Providence Resources, Inc.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, QMIS has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while QMIS trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas QMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QMIS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and QMIS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QMIS's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, GSHN has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while GSHN trades at $22.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GSHN's P/E ratio is -2270.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GSHN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and GSHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GSHN's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, KATX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while KATX trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KATX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KATX's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to KATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check KATX's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, CCYC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while CCYC trades at $11.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CCYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CCYC's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and CCYC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CCYC's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ZSYC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while ZSYC trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ZSYC's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZSYC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to ZSYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check ZSYC's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, WPCBF has a market cap of 700.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while WPCBF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WPCBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WPCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and WPCBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WPCBF's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, NOTR has a market cap of 570.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while NOTR trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NOTR's P/E ratio is -433.33. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NOTR's ROE of -65.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to NOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check NOTR's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, WCHS has a market cap of 531.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while WCHS trades at $5.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WCHS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WCHS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to WCHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check WCHS's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, FZRO has a market cap of 346.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while FZRO trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FZRO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FZRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and FZRO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FZRO's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, RGLG has a market cap of 342.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while RGLG trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RGLG's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RGLG's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to RGLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check RGLG's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, CINV has a market cap of 338.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while CINV trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CINV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CINV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and CINV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CINV's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, DVTC has a market cap of 272.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while DVTC trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DVTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DVTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and DVTC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DVTC's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, AMRR has a market cap of 250.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while AMRR trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AMRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMRR's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and AMRR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMRR's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, KAST has a market cap of 164.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while KAST trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KAST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KAST's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to KAST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check KAST's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, XTPT has a market cap of 141.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while XTPT trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XTPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to XTPT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to XTPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check XTPT's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, SCGX has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while SCGX trades at $8.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SCGX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SCGX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to SCGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check SCGX's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, TGLO has a market cap of 119.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while TGLO trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TGLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TGLO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and TGLO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TGLO's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, TRFE has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while TRFE trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TRFE's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TRFE's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and TRFE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRFE's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, NMTT has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while NMTT trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NMTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NMTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and NMTT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NMTT's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, RMGCF has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while RMGCF trades at $7.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RMGCF's P/E ratio is -14.41. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RMGCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to RMGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check RMGCF's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, WAYS has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while WAYS trades at $4.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WAYS's P/E ratio is -49.72. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WAYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and WAYS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WAYS's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ATAQF has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while ATAQF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ATAQF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATAQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to ATAQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check ATAQF's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, WWHC has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while WWHC trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WWHC's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WWHC's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and WWHC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WWHC's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, CHAAW has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while CHAAW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CHAAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CHAAW's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and CHAAW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHAAW's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, CREEF has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while CREEF trades at $10.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CREEF's P/E ratio is 36.47. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CREEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to CREEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check CREEF's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, NOHO has a market cap of 74.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while NOHO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NOHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NOHO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to NOHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check NOHO's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, CMCAF has a market cap of 67.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while CMCAF trades at $11.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CMCAF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CMCAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and CMCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CMCAF's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, GWIN has a market cap of 66.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while GWIN trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GWIN's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GWIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and GWIN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GWIN's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, PTCP has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while PTCP trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PTCP's P/E ratio is -27.78. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PTCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and PTCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTCP's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ATMS has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while ATMS trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ATMS's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATMS's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and ATMS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ATMS's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, AASP has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while AASP trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AASP's P/E ratio is -16.97. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AASP's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to AASP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check AASP's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, GGAAF has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while GGAAF trades at $8.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GGAAF's P/E ratio is -133.33. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GGAAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to GGAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check GGAAF's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, JMTM has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while JMTM trades at $5.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JMTM's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JMTM's ROE of +3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to JMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check JMTM's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, AWCA has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while AWCA trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AWCA's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AWCA's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to AWCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check AWCA's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, KWAC has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while KWAC trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KWAC's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KWAC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and KWAC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KWAC's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, KWACW has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while KWACW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KWACW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KWACW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and KWACW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KWACW's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, USCTF has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while USCTF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas USCTF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USCTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and USCTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check USCTF's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, PMVCW has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while PMVCW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PMVCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PMVCW's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to PMVCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check PMVCW's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, MDWK has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while MDWK trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MDWK's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MDWK's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and MDWK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MDWK's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, WBQNL has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while WBQNL trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WBQNL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WBQNL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to WBQNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check WBQNL's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, AOAO has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while AOAO trades at $3.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AOAO's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AOAO's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to AOAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check AOAO's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, XCPT has a market cap of 38.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while XCPT trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XCPT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to XCPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to XCPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check XCPT's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ATMH has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while ATMH trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ATMH's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATMH's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to ATMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check ATMH's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, CNXX has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while CNXX trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CNXX's P/E ratio is -8.81. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CNXX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to CNXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check CNXX's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, CAHO has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while CAHO trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CAHO's P/E ratio is -43.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CAHO's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to CAHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check CAHO's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, IDIG has a market cap of 31.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while IDIG trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IDIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IDIG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to IDIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check IDIG's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, PSCO has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while PSCO trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PSCO's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PSCO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and PSCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSCO's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ACBD has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while ACBD trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ACBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ACBD's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to ACBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check ACBD's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, NPFC has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while NPFC trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NPFC's P/E ratio is -17.86. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NPFC's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and NPFC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPFC's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, AVNI has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while AVNI trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AVNI's P/E ratio is -21.62. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AVNI's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to AVNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check AVNI's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, CRSQ has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while CRSQ trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CRSQ's P/E ratio is -250.75. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CRSQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to CRSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check CRSQ's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, CBBB has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while CBBB trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CBBB's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CBBB's ROE of +10.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to CBBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check CBBB's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ADCV has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while ADCV trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ADCV's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADCV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and ADCV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADCV's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, EVTK has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while EVTK trades at $4.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EVTK's P/E ratio is -424.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EVTK's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to EVTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check EVTK's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, FWFW has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while FWFW trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FWFW's P/E ratio is 4.46. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FWFW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and FWFW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FWFW's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, PCMC has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while PCMC trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PCMC's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PCMC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and PCMC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCMC's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, NXMH has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while NXMH trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NXMH's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NXMH's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to NXMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check NXMH's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, GTVI has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while GTVI trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GTVI's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GTVI's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and GTVI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GTVI's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, AZRH has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while AZRH trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AZRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AZRH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to AZRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check AZRH's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ECGR has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while ECGR trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ECGR's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ECGR's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to ECGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check ECGR's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, USBL has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while USBL trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas USBL's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USBL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to USBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check USBL's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, STLY has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while STLY trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas STLY's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STLY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and STLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STLY's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, WRPT has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while WRPT trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WRPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WRPT's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to WRPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check WRPT's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, NIHL has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while NIHL trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NIHL's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NIHL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to NIHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check NIHL's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ELLH has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while ELLH trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ELLH's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ELLH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to ELLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check ELLH's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, NHICW has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while NHICW trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NHICW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NHICW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and NHICW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NHICW's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ADHI has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while ADHI trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ADHI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to ADHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check ADHI's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ITRX has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while ITRX trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ITRX's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ITRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to ITRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check ITRX's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, LWLW has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while LWLW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LWLW's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LWLW's ROE of -4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and LWLW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LWLW's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, BOREF has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while BOREF trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BOREF's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BOREF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and BOREF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOREF's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, LNMG has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while LNMG trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LNMG's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LNMG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to LNMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check LNMG's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, FUNR has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while FUNR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FUNR's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FUNR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to FUNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check FUNR's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, XITO has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while XITO trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XITO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to XITO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to XITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check XITO's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, LRGR has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while LRGR trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LRGR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LRGR's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to LRGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check LRGR's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, CHYL has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while CHYL trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CHYL's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CHYL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to CHYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check CHYL's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, SSHT has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while SSHT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SSHT's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SSHT's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and SSHT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSHT's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, NRCD has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while NRCD trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NRCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NRCD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and NRCD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRCD's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, TCRI has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while TCRI trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TCRI's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TCRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to TCRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check TCRI's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, TAKD has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while TAKD trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TAKD's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TAKD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and TAKD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TAKD's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, SLTN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while SLTN trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SLTN's P/E ratio is -17.33. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SLTN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and SLTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLTN's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ASNB has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while ASNB trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ASNB's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASNB's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to ASNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check ASNB's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ADIA has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while ADIA trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ADIA's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADIA's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and ADIA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADIA's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, NGRC has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while NGRC trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NGRC's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NGRC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to NGRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check NGRC's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, GIPL has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while GIPL trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GIPL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GIPL's ROE of +438.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and GIPL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GIPL's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, SMPP has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while SMPP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SMPP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SMPP's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to SMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check SMPP's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, MTRI has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while MTRI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MTRI's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MTRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to MTRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check MTRI's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, SITS has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while SITS trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SITS's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SITS's ROE of -4.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to SITS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check SITS's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, PLPL has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while PLPL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PLPL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PLPL's ROE of +59.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to PLPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check PLPL's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, SIPN has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while SIPN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SIPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SIPN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to SIPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check SIPN's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, WNFT has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while WNFT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WNFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WNFT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to WNFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check WNFT's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, CDBT has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while CDBT trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CDBT's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CDBT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to CDBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check CDBT's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, MVCO has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while MVCO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MVCO's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MVCO's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and MVCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MVCO's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, HKBT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while HKBT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HKBT's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HKBT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to HKBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check HKBT's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, IWSH has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while IWSH trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IWSH's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IWSH's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and IWSH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IWSH's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, XSVT has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while XSVT trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XSVT's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to XSVT's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and XSVT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check XSVT's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, GDVM has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while GDVM trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GDVM's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GDVM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to GDVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check GDVM's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, HPIL has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while HPIL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HPIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HPIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to HPIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check HPIL's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, GRNL has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while GRNL trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GRNL's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GRNL's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to GRNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.Check GRNL's competition here

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 4.8M. In comparison, ENGA has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.02, while ENGA trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ENGA's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ENGA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS and ENGA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ENGA's competition here