Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF
Mackenzie Canadian Equity Index ETF QCN.TO Peers
See (QCN.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCN.TO | $158.07 | -0.74% | 1.85B | 20.23 | $7.82 | +2.70% |
| BLK.NE | $25.56 | -2.63% | 203.72B | 22.82 | $1.12 | N/A |
| BN.TO | $78.98 | -3.80% | 130.12B | 197.45 | $0.40 | +0.81% |
| BAM.TO | $79.46 | -2.93% | 128.13B | 41.82 | $1.90 | +2.00% |
| VFV.TO | $143.87 | -1.99% | 20.05B | 25.21 | $5.71 | +1.07% |
| ZSP.TO | $88.71 | -1.98% | 17.10B | N/A | N/A | +0.96% |
| PHYS.TO | $35.17 | +0.51% | 16.38B | 5.91 | $5.95 | N/A |
| XIU.TO | $39.29 | -1.01% | 13.85B | 21.29 | $1.85 | +2.84% |
| XEF.TO | $42.31 | -0.94% | 11.42B | 16.62 | $2.55 | +2.46% |
| IGM.TO | $44.24 | -0.32% | 10.47B | 11.14 | $3.97 | +5.08% |
Stock Comparison
QCN.TO vs BLK.NE Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BLK.NE has a market cap of 203.72B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while BLK.NE trades at $25.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas BLK.NE's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BLK.NE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to BLK.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs BN.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BN.TO has a market cap of 130.12B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while BN.TO trades at $78.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas BN.TO's P/E ratio is 197.45. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BN.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to BN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs BAM.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BAM.TO has a market cap of 128.13B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while BAM.TO trades at $79.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas BAM.TO's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BAM.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to BAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VFV.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, VFV.TO has a market cap of 20.05B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while VFV.TO trades at $143.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas VFV.TO's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VFV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZSP.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, ZSP.TO has a market cap of 17.10B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while ZSP.TO trades at $88.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas ZSP.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZSP.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs PHYS.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, PHYS.TO has a market cap of 16.38B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while PHYS.TO trades at $35.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas PHYS.TO's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHYS.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to PHYS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XIU.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XIU.TO has a market cap of 13.85B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XIU.TO trades at $39.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XIU.TO's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XIU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XEF.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XEF.TO has a market cap of 11.42B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XEF.TO trades at $42.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XEF.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs IGM.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, IGM.TO has a market cap of 10.47B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while IGM.TO trades at $44.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas IGM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IGM.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to IGM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VUN.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, VUN.TO has a market cap of 10.32B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while VUN.TO trades at $108.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas VUN.TO's P/E ratio is 24.43. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VUN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZCN.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, ZCN.TO has a market cap of 9.78B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while ZCN.TO trades at $34.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas ZCN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZEA.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, ZEA.TO has a market cap of 9.37B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while ZEA.TO trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas ZEA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XIC.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XIC.TO has a market cap of 8.95B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XIC.TO trades at $41.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XIC.TO's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XIC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VCN.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, VCN.TO has a market cap of 8.83B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while VCN.TO trades at $53.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas VCN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XSP.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XSP.TO has a market cap of 8.68B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XSP.TO trades at $60.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XSP.TO's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs PSLV.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, PSLV.TO has a market cap of 8.43B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while PSLV.TO trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas PSLV.TO's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSLV.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to PSLV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XUS.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XUS.TO has a market cap of 8.26B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XUS.TO trades at $50.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XUS.TO's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XUS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XUS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs CEF.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, CEF.TO has a market cap of 7.91B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while CEF.TO trades at $40.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas CEF.TO's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEF.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to CEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ONEX.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, ONEX.TO has a market cap of 7.01B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while ONEX.TO trades at $100.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas ONEX.TO's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ONEX.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ONEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XEQT.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XEQT.TO has a market cap of 6.99B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XEQT.TO trades at $34.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XEQT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs CASH.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, CASH.TO has a market cap of 6.54B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while CASH.TO trades at $50.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas CASH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CASH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to CASH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VEQT.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, VEQT.TO has a market cap of 6.50B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while VEQT.TO trades at $46.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas VEQT.TO's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEQT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VEQT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VGRO.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, VGRO.TO has a market cap of 6.42B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while VGRO.TO trades at $37.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas VGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VGRO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs CSAV.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, CSAV.TO has a market cap of 6.20B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while CSAV.TO trades at $50.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas CSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to CSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VIU.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, VIU.TO has a market cap of 5.65B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while VIU.TO trades at $38.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas VIU.TO's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VIU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VIU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZEB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, ZEB.TO has a market cap of 4.77B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while ZEB.TO trades at $43.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas ZEB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZEB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZMMK.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, ZMMK.TO has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while ZMMK.TO trades at $49.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas ZMMK.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZMMK.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to ZMMK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs PSA.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, PSA.TO has a market cap of 4.65B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while PSA.TO trades at $50.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas PSA.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to PSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZLB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, ZLB.TO has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while ZLB.TO trades at $51.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas ZLB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZLB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZLB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs CIX.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, CIX.TO has a market cap of 4.53B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while CIX.TO trades at $31.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas CIX.TO's P/E ratio is -16.98. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CIX.TO's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to CIX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZCS.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, ZCS.TO has a market cap of 4.06B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while ZCS.TO trades at $13.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas ZCS.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZCS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to ZCS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VSP.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, VSP.TO has a market cap of 4.03B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while VSP.TO trades at $94.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas VSP.TO's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VSP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs HXS.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, HXS.TO has a market cap of 3.84B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while HXS.TO trades at $83.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas HXS.TO's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXS.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to HXS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs HXT.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, HXT.TO has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while HXT.TO trades at $68.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas HXT.TO's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXT.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to HXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VDY.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, VDY.TO has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while VDY.TO trades at $50.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas VDY.TO's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VDY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VDY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XUU.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XUU.TO has a market cap of 3.43B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XUU.TO trades at $59.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XUU.TO's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XUU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs QUU.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, QUU.TO has a market cap of 3.36B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while QUU.TO trades at $233.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas QUU.TO's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QUU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to QUU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VBAL.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, VBAL.TO has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while VBAL.TO trades at $33.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas VBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VBAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZWB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, ZWB.TO has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while ZWB.TO trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas ZWB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to ZWB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XSEM.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XSEM.TO has a market cap of 3.24B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XSEM.TO trades at $22.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XSEM.TO's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XSEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZUE.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, ZUE.TO has a market cap of 3.24B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while ZUE.TO trades at $80.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas ZUE.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZUE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZUE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XQQ.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XQQ.TO has a market cap of 3.16B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XQQ.TO trades at $52.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XQQ.TO's P/E ratio is 32.17. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XQQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XQQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs TTP.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, TTP.TO has a market cap of 3.02B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while TTP.TO trades at $29.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas TTP.TO's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TTP.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to TTP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XGRO.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XGRO.TO has a market cap of 3.00B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XGRO.TO trades at $30.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XGRO.TO's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGRO.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XGRO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XAW.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XAW.TO has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XAW.TO trades at $44.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XAW.TO's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XAW.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs BBUC.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BBUC.TO has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while BBUC.TO trades at $39.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas BBUC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBUC.TO's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to BBUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs TPU.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, TPU.TO has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while TPU.TO trades at $46.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas TPU.TO's P/E ratio is 25.98. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to TPU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs TPE.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, TPE.TO has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while TPE.TO trades at $24.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas TPE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TPE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to TPE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XBB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XBB.TO has a market cap of 2.61B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XBB.TO trades at $28.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XBB.TO's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to XBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VEE.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, VEE.TO has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while VEE.TO trades at $39.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas VEE.TO's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VEE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs NSCE.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, NSCE.TO has a market cap of 2.27B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while NSCE.TO trades at $48.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas NSCE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NSCE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to NSCE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VXC.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, VXC.TO has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while VXC.TO trades at $64.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas VXC.TO's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VXC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VXC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs PFMN.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, PFMN.TO has a market cap of 2.21B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while PFMN.TO trades at $15.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas PFMN.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PFMN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to PFMN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VCE.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, VCE.TO has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while VCE.TO trades at $57.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas VCE.TO's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VCE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VCE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XDIV.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XDIV.TO has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XDIV.TO trades at $31.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XDIV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDIV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XDIV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XEC.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XEC.TO has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XEC.TO trades at $30.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XEC.TO's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XCB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XCB.TO has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XCB.TO trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XCB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to XCB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs SII.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, SII.TO has a market cap of 2.04B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while SII.TO trades at $78.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas SII.TO's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SII.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to SII.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZQQ.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, ZQQ.TO has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while ZQQ.TO trades at $146.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas ZQQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZQQ.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZQQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs CMR.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, CMR.TO has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while CMR.TO trades at $50.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas CMR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to CMR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs MNY.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, MNY.TO has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while MNY.TO trades at $100.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas MNY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MNY.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to MNY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs HSAV.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, HSAV.TO has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while HSAV.TO trades at $115.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas HSAV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HSAV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to HSAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VGG.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, VGG.TO has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while VGG.TO trades at $92.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas VGG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to VGG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XBAL.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XBAL.TO has a market cap of 1.86B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XBAL.TO trades at $30.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XBAL.TO's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XBAL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XBAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XIN.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XIN.TO has a market cap of 1.82B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XIN.TO trades at $38.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XIN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XIN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZLU.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, ZLU.TO has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while ZLU.TO trades at $55.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas ZLU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZLU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZLU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XEI.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XEI.TO has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XEI.TO trades at $27.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XEI.TO's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEI.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XEI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZWU.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, ZWU.TO has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while ZWU.TO trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas ZWU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWU.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZWU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs FIH-U.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, FIH-U.TO has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while FIH-U.TO trades at $17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas FIH-U.TO's P/E ratio is 59.93. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIH-U.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to FIH-U.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XFN.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XFN.TO has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XFN.TO trades at $61.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XFN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XFN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XFN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XDV.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XDV.TO has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XDV.TO trades at $33.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XDV.TO's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to XDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs CBIL.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, CBIL.TO has a market cap of 1.71B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while CBIL.TO trades at $50.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas CBIL.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBIL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to CBIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs CACB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, CACB.TO has a market cap of 1.70B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while CACB.TO trades at $19.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas CACB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to CACB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ISIF.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, ISIF.TO has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while ISIF.TO trades at $12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas ISIF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISIF.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to ISIF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs QQC.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, QQC.TO has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while QQC.TO trades at $34.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas QQC.TO's P/E ratio is 32.37. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QQC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to QQC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs CYB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, CYB.TO has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while CYB.TO trades at $75.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas CYB.TO's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CYB.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to CYB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XFH.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XFH.TO has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XFH.TO trades at $34.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XFH.TO's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XFH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XFH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZWC.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, ZWC.TO has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while ZWC.TO trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas ZWC.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZWC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZWC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XSH.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XSH.TO has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XSH.TO trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XSH.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSH.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to XSH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XGB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XGB.TO has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XGB.TO trades at $19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to XGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs UNC.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, UNC.TO has a market cap of 1.48B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while UNC.TO trades at $131.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas UNC.TO's P/E ratio is 3.76. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UNC.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to UNC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs EQL.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, EQL.TO has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while EQL.TO trades at $36.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas EQL.TO's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EQL.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to EQL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZPR.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, ZPR.TO has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while ZPR.TO trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas ZPR.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZPR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZPR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZGB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, ZGB.TO has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while ZGB.TO trades at $45.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas ZGB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZGB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to ZGB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZEM.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, ZEM.TO has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while ZEM.TO trades at $22.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas ZEM.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZEM.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs HMAX.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, HMAX.TO has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while HMAX.TO trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas HMAX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HMAX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to HMAX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs HXCN.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, HXCN.TO has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while HXCN.TO trades at $42.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas HXCN.TO's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HXCN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to HXCN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs VSB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, VSB.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while VSB.TO trades at $23.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas VSB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to VSB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs RIIN.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, RIIN.TO has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while RIIN.TO trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas RIIN.TO's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RIIN.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to RIIN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XEG.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XEG.TO has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XEG.TO trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XEG.TO's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XEG.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XEG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZUQ.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, ZUQ.TO has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while ZUQ.TO trades at $85.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas ZUQ.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZUQ.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZUQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs HHL.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, HHL.TO has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while HHL.TO trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas HHL.TO's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HHL.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to HHL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs MUB.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, MUB.TO has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while MUB.TO trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas MUB.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MUB.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to MUB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs BND.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, BND.TO has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while BND.TO trades at $17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas BND.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BND.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to BND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs ZDV.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, ZDV.TO has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while ZDV.TO trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas ZDV.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZDV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to ZDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs XWD.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, XWD.TO has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while XWD.TO trades at $96.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas XWD.TO's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XWD.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to XWD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs EVT.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, EVT.TO has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while EVT.TO trades at $198.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas EVT.TO's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVT.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is more volatile compared to EVT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs QDX.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, QDX.TO has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while QDX.TO trades at $132.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas QDX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QDX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to QDX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.
QCN.TO vs FCUV.TO Comparison
QCN.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QCN.TO stands at 1.85B. In comparison, FCUV.TO has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, QCN.TO is priced at $158.07, while FCUV.TO trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QCN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.23, whereas FCUV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, QCN.TO's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FCUV.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QCN.TO is less volatile compared to FCUV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QCN.TO.