF.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ISIF.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while ISIF.TO trades at CA$12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas ISIF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to ISIF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XFH.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XFH.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XFH.TO trades at CA$34.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XFH.TO's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XFH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XFH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZWC.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZWC.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while ZWC.TO trades at CA$18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas ZWC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZWC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XGB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XGB.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XGB.TO trades at CA$19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to XGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XSH.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XSH.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XSH.TO trades at CA$19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XSH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to XSH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs UNC.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, UNC.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while UNC.TO trades at CA$135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas UNC.TO's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UNC.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to UNC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZPR.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZPR.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while ZPR.TO trades at CA$11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas ZPR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZPR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs EQL.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EQL.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while EQL.TO trades at CA$37.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas EQL.TO's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQL.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to EQL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZGB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZGB.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while ZGB.TO trades at CA$45.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas ZGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to ZGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZEM.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZEM.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while ZEM.TO trades at CA$23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas ZEM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs HMAX.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HMAX.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while HMAX.TO trades at CA$14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas HMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to HMAX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs HXCN.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HXCN.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while HXCN.TO trades at CA$44.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas HXCN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to HXCN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VSB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VSB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while VSB.TO trades at CA$23.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas VSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSB.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to VSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XEG.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XEG.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XEG.TO trades at CA$17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XEG.TO's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XEG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs RIIN.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RIIN.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while RIIN.TO trades at CA$21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas RIIN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to RIIN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZUQ.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZUQ.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while ZUQ.TO trades at CA$86.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas ZUQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZUQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs HHL.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HHL.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while HHL.TO trades at CA$7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas HHL.TO's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HHL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to HHL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XRE.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XRE.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XRE.TO trades at CA$15.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XRE.TO's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XRE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XRE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs MUB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MUB.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while MUB.TO trades at CA$18.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas MUB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MUB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to MUB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs EVT.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EVT.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while EVT.TO trades at CA$19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas EVT.TO's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVT.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to EVT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XWD.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, XWD.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while XWD.TO trades at CA$97.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas XWD.TO's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XWD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XWD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs FCUV.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FCUV.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while FCUV.TO trades at CA$19.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas FCUV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCUV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to FCUV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs BND.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BND.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while BND.TO trades at CA$17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas BND.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BND.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to BND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZDV.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ZDV.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at CA$162.51, while ZDV.TO trades at CA$23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.79, whereas ZDV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.