Providence Resources, Inc.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, QMIS has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while QMIS trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas QMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QMIS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to QMIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, GSHN has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while GSHN trades at $22.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GSHN's P/E ratio is -2270.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GSHN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to GSHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, KATX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while KATX trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KATX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KATX's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to KATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CCYC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while CCYC trades at $11.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CCYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CCYC's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to CCYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ZSYC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while ZSYC trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ZSYC's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZSYC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to ZSYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, WPCBF has a market cap of 700.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while WPCBF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WPCBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WPCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to WPCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, NOTR has a market cap of 570.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while NOTR trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NOTR's P/E ratio is -433.33. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NOTR's ROE of -65.90%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to NOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, WCHS has a market cap of 531.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while WCHS trades at $5.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WCHS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WCHS's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to WCHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, FZRO has a market cap of 346.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while FZRO trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FZRO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FZRO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to FZRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, RGLG has a market cap of 342.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while RGLG trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RGLG's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RGLG's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to RGLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CINV has a market cap of 338.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while CINV trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CINV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CINV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to CINV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, DVTC has a market cap of 272.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while DVTC trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DVTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DVTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to DVTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, BTOW has a market cap of 251.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while BTOW trades at $1.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BTOW's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BTOW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to BTOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, AMRR has a market cap of 250.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while AMRR trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AMRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMRR's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to AMRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, KAST has a market cap of 164.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while KAST trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KAST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KAST's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to KAST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, RMGCF has a market cap of 161M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while RMGCF trades at $12.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RMGCF's P/E ratio is -26.01. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RMGCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to RMGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, AOAO has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while AOAO trades at $10.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AOAO's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AOAO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to AOAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, GIPL has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while GIPL trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GIPL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GIPL's ROE of +3391.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to GIPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, TRFE has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while TRFE trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TRFE's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TRFE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to TRFE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, DSAQW has a market cap of 99M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while DSAQW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DSAQW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DSAQW's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to DSAQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, NMTT has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while NMTT trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NMTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NMTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to NMTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, TGLO has a market cap of 88.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while TGLO trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TGLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TGLO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to TGLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, WAYS has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while WAYS trades at $4.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WAYS's P/E ratio is -49.72. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WAYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to WAYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, SCGX has a market cap of 86.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while SCGX trades at $5.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SCGX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SCGX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to SCGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ATAQF has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while ATAQF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ATAQF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATAQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to ATAQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, WWHC has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while WWHC trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WWHC's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WWHC's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to WWHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CHAAW has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while CHAAW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CHAAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CHAAW's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to CHAAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CMCAF has a market cap of 76.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while CMCAF trades at $11.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CMCAF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CMCAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to CMCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CREEF has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while CREEF trades at $10.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CREEF's P/E ratio is 36.47. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CREEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to CREEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ARAT has a market cap of 62.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while ARAT trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ARAT's P/E ratio is -8.17. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ARAT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to ARAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, IDIG has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while IDIG trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IDIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IDIG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to IDIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CAHO has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while CAHO trades at $1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CAHO's P/E ratio is -162.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CAHO's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to CAHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, GWIN has a market cap of 59.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while GWIN trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GWIN's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GWIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to GWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, PTCP has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while PTCP trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PTCP's P/E ratio is -27.78. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PTCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to PTCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, SSHT has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while SSHT trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SSHT's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SSHT's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to SSHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ATMS has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while ATMS trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ATMS's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATMS's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to ATMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, AASP has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while AASP trades at $5.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AASP's P/E ratio is -18.34. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AASP's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to AASP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, GGAAF has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while GGAAF trades at $8.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GGAAF's P/E ratio is -133.33. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GGAAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to GGAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, JMTM has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while JMTM trades at $5.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JMTM's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JMTM's ROE of +4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to JMTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, MDWK has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while MDWK trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MDWK's P/E ratio is -21.50. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MDWK's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to MDWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, KWAC has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while KWAC trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KWAC's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KWAC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to KWAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, KWACW has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while KWACW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KWACW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KWACW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to KWACW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, AVNI has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while AVNI trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AVNI's P/E ratio is -41.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AVNI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to AVNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, PMVCW has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while PMVCW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PMVCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PMVCW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to PMVCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, XTPT has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while XTPT trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XTPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to XTPT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to XTPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, WBQNL has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while WBQNL trades at $3.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WBQNL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WBQNL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to WBQNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CNXX has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while CNXX trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CNXX's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CNXX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to CNXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, AWCA has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while AWCA trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AWCA's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AWCA's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to AWCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ACBD has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while ACBD trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ACBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ACBD's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to ACBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, NPFC has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while NPFC trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NPFC's P/E ratio is -17.86. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NPFC's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to NPFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CRSQ has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while CRSQ trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CRSQ's P/E ratio is -250.75. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CRSQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to CRSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CBBB has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while CBBB trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CBBB's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CBBB's ROE of +10.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to CBBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ADCV has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while ADCV trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ADCV's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADCV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to ADCV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, PSCO has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while PSCO trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PSCO's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PSCO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to PSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, EVTK has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while EVTK trades at $4.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EVTK's P/E ratio is -475.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EVTK's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to EVTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, XITO has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while XITO trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XITO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to XITO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to XITO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, AGSS has a market cap of 18.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while AGSS trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AGSS's P/E ratio is -6.35. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AGSS's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to AGSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, GTVI has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while GTVI trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GTVI's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GTVI's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to GTVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, BOREF has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while BOREF trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BOREF's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BOREF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to BOREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, STLY has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while STLY trades at $6.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas STLY's P/E ratio is -33.44. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to STLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, WRPT has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while WRPT trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WRPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WRPT's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to WRPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ECGR has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while ECGR trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ECGR's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ECGR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to ECGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, USBL has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while USBL trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas USBL's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USBL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to USBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ELLH has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while ELLH trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ELLH's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ELLH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to ELLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, NIHL has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while NIHL trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NIHL's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NIHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to NIHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, AZRH has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while AZRH trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AZRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AZRH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to AZRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, SLTN has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while SLTN trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SLTN's P/E ratio is -31.33. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SLTN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to SLTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, LWLW has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while LWLW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LWLW's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LWLW's ROE of -3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to LWLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ITRX has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while ITRX trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ITRX's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ITRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to ITRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, PCMC has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while PCMC trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PCMC's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PCMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to PCMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, NGRC has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while NGRC trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NGRC's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NGRC's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to NGRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, BDCM has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while BDCM trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BDCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BDCM's ROE of +20.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to BDCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, FUNR has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while FUNR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FUNR's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FUNR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to FUNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, SITS has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while SITS trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SITS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SITS's ROE of -3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to SITS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ADIA has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while ADIA trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ADIA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADIA's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to ADIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CDSG has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while CDSG trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CDSG's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CDSG's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to CDSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CHYL has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while CHYL trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CHYL's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CHYL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to CHYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, NXMH has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while NXMH trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NXMH's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NXMH's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to NXMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, TCRI has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while TCRI trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TCRI's P/E ratio is -8.10. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TCRI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to TCRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, XCPT has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while XCPT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XCPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to XCPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to XCPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, WHLT has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while WHLT trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WHLT's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WHLT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to WHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, LRGR has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while LRGR trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LRGR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LRGR's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to LRGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ASNB has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while ASNB trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ASNB's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASNB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to ASNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, USCTF has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while USCTF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas USCTF's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USCTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to USCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, MTRI has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while MTRI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MTRI's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MTRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to MTRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, NRCD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while NRCD trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NRCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NRCD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to NRCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CDBT has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while CDBT trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CDBT's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CDBT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to CDBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, HKBT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while HKBT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HKBT's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HKBT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to HKBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ETER has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while ETER trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ETER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ETER's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to ETER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, WNFT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while WNFT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WNFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WNFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to WNFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, XSVT has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while XSVT trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XSVT's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to XSVT's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to XSVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, FWFW has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while FWFW trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FWFW's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FWFW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to FWFW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, GDVM has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while GDVM trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GDVM's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GDVM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to GDVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, CBGH has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while CBGH trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CBGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CBGH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to CBGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, FORW has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while FORW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FORW's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FORW's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to FORW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, ENGA has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while ENGA trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ENGA's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ENGA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to ENGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, SIPN has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while SIPN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SIPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SIPN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to SIPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, INOQ has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while INOQ trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas INOQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INOQ's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is less volatile compared to INOQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.

PVRS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PVRS stands at 3.2M. In comparison, QUAN has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PVRS is priced at $0.01, while QUAN trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PVRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas QUAN's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, PVRS's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QUAN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PVRS is more volatile compared to QUAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PVRS.